| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;52:1076.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Division of Pharmacology, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases (M.K., I.M.G., R.J.A.d.B., J.M.G.v.G., A.H.J.D.), Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Medicine (N.D.L.F., N.K.H.), Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to A.H. Jan Danser, Division of Pharmacology, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Room EE1418b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail a.danser{at}erasmusmc.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30% of prorenin was detected in renin-specific assays. In conclusion, aliskiren accumulates in renin granules, thus allowing long-lasting renin-angiotensin system blockade beyond the half-life of this drug. Aliskiren also binds to prorenin. This allows its detection as renin, and might explain, in part, the renin rise during renin inhibition.
Key Words: prorenin renin storage granule mast cell aliskiren
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Unexpectedly, the vascular effects of aliskiren lasted much longer than expected on the basis of its circulating half-life.11,12 This could be because of accumulation of aliskiren-bound (pro)renin at tissue sites. In fact, long-lasting aliskiren accumulation has been demonstrated in the kidney,13 although the exact site of accumulation could not be established. An attractive hypothesis is that aliskiren reaches the renin storage sites in juxtaglomerular (JG) cells, thus allowing the release of blocked renin even when aliskiren is no longer present in blood. Unfortunately, JG cells loose their capacity to store renin when cultured.14 However, this does not apply to the recently described renin-synthesizing human mast cells (HMC-1).15 These cells abundantly store renin and release prorenin constitutively and renin in a regulated manner, thereby closely mimicking the in vivo characteristics of JG cells.16
In the present study, we set out, first, to investigate aliskiren accumulation in renin secretory granules in HMC-1 cells and, second, to determine to what degree the renin rise in humans postaliskiren actually represents prorenin. The latter was possible by applying to plasma samples of aliskiren-treated volunteers not only the widely applied renin immunoreactive assays but also a specific prorenin immunoreactive assay that is based on the recognition of the prosegment.6,17
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human Studies
Plasma samples were obtained from 20 healthy subjects on a low-sodium diet (10 mmol daily sodium intake) each receiving 3 of 4 escalating doses of aliskiren (75, 150, 300, or 600 mg).19 Each subsequent aliskiren dose was given 2 days after the previous dose. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, and the protocol was approved by the human subjects committee of the Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
Biochemical Measurements
Renin and prorenin were measured in plasma, medium, and cell lysates by enzyme-kinetic assay and/or immunoradiometric assay (IRMA; Cisbio), using recombinant human (pro)renin as a control. To allow its measurement by renin IRMA, prorenin was activated in a nonproteolytic manner by incubating the sample for 48 hours with 10 µmol/L of aliskiren at 4°C. The renin inhibitor enters the enzymatic cleft in which the active site is located, thereby inducing a slow conformational change of the inactive (closed) form of the prorenin molecule into the active (open) form (Figure 1). This approach yields the same immunoreactive renin levels ("total renin") as proteolytic prorenin activation with trypsin,6 yet without removing the prosegment. In a select set of samples, prorenin was also measured on the basis of its prosegment, replacing the 125I-labeled, active site–directed monoclonal antibody of the Cisbio kit by a prosegment-directed, 125I-labeled monoclonal antibody (F258-37-B1) in the IRMA ("prorenin IRMA"). F258-37-B1 is directed against the C-terminal part (p20 to p43) of the propeptide and does not react (<0.1%) with renin. F258-37-B1 also does not react (<0.1%) with intact, inactive prorenin.17 However, it does react with prorenin after the above treatment of prorenin with aliskiren. Thus, the aliskiren-induced nonproteolytic conformational change, causing the propeptide to move to the surface of the molecule, allows the recognition of prorenin by both the active site–directed antibody of the Cisbio kit and the prosegment-directed antibody of the prorenin IRMA. Detection limits of the enzyme-kinetic assay, the renin IRMA, and the prorenin IRMA were 0.1 ng of Ang I per milliliter per hour, 1 pg of renin per milliliter, and 5 pg of prorenin per milliliter, respectively. Angiotensinogen in cell lysates and medium was measured as described previously (detection limit: 0.1 pmol/mL).20 Protein was measured according to the Bradford method.
Data Analysis
Results are expressed as means±SEMs. IC50 values were calculated as described previously.21 Ang I–generating activities obtained in the enzyme-kinetic assay were converted to renin concentrations based on the fact that 1 ng of Ang I per milliliter per hour corresponds with 2.6 pg of human renin per milliliter. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way ANOVA. P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The medium of nonaliskiren-exposed cells also contained immunoreactive renin. These levels increased
5-fold after prorenin activation (Figure 2C). This suggests that the cells predominantly released prorenin. The prosegment assay data confirmed this view (Figure 2D). Neither the medium nor the cells contained detectable amounts of angiotensinogen (n=4), thus demonstrating that HMC-1 cells cannot generate Ang II independently.
A 7-day incubation with aliskiren increased the cellular renin levels in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2A). The maximum increase in renin, reached at 1 µmol/L of aliskiren, was
4-fold. Prorenin could not be detected in the cells at any of the tested aliskiren concentrations (Figure 2B). To investigate the possibility that the aliskiren-induced rise in cellular renin was because of the reuptake of medium renin via M6P receptors (as part of a clearance process22), the experiments were repeated in the presence of excess M6P. The maximum aliskiren-induced increase in cellular renin (2.8±0.2-fold; n=3) was unaltered in the presence of M6P (2.1±0.4-fold; n=3), and M6P did not alter the cellular renin levels in the absence or presence of aliskiren (122±22% and 88±14% of the levels without M6P, respectively; P value not significant versus 100%). Therefore, the aliskiren-induced increase in cellular renin is not because of reuptake of medium renin via M6P receptors.
In the medium, aliskiren also increased renin in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2C). This increase was much larger (maximally
20-fold) than that in the cells (P<0.01) and unaffected by M6P (data not shown). In parallel with this rise in secreted renin, the effect of prorenin activation on medium renin immunoreactivity diminished until, at aliskiren concentrations of
0.1 µmol/L, prorenin activation no longer yielded an increase in medium renin immunoreactivity. Yet, the prosegment assay still allowed the detection of intact, prosegment-containing prorenin (Figure 2D). This indicates that the 7-day incubation of the cells with aliskiren had resulted in nonproteolytic activation of prorenin, allowing its detection in both the Cisbio renin IRMA and the prosegment assay. Apparently, aliskiren concentrations of
0.1 µmol/L were sufficient to fully open all of the prorenin molecules in the medium during a 7-day incubation. Because prorenin activation in nonaliskiren-exposed cells resulted in an
5-fold rise of renin immunoreactivity, the 20-fold rise in renin should be corrected for this detection of prorenin as renin. This implies that the true aliskiren-induced rise in medium renin is
4-fold, ie, identical to the aliskiren-induced rise in cellular renin. Forskolin doubled renin release both in the absence and presence of aliskiren (P<0.01; Figure 3).
|
Renin Activity
Both cell lysate and culture medium contained Ang I–generating activity in the absence of aliskiren, and the activity in the culture medium was
10-fold lower than that in the cells (Figure 4, left and middle panels). Aliskiren, when incubated for 7 days with the cells, did not alter the Ang I–generating activity in the cell lysates (Figure 4, left). It did, however, concentration-dependently reduce the Ang I–generating activity in the culture medium (Figure 4, middle; P<0.01). To verify whether aliskiren had been degraded by the cells, Ang I–generating activity was also measured in culture medium of control cells (ie, cells that that had not been incubated with aliskiren) after adding aliskiren to the incubation sample. As shown in Figure 4 (middle), the aliskiren-induced inhibition of Ang I–generating activity was identical under both conditions (IC50 3.5±1.2 versus 1.2±0.4 nmol/L; P value not significant). Thus, a 7-day incubation had not degraded aliskiren.
|
Stimulating the cells with forskolin resulted in the appearance of Ang I–generating activity in the stimulation medium (Figure 4, right). Applying forskolin after the 7-day incubation of the cells with aliskiren revealed a concentration-dependent decrease in the released amount of Ang I–generating activity (P<0.05), despite the fact that the forskolin studies were performed without adding aliskiren again to the medium. Moreover, when incubating the stimulation medium with excess human renin, the Ang I–generating activity of this renin was 110±10% of that without stimulation medium (n=5). This indicates that the stimulation medium no longer contained aliskiren concentrations capable of blocking HMC-1 cell-released renin, ie, that the wash procedure had effectively removed aliskiren.
The renin activity data should be viewed in light of the increased immunoreactive renin levels during aliskiren exposure. Figure 5, therefore, displays the amount of aliskiren-bound renin (ie, inhibited renin) as a percentage of the total amount of renin in the cell lysate, culture medium, and stimulation medium (ie, 100%x[1–(Ang I–generating activityx2.6)/(immunoreactive renin)]). It then becomes clear that aliskiren has also blocked intracellular renin. In fact, the curves for cell lysate renin (Figure 5, left) and renin in the stimulation medium (Figure 5, right) were identical (P value not significant). This demonstrates that they represent the same renin pool, ie, the renin storage granules.
|
In the culture medium (Figure 5, middle), a distinction was made between renin and prorenin. The prosegment assay data had indicated that the majority of culture medium total renin represented prorenin, both without and with aliskiren (Figure 2D). It was, therefore, assumed that, at all aliskiren concentrations, the percentage of total renin that represented renin was identical to that in the absence of aliskiren. The Ang I–generating activity data were compared with the renin levels that were, thus, calculated, to determine the amount of aliskiren-bound renin in the culture medium. The remainder of the total renin levels represented prorenin. To also calculate the amount of aliskiren-bound prorenin, these levels were compared with the amount of prorenin that was directly recognized in the renin IRMA, because this recognition is based on the aliskiren-induced nonproteolytic activation of prorenin, ie, on the binding of aliskiren to prorenin. As can be seen in Figure 5 (middle), the aliskiren concentrations required to bind prorenin were 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than the concentrations needed to bind renin.
Human Plasma Samples
Figure 6 shows the immunoreactive (pro)renin levels in plasma of human subjects treated with aliskiren. These values are based on the Cisbio renin IRMA measurements before and after prorenin activation. According to these measurements, aliskiren treatment increased plasma renin in a dose-dependent manner, and no increases in prorenin occurred. If anything, with this assay, prorenin even decreased at t=5 hours after the intake of the 2 highest aliskiren doses. In contrast, when measuring prorenin based on the presence of its prosegment ("true" prorenin), prorenin increases were observed, which were most prominent at 24 hours after the intake of aliskiren. The difference between the 2 prorenin measurements became significant at aliskiren doses of
150 mg and increased with each subsequent aliskiren dose. Importantly, the differences were larger at 24 hours than at 5 hours postaliskiren, despite the fact that, at 24 hours, the aliskiren concentration in blood was much lower than at 5 hours (Figure 6). When using the true prorenin concentrations to recalculate the true renin concentrations, by subtracting true prorenin from the total renin level measured by Cisbio renin IRMA, it became apparent that the Cisbio renin IRMA overestimated renin by
30%.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
150 mg, the indirect measurements yielded lower prorenin levels, and prorenin even appeared to decrease at 5 hours after the intake of aliskiren. The direct prorenin measurements now show that this is incorrect and that, in fact, prorenin increases after the intake of aliskiren. This increase was of modest proportion in comparison with the increase in renin. Furthermore, it was most apparent at 24 hours after intake, as opposed to the rise in renin that was already maximal at 5 hours. These data are in full agreement with the fact that prorenin and renin release occur in a constitutive and regulated manner, respectively, and that RAS stimulation predominantly causes a rise in renin.23 The mechanism underlying the underestimation of prorenin when using renin IRMAs involves aliskiren binding to prorenin in the open conformation, thereby preventing its return to the closed conformation.6 Only the former conformation will be recognized in renin IRMAs, and, thus, renin will be overestimated and prorenin underestimated when using these assays. Under normal physiological conditions, <2% of prorenin is in the open conformation, because at 37°C the inactivation step occurs rapidly.7 Because at low temperature the equilibrium shifts considerably toward open prorenin, one may argue that the observations in this study are, at most, ex vivo phenomena related to frozen storage of the samples. However, the aliskiren effect was most apparent at 24 and 48 hours after drug intake, and not at 5 hours after intake, when the plasma aliskiren levels are highest (and when the largest consequences of this phenomenon, if solely occurring during storage, should have occurred). This, therefore, suggests that the aliskiren binding to prorenin had already occurred in vivo.
In further support of this concept, aliskiren, when incubated with HMC-1 cells at 37°C for 7 days, concentration-dependently blocked both renin and prorenin in the medium, until, at concentrations of
0.1 µmol/L, virtually all of the renin and prorenin had become aliskiren bound. Such aliskiren concentrations do occur in vivo (Figure 6), and, thus, these results are clinically relevant. The concentrations required to fully block prorenin were 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than the concentrations needed to block renin. This relates to the small percentage of prorenin that is in the open conformation at 37°C. Because this percentage is higher at lower temperatures, it is much easier to "activate" prorenin with aliskiren at 4°C than at 37°C (ie, to fully shift the equilibrium between the closed and open conformation into the direction of the open, renin IRMA-recognizable conformation).6 Aliskiren binding to both renin and prorenin stabilizes the molecule, thereby increasing the half-life by a factor of 2 to 3.6 This explains why the medium ands cellular levels of (pro)renin in the present study increased progressively when incubating the cells with increasing concentrations of aliskiren. In vivo, interference with the negative feedback loop would have been proposed to explain a rise in (pro)renin.2 However, because we were unable to demonstrate angiotensinogen synthesis by these cells, this explanation cannot be applied here. In fact, incubation with either captopril (10 µmol/L) or the Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist eprosartan (1 µmol/L) for 7 days did not increase renin (n=3; data not shown).
Finally, when exposing HMC-1 cells to forskolin after their 7-day incubation with aliskiren, the cells released aliskiren-bound renin. Thus, apparently, aliskiren is taken up by HMC-1 cells and reaches renin granules. Indeed, it has been suggested in both mast cells24 and JG cells25 that early secretory granules have the ability to take up extracellular substances, delivered through retrograde transport via early/recycling endosomes and surcompassing the Golgi network.14 This is perhaps not surprising considering that the renin granules originate as lysosomes.26 Experiments with excess M6P excluded the possibility that the cellular uptake of aliskiren represented internalization of aliskiren-bound renin from the medium via M6P receptors, which are known clearance receptors for both renin and prorenin.22,27 In vivo studies in rats have already indicated that, 3 weeks after stopping aliskiren treatment, when plasma levels are below the detection limit, the renal tissue levels of aliskiren are still well above its IC50.13 When combining these data with the present results, it seems reasonable to suggest that the renal "reservoir" of aliskiren is in fact the JG cell. Thus, these observations might explain why the effects of aliskiren on blood pressure and renin activity last for several weeks after stopping treatment.11,12
Perspectives
The cell culture and clinical data in the present study, when combined, convey 2 important messages. First, aliskiren binds intracellularly to stored renin, thus inhibiting the enzymatic activity of this enzyme before its secretion. The actual presence of aliskiren-bound renin in storage granules implies that the effect of the drug will continue even when drug levels in blood are low or undetectable (eg, when a patient does not take his daily dose or when treatment has been stopped altogether). This phenomenon might, therefore, contribute to the long-lasting effects of aliskiren after stopping treatment.11,12 Obviously, because our results were obtained in mast cells, future in vivo studies should now confirm aliskiren accumulation in JG cells, eg, using fluorescently tagged aliskiren.
Second, aliskiren also binds to prorenin. The cell culture data show that the concentrations required to accomplish this, at least at 37°C, are higher than those required for its binding to renin. Nevertheless, such concentrations do occur in blood during treatment, and, thus, this phenomenon is of clinical relevance. On the one hand, aliskiren binding allows prorenin to be detected as renin in the commercially available renin IRMAs, and it, thus, explains, at least in part, the large rise in renin that has been noted during aliskiren treatment.4 Simultaneously, given the tight binding of the molecule, it would allow aliskiren-bound prorenin to accumulate at tissue sites. Because prorenin, via binding to the (pro)renin receptor,9,28 has been suggested to be a major contributor to tissue Ang production, this would imply that aliskiren highly efficiently blocks tissue Ang generation. Such efficient interference with tissue Ang generation might, eg, explain why the effects of aliskiren on renal plasma flow are much bigger than those of other RAS blockers.19 In view of the long half-life of aliskiren-bound prorenin,6 it might also underlie the long-lasting effects of aliskiren after stopping treatment.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was funded by the Dutch Kidney Foundation (NSN C08.2246) and Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research.
Disclosures
N.K.H. and A.H.J.D. are recipients of a research grant from Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research. The remaining authors report no conflicts.
Received September 12, 2008; first decision September 26, 2008; accepted October 9, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Lu H, Rateri DL, Feldman DL, Jr RJ, Fukamizu A, Ishida J, Oesterling EG, Cassis LA, Daugherty A. Renin inhibition reduces hypercholesterolemia-induced atherosclerosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008; 118: 984–993.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Ii Y, Murakami E, Hiwada K. Effect of renin inhibitor, ES-8891, on renal renin secretion and storage in the marmoset: comparison with captopril. J Hypertens. 1991; 9: 1119–1125.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Sealey JE, Laragh JH. Aliskiren, the first renin inhibitor for treating hypertension: reactive renin secretion may limit its effectiveness. Am J Hypertens. 2007; 20: 587–597.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Azizi M, Bissery A, Lamarre-Cliche M, Ménard J. Integrating drug pharmacokinetics for phenotyping individual renin response to angiotensin II blockade in humans. Hypertension. 2004; 43: 785–790.
6. Batenburg WW, de Bruin RJA, van Gool JMG, Müller DN, Bader M, Nguyen G, Danser AHJ. Aliskiren-binding increases the half life of renin and prorenin in rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28: 1151–1157.
7. Derkx FHM, Deinum J, Lipovski M, Verhaar M, Fischli W, Schalekamp MADH. Nonproteolytic "activation" of prorenin by active site-directed renin inhibitors as demonstrated by renin-specific monoclonal antibody. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 22837–22842.
8. Danser AHJ, Deinum J. Renin, prorenin and the putative (pro)renin receptor. Hypertension. 2005; 46: 1069–1076.
9. Batenburg WW, Krop M, Garrelds IM, de Vries R, de Bruin RJA, Burcklé C, Müller DN, Bader M, Nguyen G, Danser AHJ. Prorenin is the endogenous agonist of the (pro)renin receptor. Binding kinetics of renin and prorenin in rat vascular smooth muscle cells overexpressing the human (pro)renin receptor. J Hypertens. 2007; 25: 2441–2453.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Ménard J, Guyene TT, Peyrard S, Azizi M. Conformational changes in prorenin during renin inhibition in vitro and in vivo. J Hypertens. 2006; 24: 529–534.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Oh BH, Mitchell J, Herron JR, Chung J, Khan M, Keefe DL. Aliskiren, an oral renin inhibitor, provides dose-dependent efficacy and sustained 24-hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1157–1163.
12. Andersen K, Weinberger MH, Egan B, Constance CM, Ali MA, Jin J, Keefe DL. Comparative efficacy and safety of aliskiren, an oral direct renin inhibitor, and ramipril in hypertension: a 6-month, randomized, double-blind trial. J Hypertens. 2008; 26: 589–599.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Feldman D, Jin L, Xuan H, Contrepas A, Zhou Y, Webb RL, Mueller DN, Feldt S, Cumin F, Maniara W, Persohn E, Schuetz H, Danser AHJ, Nguyen G. Effects of aliskiren on blood pressure, albuminuria, and (pro)renin receptor expression in diabetic TG(mREN-2)-27 rats. Hypertension. 2008; 52: 130–136.
14. Schweda F, Friis U, Wagner C, Skott O, Kurtz A. Renin release. Physiology. 2007; 22: 310–319.
15. Silver RB, Reid AC, Mackins CJ, Askwith T, Schaefer U, Herzlinger D, Levi R. Mast cells: a unique source of renin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 13607–13612.
16. Krop M, Garrelds IM, Danser AHJ. Renin and prorenin release by human mast cells [abstract]. J Hypertens. 2007; 25: S12.
17. Saris JJ, Derkx FHM, de Bruin RJA, Dekkers DHW, Lamers JMJ, Saxena PR, Schalekamp MADH, Danser AHJ. High-affinity prorenin binding to cardiac man-6-P/IGF-II receptors precedes proteolytic activation to renin. Am J Physiol. 2001; 280: H1706–H1715.
18. Hara M, Ono K, Wada H, Sasayama S, Matsumori A. Preformed angiotensin II is present in human mast cells. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2004; 18: 415–420.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Fisher NDL, Danser AHJ, Nussberger J, Dole WP, Hollenberg NK. Renal and hormonal responses to direct renin inhibition with aliskiren in healthy humans. Circulation. 2008; 117: 3199–3205.
20. van Kesteren CAM, Saris JJ, Dekkers DHW, Lamers JMJ, Saxena PR, Schalekamp MADH, Danser AHJ. Cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts do not synthesize renin or angiotensinogen: evidence for stretch-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy independent of angiotensin II. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 43: 148–156.
21. MaassenVanDenBrink A, de Vries R, Saxena PR, Schalekamp MADH, Danser AHJ. Vasoconstriction by in situ formed angiotensin II: role of ACE and chymase. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 44: 407–415.
22. Saris JJ, van den Eijnden MMED, Lamers JMJ, Saxena PR, Schalekamp MADH, Danser AHJ. Prorenin-induced myocyte proliferation: no role for intracellular angiotensin II. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 573–577.
23. Danser AHJ, Derkx FHM, Schalekamp MADH, Hense HW, Riegger GAJ, Schunkert H. Determinants of interindividual variation of renin and prorenin concentrations: evidence for a sexual dimorphism of (pro)renin levels in humans. J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 853–862.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Ohtsu H. Progress in allergy signal research on mast cells: the role of histamine in immunological and cardiovascular disease and the transporting system of histamine in the cell. J Pharmacol Sci. 2008; 106: 347–353.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Taugner R, Whalley A, Angermuller S, Buhrle CP, Hackenthal E. Are the renin-containing granules of juxtaglomerular epithelioid cells modified lysosomes? Cell Tissue Res. 1985; 239: 575–587.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Peters J, Clausmeyer S. Intracellular sorting of renin: cell type specific differences and their consequences. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002; 34: 1561–1568.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. van den Eijnden MMED, Saris JJ, de Bruin RJA, de Wit E, Sluiter W, Reudelhuber TL, Schalekamp MADH, Derkx FHM, Danser AHJ. Prorenin accumulation and activation in human endothelial cells. Importance of mannose 6-phosphate receptors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 911–916.
28. Nguyen G, Delarue F, Burcklé C, Bouzhir L, Giller T, Sraer J-D. Pivotal role of the renin/prorenin receptor in angiotensin II production and cellular responses to renin. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109: 1417–1427.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Andersen, M. H Weinberger, C. M Constance, M. A Ali, J. Jin, M. F Prescott, and D. L Keefe Comparative effects of aliskiren-based and ramipril-based therapy on the renin system during long-term (6 months) treatment and withdrawal in patients with hypertension Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2009; 10(3): 157 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Campbell Aliskiren Therapy Will Have Minimal Effect on Intracellular Renin of Renin-Producing Cells Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): e17 - e17. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Krop and A.H. Jan Danser Response to Aliskiren Therapy Will Have Minimal Effect on Intracellular Renin of Renin-Producing Cells Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): e18 - e18. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |