This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 47/1/35    most recent 01.HYP.0000196686.85286.9cv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Beckman, J. A. Articles by Gerhard-Herman, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beckman, J. A. Articles by Gerhard-Herman, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Peripheral Arterial Disease Related Collections Pathophysiology Other arteriosclerosis Other diagnostic testing

(Hypertension. 2006;47:35.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Articles

Automated Oscillometric Determination of the Ankle–Brachial Index Provides Accuracy Necessary for Office Practice

From the Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Joshua A. Beckman, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail jbeckman{at}partners.org

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains underdiagnosed by primary care and cardiovascular physicians. The office-based assessment of PAD is limited by the need for specialized equipment and the time required for performance of the ankle–brachial index (ABI). We explored whether the accuracy of automated ABI measurement by oscillometry compared favorably with the gold-standard method using continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound. Consecutive patients referred to our university hospital noninvasive vascular laboratory for ABI measurement were invited for participation. Of 205 patients, 201 participated, including 55 with PAD. The ABI was measured by automated oscillometry and Doppler ultrasound. The test of trends revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.78 in the left leg and 0.78 in the right leg (P<0.01 for both). The mean ABI difference between methods was 0.04±0.01 and 0.06±0.01, respectively, in the left and right legs. The differences between the methods followed a normal distribution. Oscillometric determination of the ABI provides an accurate determination of the ABI in an outpatient population. Our findings show automated oscillometry to be a reliable and easier method of ABI measurement, lowering the barrier to incorporation of this diagnostic test into clinical practice.

Key Words: vascular diseases • atherosclerosis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. van Langen, J. van Gurp, and L. Rubbens Interobserver variability of ankle-brachial index measurements at rest and post exercise in patients with intermittent claudication Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2009; 14(3): 221 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Clairotte, S. Retout, L. Potier, R. Roussel, and B. Escoubet Automated Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index Measurement by Clinical Staff for Peripheral Arterial Disease Diagnosis in Nondiabetic and Diabetic Patients Diabetes Care, July 1, 2009; 32(7): 1231 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Carmo, A Mandil, B. Nascimento, B. Arantes, J. Bittencourt, E. Falqueto, and A. Ribeiro Can we measure the ankle-brachial index using only a stethoscope? A pilot study Fam. Pract., February 1, 2009; 26(1): 22 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Wrobel and D. G. Armstrong Reliability and Validity of Current Physical Examination Techniques of the Foot and Ankle J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2008; 98(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]