This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huang, H. Articles by Lee, R. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huang, H. Articles by Lee, R. T. Related Collections Cell biology/structural biology

(Hypertension. 2001;38:1158.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Fourth Workshop on Structure and Function of Large Arteries: Part II

Receptor-Based Differences in Human Aortic Smooth Muscle Cell Membrane Stiffness

Hayden Huang; Roger D. Kamm; Peter T.C. So; Richard T. Lee

From the Division of Health Sciences and Technology (H.H.) and Mechanical Engineering (R.D.K., P.T.C.S.), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge; and the Vascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital (R.T.L.), Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Richard T. Lee, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail rlee{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu

Abstract

Abstract—— Cells respond to mechanical stimuli with diverse molecular responses. The nature of the sensory mechanism involved in mechanotransduction is not known, but integrins may play an important role. The integrins are linked to both the cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix, suggesting that probing cells via integrins should yield different mechanical properties than probing cells via non–cytoskeleton-associated receptors. To test the hypothesis that the mechanical properties of a cell are dependent on the receptor on which the stress is applied, human aortic smooth muscle cells were plated, and magnetic beads, targeted either to the integrins via fibronectin or to the transferrin receptor by use of an IgG antibody, were attached to the cell surface. The resistance of the cell to deformation ("stiffness") was estimated by oscillating the magnetic beads at 1 Hz by use of single-pole magnetic tweezers at 2 different magnitudes. The ratio of bead displacements at different magnitudes was used to explore the mechanical properties of the cells. Cells stressed via the integrins required 10-fold more force to obtain the same bead displacements as the cells stressed via the transferrin receptors. Cells stressed via integrins showed stiffening behavior as the force was increased, whereas this stiffening was significantly less for cells stressed via the transferrin receptor (P<0.001). Mechanical characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cells depend on the receptor by which the stress is applied, with integrin-based linkages demonstrating cell-stiffening behavior.

Key Words: stress • membranes • integrin • transferrin • arteries

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Lammerding, A. R. Kazarov, H. Huang, R. T. Lee, and M. E. Hemler Tetraspanin CD151 regulates {alpha}6{beta}1 integrin adhesion strengthening PNAS, June 24, 2003; 100(13): 7616 - 7621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]