This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swales, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swales, J. D.

(Hypertension. 2000;35:1179.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorials

Hypertension in the Political Arena

John D. Swales

From the Cardiovascular Research Institute, Royal Infirmary, Leicester, England.

Correspondence to Prof John D. Swales, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Clinical Science Bldg, Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, England. E-mail jds12@le.ac.uk

Key Words: Editorials • community health services • socioeconomic factors

	Introduction

 
The science of hypertension has been one of the success stories of modern medicine. The risks of high blood pressure have been defined, and through rigorous trials, effective treatments have been developed and shown to work. Pathophysiological mechanisms have been identified at least in part, and the future seems brighter as the full potential of molecular genetics is realized. A glance through previous issues of Hypertension testifies to all this: the increasing pressure on the pages of this and other prestigious journals indicates the growth both in volume and quality of relevant science. Yet, there is a paradox that is apparent to those of us who treat individuals or advise on population health. Progress in the real world has been much less impressive; indeed, it has faltered at times.¹ The problems of applying knowledge to the prevention and management of hypertension seem orders of magnitude more complex than the scientific work that provided us with the understanding in the first place. We are forced to practice and advise in a social environment that seems far from perfect and that presents us each day with formidable obstacles that seem to defy rational analysis. Basic science seems somehow easier and less messy. This would not be obvious from cursory reading of specialist journals. Only occasionally do published papers demonstrate how far from the ideal, for instance, the management of hypertension is, even in a society that spends more per capita on health than any other society.² There is a clear-cut need to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. D. Frohlich Professor John Douglas Swales Hypertension, May 1, 2001; 37(5): 1198 - 1198. [Full Text]

				A. Aviv Hypothesis : Pulse Pressure and Human Longevity Hypertension, April 1, 2001; 37(4): 1060 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]