| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2009;53:826.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to J. Andrew Taylor, Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Room 556, 125 Nashua St, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail jandrew_taylor{at}hms.harvard.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R-R interval/
systolic blood pressure) and mechanical (
diameter/
pressure) and neural (
R-R interval/
diameter) components via measurements of carotid artery diameter in previously sedentary older individuals before and after 6 months of aerobic training. There was a significant 26% increase in baroreflex gain that was directly related to the amount of exercise performed and that was derived mainly from an increase in the neural component of the arterial baroreflex (P<0.05). We did find changes in the mechanical component, but unlike integrated gain and the neural component, these were not related to the magnitude of the exercise stimulus. These results suggest that exercise training can have a powerful effect on cardiovagal baroreflex function, but a sufficient stimulus is necessary to produce the effect. Moreover, adaptations in the afferent-efferent baroreflex control of cardiac vagal outflow may be crucial for the improvement in arterial baroreflex function in older humans.
Key Words: baroreflex aging exercise nervous system autonomic carotid arteries
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given the cardioprotective effects of vagal outflow and the importance of the arterial baroreflex in determining its level, various strategies have been pursued to increase cardiovagal baroreflex function. Among these, aerobic exercise training has been thought to be an attractive intervention, because cross-sectional studies suggest that age-related declines in baroreflex function may be prevented by habitual physical activity.10–12 Indeed, research suggests that older individuals with a lifetime history of regular aerobic exercise have cardiovagal baroreflex function greater than their sedentary peers5,13 and even comparable to sedentary young individuals.7 However, it remains unclear whether this maintained function results primarily from lesser vascular stiffening of barosensory vessels.5,13 Our previous work suggests that greater neural control of cardiac vagal outflow may be the prepotent effector of maintained function in older athletes.7 However, these differences may simply reflect cohort effects; results from longitudinal, intervention studies on the effects of aerobic exercise training do not unequivocally support the benefits of exercise. Some data do suggest that baroreflex indices based on spectral analysis might be improved by exercise training.14,15 However, a baroreflex gain derived by simple observation of a spontaneously occurring heart period and arterial pressure oscillations can be suspect,16 and increases may be an epiphenomenon of greater heart rate variability concomitant with a training-related bradycardia.17 Direct probes of cardiovagal baroreflex control suggest that sensitivity may be increased in some percentage of older volunteers,13 may not change,18–20 or may even decrease21 after an exercise training program. The wide variety of methods used to assess the cardiovagal baroreflex (Valsalvas maneuver, neck suction and neck pressure, and phenylephrine bolus) and differences in the age of the subjects (from 47 to 63 years old) and in the training duration (from 3 to 6 months) may explain some of this inconsistency.
Thus, it remains unclear whether regular physical activity can reverse the age-related decline in cardiovagal baroreflex function and through what mechanism regular exercise might counterbalance this decline. The present study assessed the effects of a 6-month aerobic training program on baroreflex gain and on its neural and mechanical components.22 Based on the results obtained by Hunt et al,7 we hypothesized that regular exercise training would increase baroreflex gain primarily by increasing neural aspects of cardiac vagal baroreflex control.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protocol and Measurements
All of the subjects were familiarized with the laboratory setting on a day before the study day. After initial screening, subjects reported to the laboratory for 2 experimental sessions. Subjects were requested not to engage in vigorous exercise for the previous 48 hours and not to consume either alcohol- or caffeine-containing beverages for 24 hours before being studied. The experimental sessions were performed again after 6 months of aerobic exercise training.
During the first study session, body fat was assessed by 7-site skinfold thickness via a Harpenden caliper. Subjects then assumed the supine position for a 10-minute measurement of resting heart rate and blood pressure. Subjects were then instrumented and tested for maximal aerobic capacity. Online computer-assisted open circuit spirometry was used to determine O2 consumption during a modified Balke protocol; subjects walked or jogged on a treadmill while the grade was increased every 2 minutes until volitional exhaustion was achieved. Throughout, a 12-lead ECG was monitored. Attainment of maximum aerobic capacity was determined by meeting
3 of the following criteria: (1) a plateau in O2 consumption despite increasing workload; (2) respiratory exchange ratio
1.10 at end exercise; (3) achievement of age-predicted maximal heart rate; and (4) a rating of perceived exertion
17 on the Borg scale of 6 to 20.
During the second study session
1 week later, respiratory sinus arrhythmia and baroreflex function were assessed. The ECG was recorded during 5 minutes of paced frequency breathing (15 breaths per minute). Paced breathing avoids breathing frequency changes that influence respiratory sinus arrhythmia magnitude and alter its relation to vagal outflow.2 Baroreflex testing was conducted using the modified Oxford technique, adapted to derive integrated gain, as well as mechanical and neural components.22 The ECG, beat-by-beat blood pressures (Finapres), and longitudinal common carotid artery ultrasound images were acquired immediately before and for 2 minutes after a bolus of 100 µg of nitroprusside, followed 60 seconds later by 150 µg of phenylephrine. Two trials of this infusion sequence were performed in each subject, and each trial was separated by
15 minutes of recovery.
Training Program
After the initial evaluation, subjects were familiarized with exercise equipment (treadmill, elliptical trainer, and bicycle) and exercise principles for the 6-month training program. Initially, training was 3 days per week at 60% to 70% of heart rate reserve (derived via the Karvonen Method: maximal heart rate–resting heart ratex[desired intensity]+resting heart rate) for 20 to 30 minutes, and all of the sessions were directly supervised. Volunteers were also encouraged to exercise on their own 1 day per week at this same intensity and duration. Over the 24-week period, exercise frequency gradually increased to 5 days, intensity to 70% to 80%, and duration to 40 minutes. For all of the exercise sessions, subjects wore a heart rate monitor (Polar S610i) programmed at a recording rate of 15-s intervals and completed an exercise log to track intensity, frequency, and duration. Over the course of training, volunteers became sufficiently independent to exercise on their own and, by the final 2 months, returned once every 2 weeks to download training data from heart rate monitors and to turn in exercise logs. The training impulse was used to quantify the exertional volume and intensity for each subject and was calculated using the recorded heart rate data for each individual exercise session.24 This parameter has been used as an integrative marker of the exercise load,25–28 because it reflects exercise intensity (heart rate), as well as frequency and duration.
Data Analysis
Time series of systolic blood pressure and R-R interval were derived using signal processing software (Powerlab, ADInstruments). Systolic blood pressure was determined from the maximum of the pressure waveform and R-R intervals from the time difference between successive R waves. Systolic carotid artery diameters were obtained via image analysis software developed in our laboratory.22 Respiratory sinus arrhythmia was quantified from power spectral analysis of each 300-s R-R interval time series during paced breathing. The time series was interpolated to 4 Hz; based on the Welch algorithm, 7 overlapping periodograms were averaged to produce the spectrum estimate for the entire time series. Power within the respiratory frequency band, defined as 0.2 to 0.3 Hz, was averaged to estimate respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Baroreflex function was estimated from the relation of systolic pressure to RR interval, as described previously.29 We assessed data from the pressure rise, because it represents baroreflex afferent activation of cardiac vagal outflow.30 Analysis began at the lowest pressure value after the bolus injection of phenylephrine and ended when pressure peaked. This selection of data points often encompasses threshold and saturation regions of the sigmoid relationship. To make the analysis objective and, therefore, independent of investigator bias, we analyzed the data via a piecewise linear regression31,32 that required
5 data points to define the presence of threshold and/or saturation (if any). To gain further insight to baroreflex function, the mechanical and neural components of the baroreflex were calculated. The mechanical transduction of pressure was assessed from the relation of carotid systolic diameter to systolic arterial pressure, and the neural transduction of stretch was assessed from the relation of R-R interval to carotid systolic diameter.22 The linear portion of these relationships was also extracted with the application of the piecewise test. It must be noted that baroreflex gain and its components were determined independent of each other, which means that threshold and saturation regions were excluded from a given relation without considering where these regions lie in the other 2 relations. Cooks distance values33 were produced for each linear model as a check to remove outliers.29 Linear relations can have a range of precision as indicated by their SE; therefore, to account for differential precision and provide the most robust estimates, a weighted mean of the 2 trials was calculated for all of the linear relations using the inverse of the SE as the weight.
Statistics
A paired t test was performed to examine the effects of training. A simple regression was used to determine the relation between the average weekly exercise (training impulse) and the effects of training on baroreflex function. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. Data are presented as mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Aerobic Capacity, Body Composition, and Resting Hemodynamics
Across all of the subjects, including those who tended to perform less exercise, maximal aerobic capacity increased on average by 13% after the training program (Table; P<0.05), and both weight and body mass index decreased (Table; P<0.05). The weight loss could be attributed to a decrease in the percentage of body fat (P<0.05). Resting heart rate and systolic pressure were also decreased after training (P<0.05), whereas diastolic pressure remained unchanged. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia was also significantly increased after exercise training (66%; P<0.05).
|
Baroreflex Function
Six months of exercise training induced, on average, a 26% increase in baroreflex gain (from 10.6±1.7 to 12.9±2.6 ms/mm Hg; P<0.05; Figure 2). In addition, exercise training induced a change in the mechanical component that did not quite reach significance (0.012±0.003 versus 0.019±0.005 mm/mm Hg; P=0.06) and a significant increase in the neural component that averaged 23% (from 811.8±88.3 to 979.6±137.3 ms/mm; P<0.05; Figure 3). Because the borderline increase in the mechanical component of the arterial baroreflex might reflect a reduction in pressure, systolic pressure was explored as a predictor of this change. However, analysis of covariance showed that systolic pressure did not explain changes in the mechanical component.
|
|
Figure 4 shows the relations between the average weekly exercise performed and the changes in baroreflex gain and its components. The increase in integrated gain was linearly related to the magnitude of the exercise stimulus (r2=0.41; P<0.05). Although exercise training tended to increase the mechanical component, this increase did not relate to the average weekly exercise performed (r2=0.02; P=0.28). In contrast, similar to integrated gain, the neural component was linearly related to the amount of exercise performed over the 6 months of training (r2=0.42; P<0.05). Regression analysis also showed that the responses to training did not relate to baseline baroreflex sensitivity (r2=0.07; P=0.21), age (r2=0.07; P=0.60), or gender (r2=0.06; P=0.22). There are reports that reductions in body fat can result in increased baroreflex gain34; therefore, we used body fat as a covariate to determine whether it might be responsible, in part, for the increase in baroreflex function. A multiple linear regression model showed that decreases in body fat did not relate to increases in either integrated baroreflex gain or its neural component. We also explored whether the resting bradycardia observed after exercise training was related to the changes in arterial baroreflex function. However, there were no significant linear relations between the increased resting R-R interval and the improvements in arterial baroreflex function. Although respiratory sinus arrhythmia also increased, this response was not correlated with the amount of exercise performed by the subjects (r2=0.01; P=0.96).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Only a very few studies have explored the potential of aerobic exercise training to improve cardiovagal baroreflex control, and these have not resulted in consistent effects. Our results suggest that exercise duration, intensity, and frequency are important factors that must be considered. For example, exercise programs <6 months and with lower intensities and frequencies than we used have not found any improvement in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity.18,20 On the other hand, despite a short duration of exercise training (3 months), Monahan et al13 reported an average 25% increase in the Valsalva response in previously sedentary older individuals. This might suggest that baroreflex gain can increase early in the duration of exercise training; however Valsalvas maneuver is a heterogenous stimulus, unloading cardiopulmonary baroreceptors,35,36 as well as differentially unloading aortic and carotid baroreceptors.36 One study reported that 11 months of aerobic training did not alter heart rate responses to phenylephrine-induced increases in arterial pressure.21 However, the use of heart rate instead of R-R interval to assess cardiovagal baroreflex gain may have masked the effects of training. Cardiac vagal outflow is most closely related to R-R interval changes,37–39 and when these previous data are examined as a function of R-R interval, exercise appears to augment cardiovagal baroreflex gain.
Increased baroreflex gain with regular aerobic exercise could derive from increased carotid distensibility that increases vessel responsiveness to pressure changes and/or neural adaptations that improve transduction of barosensory stretch into vagal outflow. Thus, we investigated the effects of exercise training on not only integrated baroreflex gain but also on its mechanical and neural components. One cross-sectional study of older master athletes suggested that cardiovagal baroreflex gain is preserved in these individuals solely because of lesser stiffening of barosensory vessels.5 However, our own previous work in masters athletes suggests that greater neural control of cardiac vagal outflow is at least as important in maintaining baroreflex function, if not more important.7 Indeed, the current longitudinal study found an increase in integrated baroreflex gain that was most closely related to increases in the neural component of the reflex. Although there was a change in the mechanical component of the reflex, it was highly variable and did not demonstrate an increase that was proportional to the exercise stimulus. It should be noted that our measurement of the relationship between systolic pressure rises and systolic carotid diameter increases is not carotid distensibility, per se. Rather, this measure reflects vascular mechanics during the pressure changes that characterize baroreflex engagement. Although arterial vascular stiffness or distensibility may relate to cardiovagal baroreflex gain,40–42 we previously found no obvious relation between basal pulsatile stiffness and mechanical pressure transduction in young untrained, older untrained, and older, physically active individuals.7
In our current study, we found that there were increases in the vessel mechanics with exercise training, but they were highly variable. For example, the mean and median percentage changes for both the integrated gain and neural component were within 2%, but the median change for the mechanical component was 25% lower than the mean change. In addition, there was only 1 case wherein the increase in integrated baroreflex gain could be attributed solely to an increase in the mechanical component, but in every other case, indeed, across the group as a whole, the change in integrated baroreflex gain tended to track the change in the neural component (r2=0.33; P<0.05). It may be that the exercise training load to increase the mechanical component of the reflex is lower than that for the neural component and, therefore, occurred earlier in the training program. If so, it would appear that these adaptations do not continue with the increasing load over time or may occur at different rates based on individual vessel properties.
It is of note that every subject but 1 increased aerobic capacity, and this subject demonstrated no training-induced bradycardia or increase in cardiovagal baroreflex gain. However, in general, neither the increase in aerobic power nor the decrease in resting heart rate bore a direct relation to the change in baroreflex function. There are data suggesting that training programs can reduce resting heart rate and increase maximal aerobic capacity without having an effect on cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity.18–20 This may suggest that, like the mechanical component of the baroreflex, the resting bradycardia and the increase in maximum oxygen consumption occur earlier during exercise training than improvements in baroreflex sensitivity.
Our results suggest that, with a sufficient exercise stimulus, the change in integrated baroreflex gain most closely relates to neural improvements in cardiovascular autonomic control. The estimated neural transduction component of the baroreflex encompasses the baroreceptors themselves, their afferent activity, central integration of this activity, generation of efferent parasympathetic outflow, and, finally, the sinoatrial node responsiveness to vagal activity. It is feasible that any one site or a combination of sites might account for the neural adaptations that we found. For example, in rats with heart failure, exercise training significantly enhances baroreceptive afferent sensitivity.43 However, from this work, it is unclear whether this might arise from the baroreceptor endings themselves or from changes in the distensibility of the carotid sinuses and/or aortic arch.44 In addition, it has been suggested that exercise training may alter central neural regulation of blood pressure through the plasticity of GABAergic systems in the hypothalamus.45 This might reverse age-related alterations in central autonomic integration46 or reductions in tonic vagal outflow.47 It is also feasible that exercise mitigates the age-related decline in cardiac muscarinic receptor density.48 However, some of our previous work suggests that age-related declines in cardiac muscarinic receptor function are not impacted by regular aerobic activity.49 Although the exact site of adaptation is not certain, our observations clearly show that exercise training has marked effects to improve cardiac vagal neural control in older individuals.
Perspectives
The resting bradycardia observed in our subjects reflects one of the hallmarks of exercise training17 and is generally thought to derive from increased cardiac vagal outflow.19,50 However, we did not find a relation between increases in R-R interval or respiratory sinus arrhythmia and the greater sensitivity of the arterial baroreflex after exercise training. This might suggest that other mechanisms could be responsible for the bradycardia. Decreased sympathetic outflow and/or decreased intrinsic heart rate51 are 2 possible mediators of the observed bradycardia. Decreased cardiac responsiveness to catecholamine infusion has been demonstrated in middle-aged active men,52 suggesting that lesser cardiac sympathetic tone may result from exercise training. Pharmacological blockade suggests that the resting bradycardia observed in young endurance athletes can be explained by a lower intrinsic heart rate.53 However, to our knowledge, this has never been investigated in older active individuals. Moreover, it may simply be that a nonlinear relation exists between the vagal changes that mediate increased baroreflex function and those that mediate increased resting R-R interval and its variability.
The current work is the first to clearly delineate the nature of the baroreflex adaptations in response to exercise training in older individuals. However, we found that only with a sufficient exercise stimulus can cardiac vagal neural control be significantly enhanced. These findings suggest that regular physical activity can be cardioprotective via improvements in cardiac vagal control and may thereby decrease cardiovascular risks associated with aging.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging (grant AG014376).
Disclosures
None.
Received January 30, 2009; first decision February 16, 2009; accepted March 9, 2009.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Kollai M, Jokkel G, Bonyhay I, Tomcsanyi J, Naszlady A. Relation between baroreflex sensitivity and cardiac vagal tone in humans. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266: H21–H27.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Lakatta EG, Levy D. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: part I: aging arteries: a "set up" for vascular disease. Circulation. 2003; 107: 139–146.
4. La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators. Lancet. 1998; 351: 478–484.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Monahan KD, Tanaka H, Dinenno FA, Seals DR. Central arterial compliance is associated with age- and habitual exercise-related differences in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1627–1632.
6. Kaushal P, Taylor JA. Interrelations among declines in arterial distensibility, baroreflex function and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 1524–1530.
7. Hunt BE, Farquhar WB, Taylor JA. Does reduced vascular stiffening fully explain preserved cardiovagal baroreflex function in older, physically active men? Circulation. 2001; 103: 2424–2427.
8. Arnett DK, Boland LL, Evans GW, Riley W, Barnes R, Tyroler HA, Heiss G. Hypertension and arterial stiffness: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. ARIC Investigators. Am J Hypertens. 2000; 13: 317–323.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L, Ducimetiere P, Benetos A. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 1236–1241.
10. Davy KP, Miniclier NL, Taylor JA, Stevenson ET, Seals DR. Elevated heart rate variability in physically active postmenopausal women: a cardioprotective effect? Am J Physiol. 1996; 271: H455–H460.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Davy KP, Seals DR, Tanaka H. Augmented cardiopulmonary and integrative sympathetic baroreflexes but attenuated peripheral vasoconstriction with age. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 298–304.
12. Bowman AJ, Clayton RH, Murray A, Reed JW, Subhan MF, Ford GA. Baroreflex function in sedentary and endurance-trained elderly people. Age Ageing. 1997; 26: 289–294.
13. Monahan KD, Dinenno FA, Tanaka H, Clevenger CM, DeSouza CA, Seals DR. Regular aerobic exercise modulates age-associated declines in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in healthy men. J Physiol. 2000; 529: 263–271.
14. Levy WC, Cerqueira MD, Harp GD, Johannessen KA, Abrass IB, Schwartz RS, Stratton JR. Effect of endurance exercise training on heart rate variability at rest in healthy young and older men. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 1236–1241.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Okazaki K, Iwasaki K, Prasad A, Palmer MD, Martini ER, Fu Q, Arbab-Zadeh A, Zhang R, Levine BD. Dose-response relationship of endurance training for autonomic circulatory control in healthy seniors. J Appl Physiol. 2005; 99: 1041–1049.
16. Lipman RD, Salisbury JK, Taylor JA. Spontaneous indices are inconsistent with arterial baroreflex gain. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 481–487.
17. Clausen JP. Effect of physical training on cardiovascular adjustments to exercise in man. Physiol Rev. 1977; 57: 779–815.
18. Sheldahl LM, Ebert TJ, Cox B, Tristani FE. Effect of aerobic training on baroreflex regulation of cardiac and sympathetic function. J Appl Physiol. 1994; 76: 158–165.
19. Seals DR, Chase PB. Influence of physical training on heart rate variability and baroreflex circulatory control. J Appl Physiol. 1989; 66: 1886–1895.
20. Loimaala A, Huikuri H, Oja P, Pasanen M, Vuori I. Controlled 5-mo aerobic training improves heart rate but not heart rate variability or baroreflex sensitivity. J Appl Physiol. 2000; 89: 1825–1829.
21. Spina RJ, Bourey RE, Ogawa T, Ehsani AA. Effects of exercise training on alpha-adrenergic mediated pressor responses and baroreflex function in older subjects. J Gerontol. 1994; 49: B277–B281.
22. Hunt BE, Fahy L, Farquhar WB, Taylor JA. Quantification of mechanical and neural components of vagal baroreflex in humans. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 1362–1368.
23. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39: 1423–1434.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Banister EW, Calvert TW. Planning for future performance: implications for long term training. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1980; 5: 170–176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Banister EW, Carter JB, Zarkadas PC. Training theory and taper: validation in triathlon athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1999; 79: 182–191.[CrossRef]
26. Candau R, Busso T, Lacour JR. Effect of training on iron status in cross-country skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1992; 64: 497–502.[CrossRef]
27. Morton RH, Fitz-Clarke JR, Banister EW. Modeling human performance in running. J Appl Physiol. 1990; 69: 1171–1177.
28. Padilla S, Mujika I, Orbananos J, Angulo F. Exercise intensity during competition time trials in professional road cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32: 850–856.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Studinger P, Goldstein R, Taylor JA. Mechanical and neural contributions to hysteresis in the cardiac vagal limb of the arterial baroreflex. J Physiol. 2007; 583: 1041–1048.
30. Eckberg DL, Sleight P. Human Baroreflexes in Health and Disease. Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon Press; 1992.
31. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1998.
32. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. Applied Linear Regression Models. 2nd ed. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc; 1989.
33. Cook RD. Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics. 1977; 19: 15–18.[CrossRef]
34. Alvarez GE, Davy BM, Ballard TP, Beske SD, Davy KP. Weight loss increases cardiovagal baroreflex function in obese young and older men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 289: E665–E669.
35. Taylor JA, Halliwill JR, Brown TE, Hayano J, Eckberg DL. Non-hypotensive hypovolaemia reduces ascending aortic dimensions in humans. J Physiol. 1995; 483: 289–298.
36. Smith ML, Beightol LA, Fritsch-Yelle JM, Ellenbogen KA, Porter TR, Eckberg DL. Valsalvas maneuver revisited: a quantitative method yielding insights into human autonomic control. J Physiol. 1996; 271: H1240–H1249.
37. Parker P, Celler BG, Potter EK, McKloskey DI. Vagal stimulation and cardiac slowing. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1984; 11: 226–231.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Koizumi K, Terui N, Kollai M. Effect of cardiac vagal and sympathetic nerve activity on heart rate in rhythmic fluctuations. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1985; 12: 251–259.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Carlsten A, Folkow B, Hamberger C-A. Cardiovascular effects of direct vagal stimulation in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1957; 41: 68–76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Kingwell BA, Dart AM, Jennings GL, Korner PI. Exercise training reduces the sympathetic component of the blood pressure heart rate baroreflex in man. Clin Sci(Lond). 1992; 82: 357–362.
41. Lage SG, Polak JF, O'Leary DH, Creager MA. Relationship of arterial compliance to baroreflex function in hypertensive patients. Am J Physiol. 1993; 265: H232–H237.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Bonyhay I, Jokkel G, Kollai M. Relation between baroreflex sensitivity and carotid artery elasticity in healthy humans. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271: H1139–H1144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Rondon E, Brasileiro-Santos MS, Moreira ED, Rondon MU, Mattos KC, Coelho MA, Silva GJ, Brum PC, Fiorino P, Irigoyen MC, Krieger EM, Middlekauff HR, Negrão CE. Exercise training improves aortic depressor nerve sensitivity in rats with ischemia-induced heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006; 291: H2801–H2806.
44. Brum PC, Da Silva GJ, Moreira ED, Ida F, Negrão CE, Krieger EM. Exercise training increases baroreceptor gain sensitivity in normal and hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 1018–1022.
45. Kramer JM, Beatty JA, Plowey ED, Waldrop TG. Exercise and hypertension: a model for central neural plasticity [review]. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002; 29: 122–126.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Itoh H, Bunag RD. Aging reduces cardiovascular and sympathetic responses to NTS injections of serotonin in rats. Exp Gerontol. 1992; 27: 309–320.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Dauchot P, Gravenstein JS. Effects of atropine on the electrocardiogram in different age groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1971; 12: 274–280.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Brodde OE, Konschak U, Becker K, Rüter F, Poller U, Jakubetz J, Radke J, Zerkowski HR. Cardiac muscarinic receptors decrease with age. In vitro and in vivo studies. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 471–478.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Lee K, Picard G, Beske SD, Hwang GS, Taylor JA. Effects of fitness and age on the response to vagotonic atropine. Auton Neurosci. 2008; 139: 60–67.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Shi X, Stevens GH, Foresman BH, Stern SA, Raven PB. Autonomic nervous system control of the heart: endurance exercise training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995; 27: 1406–1413.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Katona PG, McLean M, Dighton DH, Guz A. Sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiac control in athletes and nonathletes at rest. J Appl Physiol. 1982; 52: 1652–1657.
52. Raab W, de Paula ES, Marchet H, Kimura E, Starcheska YK. Cardiac adrenergic preponderance due to lack of physical exercise and its pathogenic implications. Am J Cardiol. 1960; 5: 300–320.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Lewis SF, Nylander E, Gaad P, Areskog NH. Nonautonomic component in bradycardia of endurance trained men at rest and during exercise. Acta Physiol Scand. 1980; 109: 297–305.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |