Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2005;46:1095-1096
Published online before print October 10, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000187014.92384.a4
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/5/1095    most recent
01.HYP.0000187014.92384.a4v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Persson, P. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrowRelated Article

(Hypertension. 2005;46:1095.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial Commentaries

Baroreflexes in Hypertension

A Mystery Revisited

Pontus B. Persson

From the Institute of Physiology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

Correspondence to Dr Pontus B. Persson, Institut für Vegetative Physiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Tucholskystr. 2, D-10117 Berlin. E-mailpontus.persson@charite.de


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To date, most studies investigating baroreflexes in hypertension have been performed either by recording baroreflex afferents or by denervating them. In the current issue of Hypertension, Lohmeier et al1 present data on the effects of chronic carotid sinus stimulation (CSS) in hypertensive animals. Striking differences were observed during CSS in dogs with angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced hypertension as compared with control conditions. In line with a previous study,2 baroreflex activation by CSS significantly reduced blood pressure during control. In contrast, the hypotensive effect was markedly attenuated in Ang II hypertensive dogs. This observation fits very well with today’s understanding of baroreflexes in several forms of hypertension.

Remarkably, it is still not fully understood how the autonomic nervous system acts in hypertension, although the issue dates back to the very beginnings of research on cardiovascular reflexes. During that era, it was generally held that baroreflexes continuously buffer sympathetic nervous output. Thus, dissection of the afferent nerves supplying regions of the baroreceptors (carotid sinuses and aortic arch) was thought to increase long-term blood pressure. Koch described what he termed Entzügelungshochdruck (disinhibitory hypertension) in many species.3 Today, neurogenic hypertension is commonly used to describe hypertension following denervation of baroreceptors. The concept of neurogenic hypertension was never seriously questioned until the 1970s when Cowley et al performed long-term studies in conscious dogs. In these experiments, only slight increases in blood pressure were found after baroreceptor denervation. Neurogenic hypertension mainly seems to be observed under special experimental conditions: either in animals that are not . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Influence of Prolonged Baroreflex Activation on Arterial Pressure in Angiotensin Hypertension
Thomas E. Lohmeier, Terry M. Dwyer, Drew A. Hildebrandt, Eric D. Irwin, Martin A. Rossing, David J. Serdar, and Robert S. Kieval
Hypertension 2005 46: 1194-1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]