Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on May 16, 2005

Hypertension. 2005
Published online before print May 16, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000166746.04472.60
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/1/44    most recent
01.HYP.0000166746.04472.60v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Contreras, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Contreras, G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*AMLODIPINE BESYLATE
*METOPROLOL
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood Pressure Medicines
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Clinical Studies

Submitted on December 15, 2004
Revised on January 4, 2005

Blood Pressure Control, Drug Therapy, and Kidney Disease

Gabriel Contreras*; Tom Greene; Lawrence Y. Agodoa; DeAnna Cheek; George Junco; James Lash; Michael Lipkowitz; Edgar R. Miller III; Akinlou Ojo; Mohammed Sika; Beth Wilkening; Robert D. Toto; for the African American Study of Kidney Disease Hypertension (AASK) Study Group Investigators

From the University of Miami (G.C., G.J.), Miami, Fla; The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (T.G), Cleveland, Ohio; National Institutes of Health (L.Y.A.), Washington, DC; Rush University Medical Center (J.L.), Chicago, Ill; Mount Sinai Hospital (M.L.), New York, NY; Johns Hopkins University (E.R.M.), Baltimore, Md; University of Michigan (A.O.), Ann Arbor, Mich; Vanderbilt University (M.S.), Nashville, Tenn; Emory University (B.W.), Atlanta, Ga; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (R.D.T.), Dallas, Tex.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gcontrer{at}med.miami.edu.

Abstract--The African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension examined the effect on renal function decline of 2 blood pressure (BP) goals (low mean arterial pressure [MAP] ≤92 versus usual MAP 102 to 107 mm Hg) and 3 antihypertensives (ramipril versus amlodipine versus metoprolol). We previously reported that in all drug groups combined the BP intervention had similar effects on the primary outcome of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) slope or the main secondary clinical composite outcome of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), death, or GFR decline by 50% or 25 mL/min per 1.73 m2. This report examines the effect of the BP intervention separately in the 3 drug groups. The BP effect was similar among the drug groups for either GFR slope or the main clinical composite. However, the BP effect differed significantly among the drug groups for the composite of ESRD or death (P=0.035) and ESRD alone (P=0.021). Higher event rates for amlodipine patients assigned to the usual BP goal (0.087 per patient-year for ESRD or death and 0.064 per patient-year for ESRD) were seen compared with the remaining groups of the factorial design (range, 0.041 to 0.050 for ESRD or death; and range, 0.027 to 0.036 for ESRD). The low BP goal was associated with reduced risk of ESRD or death (risk reduction 51%; 95% confidence interval, 13% to 73%) and ESRD (54%; 8% to 77%) for amlodipine patients, but not for patients assigned to the other drug groups. These secondary analyses suggest a benefit of the low BP goal among patients assigned to amlodipine, but they must be interpreted cautiously.


Key words: angiotensin converting enzyme • calcium channel blockers • hypertension • renal disease