This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 51/3/642    most recent HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.102145v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions patientINFORMation Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, X. Articles by Mi, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chen, X. Articles by Mi, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Seniors' Health Related Collections Other etiology Other diagnostic testing Epidemiology

(Hypertension. 2008;51:642.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Articles

Impacts of Measurement Protocols on Blood Pressure Tracking From Childhood Into Adulthood

A Metaregression Analysis

Xiaoli Chen; Youfa Wang; Lawrence J. Appel; Jie Mi

From the Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health (X.C., Y.W.), and Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research (L.J.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md; and the Department of Epidemiology (J.M.), Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.

Correspondence to Youfa Wang, Center for Human Nutrition, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205. E-mail ywang{at}jhsph.edu

The best approach for blood pressure (BP) measurement in children remains controversial, specifically regarding the choice of Korotkoff phase 4 versus Korotkoff phase 5 for diastolic BP (DBP) and the use of automated devices. To examine the impacts of different BP measurement protocols on BP tracking from childhood into adulthood, we conducted a meta-analysis of 50 related studies published between 1970 and 2006 identified based on a systematic search of PubMed. These studies provided 617 data points (tracking correlation coefficient, our outcome variable) for systolic BP and 547 data points for DBP for our meta-analysis. The explanatory variables included the use of Korotkoff phase 4/Korotkoff phase 5, BP device, and number of BP measurements per visit. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders, including sex, baseline age, follow-up length, publication year, and study country. Tracking correlation coefficients for DBP measured using Korotkoff phase 4 was higher than that of Korotkoff phase 5 by 0.035 but not significant. DBP tracking assessed by automated device was higher than that of Korotkoff phase 5 by 0.152 (P=0.024) and higher than the mercury manometer by 0.223 (P=0.005). BP tracking was slightly higher with multiple BP measurements per visit, but measurements of 3 times did not improve the tracking further compared with 2 measurements. Although policy-making bodies currently recommend the use of Korotkoff phase 5 to assess DBP in children, our metaregression analysis did not support the recommendation. In general, Korotkoff phase 4 seems to be different from Korotkoff phase 5, and automated device is a promising approach for BP assessment in childhood.

Key Words: blood pressure • measurement protocol • Korotkoff phase • tracking • child • hypertension

Find additional patient-related information at:

Read a summary of this article at americanheart.org

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Chiolero, G. Paradis, G. Madeleine, J. A. Hanley, F. Paccaud, and P. Bovet Discordant Secular Trends in Elevated Blood Pressure and Obesity in Children and Adolescents in a Rapidly Developing Country Circulation, February 3, 2009; 119(4): 558 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]