| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2009;54:1062.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Physiology (Z.G., A.K.C., E.W.I.) and the Vascular Biology Center (J.S.P., J.L.H.), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.
Correspondence to Professor Edward W. Inscho, Department of Physiology, CA3137, Medical College of Georgia, 1120, 15th Street, Augusta, GA 30912. E-mail einscho{at}mail.mcg.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, β, and
subunits of ENaC in freshly isolated preglomerular microvascular smooth muscle cells. These results demonstrate that selective ENaC inhibitors attenuate afferent arteriolar myogenic responses and suggest that ENaC may function as mechanosensitive ion channels initiating pressure-dependent myogenic responses in rat juxtamedullary afferent arterioles.
Key Words: myogenic response epithelial sodium channel amiloride benzamil juxtamedullary nephrons autoregulatory response
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Currently several hypotheses have been proposed for linking mechanical stimuli to the cellular events producing a myogenic response. These include involvement of stretch-activated cation channels, perturbation of the actin cytoskeleton, specialized membrane domains, or extracellular matrix proteins such as integrins.8,9,14–16 The role of stretch-activated cation channels in the myogenic response was indirectly demonstrated in isolated perfused hydronephrotic rat kidneys lacking TGF responses.17 In this model, pressure-mediated vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles was abolished during nonselective cation channel blockade by gadolinium and attenuated by reducing the extracellular sodium concentration.17 However, other studies showed that the myogenic response of mesenteric arteries,18 cerebral arteries,19 and afferent arterioles from hydronephrotic kidneys20 was unchanged by a low-sodium medium.
Epithelial sodium channels (ENaC) consist of 3 subunits (
, β, and
)21 and are heavily expressed in the apical membrane of epithelial cells in several organs, including the distal tubules in kidneys, where they facilitate Na+ reabsorption.22 Since the discovery that ENaC was a mechanosensor in Caenorhabditis elegans,23,24 similar mechanosensor roles have been postulated for ENaC in other species and cell types.25–31 Recent studies by Jernigan and Drummond14,15,32 suggest that ENaC may be part of a mechanosensitive ion channel complex involved in myogenic responses in isolated perfused rat cerebral and mouse intrarenal arteries. Single smooth muscle cells collected from these arteries were found to express β and
-ENaC subunits.14,15 Furthermore, the selective ENaC blocker amiloride, or its more potent analogue, benzamil, attenuated or abolished myogenic vasoconstriction in isolated cerebral and intrarenal arteries.14,15,33,34
Although all segments of the preglomerular vasculature contribute to myogenic control of whole kidney autoregulation, the afferent arteriole provides the principle resistance adjustment determining autoregulatory efficiency.6 A recent study using afferent arterioles from hydronephrotic rat kidneys showed that the myogenic response was unaltered by perfusion with amiloride or benzamil.20 To test the hypothesis that ENaC is involved in the myogenic response, we performed this study using the in vitro blood-perfused rat juxtamedullary nephron preparation, where the autoregulatory behavior of afferent arterioles was directly assessed under conditions where vascular/tubular organization was retained. We found that the myogenic response of rat juxtamedullary afferent arterioles was significantly attenuated by the ENaC blockers, amiloride and benzamil, but responses to KCl-induced depolarization were unchanged.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kidney Preparation
Experiments were performed in vitro, using the blood-perfused juxtamedullary nephron technique, as described previously.35,36 Briefly, 2 rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection (50 mg/kg) of pentobarbital sodium for each experiment. The right kidney from the kidney donor was cannulated via the superior mesenteric artery during continuous perfusion with Tyrode buffer containing 5.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Calbiochem) and L-amino acids.37 Blood was collected into a heparinized syringe (500 IU) via a carotid artery cannula and processed with blood collected from a blood donor rat. The kidney was harvested and sectioned along the longitudinal axis on the dorsal two-thirds of the kidney. The ends of the large arteries were tied with 10-0 nylon suture to restore renal perfusion pressure. Glomeruli and microvessels were exposed by careful removal of connective tissue covering the inner cortical surface.
After completion of the dissection, the chamber containing the prepared kidney was attached to the stage of a Nikon Eclipse E600FN microscope (Nikon) equipped with a Nikon water-immersion objective (40x). The perfusate was switched to the reconstituted blood from a sealed pressurized reservoir continuously gassed with 95%O2/5%CO2. The surface of the kidney was superfused with 37°C Tyrode buffer containing 1% BSA. The image of the perfused kidney was displayed on a video monitor via a high-resolution NC-70 Newvicon video camera (DAGE-MTI) and recorded on DVD for later analysis.
Perfusion pressure was monitored directly within the perfusion cannula via a polyethylene line connected to a pressure transducer (Model TRN005, Kent Scientific Corporation) linked to a chart recorder (Model 201, Cole Parmer). Perfusion pressure was held constant at 100 mm Hg during equilibration. To minimize TGF influences, the region of afferent arteriole chosen for this study was selected from the first 1/3 segment of afferent arteriole to the midpoint of arteriolar length. Vascular inner diameters were measured at 12-s intervals using a calibrated image-shearing monitor (Model 908, Vista Electronics), and the steady-state arteriolar diameter was calculated from the average of all diameter measurements obtained during the final 2 minutes of each treatment period.
Experimental Protocol
Each protocol began with a 5-minute control period at a perfusion pressure of 100 mm Hg after an initial equilibration period (at least 10 minutes). After the control period, which established the baseline arteriolar diameter (baseline diameter), a papillectomy was performed to eliminate TGF influences on autoregulatory responses,38–40 and the arteriole was refocused at the same site. After another 10-minute stabilization period, the superfusate was continued (Control group) or switched to a similar solution containing either amiloride (5 or 10 µmol/L) or its analogue, benzamil (1 or 10 µmol/L), for a 30-minute incubation, and then pressure-mediated myogenic responses of afferent arterioles were assessed by lowering perfusion pressure from 100 mm Hg (control diameter) to 70 mm Hg, followed by stepwise increases in perfusion pressure from 70 to 160 mm Hg at 30-mm Hg intervals (5 minutes each). Perfusion pressure was returned to 100 mm Hg at the end of each protocol. At end of the experiment, some arterioles were exposed to a modified Tyrode buffer containing 55 mmol/L KCl (substituted for NaCl) and 1% BSA for 5 minutes to determine the effect of depolarization on afferent arteriolar diameter in the presence or absence of ENaC inhibitors.
Additionally, to determine the impact of luminal delivery of ENaC blockers on the myogenic response of juxtamedullary afferent arterioles, amiloride was added to the perfusate blood in 2 separate groups of rats. Similar to the above protocol, 10 minutes after papillectomy a fresh amiloride solution (100 or 500 µmol/L) was directly added into the perfusate blood to achieve an amiloride concentration of 1 or 5 µmol/L, respectively, while the kidney was superfused with 1% BSA solution. After 30 minutes incubation, pressure-mediated autoregulatory responses were assessed as described above.
Immunofluorescence Staining in Single Preglomerular Microvascular Smooth Muscle Cells
For immunostaining of ENaC subunit protein expression, single preglomerular microvascular smooth muscle cells were freshly isolated as described previously.41 Briefly, rats were anesthetized and the kidneys were perfused with 5.2% BSA followed by 0.5% Evans blue and removed in ice-cold physiological buffer solution (PBS). Preglomerular microvessels, consisting of interlobular arteries and afferent arterioles, were carefully separated from the cortex under a stereomicroscope and transferred to an enzymatic digestion solution containing 0.05% dithiothreitol, 0.14% papain, and 0.4% BSA dissolved in PBS at 36.5°C. After a 20-minute incubation period, the mixture was centrifuged (1000 rpm for 5 minutes) to collect the dispersed cells. The cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes and air-dried on positive charged glass slides at 37°C. The slides were rinsed in PBS and blocked in 5% normal goat serum for 1 hour. The cells were incubated overnight (4°C) with primary antibody for rat
, β, or
-ENaC. To establish expression of all ENaC subunits in preglomerular microvascular smooth muscle cells and to control for variability in antibody specificity, antibodies for each subunit were obtained from 3 different sources including Chemicon (1:100;
, β, and
-ENaC antibodies), Affinity BioReagents Inc, (1:100; β and
-ENaC antibodies), and a kind gift from Dr Heather Drummond (Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson; 1:4000; β and 1:500;
-ENaC antibodies).14 The cells were rinsed in PBS and incubated with secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG with an Alexa Fluor 594 tag (1:100, Invitrogen) for 1 hour and with the nuclear stain, DAPI (300 nmol/L, Invitrogen), for 5 minutes at room temperature. After a final rinse with PBS, samples were covered with Gel-Mount mounting medium and cover-slips. Negative controls were prepared by omitting the primary antibodies of each ENaC subunit with the rest of process identical. Images of immunostained cells were captured using an Olympus BX40F-3 fluorescence microscope equipped with an Olympus DP70 digital camera using DP Controller software (Olympus Optical Co Ltd).
Statistical Analysis
All values are expressed as a mean±SEM. Afferent arteriolar responses were normalized and analyzed as a percentage of the control diameter or as symmetrized percent changes.42 Because the trend of the 2 normalization techniques was not distinguishable, we only present the percentage of control diameter data in the Results section. Within-group analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance for repeated measures combined with the Newman-Keuls multiple range test. Differences between groups, within each series, were determined using a Student-Newman-Keuls multiple range test. Probability values <0.05 were considered to indicate significant differences.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Inhibition of the Myogenic Response by Superfusion of Amiloride
The effect of superfusion with a potent ENaC inhibitor, amiloride, on pressure-mediated afferent arteriolar diameter responses is depicted in Figure 1. In control vessels, the afferent arteriole exhibited pressure-dependent vascular responses as perfusion pressure was varied between 70 and 160 mm Hg. Afferent arteriolar diameter averaged 13.0±1.3 µm at perfusion pressure of 100 mm Hg. Reducing perfusion pressure to 70 mm Hg increased arteriolar diameter to 14.7±1.2 µm (Figure 1A, P<0.05), which is 115±4% of the control diameter at 100 mm Hg (Figure 1B). The diameter decreased to 88±1 and 81±2% of the control diameter when the perfusion pressure was increased to 130 and 160 mm Hg, respectively (Figure 1B). The pressure-diameter relationship indicates an intact myogenic response. The profile of the myogenic response was unchanged by superfusion of 5 µmol/L amiloride (Figure 1). In contrast, kidneys superfused with 10 µmol/L amiloride exhibited an attenuated autoregulatory response. Afferent arteriolar diameter did not change significantly when perfusion pressure was reduced to 70 mm Hg or increased up to 160 mm Hg (Figure 1). The relationship between pressure and diameter was relatively flat, indicating reduced myogenic activity.
|
Inhibition of the Myogenic Response by Superfusion of Benzamil
We also tested a more specific ENaC blocker, benzamil, on the pressure-mediated afferent arteriolar myogenic response. As shown in Figure 2, superfusion with a low concentration of benzamil (1 µmol/L) did not alter afferent arteriolar responses to the changes in perfusion pressure. Afferent arteriolar diameter averaged 111±2, 96±1, 86±2 and 82±2% of the control diameter at perfusion pressure of 70, 100, 130 and 160 mm Hg, respectively (Figure 2B). This pressure-diameter profile was similar to control kidneys. However, afferent arteriolar autoregulatory responses were significantly blunted by 10 µmol/L benzamil (Figure 2). The relatively flat pressure-diameter relationship in the presence of benzamil is consistent with the impaired autoregulatory response observed in the presence of amiloride.
|
Inhibition of the Myogenic Response by Blood Perfusion With Amiloride
To determine whether intravascular delivery of ENaC inhibitors may inhibit the myogenic response, we added amiloride to the blood perfusing the vascular lumen rather than using adventitial exposure in the superfusate. As shown in Figure 3, perfusion with 1 µmol/L amiloride had no detectable effect on pressure-mediated responses compared to control kidneys. However, 5 µmol/L amiloride in the perfusate markedly attenuated the pressure-mediated afferent arteriolar vasoconstrictor response (Figure 3).
|
Intact Membrane Depolarization During ENaC Blockade
A central component of the myogenic response is activation of L-type calcium channels by depolarization. Consequently, we verified the voltage-dependent vasoconstriction during ENaC inhibition. KCl (55 mmol/L) was applied to some kidneys at the end of experiments. As seen in Figure 4, although the myogenic response of afferent arterioles was inhibited by application of amiloride or benzamil, the vasoconstriction induced by exposure to KCl was intact during ENaC blockade. The reduction in arteriolar diameter in response to KCl was similar in each group in the absence and presence of ENaC inhibitors.
|
Expression of ENaC in Preglomerular Microvascular Smooth Muscle Cells
To assess ENaC expression, we isolated single smooth muscle cells from preglomerular microvessels. As shown in Figure 5A and 5B, all 3 subunits of ENaC (
, β, and
) were detected in the smooth muscle cells freshly isolated from preglomerular microvessels. No staining was observed in negative control samples when the primary antibodies were omitted (Figure 5A and 5B). Expression of
, β, and
-ENaC subunits were confirmed using specific antibodies from 3 different sources (the positive staining for β and
-ENaC antibodies obtained from Affinity BioReagents Inc was not shown). Each cell was confirmed by the positive nuclear staining with DAPI (negative control DAPI staining not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, β, and
) are expressed in preglomerular microvascular smooth muscle cells. These studies support the hypothesis that ENaC may constitute part of a mechnosensitive ion channel complex triggering myogenic responses. The kidney uses the myogenic and TGF mechanisms to accomplish whole kidney autoregulation of renal blood flow.4 Therefore, we performed a papillectomy to eliminate TGF influences and measurements were made near the midpoint of arteriolar length (at a distance of 58% to 64% away from the glomeruli) to isolate the myogenic responses from TGF influences. Under these conditions, pressure-mediated autoregulatory responses reflect myogenic control mechanisms.38–40 In the absence of ENaC inhibitors, increasing perfusion pressure caused appropriate decreases in afferent arteriolar diameter and decreasing perfusion pressure led to predictable increases in afferent arteriolar diameter, indicating that pressure-mediated autoregulatory influences exist in this preparation after papillectomy. Amiloride (10 µmol/L) superfused on the inner cortical surface markedly attenuated pressure-mediated afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction. Benzamil is a benzyl-substituted amiloride analogue that is more potent than amiloride and that imposes a longer acting inhibition of ENaC than amiloride.22 Benzamil (10 µmol/L) also blunted pressure-mediated afferent arteriolar responses. The present findings suggest a role for ENaC in the myogenic signaling cascade that is consistent with the observations of others in different vascular beds.14,15,33,34
A central element of the myogenic signaling cascade is vascular smooth muscle membrane depolarization and activation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels.8 An early study in mouse neuroblastoma cells suggested that amiloride inhibited T-type Ca2+ channels dose-dependently with an IC50 of 30 µmol/L.43 Additionally, both amiloride (IC50 at 1700 µmol/L) and benzamil (IC50 at 56 µmol/L) inhibited L-type Ca2+ channels in GH3 anterior pituitary cells.44 Therefore, in the current study, KCl was applied to kidneys to verify that voltage-dependent contractile mechanisms were intact during ENaC inhibition. Data indicate that KCl-mediated vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles was unaffected by ENaC inhibition. This is strong evidence that the depolarizing function of afferent arteriolar smooth muscle is intact and that the inhibitory effect of amiloride or benzamil on afferent arteriolar myogenic responses acts upstream of membrane depolarization in the myogenic signaling cascade.
Early studies showed that amiloride and benzamil have a high affinity for ENaC with an IC50 in the submicromolar range.22,45 In addition to specific inhibition of ENaC, amiloride is also reported to inhibit other signaling mechanisms including the Na+/H+ exchanger, the Na+/K+-ATPase and Na+/Ca2+ exchange system.45–47 However, the nonspecific inhibitory effects of amiloride on these mechanisms require about 20-fold more amiloride than is required for ENaC blockade.48–51 For example, the IC50 of amiloride for inhibiting the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger is 1000 µmol/L whereas the IC50 of amiloride for inhibiting the Na+/H+ exchanger is 84 µmol/L52 and is increased up to millimolar concentrations when Na+ concentrations reach 100 mmol/L.53 In addition, amiloride reportedly blocks transient receptor potential (TRP) channel currents.54–56 Several subfamilies of TRP are localized to vascular smooth muscle or endothelial cells, and they are implicated in vascular mechanotransduction in cerebral arteries and in modulation of afferent arteriolar reactivity.57–61 However, the concentration of amiloride required to block TRP channels is usually 10- to 100-fold greater (ranging from 100 to 1000 µmol/L) than the concentration applied in this study.54–56
Compared to isolated vessel studies,14,15 we found that we needed higher concentrations of amiloride and benzamil in the superfusion solution to block the afferent arteriolar myogenic response than were effective in isolated pressurized mouse intrarenal arteries. This discrepancy may be attributable to differences in participation of ENaC in myogenic responses in different segments of preglomerular vessels, or to species differences (rat versus mouse), or the route of drug delivery. If amiloride is applied only in the bath, a higher concentration is needed to block the myogenic response33,34 than when amiloride is applied on both sides of the vessels.14,15 Further, Oyabe et al34 observed that amiloride acted slowly, and that the time required for the maximum inhibition of pressure-mediated cerebral arterial vasoconstriction was concentration-dependent. Low concentrations of amiloride needed longer incubation periods to inhibit myogenic responses in cerebral arteries. This could explain why lower concentrations of amiloride or benzamil had little effect on the myogenic response of afferent arterioles in the current study. Collectively, it is unlikely that the inhibition of pressure-mediated vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles by amiloride or benzamil reflects nonspecific effects.
Alternatively, it may reflect differences in the delivery systems used. In the current study, amiloride was given either luminally or to the adventitial side of the vessel. When amiloride was administered in the perfusate blood, 5 µmol/L amiloride was sufficient to diminish the myogenic response, similar to the inhibitory effect seen in mouse intrarenal arteries.15 This concentration is 50% lower than the concentration needed for adventitial treatment. Accordingly, amiloride is more effective when delivered via the vascular lumen. Possibly application of amiloride in the perfusate blood allows it to enter the capillary circulation and distribute more rapidly through the interstitial fluid space, thus enhancing vascular exposure and facilitating a lower concentration of amiloride to inhibit myogenic responses. Another possibility is that luminal amiloride inhibits endothelial ENaC and enhances endothelial modulation of myogenic vasoconstrictor activities.62 It is important to note that myogenic responses are endothelium-independent, but vasoactive agents released by the endothelium can modulate vasoconstrictor responses.
In a recent study, the role of ENaC in the myogenic response of afferent arterioles was examined in hydronephrotic rat kidneys.20 The myogenic response was unaltered by administering amiloride or benzamil or by reducing extracellular Na+ concentration from 140 to 100 mmol/L. Indeed, the myogenic response was enhanced by 1 µmol/L benzamil. Also, the vasorelaxation that occurred on restoring extracellular Na+ concentration to normal was attenuated by benzamil (10 µmol/L), suggesting that benzamil may partially inhibit Na+/Ca2+ exchangers. In contrast, a more recent study showed that the myogenic response of rat cremaster first order arterioles was impaired by inhibitors of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger or by decreasing the extracellular Na+ concentration,9 although reducing extracellular Na+ concentration led to arteriolar constriction similar to that reported for arterioles from hydronephrotic kidneys.20 The latter study suggests a contribution of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger to myogenic vasoconstriction in isolated rat cremaster arterioles.9
Because ENaC are heavily expressed in distal tubular cells, one potential problem in detecting protein and mRNA expression of ENaC in the renal microvasculature is possible contamination of vascular tissue samples with distal tubular cells. However, the immunolabeling studies of ENaC using freshly isolated single smooth muscle cells from renal microvessels provides a reliable means to clearly localize ENaC expression specifically to the vascular smooth muscle cells. Clearly, both β and
-ENaC are expressed in the smooth muscle cells collected from preglomerular microvasculature, whereas neither β nor
-ENaC staining are present in the negative controls. This result is consistent with different sources of antibodies and also consistent with the findings of Jernigan and Drummond in mouse intrarenal arteries.15 However, we also detected expression of
-ENaC in our cells. This differs from the observation of Jernigan and Drummond,15 where
-ENaC expression was not detected in single cells isolated from mouse intrarenal arteries. The discrepancy may reflect differences in single cells from different preglomerular vascular segments or different species. Taken together, immunostaining of ENaC in preglomerular microvascular smooth muscle cells combined with afferent arteriolar sensitivity to ENaC blockers suggests that ENaC may act as mechanosensors in mediating myogenic autoregulatory responses in afferent arterioles.
In conclusion, this study presents immunofluorescent images establishing that preglomerular microvascular smooth muscle cells express ENaC subunits. Functional studies provide compelling evidence that pressure-mediated myogenic responses of afferent arterioles are attenuated by application of amiloride or benzamil, while KCl-induced vasoconstriction is preserved. These data suggest that ENaC blockers act upstream of membrane depolarization and support the hypothesis that ENaC may function as a mechanosensitive ion channel complex participating in myogenic responses of rat afferent arterioles.
Perspectives
The myogenic response is inherent in the renal, coronary, cerebral, and mesenteric vasculature. Impairment of myogenic control is a risk factor for renal injury, coronary artery disease, and stroke. A role for ENaC in the preglomerular myogenic response is a new concept. Afferent arterioles are the major vessels responsible for renal autoregulation. Therefore, it is important to understand the mechanisms of renal autoregulatory control. Better understanding of the mechanotransduction pathway underlying the myogenic response will provide a clearer understanding of vascular physiology and pathology and will aid in reducing end-organ damage during arterial pressure fluctuations.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (DK 44628 and HL074167). Z.G. is the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Greater Southeast Affiliate of the American Heart Association.
Disclosures
None.
Received June 19, 2009; first decision July 7, 2009; accepted August 4, 2009.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bidani AK, Griffin KA. Pathophysiology of hypertensive renal damage: implications for therapy. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 595–601.
3. Loutzenhiser R, Griffin K, Williamson G, Bidani A. Renal autoregulation: new perspectives regarding the protective and regulatory roles of the underlying mechanisms. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006; 290: R1153–R1167.
4. Navar LG, Inscho EW, Majid SA, Imig JD, Harrison-Bernard LM, Mitchell KD. Paracrine regulation of the renal microcirculation. Physiol Rev. 1996; 76: 425–536.
5. Bell PD, Lapointe JY, Peti-Peterdi J. Macula densa cell signaling. Annu Rev Physiol. 2003; 65: 481–500.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Carmines PK, Inscho EW, Gensure RC. Arterial pressure effects on preglomerular microvasculature of juxtamedullary nephrons. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 1990; 258: F94–F102.
7. Davis MJ, Hill MA. Signaling mechanisms underlying the vascular myogenic response. Physiol Rev. 1999; 79: 387–423.
8. Hill MA, Davis MJ, Meininger GA, Potocnik SJ, Murphy TV. Arteriolar myogenic signalling mechanisms: implications for local vascular function. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2006; 34: 67–79.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Raina H, Ella SR, Hill MA. Decreased activity of the smooth muscle Na+/Ca2+ exchanger impairs arteriolar myogenic reactivity. J Physiol. 2008; 586: 1669–1681.
10. Cohen AJ, Fray JC. Calcium ion dependence of myogenic renal plasma flow autoregulation: evidence from the isolated perfused rat kidney. J Physiol. 1982; 330: 449–460.
11. Harder DR. Pressure-dependent membrane depolarization in cat middle cerebral artery. Circ Res. 1984; 55: 197–202.
12. Casellas D, Carmines PK, Dupont M, Redon P, Moore LC. Arteriolar renin and vascular effects of angiotensin II in juxtamedullary nephrons. Kidney Int Suppl. 1990; 30: S60–S64.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Inscho EW, Imig JD, Cook AK. Afferent and efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction to angiotensin II and norepinephrine involves release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 222–227.
14. Drummond HA, Gebremedhin D, Harder DR. Degenerin/epithelial Na+ channel proteins: components of a vascular mechanosensor. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 643–648.
15. Jernigan NL, Drummond HA. Vascular ENaC proteins are required for renal myogenic constriction. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005; 289: F891–F901.
16. Balasubramanian L, Ahmed A, Lo CM, Sham JS, Yip KP. Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction in renal vascular smooth muscle cells: activation of calcium sparks. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007; 293: R1586–R1594.
17. Takenaka T, Suzuki H, Okada H, Hayashi K, Kanno Y, Saruta T. Mechanosensitive cation channels mediate afferent arteriolar myogenic constriction in the isolated rat kidney. J Physiol. 1998; 511: 245–253.
18. Watanabe J, Horiguchi S, Keitoku M, Karibe A, Takeuchi M, Suzuki S, Satoh S, Shirato K. The role of extracellular cations in the development of myogenic contraction in isolated rat small arteries. Jpn Circ J. 1996; 60: 239–246.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Nelson MT, Conway MA, Knot HJ, Brayden JE. Chloride channel blockers inhibit myogenic tone in rat cerebral arteries. J Physiol. 1997; 502: 259–264.
20. Wang X, Takeya K, Aaronson PI, Loutzenhiser K, Loutzenhiser R. Effects of amiloride, benzamil, and alterations in extracellular Na+ on the rat afferent arteriole and its myogenic response. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008; 295: F272–F282.
21. Canessa CM, Schild L, Buell G, Thorens B, Gautschi I, Horisberger JD, Rossier BC. Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature. 1994; 367: 463–467.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Garty H, Palmer LG. Epithelial sodium channels: function, structure, and regulation. Physiol Rev. 1997; 77: 359–396.
23. Driscoll M, Chalfie M. The mec-4 gene is a member of a family of Caenorhabditis elegans genes that can mutate to induce neuronal degeneration. Nature. 1991; 349: 588–593.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Huang M, Chalfie M. Gene interactions affecting mechanosensory transduction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1994; 367: 467–470.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Lane JW, McBride DW Jr, Hamill OP. Amiloride block of the mechanosensitive cation channel in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol. 1991; 441: 347–366.
26. Canessa CM, Horisberger JD, Rossier BC. Epithelial sodium channel related to proteins involved in neurodegeneration. Nature. 1993; 361: 467–470.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Drummond HA, Price MP, Welsh MJ, Abboud FM. A molecular component of the arterial baroreceptor mechanotransducer. Neuron. 1998; 21: 1435–1441.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Furness DN, Hackney CM, Benos DJ. The binding site on cochlear stereocilia for antisera raised against renal Na+ channels is blocked by amiloride and dihydrostreptomycin. Hear Res. 1996; 93: 136–146.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Welsh MJ, Price MP, Xie J. Biochemical basis of touch perception: mechanosensory function of degenerin/epithelial Na+ channels. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 2369–2372.
30. Du S, Araki I, Mikami Y, Zakoji H, Beppu M, Yoshiyama M, Takeda M. Amiloride-sensitive ion channels in urinary bladder epithelium involved in mechanosensory transduction by modulating stretch-evoked adenosine triphosphate release. Urology. 2007; 69: 590–595.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Drummond HA, Grifoni SC, Jernigan NL. A new trick for an old dogma: ENaC proteins as mechanotransducers in vascular smooth muscle. Physiology (Bethesda). 2008; 23: 23–31.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Jernigan NL, Drummond HA. Myogenic vasoconstriction in mouse renal interlobar arteries: role of endogenous beta and gamma ENaC. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006; 291: F1184–F1191.
33. Henrion D, Laher I, Klaasen A, Bevan JA. Myogenic tone of rabbit facial vein and posterior cerebral artery is influenced by changes in extracellular sodium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1994; 266: H377–H383.
34. Oyabe A, Masumoto N, Ueta K, Nakayama K. Amiloride-sensitive pressure-induced myogenic contraction in rat cerebral artery. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2000; 14: 369–377.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Casellas D, Navar LG. In vitro perfusion of juxtamedullary nephrons in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 1984; 246: F349–F358.
36. Inscho EW, Imig JD, Deichmann PC, Cook AK Candesartan cilexetil protects against loss of autoregulatory efficiency in angiotensin II-infused rats. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10 Suppl 11: S178–S183.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Carmines PK, Navar LG. Disparate effects of Ca2+ channel blockade on afferent and efferent arteriolar responses to Ang II. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 1989; 256: F1015–F1020.
38. Takenaka T, Harrison-Bernard LM, Inscho EW, Carmines PK, Navar LG. Autoregulation of afferent arteriolar blood flow in juxtamedullary nephrons. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 1994; 267: F879–F887.
39. Walker II, M, Harrison-Bernard LM, Cook AK, Navar LG. Dynamic interaction between myogenic and TGF mechanisms in afferent arteriolar blood flow autoregulation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000; 279: F858–F865.
40. Inscho EW, Cook AK, Imig JD, Vial C, Evans RJ. Physiological role for P2X1 receptors in renal microvascular autoregulatory behavior. J Clin Invest. 2003; 112: 1895–1905.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Zhao X, Cook AK, Field M, Edwards B, Zhang S, Zhang Z, Pollock JS, Imig JD, Inscho EW. Impaired Ca2+ signaling attenuates P2X receptor-mediated vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles in angiotensin II hypertension. Hypertension. 2005; 46: 562–568.
42. Berry DA, Ayers GD. Symmetrized percent changes for treatment comparisons. Am Statistician. 2006; 60: 27–31.[CrossRef]
43. Tang CM, Presser F, Morad M. Amiloride selectively blocks the low threshold (T) calcium channel. Science. 1988; 240: 213–215.
44. Garcia ML, King VF, Shevell JL, Slaughter RS, Suarez-Kurtz G, Winquist RJ, Kaczorowski GJ. Amiloride analogs inhibit L-type calcium channels and display calcium entry blocker activity. J Biol Chem. 1990; 265: 3763–3771.
45. Kleyman TR, Yulo T, Ashbaugh C, Landry D, Cragoe E Jr, Karlin A, Al-Awqati Q. Photoaffinity labeling of the epithelial sodium channel. J Biol Chem. 1986; 261: 2839–2843.
46. Soltoff SP, Mandel LJ. Amiloride directly inhibits the Na,K-ATPase activity of rabbit kidney proximal tubules. Science. 1983; 220: 957–958.
47. Teiwes J, Toto RD. Epithelial sodium channel inhibition in cardiovascular disease. A potential role for amiloride. Am J Hypertens. 2007; 20: 109–117.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Kellenberger S, Schild L. Epithelial sodium channel/degenerin family of ion channels: a variety of functions for a shared structure. Physiol Rev. 2002; 82: 735–767.
49. Waldmann R, Bassilana F, de Weille J, Champigny G, Heurteaux C, Lazdunski M. Molecular cloning of a non-inactivating proton-gated Na+ channel specific for sensory neurons. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 20975–20978.
50. Kleyman TR, Cragoe EJ Jr. The mechanism of action of amiloride. Semin Nephrol. 1988; 8: 242–248.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Kashlan OB, Sheng S, Kleyman TR. On the interaction between amiloride and its putative alpha-subunit epithelial Na+ channel binding site. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 26206–26215.
52. Kleyman TR, Cragoe EJ Jr. Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport. J Membr Biol. 1988; 105: 1–21.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Boron WF, Boulpaep EL. Intracellular pH regulation in the renal proximal tubule of the salamander. Na-H exchange. J Gen Physiol. 1983; 81: 29–52.
54. Inoue R, Okada T, Onoue H, Hara Y, Shimizu S, Naitoh S, Ito Y, Mori Y. The transient receptor potential protein homologue TRP6 is the essential component of vascular alpha1-adrenoceptor-activated Ca2+-permeable cation channel. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 325–332.
55. Dai XQ, Ramji A, Liu Y, Li Q, Karpinski E, Chen XZ. Inhibition of TRPP3 channel by amiloride and analogs. Mol Pharmacol. 2007; 72: 1576–1585.
56. Foller M, Kasinathan RS, Koka S, Lang C, Shumilina E, Birnbaumer L, Lang F, Huber SM. TRPC6 contributes to the Ca2+ leak of human erythrocytes. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2008; 21: 183–192.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Welsh DG, Morielli AD, Nelson MT, Brayden JE. Transient receptor potential channels regulate myogenic tone of resistance arteries. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 248–250.
58. Earley S, Waldron BJ, Brayden JE. Critical role for transient receptor potential channel TRPM4 in myogenic constriction of cerebral arteries. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 922–929.
59. Sharif-Naeini R, Dedman A, Folgering JH, Duprat F, Patel A, Nilius B, Honore E. TRP channels and mechanosensory transduction: insights into the arterial myogenic response. Pflugers Arch. 2008; 456: 529–540.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Folgering JH, Sharif-Naeini R, Dedman A, Patel A, Delmas P, Honore E. Molecular basis of the mammalian pressure-sensitive ion channels: focus on vascular mechanotransduction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008; 72: 180–195.
61. Fellner SK, Arendshorst WJ. Angiotensin II-stimulated Ca2+ entry mechanisms in afferent arterioles: role of transient receptor potential canonical channels and reverse Na+/Ca2+ exchange. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008; 294: F212–F219.
62. Perez FR, Venegas F, Gonzalez M, Andres S, Vallejos C, Riquelme G, Sierralta J, Michea L. Endothelial epithelial sodium channel inhibition activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase via phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt in small-diameter mesenteric arteries. Hypertension. 2009; 53: 1000–1007.
Related Article:
Hypertension 2009 54: 962-963.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. A. Drummond Yes, No, Maybe So: ENaC Proteins as Mediators of Renal Myogenic Constriction Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): 962 - 963. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |