Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2000;35:e15

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verdecchia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Silvestrini, O. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verdecchia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Silvestrini, O. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
*Stroke

(Hypertension. 2000;35:e15.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Hypertension Electronic Pages

J-Shaped Relation Between Blood Pressure and Stroke

Paolo Verdecchia; Giuseppe Schillaci; Ospedale R. Silvestrini

Dipartimento Discipline Cardiovascolari, Perugia, Italy


*    Introduction
 
To the Editor:

In their interesting study on the J-shaped relation between blood pressure and stroke, Vokó and colleagues1 found an excess risk of stroke associated with diastolic blood pressure (BP) levels <65 mm Hg in treated hypertensive subjects but not in a group of untreated subjects. On this basis, they hypothesized a harmful effect of excessive BP reduction. The study was not a direct comparison of the prognostic value of pretreatment and in-treatment diastolic BP in the same subjects. By contrast, the authors examined stroke rate in a group of treated hypertensive subjects and in an untreated control group principally composed of normotensive subjects. Therefore, for progressively lower diastolic BPs, pulse pressure (PP) may have been higher in the treated hypertensive group than in the untreated control group. Given the potent prognostic value of PP, such an imbalance could have conditioned the greater stroke risk among the subjects with a diastolic BP <65 mm Hg than among those with a diastolic BP 65 to 74 mm Hg in the treated hypertensive group but not in the untreated group. To clarify this point, the authors should (a) not limit data presentation to the relative risks, but include a table with diastolic BP and PP in each category; (b) compare PP between treated and untreated subjects for each stratum of diastolic BP; and (c) examine PP among the potential determinants of stroke risk. If the J-shaped relation between diastolic BP and stroke risk was due to excessive BP lowering, such a . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Fournier, H. Mazouz, R. Oprisiu, A. Pruna, M. Andrejak, J.-M. Achard, L. Fernandez, Z. Voko, and M. M.B. Breteler
Response
Hypertension, May 1, 2000; 35 (5): e16 - e16.
[Full Text] [PDF]