This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Polk, B. F. Articles by Vandenburgh, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Polk, B. F. Articles by Vandenburgh, M.

Hypertension, Vol 2, 221-227, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

An evaluation of the Vita-Stat automatic blood pressure measuring device

BF Polk, B Rosner, R Feudo and M Vandenburgh

Four Vita-Stat (VS) automatic, coin-operated, blood pressure measuring devices were evaluated for accuracy and precision. Under field conditions, 342 adults had two blood pressure measurements with both the VS device and with the Random-Zero (RZ) device. Two of the VS machines gave significantly higher systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values, compared to the RZ values. The mean difference between these two units and the RZ device were clinically important (14.0 and 6.9 mm Hg SBP; 7.5 and 6.8 mm Hg DBP), and resulted in the misclassification of 23% of normotensives as hypertensives. We observed a significant order effect on SBP with the VS device, with a mean decrement of 4.9 mm Hg between the first and second SBP values, compared to 0.6 mm Hg with the RZ device. Even after adjusting for this bias, all four VS devices gave significantly more variable SBP readings than the RZ unit; two of the four also gave more variable DBP values. These data suggest that the VS device is neither accurate nor precise enough at the present time to be recommended for widespread use. These findings also raise questions concerning the monitoring of performance of this and similar devices in the field.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. G. Pickering, J. E. Hall, L. J. Appel, B. E. Falkner, J. Graves, M. N. Hill, D. W. Jones, T. Kurtz, S. G. Sheps, and E. J. Roccella Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 697 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G. Pickering, J. E. Hall, L. J. Appel, B. E. Falkner, J. Graves, M. N. Hill, D. W. Jones, T. Kurtz, S. G. Sheps, and E. J. Roccella Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research Hypertension, January 1, 2005; 45(1): 142 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Lewis, E. Boyle, L. Magharious, and M. G. Myers Evaluation of a community-based automated blood pressure measuring device Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 1, 2002; 166(9): 1145 - 1148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Yarows, S. Julius, and T. G. Pickering Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Arch Intern Med, May 8, 2000; 160(9): 1251 - 1257. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J M. Bland and D. G Altman Measuring agreement in method comparison studies Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 1999; 8(2): 135 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. L. Shuler, N. Allison, S. Holcomb, M. Harlan, J. McNeill, G. Robinett, and S. P. Bagby Accuracy of an Automated Blood Pressure Device in Stable Inpatients: Optimum vs Routine Use Arch Intern Med, April 13, 1998; 158(7): 714 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Whitcomb, A. Prochazka, M. LoVerde, and R. L. Byyny Failure of the Community-Based Vita-Stat Automated Blood Pressure Device to Accurately Measure Blood Pressure Arch Fam Med, May 1, 1995; 4(5): 419 - 424. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. H. Bailey and J. H. Bauer A Review of Common Errors in the Indirect Measurement of Blood Pressure: Sphygmomanometry Arch Intern Med, December 27, 1993; 153(24): 2741 - 2748. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Mundt, L. E. Chambless, C. B. Burnham, and G. Heiss Measuring Ankle Systolic Blood Pressure: Validation of the Dinamap 1846 SX Angiology, July 1, 1992; 43(7): 555 - 566. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Hunt, E. D. Frohlich, M. Moser, E. J. Roccella, and E. A. Keighley Devices Used for Self-Measurement of Blood Pressure: Revised Statement of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Arch Intern Med, December 1, 1985; 145(12): 2231 - 2234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. J. Mroczek and J. F. Burris Nonpharmacologic Treatment of Hypertension Arch Intern Med, September 1, 1985; 145(9): 1741 - 1743. [Abstract] [PDF]