Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2006;48:562-563
Published online before print August 28, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000239226.62314.31
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/4/562    most recent
01.HYP.0000239226.62314.31v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castellano, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castellano, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease
Right arrowRelated Article

(Hypertension. 2006;48:562.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial Commentaries

Geographic Ancestry, Angiotensinogen Gene Polymorphism, and Cardiovascular Risk

Maurizio Castellano

From the Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences. University of Brescia Medical School, Brescia, Italy.

Correspondence to Maurizio Castellano, 2^ Medicina Centro, Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25100 Brescia, Italy. E-mail castella@med.unibs.it


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

The influence of race on the association of genetic variants with pathological phenotypes is an intriguing issue, and the study by Goldenberg et al1 published in the present issue of Hypertension stimulates several considerations. The concept of "race" itself is the object of major controversy between those claiming that there is no biological basis for it and others supporting the scientific validity of pragmatic racial categorizations, such as that proposed by the Office of Management and Budget in the United States. Without fear of appearing "politically incorrect," we should admit that the analysis of a large set of genetic markers has convincingly shown that {approx}10% of total genetic variation in humans originates from differences between a limited number of population groups, corresponding to "geographic clusters" of individuals.2

Race or, perhaps better, ancestry-related genetic variability, may underline different genetic risk for 2 main reasons: (1) a susceptibility variant has different frequencies in individuals of different geographic ancestries or (2) a genetic variant may result associated with increased risk of disease in ≥1 population but not in individuals of different geographic ancestries. As a general consideration, a relevant proportion of genetic polymorphisms have a substantially different frequency in different population groups; in particular, common single nucleotide polymorphisms are frequently not shared between black and nonblack populations.2 On the other hand, when the same susceptibility variants are present in different population groups, their biological impact is usually consistent across traditional racial groupings, as suggested by Ioannidis et al3 in a recent analysis of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Polymorphism in the Angiotensinogen Gene, Hypertension, and Ethnic Differences in the Risk of Recurrent Coronary Events
Ilan Goldenberg, Arthur J. Moss, Daniel Ryan, Scott McNitt, Shirley W. Eberly, and Wojciech Zareba
Hypertension 2006 48: 693-699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]