| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2007;49:986.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Unit of Internal Medicine (G.S., M.P., G.Pucci, M.R.M., L.S., E.M.), Angiology and Arteriosclerosis, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; the Department of Clinical Medicine and Prevention (G.Parati), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; and the Department of Cardiology (G.Parati), San Luca Hospital, IRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Correspondence to Giuseppe Schillaci, Unit of Internal Medicine, Angiology and Arteriosclerosis, University of Perugia Medical School, Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia," Piazzale Menghini, 1, IT-06129 Perugia, Italy. E-mail skill{at}unipg.it
Ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI), a measure based on the relative behavior of 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), has been suggested as a marker of arterial stiffness and a predictor of cardiovascular mortality. However, a narrow range of diastolic BP values over the 24 hours tends to flatten the regression slope and to artificially increase AASI. We explored the possible influence of different ranges of 24-hour diastolic BP fluctuations, such as those related to nocturnal BP fall, on AASI, and on its relationship with target organ damage. In 515 untreated hypertensive patients, AASI was directly related to age (r=0.30) and 24-hour systolic BP (r=0.20), whereas it was inversely related with nocturnal systolic and diastolic BP reduction (r=0.28 and 0.46, respectively; all P<0.001). A direct relationship was found between AASI and left ventricular mass index (r=0.17; P<0.001), but this relation was no longer significant after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, daytime systolic BP, and day-night systolic BP reduction (all P<0.05). AASI was directly related to carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, an intrinsic measure of aortic stiffness (r=0.28; P<0.001), but no independent relation was found in a multiple linear regression. Our conclusions are as follows: (1) AASI is strongly dependent on the degree of nocturnal BP fall in hypertensive patients; (2) there is no significant relation between AASI and left ventricular mass after proper adjustment for confounders; and (3) the relation between AASI and a widely accepted measure of aortic stiffness, such as pulse wave velocity, is weak and importantly affected by other factors.
Key Words: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring arteries blood pressure arterial stiffness left ventricular hypertrophy
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Parati and G. Bilo Should 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Be Done in Every Patient With Diabetes? Diabetes Care, November 1, 2009; 32(suppl_2): S298 - S304. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schillaci, G. Pucci, M. R. Mannarino, M. Pirro, and G. Parati Determinants of the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Regression Line Hypertension, May 1, 2009; 53(5): e33 - e33. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Adiyaman, D. Dechering, T. Thien, J. Boggia, Y. Li, J.-G. Wang, T. W. Hansen, E. O'Brien, T. Richart, L. Thijs, et al. Response to Determinants of the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Regression Line Hypertension, May 1, 2009; 53(5): e34 - e34. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Palmas, T. G. Pickering, J. Teresi, J. E. Schwartz, A. Moran, R. S. Weinstock, and S. Shea Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and All-Cause Mortality in Elderly People With Diabetes Mellitus Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): 120 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bursztyn and I. Z. Ben-Dov Diabetes Mellitus and 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Broadening Horizons of Risk Assessment Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): 110 - 111. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Adiyaman, D. G. Dechering, J. Boggia, Y. Li, T. W. Hansen, M. Kikuya, K. Bjorklund-Bodegard, T. Richart, L. Thijs, C. Torp-Pedersen, et al. Determinants of the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index in 7604 Subjects From 6 Populations Hypertension, December 1, 2008; 52(6): 1038 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Adiyaman, J. Boggia, Y. Li, J.-G. Wang, E. O'Brien, T. Richart, L. Thijs, and J. A. Staessen Dipping Deeper Into the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Hypertension, September 1, 2007; 50(3): e59 - e60. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schillaci, G. Parati, M. Pirro, G. Pucci, M. R. Mannarino, L. Sperandini, and E. Mannarino Response to Dipping Deeper Into the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Hypertension, September 1, 2007; 50(3): e61 - e62. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schillaci, G. Pucci, M. Pirro, and G. Parati Response to Interstudy Variability of Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Hypertension, September 1, 2007; 50(3): e66 - e66. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gavish, I. Z. Ben-Dov, and M. Bursztyn Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Is Not a Specific Marker of Reduced Arterial Compliance Hypertension, August 1, 2007; 50(2): e18 - e18. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schillaci, M. Pirro, G. Pucci, and G. Parati Response to Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Is Not a Specific Marker of Reduced Arterial Compliance Hypertension, August 1, 2007; 50(2): e19 - e19. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |