on August 28, 2006
Published online before print August 28, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000238330.08894.17
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on April 17, 2006
From the BMEYE (B.E.W., I.G.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Physiology (N.W.), Institute for Cardiovascular Research-Vrije University, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Physiology (J.M.K.), Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and the Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering (A.A.), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: berend.westerhof{at}bmeye.com.
Abstract--Wave reflections affect the proximal aortic pressure and flow waves and play a role in systolic hypertension. A measure of wave reflection, receiving much attention, is the augmentation index (AI), the ratio of the secondary rise in pressure and pulse pressure. AI can be limiting, because it depends not only on the magnitude of wave reflection but also on wave shapes and timing of incident and reflected waves. More accurate measures are obtainable after separation of pressure in its forward (Pf) and reflected (Pb) components. However, this calculation requires measurement of aortic flow. We explore the possibility of replacing the unknown flow by a triangular wave, with duration equal to ejection time, and peak flow at the inflection point of pressure (FtIP) and, for a second analysis, at 30% of ejection time (Ft30). Wave form analysis gave forward and backward pressure waves. Reflection magnitude (RM) and reflection index (RI) were defined as RM=Pb/Pf and RI=Pb/(Pf+Pb), respectively. Healthy subjects, including interventions such as exercise and Valsalva maneuvers, and patients with ischemic heart disease and failure were analyzed. RMs and RIs using FtIP and Ft30 were compared with those using measured flow (Fm). Pressure and flow were recorded with high fidelity pressure and velocity sensors. Relations are: RMtIP=0.82RMmf+0.06 (R2=0.79; n=24), RMt30=0.79RMmf+0.08 (R2=0.85; n=29) and RItIP=0.89RImf+0.02 (R2=0.81; n=24), RIt30=0.83RImf+0.05 (R2=0.88; n=29). We suggest that wave reflection can be derived from uncalibrated aortic pressure alone, even when no clear inflection point is distinguishable and AI cannot be obtained. Epidemiological studies should establish its clinical value.
Revised on May 3, 2006
Quantification of Wave Reflection in the Human Aorta From Pressure Alone. A Proof of Principle
Berend E. Westerhof*;
Key words: aorta • blood flow • blood flow velocity • blood pressure • pulse
Related Article:
Hypertension 2006 48: 543-545.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Hashimoto and S. Ito Some mechanical aspects of arterial aging: physiological overview based on pulse wave analysis Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2009; 3(5): 367 - 378. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Chirinos, P. Segers, A. K. Gupta, A. Swillens, E. R. Rietzschel, M. L. De Buyzere, J. N. Kirkpatrick, T. C. Gillebert, Y. Wang, M. G. Keane, et al. Time-Varying Myocardial Stress and Systolic Pressure-Stress Relationship: Role in Myocardial-Arterial Coupling in Hypertension Circulation, June 2, 2009; 119(21): 2798 - 2807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. G. Kips, E. R. Rietzschel, M. L. De Buyzere, B. E. Westerhof, T. C. Gillebert, L. M. Van Bortel, and P. Segers Evaluation of Noninvasive Methods to Assess Wave Reflection and Pulse Transit Time From the Pressure Waveform Alone Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): 142 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Westerhof, J. P. van den Wijngaard, J. P. Murgo, and B. E. Westerhof Response to Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity, Reflection Site Distance, and Augmentation Index Hypertension, January 1, 2009; 53(1): e10 - e10. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. E. Westerhof, I. Guelen, W. J. Stok, H. A. J. Lasance, C. A. P. L. Ascoop, K. H. Wesseling, N. Westerhof, W. J. W. Bos, N. Stergiopulos, and J. A. E. Spaan Individualization of transfer function in estimation of central aortic pressure from the peripheral pulse is not required in patients at rest J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1858 - 1863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. E. Westerhof, J. P. van den Wijngaard, J. P. Murgo, and N. Westerhof Location of a Reflection Site Is Elusive: Consequences for the Calculation of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Hypertension, September 1, 2008; 52(3): 478 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Qasem and A. Avolio Response to Modeled Decomposition of Aortic Pressure Waveforms Does Not Provide Estimates for Pulse Wave Velocity Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): e61 - e61. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Qasem and A. Avolio Determination of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity From Waveform Decomposition of the Central Aortic Pressure Pulse Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 188 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Segers, E. R. Rietzschel, M. L. De Buyzere, S. J. Vermeersch, D. De Bacquer, L. M. Van Bortel, G. De Backer, T. C. Gillebert, P. R. Verdonck, and on behalf of the Asklepios investigators Noninvasive (Input) Impedance, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Wave Reflection in Healthy Middle-Aged Men and Women Hypertension, June 1, 2007; 49(6): 1248 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. F. Mitchell Response to Timing and Amplitude of Wave Reflection Hypertension, January 1, 2007; 49(1): E4 - E4. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. F. Mitchell Triangulating the Peaks of Arterial Pressure Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 543 - 545. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|