Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on July 29, 2002

Hypertension. 2002
Published online before print July 29, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000028978.99648.D0
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/3/298    most recent
01.HYP.0000028978.99648.D0v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hermida, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ayala, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hermida, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ayala, D. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

Submitted on May 15, 2002
Revised on June 11, 2002

Prognostic Value of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements in Pregnancy

Ramón C. Hermida* and Diana E. Ayala

From Bioengineering and Chronobiology Laboratories, University of Vigo, Campus Universitario, Vigo, Spain.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rhermida{at}tsc.uvigo.es.

Abstract—With the objective to assess the prognostic value of office values as compared with ambulatory monitoring in pregnancy, we analyzed 2430 blood pressure series systematically sampled from 403 untreated pregnant women for 48 consecutive hours every 4 weeks from the first visit to the hospital until delivery. Women were divided into 5 groups: "detected" gestational hypertension, women with office blood pressures >140/90 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation and hyperbaric index (area of blood pressure excess above the upper limit of a time-specified tolerance interval) consistently above the threshold for diagnosing hypertension in pregnancy; "undetected" gestational hypertension, office values <140/90 mm Hg but hyperbaric index above the threshold for diagnosis; normotension, both office values and hyperbaric index below the thresholds for diagnosis; white coat hypertension, women with recorded diagnosis of gestational hypertension but hyperbaric index consistently below the threshold for diagnosis; and preeclampsia, defined as gestational hypertension and proteinuria. Results indicate small and nonsignificant differences in 24-hour mean of ambulatory pressures between "detected" and "undetected" gestational hypertension at all stages of pregnancy, in contrast with highly significant differences between these two groups and normotensive pregnancies. Average office blood pressure values were similar for preeclampsia, "detected," and "undetected" gestational hypertension. The hyperbaric index was, however, significantly higher for women with preeclampsia after 20 weeks of gestation as compared with all other groups and higher for women with either "detected" or "undetected" gestational hypertension as compared with normotensive pregnant women. The incidence of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation were similar for "detected" and "undetected" gestational hypertension but significantly lower for normotensive women. In pregnancy, the hyperbaric index derived from ambulatory monitoring is markedly superior to office measurements for diagnosis of what should be truly considered gestational hypertension, as well as for prediction of the outcome of pregnancy.


Key words: blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory • hypertension, pregnancy • preeclampsia • blood pressure determination




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. C. Hermida, D. E. Ayala, and M. Iglesias
Differences in Circadian Pattern of Ambulatory Pulse Pressure Between Healthy and Complicated Pregnancies
Hypertension, September 1, 2004; 44(3): 316 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. C. Hermida and D. E. Ayala
Sampling Requirements for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Hypertension in Pregnancy
Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 619 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. C. Hermida, D. E. Ayala, and M. Iglesias
Administration Time-Dependent Influence of Aspirin on Blood Pressure in Pregnant Women
Hypertension, March 1, 2003; 41(3): 651 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]