| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;51:179.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial Commentaries |
From Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (G.d.S.), Federico II University, Naples, Italy; and Weill-Cornell Medical College (R.B.D.), New York, NY.
Correspondence to Giovanni de Simone, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University Hospital, v.S.Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy. E-mail simogi@unina.it
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
| Introduction |
|---|
Ea influences stroke volume and is related to LV contractility, as assessed at end ejection by the pressure-volume loop and determination of the LV elastance (Emax).4,5 Thus, Ea has been combined with Emax, the slope of a regression line connecting end-systolic pressures and volumes obtained at different loading conditions. The ratio Ea/Emax is widely used as a measure of LV-arterial coupling. As emphasized recently by Baicu et al,6 LV function, LV performance, LV contractility, and myocardial contractility are not interchangeable terms. Experimental studies suggest that LV performance, measured as stroke work (SW),6 is maximal when Emax=Ea. LV performance increases its efficiency when, for a given SW, myocardial oxygen consumption is lower. The optimal efficiency of LV performance is achieved at Ea
Related Article:
Hypertension 2008 51: 275-281.
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |