| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2009;53:912.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Pediatrics (E.L., E.C., I.T., F.A., J.A.), Consorcio Hospital General, University of Valencia; CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CB06/03) (E.L., I.T., F.A., J.A., J.R.), Instituto de Salud Carlos III; and Hypertension Clinic (J.R.), Hospital Clinico, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Correspondence to Empar Lurbe, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Consorcio Hospital General, University of Valencia, Avda Tres Cruces s/n. 46014 Valencia, Spain. E-mail empar.lurbe{at}uv.es
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: birth weight obesity adolescents blood pressure augmentation index
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BP phenotype is determined not only by conventional risk factors but also by early life programming based on intrauterine fetal growth retardation.1–3 During childhood, there is a mismatch between the conditions for which the fetus is programmed in utero and the environment that the child meets. Consequently, BP is influenced both by size at birth4 as well as by weight gain in childhood.5 The adverse effects of excessive weight gain on BP, and the association of weight gain with a higher incidence of hypertension later in life, represent major issues in health care.5–9 Indeed, because of the increasing tendency of obesity to appear during childhood and to track, to some extent, into adult life,10,11 children with low birth weight (BW) who become obese could be at particularly high risk for an undesired increase in BP.12 However, the impact of growth during fetal life and of obesity on BP characteristics has not been addressed previously.
Abnormalities in BP are accompanied by functional changes in the vascular tree, and evidence of early alterations in vascular function has been described in children and adolescents with low BW.13 These alterations are manifested not only in high BP14 but also in an increment in BP variability,15 pulse pressure (PP),16 and in the impact of reflecting waves on central PP.13 These intermediate phenotypes can be the expression of functional or structural abnormalities from fetal life.
The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of obesity and low BW on office and ambulatory BP values in normotensive youths. In addition, early functional vascular changes were analyzed as well by using aortic-derived parameters from peripheral recordings: the Sphygmocor method.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In obese and nonobese subjects, gestational age and BW were obtained from routine obstetric records. Subjects included in the present study were born at term (
37 weeks), after a normotensive pregnancy. Subjects were divided into 4 groups according to the presence or absence of obesity and according to a BW lower than the 10th percentile for gestational age (low BW) or higher (normal BW).17
Clinical Procedures
Body weight was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg using a standard beam balance scale with the subjects wearing light indoor clothing and no shoes. Height was recorded to the nearest 0.5 cm using a standardized wall-mounted height board.
On the day of ambulatory BP monitoring, trained clinic nurses measured the BP of each subject 3 times consecutively in the seated position, at 5-minute intervals, using a mercury sphygmomanometer. This was done on the nondominant arm, with a cuff and a bladder size adjusted to upper-arm girth.18 Office BP values were taken as the mean of 3 measurements. Office BP had to be persistently greater than or equal to the 95th percentile of the BP distribution in a normal reference population on
3 separate occasions to be considered indicative of a hypertensive condition.18 All included subjects were normotensive by office measurement. Ambulatory BP monitoring was measured using a validated oscillometric device (Spacelabs model 90207; Spacelabs, Inc.) following a previously described protocol.19
The following parameters were calculated for each subject: average of systolic BP, diastolic BP, PP, and heart rate (HR) for office BP; and average of systolic BP, diastolic BP, PP, and HR for ambulatory BP, 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime periods.
Aortic-Derived Parameters
Pressure waveforms were recorded from the radial artery of the wrist of the dominant hand with a high-fidelity micromanometer (SPC-301; Millar Instruments) after being seated and having rested for
5 minutes. The waveform data were then processed by the SphygmoCor radial/aortic transform software module (SphygmoCor; PWV Medical) to produce the estimated aortic pressure waveform.20,21 The series of estimated aortic waveforms, together with the series of radial waveforms from which these were derived, were each ensemble-averaged over an 8-second period into a single calibrated waveform. The Augmentation Index (AI) is defined as the difference between the second and first systolic peaks expressed in mm Hg or as a percentage of the PP. Although the method has not been validated specifically for children, there are data available that support the validity of the technique in this age group. Vascular properties of the upper-limb vessels vary little with age, in contrast to the changes observed in trunk and lower-limb vessels.22 This allows for constructs of central aortic pressure derived from the radial waveform, whatever the age, when good quality peripheral pulse tracings are obtained.
Statistical Analysis
Values were expressed as mean±SE for each study group. The differences in BP mean values among the different groups were assessed through analysis of variance covariate by sex and height. Bonferroni correction was applied in the case of multiple comparisons. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed using office and ambulatory BP values as dependent variables, with age, sex, obesity, and low BW as independent variables. Two-way analysis of variance for multiple comparisons was used to compare the 24-hour BP circadian pattern. The difference in AI values within groups was examined using analysis of variance covariate by height, HR, and office diastolic BP. A formal test was performed to assess whether an interaction of BP values or aortic-derived parameters exists between obesity and low BW. Values of 2-sided P<0.05 were set as the minimum level of statistical significance throughout the article.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
BP and HR Values
The means of the systolic BP, diastolic BP, PP, and HR for office and ambulatory 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime periods for the groups adjusted by sex and height are shown in Table 2. Significant differences in systolic BP, diastolic BP, or PP were observed within groups. However, the differences were more prominent for systolic BP than were those observed for diastolic BP. Office, 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic BP values were significantly higher in those subjects with low BW who became obese, as shown in Table 2. The lowest BP values were present in nonobese subjects in the absence of low BW. In the middle, with similar BP values, were the nonobese subjects with low BW and the obese subjects in the absence of low BW. Despite these differences among the groups, no interaction existed between obesity and low BW in the office (P=0.165) or ambulatory (P=0.603) systolic BP values. Differences among groups were also observed for ambulatory HRs, with the highest values belonging to the 2 obese groups.
|
Significant differences in 24-hour systolic BP circadian pattern among the 4 groups (P=0.003) are shown in Figure 1. Obese low BW subjects had the highest systolic BP values over the 24 hours, whereas the nonobese subjects in the absence of low BW had the lowest values. In between these 2 extreme groups, there were the systolic BP values of the other 2 groups: nonobese low BW and obese in the absence of low BW. No differences in circadian variability were observed among the 4 groups.
|
Using a multiple regression analysis, the influence of obesity and low BW on the office and ambulatory systolic BP were assessed adjusting for age and sex. Whereas the presence of obesity in these children was significantly associated with office systolic BP, both obesity and low BW were independently associated with ambulatory systolic BP, 24-hour BP, and daytime and nighttime BP (Table 3; P<0.01). When current BMI and BW were introduced into the model as continuous variables, both parameters were significantly associated with office systolic BP (P<0.05). In a similar model with ambulatory systolic BP as the dependent variable, BW only achieved borderline significance (P<0.091), whereas BMI remained nominally significant (P<0.001). However, it should be noted that because participants were originally selected from the extremes of the BW distribution, a model that includes BW as a continuous variable may introduce statistical error.
|
Aortic-Derived Parameters
The aortic-derived parameters were analyzed in a subsample total of 149 subjects, of whom 73 (49%) were obese and 76 (51%) had normal weight. In the low BW group, there were 32 (44%) obese subjects and 34 (45%) nonobese ones. The general characteristics of the patients in each of the 4 subgroups did not differ from the total study population (data not shown).
The office- and the aortic-derived parameters of the 4 groups are shown in Table 4. Office systolic BP and diastolic BP were similar, as described above, for the total population. The derived aortic systolic and diastolic values were significantly higher in the obese groups when compared with those of the nonobese groups, the higher values being those corresponding to the obese low BW group. The AI, the parameter used to estimate the pulse wave reflection expressed in mm Hg or by the percentage of aortic PP, was significantly higher in the nonobese low BW group when compared with the other groups (Table 4). These differences between the low BW group and the other groups remained significant after controlling for height, HR, and office diastolic BP (Figure 2). A significant interaction between low BW and obesity (P<0.005) existed. Likewise, the amplification phenomenon from central to peripheral vascular tree, calculated by using the radial to aortic PP ratio, tended to be lower in the low BW groups when compared with that of the other BW groups, although the differences were not statistically significant.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Epidemiological studies have repeatedly documented the association between fetal growth impairment, low BW, and BP elevation, and even hypertension,23 although not all are in agreement that BW has a relationship with BP level later in life.24 In children and adolescents, the contribution of intrauterine environment, as reflected by BW, to ambulatory BP has also been observed.14 Subjects with the lowest BW tend not only to have the highest systolic BP values and variability15 but also the highest PP values.16 These BP phenotypes become manifested early in life, because a rapid rise in BP during the first weeks after birth has been observed in low BW newborns.4 All of these abnormalities may be the expression of functional or structural abnormalities established from fetal life as a consequence of an adverse intrauterine environment.
Considering low BW as one expression of a cardiovascular risk syndrome, studies of the functional characteristics of the vascular tree offer an opportunity to further clarify the underlying susceptibility long before structural vascular disease has been established. Indeed, evidence of early alterations in vascular function has been described.25 An increment in the AI, a quantitative measure of the contribution of wave reflection to the central pressure waveform, was described previously in low BW by our group,13 and it has been confirmed in the present study performed on a different subset of subjects. The inverse relationship was independent of other determinants of wave reflection such as height, HR, and office diastolic BP. These results are also in concordance with a previous report in adults that described an inverse relationship between BW and pulse wave velocity, a marker of aortic elasticity and one of the main determinants of reflecting waves.26
The impact of low BW on growth during early childhood, a time when excessive weight gain may predispose to later overweight or obesity, is not well established. However, the contribution of childhood body weight gain to BP values in low BW children is a matter of concern. In infants born at term, upward percentile crossing for weight was associated with higher later BP, insulin resistance, and risk for obesity.27
The impact of overweight and obesity on BP values has been well established. Substantial clinical and epidemiological evidence supports the influence of obesity on BP levels, even early in life.28,29 Obesity increases BP values across age, race, and sex. Furthermore, a significant reduction in BP values is achieved after losing weight. In the present study, significantly higher BP values, office as well as ambulatory, were observed in obese subjects when compared with those of subjects in the normal percentile of BMI. Obesity-associated BP elevation is characterized by increased vascular volume as a consequence of increased sodium reabsorption in the kidney.30 Despite the large bulk of evidence of BP elevation in obese subjects, few studies have analyzed the characteristics of the reflecting wave associated with obesity. No differences in AI have been observed across tertiles of BMI in healthy subjects,31 nor has obesity been related to lower peripheral wave reflection in subjects with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus.32 The results from these studies are in agreement with the present results, in which not only the obese children have a "normal" AI, but obesity also blunts the increased AI observed in low BW children. However, the results may not be representative of the entire population at risk, and it cannot be generalized to non-whites at present.
The role of wave reflections as an early change in the evolution of vascular disease is being recognized increasingly,3 and the incremental value of AI may be relevant in normotensive youths. For the first time, the effect of both low BW and obesity on BP values and on the AI has been explored early in the natural history of functional vascular alterations. On becoming obese, low BW children have significantly higher office and ambulatory BP values. However, the AI values are near those observed in nonobese subjects with normal BW. The precise mechanisms that lead to this apparent discrepancy in the AI cannot be inferred from the data of the present study. Perhaps volume overload in the obese subjects blunts the impact of the reflecting waves in the pulse wave contour, reducing the elevation of the systolic peak over the wave shoulder. Nevertheless, BP values are the highest in low BW subjects who have become obese. Prospective studies may be useful in assessing the features of vascular loading beyond those obtained from BP measurements.
Clinical Perspectives
The presence of these abnormalities of BP phenotype and vascular function may be expressions of early vascular ageing susceptibility because the structural and mechanical properties of the large arteries can be permanently affected by altered hemodynamic stress early in life. Low BW children and adolescents who became obese have higher BP values early in life even when the impact of reflecting waves in central BP parameters is diminished when compared with those of nonobese low BW children. The addition of obesity to low BW increases the risk of vascular complications later in life. Consequently, overweight and obesity should be prevented, especially in low BW children.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was partially funded by CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CB06/03), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain.
Disclosures
None.
Received January 13, 2009; first decision January 28, 2009; accepted April 7, 2009.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Hales CN, Ozanne SE. The dangerous road of catch-up growth. J Physiol. 2003; 547: 5–10.
3. Nilsson PM, Lurbe E, Laurent S. The early life origins of vascular ageing and cardiovascular risk: the EVA syndrome. J Hypertens. 2008; 26: 1049–1057.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Lurbe E, Garcia-Vicent C, Torro I, Fayos JL, Aguilar F, de Llano JM, Fuertes G, Redón J. First-year blood pressure increase steepest in low birthweight newborns. J Hypertens. 2007; 25: 81–86.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Barker DJ, Osmond C, Forsén TJ, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG. Trajectories of growth among children who have coronary events as adults. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 1802–1809.
6. Wright CM, Parker L, Lamont D, Craft AW. Implications of childhood obesity for adult health: findings from thousand families cohort study. BMJ. 2001; 323: 1280–1284.
7. Lawlor DA, Leon DA. Association of body mass index and obesity measured in early childhood with risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in middle age: findings from the Aberdeen children of the 1950s prospective cohort study. Circulation. 2005; 111: 1891–1896.
8. Viner RM, Segal TY, Lichtarowicz-Krynska E, Hindmarsh P. Prevalence of the insulin resistance syndrome in obesity. Arch Dis Child. 2005; 90: 10–14.
9. Sinaiko AR, Steinberger J, Moran A, Prineas RJ, Vessby B, Basu S, Tracy R, Jacons DR Jr. Relation of body mass index and insulin resistance to cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory factors, and oxidative stress during adolescence. Circulation. 2005; 111: 1985–1991.
10. Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, Seidel KD, Dietz WH. Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337: 869–873.
11. Must A. Does overweight in childhood have an impact on adult health? Nutr Rev. 2003; 61: 139–142.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Freedman DS, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The relation of overweight to cardiovascular risk factors among children and adolescents: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 1999; 103: 1175–1182.
13. Lurbe E, Torro MI, Carvajal E, Alvarez V, Redón J. Birth weight impacts on wave reflections in children and adolescents. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 646–650.
14. Lurbe E, Redon J, Alvarez V, Durazo R, Gomez A, Tacons J, Cooper RS. Relationship between birth weight and awake blood pressure in children and adolescents in absence of intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Hypertens. 1996; 9: 787–794.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Lurbe E, Torro I, Rodríguez C, Alvarez V, Redón J. Birth weight influences blood pressure values and variability in children and adolescents. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 389–393.
16. Lurbe E, Torró I, Alvarez V, Aguilar F, Redon J. The impact of birth weight on pulse pressure during adolescence. Blood Press Monit. 2004; 9: 187–192.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from live born birth weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 1963; 32: 793–800.
18. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004; 114: 555–576.
19. Lurbe E, Redon J. Reproducibility and validity of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children. Am J Hypertens. 2002; 15: 69S–73S.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Takazawa K, O'Rourke M, Fujita M, Tanaka N, Takeda K, Kurosu F, Ibukiyama C. Estimation of ascending aortic pressure from radial arterial pressure using a generalized transfer function. Z Kardiol. 1996; 85 (suppl III): 137–139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Karamanoglu M, Gallagher DE, Avolio AP, O'Rourke MF. Pressure wave propagation in a multibranched model of the human upper-limb. Am J Physiol. 1995; 269: H1363–H1369.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, Pak PH, Yin FCP, Maughan WL, Kass DA. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure: validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1827–1836.
23. Huxley RR, Shiell AW, Law CM. The role of size at birth and postnatal catch-up growth in determining systolic blood pressure: a systematic review of the literature. J Hypertens. 2000; 18: 815–831.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Falkner B, Hulman S, Kushner H. Effect of birth weight on blood pressure and body size in early adolescence. Hypertension. 2004; 43: 203–207.
25. Martin H, Hu J, Gennser G, Norman M. Impaired endothelial function and increased carotid stiffness in 9-year-old children with low birthweight. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2739–2744.
26. Martyn CN, Barker DJP, Jespersen S, Greenwald S, Osmond C, Berry C. Growth in utero, adult blood pressure and arterial compliance. Br Heart J. 1995; 73: 116–121.
27. Singhal A, Cole TJ, Fewtrell M, Kennedy K, Stephenson T, Elias-Jones A, Lucas A. Promotion of faster weight gain in infants born small for gestational age: is there an adverse effect on later blood pressure? Circulation. 2007; 115: 213–220.
28. Lurbe E, Alvarez V, Redon J. Obesity, body fat distribution, and ambulatory blood pressure in children and adolescents. J Clin Hypertens. 2001; 3: 362–367.[CrossRef]
29. Lurbe E, Invitti C, Torro I, Maronati A, Aguilar F, Sartorio A, Redon J, Parati G. The impact of the degree of obesity on the discrepancies between office and ambulatory blood pressure values in youth. J Hypertens. 2006; 24: 1557–1564.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Sorof J, Daniels S. Obesity hypertension in children: a problem of epidemic proportions. Hypertension. 2002; 40: 441–447.
31. Wykretowicz A, Adamska K, Guzik P, Krauze T, Wysocki H. Indices of vascular stiffness and wave reflection in relation to body mass index or body fat in healthy subjects. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007; 34: 1005–1009.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Maple-Brown LJ, Piers LS, O'Rourke MF, Celermajer DS, O'Dea K. Central obesity is associated with reduced peripheral wave reflection in Indigenous Australians irrespective of diabetes status. J Hypertens. 2005; 23: 1403–1407.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Hypertension 2009 53: 905-906.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. T. Lackland High Blood Pressure: A Lifetime Issue Hypertension, September 1, 2009; 54(3): 457 - 458. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Falkner and S. DeLoach Refining the Blood Pressure Phenotype in Children: When Does Target Organ Damage Begin? Hypertension, June 1, 2009; 53(6): 905 - 906. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |