| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2009;53:549.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Medicine and Diabetes Center, University of California at San Francisco.
Correspondence to David G. Gardner, 1109 HSW, 513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0540. E-mail dgardner{at}diabetes.ucsf.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: B-type natriuretic peptide cardiac hypertrophy endothelin histone deacetylase Ying Yang 1
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Under normal conditions, BNP is expressed at relatively low levels in the adult heart and without a pronounced chamber-specific pattern. Expression is increased in late fetal and early neonatal life, and it increases dramatically in association with cardiac hypertrophy. Plasma BNP levels are used clinically in the diagnosis and management of heart failure.6,7
The transcription factor Ying Yang 1 (YY1), also known as NF-F1, UCRBP, and CF1, is a ubiquitously expressed 68-kDa, zinc-finger transcription factor of the GLI-Kruppel family with the relatively unique ability to stimulate,8 suppress,9 or initiate10 transcription of target genes in different genomic contexts. YY1 protein levels have been shown to be increased in both mouse models of hypertrophy and in human patients with heart failure.11 In addition, several genes involved in the hypertrophic program have been shown to be regulated by YY1.11–13
A recent study from Bhalla et al14 investigated the role of YY1 in the regulation of rat BNP gene transcription with particular emphasis on the interaction of this protein with the transcription factor GATA-4 in heterologous cells (HeLa cells). In the present study, we have identified a YY1 site in the human BNP gene that appears to traffic both basal- and agonist-stimulated promoter activation in the neonatal rat cardiac myocyte. YY1 occupies this site in an agonist-dependent manner within the context of the intact myocyte and may acquire its activating properties through interaction with histone deacetylase (HDAC) 2.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C (deleted amino acids 334 to 414) were gifts from Bernhard Lüscher15 of Medizinische Jochschule (Hanover, Germany). The –198 human (h) BNP luciferase has been described previously.16 Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out with the QuickChange kit (Stratagene). The sequence of the mutagenic primer (sense strand) was as follows (mutagenized bases are italicized): 5'-CAGAGATAGACCTGCCGTTCAGGCAGGCCCGACA-3'. Lentiviral YY1 and control small-interfering RNA (siRNA) plasmids construct were purchased from OpenBiosystems.
Cell Culture
Ventricular myocytes were prepared from 1- to 2-day-old neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats by alternate cycles of 0.05% trypsin digestion and mechanical trituration and cultured as described.17
3H Leucine Incorporation
After serum starvation for 12 hours, cells were treated with 10–7 mol/L of endothelin (ET)-1 for 36 hours. During the final 12 hours, they were incubated with 3H-leucine (5 µCi/mL). 3H-leucine incorporation was measured as described previously.17
Lentiviral Preparation and Infection
Lentivirus was prepared as described previously.18 Virus was handled according to established biosafety protocols. After serum deprivation, lentivirus was directly applied to the medium, and cells were incubated an additional 24 hours before treatment with vehicle or ET-1 (10–7 mol/L) for 48 hours.
RNA Isolation and Quantitative PCR
Total RNA was isolated from cardiac myocytes with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed into cDNA. Quantitative PCR was carried out with rat BNP (Rn00580641_m1) and GAPDH (Rn99999916_sl) Taqman primers (Applied Biosystems).
Transfection and Luciferase Assay
Ventricular myocytes were transiently transfected with the indicated reporters by electroporation (Gene Pulser, Bio Rad Laboratories) at 280 mV and 250 µF or by lipofectin, according to the manufacturers recommendation (Invitrogen). DNA content in individual cultures was normalized with pcDNA3. Cells were plated and cultured in DMEM H-21 containing 10% enriched calf serum for 24 hours and then changed to serum-free medium for 4 hours before treatment with ET-1 (10–7 mol/L). After 48 hours, luciferase activity was measured with the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). Where indicated, firefly luciferase levels were normalized for Renilla luciferase.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were performed with isolated myocyte nuclear extracts and 32P-labeled oligonucleotide harboring the candidate YY1 binding sequence, as described previously.19 Double-stranded oligonucleotides used for electrophoretic mobility shift assay are described above. Nuclear extracts were combined with 32P end-labeled, double-stranded, wild-type or mutant oligonucleotide on ice. All of the samples were resolved on 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. Gels were dried and exposed to x-ray film.
DNA-Immunoprecipitation Assay
Cardiac myocytes were transfected with –198 hBNP-Luc using lipofectin (Invitrogen). After 24 hours, cell cultures were changed to serum free-medium for an additional 4 hours, then treated with 10–7 mol/L of ET-1 for different periods of time. The DNA- immunoprecipitation (IP) assays were performed using a modification of published methodology.20 See the Methods section in the online data supplement for additional details (http://hyper.ahajournals.org).
Statistics
Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and the Newman-Keuls posthoc test or the Student t test to assess significance. Error bars represent SDs or SEMs, as indicated.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
YY1 Binding Element Contributes to Basal- and ET-1–Dependent hBNP Promoter Activity
We identified a candidate YY1 binding site (consensus gCCAT) on the antisense strand between –62 bp and –58 bp relative to the transcription start site of the hBNP gene (Figure 2A). Much like the site identified by Bhalla et al14 in the rat gene, this binding site lies in close proximity to 2 functional GATA binding elements in the BNP gene promoter. As shown in Figure 2B, mutation of the YY1 binding site resulted in
75% reduction in basal promoter activity and eliminated the ET-1–dependent stimulation of hBNP promoter activity. This suggests that the YY1 site plays a key role in promoting the increase in BNP gene transcription that accompanies transition to the hypertrophic phenotype.
|
YY1 Binds the hBNP Promoter
Binding of YY1 protein to this candidate site was confirmed by EMSA (Figure 3A and Figure S1) using an oligonucleotide probe spanning the candidate site. A protein(s) in the nuclear extract of cardiac myocytes formed a complex with the radiolabeled oligonucleotide harboring the YY1 binding site but not the oligonucleotide containing the mutant sequence. Binding to the wild-type sequence was appropriately competed by unlabeled excess (x100) wild-type oligonucleotide but not mutant oligonucleotide. Importantly, an antibody directed against YY1, but not SP1, disrupted the putative YY1-DNA binding complex, suggesting that the complex contained the YY1 transcription factor. Disruption of the binding complex by the YY1 antibody has been reported previously,21–23 and similar findings were obtained using 35S-labeled recombinant YY1 (Figure S1).
|
To assess binding of YY1 to the hBNP gene promoter within the context of the intact cardiac myocyte, we performed DNA-IP analysis20 using a transfected –198 hBNP-LUC reporter or cytomegalovirus (CMV)-pcDNA3 plasmid as a control. As shown in Figure 3B, YY1 bound the proximal hBNP promoter after 15 minutes of ET-1 (10–7 mol/L) treatment. It remained bound for
120 minutes after stimulus application. Amplifications of DNA in the input samples were not significantly different. Similar to the EMSA findings, YY1 could not be shown to associate with the –198 hBNP-LUC construct harboring the mutant YY1 binding element (Figure 3C).
YY1 Enhances Basal and ET-Mediated BNP Transcriptional Activity
Cotransfection of the wild-type YY1 expression vector with –198 hBNP-LUC resulted in a dose-dependent increase in both basal and ET-stimulated hBNP promoter activity (P<0.05) that peaked at 0.125 µg of YY1 expression vector and fell off at higher concentrations of transfected plasmid (presumably reflecting a nonspecific "squelching" effect of the transcription factor; Figure 4). It has been shown previously that the DNA binding activity of YY1 is located in the carboxy-terminal zinc finger domain of the protein.24 Transfection of an expression vector encoding a YY1 mutant that lacks the carboxy-terminal DNA binding domain failed to stimulate BNP promoter activity (Figure 4). This contrasts with the previous report of Bhalla et al14 in which the YY1 DNA binding domain was not necessary for GATA4-dependent synergistic activation of the rat BNP promoter by YY1. These results support our hypothesis that YY1 plays a key role in regulating hBNP promoter activity and suggest that YY1 levels are, to some degree, limiting (ie, nonsaturating) in the neonatal myocyte.
|
HDAC and hBNP Promoter Activity
Recently, the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) has been shown to reverse hypertrophy, including activation of hypertrophy-dependent gene expression, in both mouse and rat models.11,25–27 Because BNP gene transcription is known to be a marker for hypertrophy in cultured ventricular myocytes, we examined the effects of TSA on hBNP promoter activity. As shown in Figure 5A, TSA inhibited hBNP promoter activity under both basal (
61% inhibition) and ET-stimulated (
65% inhibition) conditions. Interestingly, cotransfection of an additional YY1 expression plasmid failed to enhance hBNP reporter activity in the presence of TSA. This did not reflect nonspecific inhibition of myocyte gene transcription, because activity of a cotransfected CMV promoter (pRL-CMV; assessed as Renilla luciferase activity) was increased
8-fold by 100 nmol/L of TSA (Figure 5B). These results suggest that suppression of HDAC activity results in selective inhibition of the hBNP promoter.
|
YY1 has been shown to interact with both class I and II HDACs. The role of HDACs in regulating cardiac gene expression is complex.28 However, it appears that class I HDACs, specifically HDAC2, serve to promote the hypertrophic program in cardiac myocytes.29 We examined the ability of HDAC2 to interact with YY1 within the context of the cardiac myocyte using a coimmunoprecipitation approach (Figure 6A). Endogenous YY1 associates with HDAC2 in cultured myocytes. This interaction was not enhanced by ET-1 treatment, but it was completely inhibited after treatment with TSA.
|
To determine whether HDAC2 directly associated with the hBNP promoter, DNA-IP was carried out using the transfected –198 hBNP-LUC reporter or CMV-pcDNA3 as a control. As shown in Figure 6B, HDAC2 associated with the –198 hBNP promoter, and the association was enhanced after treatment with ET-1. Pretreatment with TSA, however, prevented HDAC2 interaction with the promoter.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
YY1 has been shown to be increased in models of heart disease and in patients with heart failure,11,30 suggesting a role for YY1 in mediating the transcriptional changes associated with cardiac dysfunction. Indeed, YY1 has been shown to both positively and negatively regulate several genes important in the hypertrophic program. In the cardiac myocyte, YY1 functions as a negative regulator of
-myosin heavy chain,12 a key component of sarcomeric structure. In rodent models of cardiac hypertrophy,
-myosin heavy chain is downregulated in favor of the β isoform, which is thought to result in more energy-efficient sarcomeric activation and decreased contractility.1 YY1 has also been shown to reduce expression of the skeletal
-actin gene,31 which is increased in hypertrophic states.32 A mutation that selectively blocks YY1 binding to that promoter resulted in increases in both basal and TGF-β–dependent skeletal
-actin gene transcription, implying that YY1 is a constitutive inhibitor of this gene. These changes in cardiac gene expression, taken together with the results in the present study and those of Bhalla et al14 with the rat BNP promoter, suggest that YY1 may serve as a point of molecular integration to coordinate expression of the fetal gene program.
YY1 activity can be modified through changes in YY1 expression or YY1 activation, through increased translocation of YY1 from the cytoplasmic to the nuclear compartment33 or through posttranslational acetylation of the YY1 protein.34 YY1 has been shown to be acetylated by pCAF and p300 and deacetylated by members of the HDAC gene family. In this study, we have shown that ET-1 treatment results in a reduction in acetylated YY1 (see the data supplement), which correlates with transcriptional activation of the BNP promoter. Whether it is this deacetylation (versus others involving proteins associated with the BNP promoter) that leads the increase in transcriptional activity remains to be defined.
Recently, several members of the HDAC family have been shown to be expressed in the heart and associated with cardiac hypertrophy. In mammals, HDACs are subdivided into 3 classes termed class I, II, and III. Classically, HDACs are thought to associate with and deacetylate histones and thereby to promote transcriptional repression through condensation of chromatin. Several transcription factors have also been shown to be targets of HDACs, including the myocyte enhancer factor 2, which associates with class II HDACs,35 and YY1, which has been shown to associate with both class I and II HDACs.34,36
Both class I and II HDAC enzymatic activity is inhibited pharmacologically by the inhibitor TSA. TSA has been shown to block the development of cardiac hypertrophy induced by thoracic aortic banding (a model of pressure induced hypertrophy), angiotensin II,26,27 and isoproterenol25 suggesting a key role for at least some HDACs in the regulation of hypertrophy. In our study, TSA treatment of cardiac myocytes resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of BNP reporter activity, a recognized marker for activation of the hypertrophic gene transcription program.
Gene deletion studies of class II HDACs suggest that HDAC5 and HDAC9 act as antagonists of cardiac hypertrophy induced by either aortic banding or constitutive calcineurin signaling.37,38 Interestingly, HDAC5 and HDAC9 null mice did not display an enhanced hypertrophic phenotype in response to isoproterenol-mediated hypertrophy, raising the possibility of distinct signaling mechanisms associated with the hypertrophic response to β-adrenergic stimulation. However, TSA treatment does block isoproterenol-mediated hypertrophy. This, taken together with the apparent antihypertrophic activity of HDAC5 and HDAC9, suggests that class I HDACs may be both prohypertrophic and likely targets of TSA treatment in the heart. In support of this, recent studies of HDAC2 null mice have revealed the importance of this class I HDAC in both normal heart development and in hypertrophy.29,39 HDAC2 null mice are resistant to isoproterenol-mediated hypertrophy and seem to be protected from hypertrophy associated with overexpression of the prohypertrophic transcription factor Hod (also known as Hop).29 In addition, mice expressing a transgene for HDAC2 in the heart demonstrate increased hypertrophy.29
We have shown that HDAC2 physically associates with the BNP promoter and that the association is inhibited by TSA. This result suggests that HDAC2 participates in the activation of the BNP promoter directly. Of note, atrial natriuretic peptide gene expression, which closely tracks with BNP expression, is blunted in HDAC2 null mice.29 In addition, HDAC5 and HDAC9 gene deletion result in enhanced expression of BNP, especially in the setting of enhanced calcineurin signaling. Thus, although YY1 is capable of binding class I and II HDACs, it seems likely that interaction with class I HDACs, specifically HDAC2, is the more probable link to hypertrophy-dependent BNP gene transcription.
Perspectives
We have shown that the transcription factor YY1 plays a pivotal role in the regulation of hBNP gene promoter activity. Treatment with the prohypertrophic agonist (ET-1) results in translocation of YY1 to the nuclear compartment, deacetylation of the YY1 protein, and increased YY1 binding to the hBNP promoter. Activation of the hBNP gene promoter is accompanied by increased association with the class I HDAC HDAC2. Taken in context with other studies of this regulatory transcription factor, the present study suggests an important integrative role for YY1 in controlling BNP gene transcription.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by grants HL45637 (to D.G.G.) and F32 HL086158 (to D.J.G.) from the National Institutes of Health.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 13, 2008; first decision November 7, 2008; accepted December 15, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Durocher D, Grepin C, Nemer M. Regulation of gene expression in the endocrine heart. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1998; 53: 7–23,discussion 22–23.
3. Chien KR, Knowlton KU, Zhu H, Chien S. Regulation of cardiac gene expression during myocardial growth and hypertrophy: molecular studies of an adaptive physiologic response. FASEB J. 1991; 5: 3037–3046.[Abstract]
4. Burnett JC Jr, Kao PC, Hu DC, Heser DW, Heublein D, Granger JP, Opgenorth TJ, Reeder GS. Atrial natriuretic peptide elevation in congestive heart failure in the human. Science. 1986; 231: 1145–1147.
5. Levin ER, Gardner DG, Samson WK. Natriuretic peptides. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 321–328.
6. Morrison LK, Harrison A, Krishnaswamy P, Kazanegra R, Clopton P, Maisel A. Utility of a rapid B-natriuretic peptide assay in differentiating congestive heart failure from lung disease in patients presenting with dyspnea. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 202–209.
7. Troughton RW, Frampton CM, Yandle TG, Espiner EA, Nicholls MG, Richards AM. Treatment of heart failure guided by plasma aminoterminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) concentrations. Lancet. 2000; 355: 1126–1130.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Seto E, Shi Y, Shenk T. YY1 is an initiator sequence-binding protein that directs and activates transcription in vitro. Nature. 1991; 354: 241–245.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Shi Y, Seto E, Chang LS, Shenk T. Transcriptional repression by YY1, a human GLI-Kruppel-related protein, and relief of repression by adenovirus E1A protein. Cell. 1991; 67: 377–388.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Usheva A, Shenk T. TATA-binding protein-independent initiation: YY1, TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II direct basal transcription on supercoiled template DNA. Cell. 1994; 76: 1115–1121.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Sucharov CC, Mariner P, Long C, Bristow M, Leinwand L. Yin Yang 1 is increased in human heart failure and represses the activity of the human alpha-myosin heavy chain promoter. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 31233–31239.
12. Mariner PD, Luckey SW, Long CS, Sucharov CC, Leinwand LA. Yin Yang 1 represses alpha-myosin heavy chain gene expression in pathologic cardiac hypertrophy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 326: 79–86.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Lee TC, Zhang Y, Schwartz RJ. Bifunctional transcriptional properties of YY1 in regulating muscle actin and c-myc gene expression during myogenesis. Oncogene. 1994; 9: 1047–1052.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Bhalla SS, Robitaille L, Nemer M. Cooperative activation by GATA-4 and YY1 of the cardiac B-type natriuretic peptide promoter. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 11439–11445.
15. Austen M, Luscher B, Luscher-Firzlaff JM. Characterization of the transcriptional regulator YY1. The bipartite transactivation domain is independent of interaction with the TATA box-binding protein, transcription factor IIB, TAFII55, or cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CPB)-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 1709–1717.
16. LaPointe MC, Wu G, Garami M, Yang XP, Gardner DG. Tissue-specific expression of the human brain natriuretic peptide gene in cardiac myocytes. Hypertension. 1996; 27: 715–722.
17. Wu J, Garami M, Cheng T, Gardner DG. 1,25(OH)2 Vitamin D3, and retinoic acid antagonize endothelin-stimulated hypertrophy of neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97: 1577–1588.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Crittenden JR, Heidersbach A, McManus MT. Lentiviral strategies for RNAi knockdown of neuronal genes. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2007; 5: 1–20.
19. Liang F, Schaufele F, Gardner DG. Functional interaction of NF-Y and Sp1 is required for type A natriuretic peptide receptor gene transcription. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 1516–1522.
20. Nissen RM, Yamamoto KR. The glucocorticoid receptor inhibits NFkappaB by interfering with serine-2 phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain. Genes Dev. 2000; 14: 2314–2329.
21. Donohoe ME, Zhang LF, Xu N, Shi Y, Lee JT. Identification of a CTCF cofactor, YY1, for the X chromosome binary switch. Mol Cell. 2007; 25: 43–56.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Li H, Liu H, Wang Z, Liu X, Guo L, Huang L, Gao L, McNutt MA, Li G. The role of transcription factors Sp1 and YY1 in proximal promoter region in initiation of transcription of the mu opioid receptor gene in human lymphocytes. J Cell Biochem. 2008; 104: 237–250.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Xu X, Kawachi Y, Nakamura Y, Sakurai H, Hirota A, Banno T, Takahashi T, Roop DR, Otsuka F. Yin-yang 1 negatively regulates the differentiation-specific transcription of mouse loricrin gene in undifferentiated keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2004; 123: 1120–1126.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Bushmeyer S, Park K, Atchison ML. Characterization of functional domains within the multifunctional transcription factor, YY1. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 30213–30220.
25. Kook H, Lepore JJ, Gitler AD, Lu MM, Wing-Man Yung W, Mackay J, Zhou R, Ferrari V, Gruber P, Epstein JA. Cardiac hypertrophy and histone deacetylase-dependent transcriptional repression mediated by the atypical homeodomain protein Hop. J Clin Invest. 2003; 112: 863–871.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Kong Y, Tannous P, Lu G, Berenji K, Rothermel BA, Olson EN, Hill JA. Suppression of class I and II histone deacetylases blunts pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2579–2588.
27. Kee HJ, Sohn IS, Nam KI, Park JE, Qian YR, Yin Z, Ahn Y, Jeong MH, Bang YJ, Kim N, Kim JK, Kim KK, Epstein JA, Kook H. Inhibition of histone deacetylation blocks cardiac hypertrophy induced by angiotensin II infusion and aortic banding. Circulation. 2006; 113: 51–59.
28. Backs J, Olson EN. Control of cardiac growth by histone acetylation/deacetylation. Circ Res. 2006; 98: 15–24.
29. Trivedi CM, Luo Y, Yin Z, Zhang M, Zhu W, Wang T, Floss T, Goettlicher M, Noppinger PR, Wurst W, Ferrari VA, Abrams CS, Gruber PJ, Epstein JA. Hdac2 regulates the cardiac hypertrophic response by modulating Gsk3 beta activity. Nat Med. 2007; 13: 324–331.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Sucharov CC, Helmke SM, Langer SJ, Perryman MB, Bristow M, Leinwand L. The Ku protein complex interacts with YY1, is up-regulated in human heart failure, and represses alpha myosin heavy-chain gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24: 8705–8715.
31. MacLellan WR, Lee TC, Schwartz RJ, Schneider MD. Transforming growth factor-beta response elements of the skeletal alpha-actin gene. Combinatorial action of serum response factor, YY1, and the SV40 enhancer-binding protein, TEF-1. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 16754–16760.
32. Schwartz K, de la Bastie D, Bouveret P, Oliviero P, Alonso S, Buckingham M. Alpha-skeletal muscle actin mRNAs accumulate in hypertrophied adult rat hearts. 1986;59:551–555.
33. Krippner-Heidenreich A, Walsemann G, Beyrouthy MJ, Speckgens S, Kraft R, Thole H, Talanian RV, Hurt MM, Luscher B. Caspase-dependent regulation and subcellular redistribution of the transcriptional modulator YY1 during apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 25: 3704–3714.
34. Yao YL, Yang WM, Seto E. Regulation of transcription factor YY1 by acetylation and deacetylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 21: 5979–5991.
35. Lu J, McKinsey TA, Zhang C-L, Olson EN. Regulation of skeletal myogenesis by association of the MEF2 transcription factor with class II histone deacetylases. Mol Cell. 2000; 6: 233–244.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Sucharov CC, Langer S, Bristow M, Leinwand L. Shuttling of HDAC5 in H9C2 cells regulates YY1 function through CaMKIV/PKD and PP2A. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006; 291: C1029–C1037.
37. Zhang CL, McKinsey TA, Chang S, Antos CL, Hill JA, Olson EN. Class II histone deacetylases act as signal-responsive repressors of cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. 2002; 110: 479–488.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Chang S, McKinsey TA, Zhang CL, Richardson JA, Hill JA, Olson EN. Histone deacetylases 5 and 9 govern responsiveness of the heart to a subset of stress signals and play redundant roles in heart development. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24: 8467–8476.
39. Montgomery RL, Davis CA, Potthoff MJ, Haberland M, Fielitz J, Qi X, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Olson EN. Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 redundantly regulate cardiac morphogenesis, growth, and contractility. Genes Dev. 2007; 21: 1790–1802.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |