Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on July 24, 2006

Hypertension. 2006
Published online before print July 24, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000231662.77359.de
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/3/374    most recent
01.HYP.0000231662.77359.dev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leenen, F. H.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leenen, F. H.H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*AMLODIPINE BESYLATE
*LISINOPRIL
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on February 20, 2006
Revised on March 13, 2006

Clinical Events in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomly Assigned to Calcium Channel Blocker Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial

Frans H.H. Leenen*; Chuke E. Nwachuku; Henry R. Black; William C. Cushman; Barry R. Davis; Lara M. Simpson; Michael H. Alderman; Steven A. Atlas; Jan N. Basile; Aloysius B. Cuyjet; Richard Dart; James V. Felicetta; Richard H. Grimm; L. Julian Haywood; Syed Z.A. Jafri; Michael A. Proschan; Udho Thadani; Paul K. Whelton; Jackson T. Wright;; for the Antihypertensive Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) Collaborative Research Group

From the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (F.H.H.L.), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (M.A.P., C.E.N.), Bethesda, Md; Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center (H.R.B.), Chicago, Ill; Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center (W.C.C.), Tenn; University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health (B.R.D., L.M.S.), Houston; Albert Einstein College of Medicine (M.H.A.), Bronx, NY; Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center (S.A.A.), NY; Charleston Veterans Affairs Medical Center (J.N.B.), SC; New Jersey Medical School (A.B.C.), Newark; Marshfield Clinic (R.D.), Marshfield, Wis; Carl T. Hayden Veterans Affairs Medical Center (J.V.F.), Phoenix, Ariz; Berman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research (R.H.G.), Minneapolis, Minn; Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center (L.J.H.); Fargo Veterans Affairs Medical Center (S.Z.A.J.), ND; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and Veterans Affairs Medical Center (U.T.), Oklahoma City; Tulane University Health Sciences Center (P.K.W.), New Orleans, La; University Hospitals of Cleveland (J.T.W.), Ohio.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fleenen{at}ottawaheart.ca.

Abstract--The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) provides a unique opportunity to compare the long-term relative safety and efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and calcium channel blocker-initiated therapy in older hypertensive individuals. Patients were randomized to amlodipine (n=9048) or lisinopril (n=9054). The primary outcome was combined fatal coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, stroke, combined cardiovascular disease (CVD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cancer, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Mean follow-up was 4.9 years. Blood pressure control was similar in nonblacks, but not in blacks. No significant differences were found between treatment groups for the primary outcome, all-cause mortality, ESRD, or cancer. Stroke rates were higher on lisinopril in blacks (RR=1.51, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.86) but not in nonblacks (RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.28), and in women (RR=1.45, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.79), but not in men (RR=1.10, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.31). Rates of combined CVD were higher (RR=1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12) because of higher rates for strokes, peripheral arterial disease, and angina, which were partly offset by lower rates for heart failure (RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96) on lisinopril compared with amlodipine. Gastrointestinal bleeds and angioedema were higher on lisinopril. Patients with and without baseline coronary heart disease showed similar outcome patterns. We conclude that in hypertensive patients, the risks for coronary events are similar, but for stroke, combined CVD, gastrointestinal bleeding, and angioedema are higher and for heart failure are lower for lisinopril-based compared with amlodipine-based therapy. Some, but not all, of these differences may be explained by less effective blood pressure control in the lisinopril arm.


Key words: antihypertensive therapy • hypertension, detection and control • calcium channel blockers • angiotensin-converting enzyme • cardiovascular diseases • stroke • heart failure


Related Article:

Amlodipine Better Than Lisinopril?: How One Randomized Clinical Trial Ended Fallacies From Observational Studies
Franz H. Messerli and Jan A. Staessen
Hypertension 2006 48: 359-361. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. R. Miller, S. A. Oliveria, D. R. Berlowitz, B. G. Fincke, P. Stang, and D. E. Lillienfeld
Angioedema Incidence in US Veterans Initiating Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1624 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J.-G. Wang, Y. Li, S. S. Franklin, and M. Safar
Prevention of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction by Amlodipine and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: A Quantitative Overview
Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 181 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
CCB vs. ACE Inhibitor in High-Risk Hypertension
Journal Watch Cardiology, September 27, 2006; 2006(927): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
F. H. Messerli and J. A. Staessen
Amlodipine Better Than Lisinopril?: How One Randomized Clinical Trial Ended Fallacies From Observational Studies
Hypertension, September 1, 2006; 48(3): 359 - 361.
[Full Text] [PDF]