This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dai, S. Articles by Labarthe, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dai, S. Articles by Labarthe, D. R. Related Collections Risk Factors Echocardiography Epidemiology

(Hypertension. 1999;34:236-241.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.

Scientific Contributions

Validity of Echocardiographic Measurement in an Epidemiological Study

Project HeartBeat!

Shifan Dai; Nancy A. Ayres; Ronald B. Harrist; J. Timothy Bricker; Darwin R. Labarthe

From the University of Texas–Houston Health Science Center, School of Public Health (S.D., R.B.H., D..L.), and the Texas Children's Hospital (N.A.A., J.T.B.), Houston, Tex.

Correspondence to Shifan Dai, MD, PhD, School of Public Health, University of Texas–Houston Health Science Center, 1200 Herman Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail sdai{at}sph.uth.tmc.edu

Abstract—In Project HeartBeat!, a longitudinal study of cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy children and adolescents, 3 samples of 40, 80, and 182 echocardiograms, respectively, were randomly selected and reread to evaluate intraobserver and interobserver variabilities and comparability between measurements of field echocardiographic technicians and reference readings at Texas Children's Hospital. Included in the evaluation were 8 M-mode echocardiographic measurements, ie, aortic root diameter, left atrial diameter, and end-diastolic and end-systolic measurements of interventricular septal thickness, left ventricular (LV) diameter, and LV posterior wall thickness; 8 Doppler measurements; and a calculated LV mass. Means and SDs of the differences of the paired measurements were used to assess the relative bias and random error of the measurements. For the intraobserver comparison, means and SDs of the differences were very small, indicating that the echo measurements were performed consistently by each project echo technician. Interobserver comparison showed statistically but not clinically significant differences between the paired readings of end-diastolic septal thickness, end-systolic LV posterior wall thickness, and 5 Doppler measurements. Comparison with reference readings at Texas Children's Hospital showed significant differences in diastolic LV diameter, systolic septal thickness, and right ventricular ejection time. These differences, however, were minimal with limited clinical significance. Mean differences in LV mass for the corresponding comparisons were –1.82, 4.50, and 0.0013 g, and the SDs were 18.79, 24.16, and 12.35 g, respectively. We conclude that the echocardiographic measurements taken from healthy children in a longitudinal study can be made accurately with acceptable reproducibility.

Key Words: echocardiography • left ventricular mass • observer variation • reproducibility of results • population study

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. M. McQuillan, M. H. Picard, M. Leavitt, and A. E. Weyman Clinical Correlates and Reference Intervals for Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure Among Echocardiographically Normal Subjects Circulation, December 4, 2001; 104(23): 2797 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]