| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on October 9, 2002
From the Departments of Internal Medicine (S.A.R.H., A.A.K., P.W.d.L.), Clinical Neurophysiology (W.H.M.), and Neurology (J.L.), University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands; the Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University (S.A.R.H., M.P.J.v.B., J.J.); European Graduate School of Neuroscience (EURON) (M.P.J.v.B., J.J.); and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) (S.A.R.H., A.A.K., W.H.M., J.L., P.W.d.L.). * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: P.deleeuw{at}intmed.unimaas.nl.
Abstract--In studies on carotid artery intima-media thickness and stroke, researchers implicitly assume that cerebrovascular abnormalities show a symmetrical distribution. To evaluate whether there is a difference in intima-media thickness between the 2 carotids, we compared left and right common carotid artery intima-media thickness as measured by B-mode ultrasonography in a group of 102 untreated hypertensive patients. This yielded a significant difference between both sides (left, 0.75±0.11 mm; right, 0.71±0.11 mm; P<0.001). This was associated with a higher cross-sectional area of the intima-media complex and a higher flow velocity at the left side. Arterial diameters, however, were not different. We also assessed whether there is a side preference with respect to cerebrovascular accidents. To this end, we explored our population-based Stroke Registry of 1843 subjects and indeed found a significantly higher incidence of nonlacunar cerebrovascular stroke at the left side, whereas lacunar infarcts were symmetrically distributed. Our findings suggest a predilection for cerebrovascular disease at the left side, which may be related to greater hemodynamic stress and intimal damage in the left carotid artery.
Revised on November 12, 2002
Is There a Side Predilection for Cerebrovascular Disease?
Sergio A. Rodríguez Hernández;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M S. Sanjari, K G. Falavarjani, M Mehrabani, L Ghiasian, and B Zamani Retrobulbar haemodynamics and carotid wall thickness in patients with non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy Br J Ophthalmol, May 1, 2009; 93(5): 638 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukuhara and K. Hida Pulsatility index at the cervical internal carotid artery as a parameter of microangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2006; 25(5): 599 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. R. Hernandez, A. A. Kroon, and P. W. de Leeuw Response Hypertension, December 1, 2003; 42 (6): e18 - e18. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Foerch, A. Buehler, S. von Kegler, and M. Sitzer Intima-Media Thickness Side Differences Are Limited to the Common Carotid Artery Hypertension, December 1, 2003; 42 (6): e17 - e17. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, October 6, 2003; 327(7418): E254 - 254. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, July 17, 2003; 327(7407): 172 - 172. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |