| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2009;53:739.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Biomedicine (T.D., S.M.-B., K.B., C.M., D.J., M.B.), University of Basel and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Division of Cardiology (T.D., P.T.B.), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Clayton Foundation Laboratories (J.R., W.W.V.), Salk Institute, La Jolla, Calif; and the Institute of Molecular Medicine (K.L.P.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
Correspondence to Thomas Dieterle, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail dieterlet{at}uhbs.ch
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: CRF receptor urocortin 2 Dahl salt-sensitive rat arterial hypertension blood pressure left ventricular hypertrophy left ventricular function
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In recent years, novel corticotropin releasing factor (CRF)–related peptides and a specific CRF receptor system residing in the heart and peripheral vessels have been identified. Originally identified as a transmitter involved in the regulation of the hypothalamic-hypopituitary-adrenal axis of the stress response, CRF was the first endogenous ligand of the CRF family of peptides to bind to CRF receptors. Three additional CRF-related peptides, named urocortin (Ucn) 1,9 Ucn2 (human ortholog: stresscopin-related peptide10,11), and Ucn3 (human ortholog: stresscopin11,12), signaling through 2 G protein–coupled receptors, the CRF receptors (CRFR) 1 and 2, have been discovered. Although CRFR1 and CRFR2 are found in the central nervous system, CRFR2 is particularly abundant in the periphery, including the heart and systemic vasculature.13–17 Ucn2 and Ucn3 bind selectively to CRFR2, with no appreciable activity at CRFR1.10,12
Marked inotropic and lusitropic effects, as well as a reduction of peripheral resistance, have been reported for Ucn2 in a recent study in wild-type mice and cardiomyopathic mice with congestive heart failure (CHF)18 and, together with beneficial renal and endocrine effects, in pacing-induced CHF in sheep.19 Potent vasodilatory effects by Ucn2 were reported in rat thoracic aorta20 and in human arteries.21 Intravenous application of Ucn2 induced a dose-dependent rapid and highly significant BP reduction in normotensive rats.22–24
To date, BP lowering effects of Ucn2 have only been tested acutely and in normotensive animals but never in animal models of arterial hypertension. No data are available on the long-term effects of Ucn2 treatment on BP, heart rate (HR), cardiac dimension, and function. These data are needed to judge the potential clinical applicability of Ucn2 for the treatment of high BP. We performed a long-term study in the Dahl salt-sensitive (DSS) rat, an animal model of arterial hypertension and LVH. To determine acute and long-term effects, BP measurements, together with echocardiographic analysis of LV dimensions and function, were performed after initial Ucn2 application and at prespecified time points during the chronic treatment phase.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Treatment Protocol
To induce arterial hypertension, rats were fed a low-salt diet (0.3% NaCl) and, at the age of 6 weeks, were switched to a high-salt diet (HSD) containing 4% NaCl. Age-matched DSR rats were treated in an identical manner and served as normotensive controls. After 15 days of HSD (age 8 weeks), DSS and DSR rats were randomized either to a treatment with human Ucn2 at a dose of 2.5 µg/kg of body weight (BW) b.i.d. (corresponding to
1.0 nmol/kg BW/d) or the corresponding volume of vehicle (0.9% NaCl). Human Ucn2 was chosen to ensure comparability with previous studies experimental studies.22,24
Ucn2 or vehicle was administered IP in strict 12-hour intervals. Ucn2 was provided by Dr Jean Rivier (Salk Institute).
Echocardiography and BP Measurements
BP measurements and echocardiographic analysis of LV dimensions and function were performed simultaneously on slightly sedated (pentobarbital 20 mg/kg of BW IP), spontaneously breathing animals (n=10 in each group). The amount of pentobarbital used for sedation was carefully controlled and strictly adapted to the BW of the animals. Great care was taken to perform the application of Ucn2 or vehicle, BP measurements, and echocardiographic tracings at equal time points after application of pentobarbital. BP was measured at baseline (before the first injection of Ucn2 or vehicle [BL]) and at 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after Ucn2 or vehicle injection. Echocardiography was performed in parallel at BL and at 15 and 30 minutes after the first injection of Ucn2 or vehicle, as well as at weeks 1, 2, and 5 of BID treatment, in which case the measurement was always taken at 12 hours after the last application of Ucn2.
Systolic BP was assessed using a standard tail-cuff BP monitor (IITC Inc, Life Science Instruments). Echocardiography was performed using a 15.0-MHz linear transducer interfaced with a Philips SONOS 5500 system (Philips Medical Systems).
For image acquisition, rats were placed in the left lateral decubitus position. The transducer was placed on the left hemithorax. Care was taken not to apply excessive pressure on the chest to avoid bradycardia. The 2D parasternal short-axis view was used as a guide, and an LV M-mode tracing was obtained close to the papillary muscle level with a sweep speed of 150 mm/s. Pulsed Doppler tracings of LV outflow tract velocity were obtained in a modified parasternal long-axis view at a sweep speed of 150 mm/s. Transmitral Doppler flows (E and A velocities) were measured in a modified apical 4-chamber orientation with the sample volume placed at the tips of the mitral leaflet. M-mode and Doppler tracings were recorded on a magneto-optical disk for offline analysis.
LV end-diastolic and end-systolic internal diameters (LVEDD and LVESD), as well as LV posterior wall thickness (PWth), were measured in 3 consecutive heart cycles using the American Society of Echocardiography leading-edge method25 by an investigator blinded for treatment allocation and phase. LV fractional shortening (FS) was calculated as FS (%)=(LVEDD–LVESD)/LVEDDx100. Using the mean aortic ejection time (ET) from 3 consecutive heart cycles obtained from the Doppler tracings of the LV outflow tract, we calculated the velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (Vcf) as Vcf (circumferences/s)=(
LVEDD–
LVESD)/(ETx
LVEDD). Mean Vcf provides an in vivo assessment of myocardial contractility under basal conditions and in the absence of acute changes in arterial pressure.26 From E and A velocities, the E/A ratio was calculated as a measure for LV diastolic filling properties.
Tissue Harvesting and Processing
After the last BP measurement and echocardiography, rats were euthanized using thiopental anesthesia (150 mg/kg BW IP). After thoracotomy, hearts were immediately isolated and further processed in ice-cold saline solution. Wet heart weight (HW) and BW were determined, and for each animal the HW/BW ratio was calculated. The LV was separated and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen.
RNA Isolation and Analysis by Real-Time PCR
Expression levels of Ucn2, CRFR2, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in LV and aortic tissue from DSS and DSR rats (DSS: n=7; DSR: n=6) were determined using real-time PCR. Expression of BNP served as a marker of cardiac hypertrophy.27 Total RNA was extracted using TRI-Reagent (Sigma), treated with DNAse (RNase-free, Ambion) to remove DNA contaminations, and 2 µg of this RNA were reverse transcribed by random priming (Omniscript reverse transcription kit, Qiagen). Nontranscribed RNA served as negative control. The resulting cDNA was analyzed either undiluted for Ucn2 or diluted 10- and 20-fold for CRFR2 and BNP, respectively. Real-time PCR was performed in an ABI 7500 Fast Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) using iTaq SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Bio-Rad) and the primers given in Table S1 of the data supplement (available online at http://hyper.ahajournals.org). Primers were designed as intron spanning except for Ucn2, because its gene consists of 1 exon only. β-Tubulin mRNA was used as an internal standard for sample normalization. β-Tubulin by itself did not differ between the experimental groups (Table S2). mRNA levels of the target and standard genes were calculated by using a standard curve. All of the samples were assayed in triplicate.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GB-STAT software (Dynamic Microsystems Inc, version 8.0). All of the values are expressed as means±SDs. Comparisons of HW/BW ratios and expression levels of Ucn2 and CRFR2 at week 5 of treatment with Ucn2 or vehicle were performed using ANOVA. Changes in BP, LV dimension, and LV function during the treatment were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Student-Newman-Keuls test was used for posthoc comparisons. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30 minutes. No effects on BP were observed in vehicle-treated hypertensive DSS rats (Figure 1A). Whereas BP continued to rise in vehicle-treated DSS rats, we found sustained BP-lowering effects in animals treated with Ucn2 at a dose of 2.5 µg/kg BID (Figure 1B). Interestingly, no acute or chronic effects on BP were observed in Ucn2-treated DSR rats compared with vehicle-treated animals (Figure 1C and 1D). HR did not differ between groups at any phase of the study. Importantly, the drop in BP in Ucn2-treated DSS rats was not accompanied by a rise in HR (Figure S1).
|
Changes in LV Dimension and Function After Ucn2 Treatment
Effects of Ucn2 on LV dimension and function in hypertensive DSS rats are summarized in Figure 2. Initial application of Ucn2 induced an immediate improvement of FS and Vcf, a measure of contractile force in the basal state. This was accompanied by a reduction of LVEDD and an increase in PWth. Application of vehicle to DSS rats had no effects. E/A ratio at BL did not differ between DSS and DSR rats and was not affected by initial application of Ucn2 or vehicle. Moreover, Ucn2 or vehicle did not change contractile force in normotensive DSR rats (data not shown).
|
Analysis of LV function after 5 weeks of BID treatment revealed preserved FS in both Ucn2- and vehicle-treated DSS rats. However, contractile force expressed as Vcf was significantly decreased in vehicle-treated DSS rats and maintained in Ucn2-treated DSS rats (P<0.05) compared with BL. Importantly, E/A ratios remained unchanged in Ucn2-treated DSS rats after 5 weeks of BID treatment (1.69±0.15 [BL] versus 1.61±0.09 [week 5]; P value not significant), whereas we observed a significant increase in vehicle-treated DSS rats compared with BL (1.61±0.09 [BL] versus 1.95±0.29 [week 5]; P<0.05). No changes were observed in DSR rats treated with Ucn2 or vehicle for 5 weeks.
Figure 2 shows that, after 5 weeks of treatment and measured at the trough point after Ucn2 injection, no difference in LVEDD existed, but importantly, PWth was significantly lower in Ucn2-treated DSS rats than in vehicle-treated controls (0.143±0.010 cm versus 0.191±0.011 cm; P<0.05). Analysis of HW/BW ratios (Figure 3A) or HW/tibial length ratios (data not shown) after sacrifice of the DSS rats confirmed the echocardiographic findings. Although HW/BW ratios were significantly higher in DSS compared with DSR rats, among the DSS rats, the Ucn2-treated group displayed a 14% lower HW/BW ratio than the vehicle-treated group (35±3 mg/g versus 40±5 mg/g; P<0.05). No differences in HW/BW between treatment groups were observed in DSR rats (28±2 mg/g versus 28±1 mg/g; P value not significant). Assessment of BNP expression by real-time PCR (Figure 3B) as a marker of hypertrophy did not, however, reveal any differences between the treatment groups. Taken together, our echocardiographic and cardiac weight data show that hearts of Ucn2-treated DSS rats were less hypertrophied than those of vehicle-treated rats after 5 weeks of HSD.
|
Gene Expression of CRFR2 and Ucn2
To evaluate whether Ucn2 treatment changes tissue expression of its receptor, CRFR2, and of endogenous Ucn2, we quantified in LV and aorta the mRNAs that encode these proteins. Neither in DSS nor in DSR rats did LV or aortic CRFR2 mRNA levels differ between the Ucn2 and vehicle groups after 5 weeks of treatment (Figure S2). For Ucn2 mRNA, no statistical significance was obtained in either tissue between the treatment groups. Ucn2 mRNA was present only at very low levels in both tissues, with consequently high variability of our measurements.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of Ucn2 on BP
Our study is the first to demonstrate immediate and prolonged BP-lowering effects of Ucn2 in arterial hypertension. In humans, a plasma half life of Ucn2 of 15.5 minutes has been reported.30 In our study, significant BP reductions were still measured at 12 hours after Ucn2 application, indicating long-lasting effects of Ucn2. Earlier studies have reported vasodilatory and hypotensive effects of Ucn2 in normotensive rats.22,24–26 Our experiments confirm these previous findings and extend them to a clinically relevant model of arterial hypertension: the DSS rat. We demonstrate an immediate and highly significant BP reduction after application of a single dose of Ucn2 with BP values comparable to those observed in normotensive control animals. Despite the rapid drop of BP, no significant increase in HR was observed, a finding of potential clinical importance.
No downregulation of CRFR2 mRNA expression was detected in LV and aortic tissue, which explains, at least in part, the preserved reactivity to CRFR2 stimulation with Ucn2 in DSS rats even after 5 weeks of treatment. Moreover, our findings further support the notion of an involvement of the CRF-related peptides and their receptors in the regulation of cardiovascular function.31
An additional, clinically important observation in this study was that BID application of Ucn2 for 5 weeks led to sustained BP reduction in hypertensive DSS rats, whereas a continuous further increase of BP was found in vehicle-treated animals. These data provide first evidence of a potential beneficial long-term effect of CRFR2 stimulation on BP.
Several mechanisms seem to be involved in the BP-lowering effects of Ucn2. Both endothelium-dependent and -independent vasorelaxation have been described previously in the human internal mammary artery32 and the coronary circulation of pigs.33 The endothelium-dependent component appears to act primarily via the release of endothelial NO, which, in turn, stimulates Ca2+-activated K+ channels in vascular smooth muscle via cGMP-dependent mechanisms.32,34 Moreover, vasodilatory effects via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and the protein kinase A pathway may contribute to the vasodilatory effect of Ucn2.22 In addition, potent diuretic effects of Ucn2 have been described at least in an animal model of CHF35 that might contribute to the BP-lowering effects of Ucn2 beyond direct vascular effects.
However, some potential limitations have to be acknowledged with respect to the effects of Ucn2 on BP in this study. To ensure comparability with previous studies in normal rats,22,24 this study was conducted using the human form of Ucn2. Although the rat and human forms of Ucn2 share an 83% homology,36 it is conceivable that the amino acid differences might result in greater or lesser activation of rat CRFR2 by the human compared with the rat form of Ucn2. Therefore, the observed effects of Ucn2 might have been more or less potent had the rat form of Ucn2 been used.
Effects of Ucn2 on LV Structure
The goal of antihypertensive therapy is to prevent the development of hypertensive target organ damage and cardiovascular disease, in particular, LVH and CHF. In previous studies, mitogenic effects of Ucn1 have been described in cardiac myocytes and nonmyocytes,37,38 and exposure of cultured cardiac myocytes to Ucn2 and Ucn3 resulted in increased myocyte size and protein synthesis.39 All 3 CRF-related peptides increased markers of hypertrophy in these experiments, with Ucn3 being the most and Ucn2 the least potent. In our study we did not find any differences between Ucn2- and vehicle-treated normotensive DSR rats regarding HW/BW ratio, BNP mRNA expression levels, or echocardiographic LV dimensions. Thus, chronic administration of Ucn2 does not seem to induce relevant hypertrophic effects in the myocardium in normotensive rats. In fact, in hypertensive DSS rats, chronic HW/BW ratio was significantly lower in Ucn2- compared with vehicle-treated animals. Together with unchanged echocardiographic LV diameters and reduced LVPWth, data from this study suggest that chronic administration of Ucn2 may even diminish the hypertension-induced LV hypertrophic response.
Effects of Ucn2 on LV Function
Several recent studies with animal models of dilated cardiomyopathy or pacing-induced CHF have demonstrated potent beneficial effects of Ucn2 on LV function.18,19,40 As in previous studies, we observed an immediate improvement of FS and Vcf after acute administration of Ucn2, indicating potent inotropic effects. After 5 weeks of treatment with Ucn2, both FS and Vcf were preserved in Ucn2-treated DSS rats, whereas we observed a significant decrease of Vcf in vehicle-treated animals. Moreover, E/A ratio was significantly increased in vehicle-treated DSS rats, indicating significantly impaired LV filling properties in these animals, whereas E/A ratio was preserved in Ucn2-treated DSS rats. Taken together, these data suggest that chronic administration of Ucn2 has beneficial acute and chronic effects on both systolic and diastolic function in hypertensive DSS rats and may prevent the deterioration of LV function observed in vehicle-treated animals.
Perspectives
In summary, our study demonstrates that administration of Ucn2 produces an immediate BP reduction in hypertensive rats. Chronic administration of Ucn2 BID for 5 weeks resulted in a significant and sustained BP reduction (without downregulation of CRFR2) compared with vehicle-treated animals and retarded the development of hypertension-induced LVH. Most importantly, chronic administration of Ucn2 in hypertensive DSS rats prevented the deterioration of LV function observed in vehicle-treated animals and seemed to beneficially affect LV geometry. Taken together, the findings of our study indicate that chronic CRFR2 stimulation is feasible, effective, and may represent a novel and attractive approach for antihypertensive therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by project grants from the Swiss Heart Foundation, Bern; the Mach-Gaensslen-Stiftung, Zug; the SWISSLIFE Jubilee Foundation, Zurich; the Stiftung für Gesundheit und Kardioneurovaskuläre Forschung; the Nora van Meeuwen-Haefliger Foundation; and the Kardiovaskuläre Stiftung, Basel, Switzerland. Further support was provided by NIDDK grant 5P01 DK26741 and by the Clayton Medical Research Foundation. T.D. was supported by career development grants from the Verein für Wissenschaft, Aus-, Weiter- und Fortbildung (2005–2006), and the L&Th La Roche-Foundation (2006–2007), Basel, Switzerland.
Disclosures
J.R. and W.W.V. report patent and licensing income in the CRF field in accordance with Salk Institute policy. W.W.V. is a cofounder, consultant, equity holder, and member of the Board of Directors and Scientific Advisory Board of Neurocrine Biosciences Inc. The remaining authors report no conflicts.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 16, 2008; first decision November 17, 2008; accepted January 16, 2009.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Gradman AH, Alfayoumi F. From left ventricular hypertrophy to congestive heart failure: management of hypertensive heart disease. Progr Cardiovasc Dis. 2006; 48: 326–341.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Cipriano C, Gosse P, Bermurat L, Mas D, Lemetayer P, N'Tela G, Clementy J. Prognostic value of left ventricular mass and its evolution during treatment in the Bordeaux cohort of hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14: 524–529.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Gardin JM, McClelland R, Kitzman D, Lima JA, Bommer W, Klopfenstein HS, Wong ND Smith VE, Gottdiener J. M-mode echocardiographic predictors of six- to seven-year incidence of coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, and mortality in an elderly cohort (the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 1051–1057.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Levy D, Anderson KM, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Christiansen JC, Castelli WP. Echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy: prevalence and risk factors. The Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 1988; 108: 7–13.
6. Verdecchia P, Carini G, Circo A, Novellini E, Giovannini E, Lombardo M, Solinas P, Gorini M, Maggioni AP. Left ventricular mass and cardiovascular morbidity in essential hypertension: the MAVI Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1829–1835.
7. Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Reboldi G, Gattobigio R, Borgioni C, Pearson TA, Ambrosio G. Left ventricular hypertrophy as an independent predictor of acute cerebrovascular events in essential hypertension. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2039–2044.
8. Safar ME, Smulyan H. Blood pressure components in clinical hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006; 8: 659–666.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Vaughan J, Donaldson C, Bittencourt J, Perrin MH, Lewis K, Sutton S, Chan R, Turnbull AV, Lovejoy D, Rivier C, Rivier J, Sawchenko PE, Vale W. Urocortin, a mammalian neuropeptide related to fish urotensin I and to corticotropin-releasing factor. Nature. 1995; 378: 287–292.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Reyes TM, Lewis K, Perrin MH, Kunitake KS, Vaughan J, Arias CA, Hogenesch JB, Gulyas J, Rivier J, Vale WW, Sawchenko PE. Urocortin II: a member of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) neuropeptide family that is selectively bound by type 2 CRF receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 2843–2848.
11. Hsu SY, Hsueh AJ. Human stresscopin and stresscopin-related peptide are selective ligands for the type 2 corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 605–611.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Lewis K, Li C, Perrin MH, Blount A, Kunitake K, Donaldson C, Vaughan J, Reyes TM, Gulyas J, Fischer W, Bilezikjian L, Rivier J, Sawchenko PE, Vale WW. Identification of urocortin III, an additional member of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family with high affinity for the CRF2 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 7570–7575.
13. Lovenberg TW, Liaw CW, Grigoriadis DE, Clevenger W, Chalmers DT, De Souza EB, Oltersdorf T. Cloning and characterization of a functionally distinct corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtype from rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 836–840.
14. Stenzel P, Kesterson R, Yeung W, Cone RD, Rittenberg MB, Stenzel-Poore MP. Identification of a novel murine receptor for corticotropin-releasing hormone expressed in the heart. Mol Endocrinol. 1995; 9: 637–645.
15. Perrin M, Donaldson C, Chen R, Blount A, Berggren T, Bilezikjian L, Sawchenko P, Vale W. Identification of a second coticotropin-releasing factor receptor gene and characterization of a cDNA expressed in the heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 2969–2973.
16. Lovenberg TW, Chalmers DT, Liu C, De Souza EB. CRF2 alpha and CRF2 beta receptor mRNAs are differently distributed between the rat central nervous system and peripheral tissues. Endocrinology. 1995; 136: 4139–4142.[Abstract]
17. Kishimoto T, Pearse RV II, Lin CR, Rosenfeld MG. A sauvagine/corticotrophin-releasing factor receptor expressed in heart and skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 1108–1112.
18. Bale TL, Hoshijima M, Gu Y, Dalton N, Anderson KR, Lee K-F, Rivier J, Chien KR, Vale WW, Peterson KL. The cardiovascular physiologic actions of urocortin II: acute effects in murine heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 3697–3702.
19. Rademaker MT, Cameron VA, Charles CJ, Richards AM. Integrated hemodynamic, hormonal, and renal actions of urocortin 2 in normal and paced sheep: beneficial effects in heart failure. Circulation. 2005; 112: 3624–3632.
20. Kageyama K, Furukawa K, Miki I, Terui K, Motomura S, Suda T. Vasodilative effects of urocortin II via protein kinase A and a mitogen-activated protein kinase in rat thoracic aorta. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2003; 42: 561–565.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Wiley KE, Davenport AP. CRF2 receptors are highly expressed in the human cardiovascular system and their cognate ligands urocortins 2 and 3 are potent vasodilators. Br J Pharmacol. 2004; 143: 508–514.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Chen C-Y, Doong M-L, Rivier JE, Taché Y. Intravenous urocortin II decreases blood pressure through CRF2 receptor in rats. Regul Peptides. 2003; 113: 125–130.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Mackay KM, Stiefel TH, Ling N, Foster AC. Effects of a selective agonist and antagonist of CRF2 receptors on cardiovascular function in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003; 469: 111–115.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Gardiner SM, March JE, Kemp PA, Bennett T. A comparison between the cardiovascular actions of urocortin 1 and urocortin 2 (stresscopin-related peptide) in conscious rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007; 321: 221–226.
25. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978; 58: 1072–1083.
26. Mahler F, Ross J Jr, O'Rourke RA, Covell JW. Effects of changes in preload, afterload and inotropic state on ejection and isovolumic phase measures of contractility in the conscious dog. Am J Cardiol. 1975; 35: 626–634.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Nakagawa O, Ogawa Y, Itoh H, Suga S-I, Komatsu Y, Kishimoto I, Nishino K, Yoshimasa T, Nakao K. Rapid transcriptional activation and early mRNA turnover of brain natriuretic peptide in cardiocyte hypertrophy. J Clin Invest. 1995; 96: 1280–1287.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Huang BS, Wang H, Leenen FHH. Enhanced sympathoexcitatory and pressor responses to central Na+ in Dahl salt-sensitive and –resistant rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 281: H1881–H1889.
29. Zhao X, White R, van Huysse J, Leenen FHH. Cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac renin-angiotensin system in Dahl rats on high salt intake. J Hypertens. 2000; 18: 1319–1326.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Davis ME, Pemberton CJ, Yandle TG, Fisher SF, Lainchbury JG, Frampton CM, Rademaker MT, Richards M. Urocortin 2 infusion in human heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 2589–2597.
31. Bale TL, Contarino A, Smith GW, Chan R, Gold LH, Sawchemko PE, Koob GF, Vale WW, Lee KF. Mice deficient for corticotrophin-releasing hormone receptor-2 display anxiety-like behaviour and are hypersensitive to stress. Nat Genet. 2000; 24: 410–414.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Coste SC, Kesterson RA, Heldwein KA, Stevens SL, Heard AD, Hollis JH, Murray SE, Hill JK, Pantley GA, Hohimer AR, Hatton DC, Phillips TJ, Finn DA, Low MJ, Rittenberg MB, Stenzel P, Stenzel-Poore MP. Abnormal adaptations to stress and impaired cardiovascular function in mice lacking corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor-2. Nat Genet. 2000; 24: 403–409.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Chen ZW, Huang Y, Yang Q, Li X, Wie W, He GW. Urocortin-induced relaxation in the human internal mammary artery. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 65: 913–920.
34. Grossini E, Molinari C, Mary DA, Marino P, Vacca G. The effect of urocortin II administration on the coronary circulation and cardiac function in the anaesthesized pig is nitric-oxide-dependent. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008; 578: 242–248.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Secilmis MA, Ozu OY, Emre M, Buyukafsar K, Kiroglu OE, Ertug P, Karatas Y, Onder S, Singirik E. urocortin induces endothelium-dependent vasodilatation and hyperpolarization of rat mesenteric arteries by activating Ca2+-activated K+ channels. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007; 21: 89–98.
36. Fekete EM, Zorilla EP. Physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic relevance of urocortins in mammals: ancient CRF paralogs. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2007; 28: 1–27.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Ikeda K, Tojo K, Oki Y, Nakao K. Urocortin has cell-proliferative effects on cardiac non-myocytes. Life Sci. 2002; 71: 1929–1938.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Railson JE, Liao Z, Brar BK, Buddle JC, Pennica D, Stephanou A, Latchman DS. Cardiotrophin-1 and urocortin cause protection by the same pathway and hypertrophy via distinct pathways in cardiac myocytes. Cytokine. 2002; 17: 243–253.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Chanalaris A, Lawrence KM, Townsend PA, Davidson S, Jamshidi Y, Stephanou A, Knight RD, Hsu SY, Hsueh AJ, Latchman DS. Hypertrophic effects of urocortin homologous peptides are mediated via activation of the Akt pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 328: 442–448.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Dieterle T, Gu Y, Vale W, Hoshijima M, Pfisterer M, Buser PT, Peterson KL. Urocortin II: potential to improve left ventricular function in beta-adrenergic agonist resistant congestive heart failure? Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 483. Abstract.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |