Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1995;25:14-21

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delacrétaz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Brunner, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delacrétaz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Brunner, H. R.

(Hypertension. 1995;25:14-21.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Characterization of the Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist TCV-116 in Healthy Volunteers

Etienne Delacrétaz; Jürg Nussberger; Jerôme Biollaz; Bernard Waeber; Hans R. Brunner

From the Division of Hypertension and the Division of Clinical Pharmacology (J.B.), University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Correspondence to Hans R. Brunner, Division of Hypertension, CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the inhibitory effect of TCV-116, an orally active angiotensin II (Ang II) antagonist, on the pressor action of exogenous Ang II and to determine the compensatory rise in plasma renin activity and Ang II levels. Twenty-three male volunteers were treated for 8 days in a double-blind fashion with either placebo or TCV-116 (1, 2, or 4 mg PO daily) and challenged on the first, fourth, and eighth days with repeated bolus injections of Ang II. An additional 4 subjects received 8 mg PO daily in a single-blind fashion. The inhibitory effect on the systolic blood pressure response to Ang II was long lasting and clearly dose related. Six hours after 4 mg TCV-116, the systolic blood pressure response to a given dose of Ang II was reduced to 40±4% and 35±8% of baseline value on days 1 and 8, respectively. TCV-116 induced a dose-related increase in plasma renin activity and Ang II levels that was more pronounced on the eighth than on the first day of drug administration. Despite this compensatory mechanism, the relation between the time-integrated systolic blood pressure response to Ang II and the time-integrated CV-11974 levels, the active metabolite of TCV-116, was not different between days 1 and 8. In conclusion, TCV-116 appears to be a well-tolerated, orally active, potent, and long-lasting antagonist of Ang II in men.


Key Words: angiotensin II • aldosterone • renin • dose-response relationship, drug




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
V. P. Singh, B. Le, R. Khode, K. M. Baker, and R. Kumar
Intracellular Angiotensin II Production in Diabetic Rats Is Correlated With Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis, Oxidative Stress, and Cardiac Fibrosis
Diabetes, December 1, 2008; 57(12): 3297 - 3306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. A. Miller, D. Z. Cherney, J. A. Duncan, V. Lai, K. D. Burns, C. R.J. Kennedy, J. Zimpelmann, W. Gao, D. C. Cattran, and J. W. Scholey
Gender Differences in the Renal Response to Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2006; 17(9): 2554 - 2560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Azizi, A. Bissery, M. Lamarre-Cliche, and J. Menard
Integrating Drug Pharmacokinetics for Phenotyping Individual Renin Response to Angiotensin II Blockade in Humans
Hypertension, April 1, 2004; 43(4): 785 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
D. Tran, S. Phoon, and L. Howes
The effects of candesartan on vascular responses to angiotensin II and norepinephrine in normal volunteers
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2001; 2(3): 199 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
G. Vauquelin, F. L. Fierens, I. Verheijen, and P. M. Vanderheyden
Distinctions between non-peptide angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonists
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2001; 2(1_suppl): S24 - S31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
W. F van Rodijnen, T. A van Lambalgen, M. E van Teijlingen, G.-J. Tangelder, and P. M ter Wee
Comparison of the AT1-receptor blockers candesartan, irbesartan and losartan for inhibiting renal microvascular constriction
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2001; 2(1_suppl): S204 - S210.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Burnier
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
Circulation, February 13, 2001; 103(6): 904 - 912.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. Mazzolai, M. Maillard, J. Rossat, J. Nussberger, H. R. Brunner, and M. Burnier
Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade in Normotensive Subjects : A Direct Comparison of Three AT1 Receptor Antagonists
Hypertension, March 1, 1999; 33(3): 850 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. H. Bauer and G. P. Reams
The Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists: A New Class of Antihypertensive Drugs
Arch Intern Med, July 10, 1995; 155(13): 1361 - 1368.
[Abstract] [PDF]