Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2007;49:e21
Published online before print February 26, 2007, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000259962.47982.2a
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/4/e21    most recent
01.HYP.0000259962.47982.2av1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nama, V.
Right arrow Articles by Manyonda, I. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nama, V.
Right arrow Articles by Manyonda, I. T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Risk Pregnancy
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Hypertension. 2007;49:e21.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Modeling Preeclampsia: The True Model for the Uniquely Human Disease Preeclampsia Is the Human Female Not the Pregnant Rat

Vivek Nama; Tarek F. Antonios

Blood Pressure Unit, Department of Cardiac and Vascular Sciences, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom

Isaac T. Manyonda

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

Gadonski et al1 describe a series of elegant experiments in which they used a rodent (rat) model to show that chronic reduction in uterine perfusion pressure was associated with an elevation of arterial pressure and that this elevation in AP was associated with a rise in serum levels of interleukin-6. They further showed that this rise in arterial pressure occurs after chronic elevation of interleukin-6 in pregnant but not in nonpregnant rats and is associated with increase in renal vascular resistance and reduction in renal plasma flow, as well as glomerular filtration rate. They conclude that interleukin-6 may play a role in mediating the hypertension and reduction in renal hemodynamics observed in the reduction in uterine perfusion pressure in pregnant rats. All of this is fine until the authors allude to the possibility that their observations could reflect the pathophysiology of that uniquely human disease of pregnancy, that is, preeclampsia (PE).

First, it is clear that no adequate laboratory model of PE exists. Stated another way, no animal model develops a condition during pregnancy that remotely resembles PE. This is in part because of the evolutionary diversity in placentation, and although the hemochorial placentation seen in the human also occurs in rodents, there are important differences between the 2 species. Specifically, rodents do not spontaneously develop PE. Occluding uterine arteries to create a reduction in uterine perfusion pressure could hardly be compared with the high resistance that is found in the fetoplacental circulation in PE. Moreover, studies . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. P. Granger
Response to Modeling Preeclampsia: The True Model for the Uniquely Human Disease Preeclampsia Is the Human Female Not the Pregnant Rat
Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): e22 - e22.
[Full Text] [PDF]