Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2008;51:e52
Published online before print April 14, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.112276
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/6/e52    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.112276v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhuo, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhuo, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension

(Hypertension. 2008;51:e52.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Intrarenal Perfusion and Angiotensin II Levels Regulate In Vivo Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Imaging in the Kidney

Jia L. Zhuo

Laboratory of Receptor and Signal Transduction, Division of Hypertension and Vascular Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich

To the Editor:

In the recent issue of Hypertension, Dr Szabo’s group used novel positron-emission tomographic (PET) [11C]KR31173 imaging to study the regulation of intrarenal angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor binding in a swine model of renal artery stenosis in vivo.1 In this study, AT1 receptor binding, as visualized by live [11C]KR31173 imaging (L-159 884), was markedly increased in pig kidneys with renal artery stenosis, and pretreatment of the animals with the ACE inhibitor lisinopril for 2 weeks did not alter AT1 receptor binding in vivo.1 The authors interpreted these results as that reduced renal perfusion attributable to renal artery stenosis increases AT1 receptor binding in vivo and that lisinopril should abolish this increase in AT1 receptor binding. The authors further suggest that live PET [11C]KR31173 imaging may be a diagnostic biomarker for patients with renovascular disease.

However, renal artery stenosis is well-recognized to increase circulating and intrarenal Ang II levels, which may lead to the downregulation of vascular and intrarenal AT1 receptors.2 Increased [11C]KR31173 levels in pig kidneys with stenosis were likely attributable to delayed clearance or increased intrarenal accumulation (or retention) of [11C]KR31173, because tissue- or cell-bound and free [11C]KR31173 could not be separated before live imaging in the study.1 Indeed, marked decreases in [11C]KR31173 levels were clearly observed at 2 minutes, which were followed by marked increases in [11C]KR31173 accumulation in the kidneys with stenosis at 30 minutes after injection of the radioligand. By contrast, most injected [11C]KR31173 already disappeared from normal kidneys and contralateral kidneys at 30 minutes.1 These images were consistent with >70% reductions in intrarenal perfusion in the kidneys with renal artery stenosis compared with contralateral kidneys.

The finding that long-term lisinopril treatment did not alter intrarenal AT1 receptor binding in pig kidneys with stenosis suggests that angiotensin I–converting enzyme (ACE) might not be adequately inhibited in this study.1 It would be interesting to determine whether plasma renin activities (or concentrations) and circulating and intrarenal Ang II levels in these pigs were altered by long-term lisinopril treatment. These investigators have indeed nicely showed that intrarenal AT1 receptor binding was inversely related to Ang II in dogs treated with high- or low-salt diet.3 We also previously showed that increased renal perfusion by sodium nitroprusside decreased, whereas the ACE inhibitor perindopril increased, intrarenal AT1 receptor binding in rats in vivo.4 Long-term ACE inhibition with captopril also increased receptor-mediated intracellular uptake of [125I]-Val5-Ang II in mice in part because of the upregulation of intrarenal AT1 receptors.5 Thus, long-term lisinopril treatment should increase rather than abolish intrarenal AT1 receptor binding in vivo, as suggested by this study.1


*    Acknowledgments
 
Source of Funding

J.L.Z.’s work is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5RO1 DK067299).

Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 
1. Xia J, Seckin E, Xiang Y, Vranesic M, Mathews WB, Hong K, Bluemke DA, Lerman LO, Szabo Z. Positron-emission tomography imaging of the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor in swine renal artery stenosis. Hypertension. 2008; 51: 466–473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Amiri F, Garcia R. Renal angiotensin II receptor regulation in two-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats: effect of ACE inhibition. Hypertension. 1997; 30: 337–344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Szabo Z, Speth RC, Brown PR, Kerenyi L, Kao PF, Mathews WB, Ravert HT, Hilton J, Rauseo P, Dannals RF, Zheng W, Lee S, Sandberg K. Use of positron emission tomography to study AT1 receptor regulation in vivo. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12: 1350–1358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Zhuo JL, Alcorn D, McCausland J, Casley D, Mendelsohn FA. In vivo occupancy of angiotensin II subtype 1 receptors in rat renal medullary interstitial cells. Hypertension. 1994; 23: 838–843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Li XC, Zhuo JL. In vivo regulation of AT1a receptor-mediated intracellular uptake of [125I]Val5-ANG II in the kidneys and adrenals of AT1a receptor-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008; 294: F293–F302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Xia and Z. Szabo
Response to Intrarenal Perfusion and Angiotensin II Levels Regulate In Vivo Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Imaging in the Kidney
Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): e53 - e53.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/6/e52    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.112276v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhuo, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhuo, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension