| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2003;41:1180.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial Commentaries |
From the Department of Physics Applied to Medicine, University of London School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of London (R.G.G.), UK, and the Department of Geriatric Medicine, Canberra Hospital and Medical School, Australian National University (M.M.B.), Canberra, Australia.
Correspondence to Associate Professor Marc M. Budge, Department of Geriatric Medicine, The Canberra Hospital, PO Box 11, Woden ACT 2606, Australia. E-mail marc.budge@act.gov.au
Key Words: elasticity arteries aorta compliance pulse
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
The Current State
The ability to characterize and quantify the elastic behavior of arteries has become increasingly important, because its application has broadened from basic physiology to clinical domains and the prediction of cardiovascular risk. Consequently, it is imperative that terminology to communicate across these disciplines is consistent and meaningful. In 1960, Peterson et al1 suggested coining a new definition of elastic modulus, the ratio of stress to strain, in terms of the pulse pressure,
P, and the directly measurable parameters
D and D (diameter). This has subsequently become known as Petersons modulus (Ep), where
|
|
In 1975, one of us (R.G.G.)2 suggested calling the inverse of Ep the arterial compliance, C, where
|
|
However, since that date, various authors have used the term distensibility for this quantity (eg, most recently ORourke et al3), and the term compliance has also become strongly linked with adherence to medical advice. The authors would therefore suggest that this difference in terminology is best resolved by using the long-established, engineering term compressibility when referring to the inverse of the elastic modulus.4,5
Thus, use of the well-defined, longer-established terms, elastic modulus and compressibility, would replace the need to use the terms compliance and distensibility, about whose mathematical definition some confusion exists in the literature.
Essential History
The classic physics of elasticity is often said to have started in 1600 with the discovery by Hooke that the ratio of stress to strain in isotropic materials, within their elastic limit, was constant. He defined strain as the fractional deformation caused by
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Cecelja, B. Jiang, K. McNeill, B. Kato, J. Ritter, T. Spector, and P. Chowienczyk Increased wave reflection rather than central arterial stiffness is the main determinant of raised pulse pressure in women and relates to mismatch in arterial dimensions: a twin study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2009; 54(8): 695 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Seward, M. F. O'Rourke, M. M. Budge, and R. G. Gosling Terminology for Describing the Elastic Behavior of Arteries * Response: Terminology for Describing the Elastic Behavior of Arteries Hypertension, April 1, 2004; 43(4): e25 - e26. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Schram, R. M.A Henry, R. A.J.M van Dijk, P. J. Kostense, J. M. Dekker, G. Nijpels, R. J. Heine, L. M. Bouter, N. Westerhof, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Increased Central Artery Stiffness in Impaired Glucose Metabolism and Type 2 Diabetes: The Hoorn Study Hypertension, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 176 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M.T. Hughes, L. J. Dixon, G. E. McVeigh, M. E. Safar, B. I. Levy, and H. Struijker-Boudier Arterial Stiffness and Pulse Wave Velocity: Problems with Terminology * Response Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109 (2): e3 - e3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |