Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2008;51:657-662
Published online before print January 22, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.104943
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/3/657    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.104943v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bekele, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bekele, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Peripheral vascular disease

(Hypertension. 2008;51:657.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Prognostic Significance of Between-Arm Blood Pressure Differences

Rajiv Agarwal; Zerihun Bunaye; Dagim M. Bekele

From the Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans’ Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis.

Correspondence to Rajiv Agarwal, Indiana University and Veterans Administration Medical Center, 1481 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202. E-mail ragarwal{at}iupui.edu

Blood pressure (BP) recordings often differ between arms, but the extent to which these differences are reproducible and whether the differences have prognostic importance is unknown. We enrolled 421 consecutive patients from a medicine and a renal clinic at a veterans’ hospital. Three BP recordings were obtained in each arm using an oscillometric device in a sequential manner and repeated in 1 week. Patients were followed for all-cause mortality ≤7 years. The right arm had 5.1-mm Hg higher systolic BP that attenuated by {approx}2.2 mm Hg a week later. Systolic BP dropped 6.9 mm Hg over 1 week and by an additional 5.3 mm Hg in patients with chronic kidney disease. Accounting for the visit and arm effect improved the reproducibility of the BP measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.74, which improved to 0.88 after accounting for visit and 0.93 after accounting for arm. The crude mortality rate was 6.33 per 100 patient-years. Every 10-mm Hg difference in systolic BP between the arms conferred a mortality hazard of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.52) after adjusting for average systolic BP and chronic kidney disease. BP differences between arms are reproducible and carry prognostic information. Patients should have evaluation of BP in both arms at the screening visit.


Key Words: hypertension • blood pressure measurement • mortality • cohort study • survival analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. Kleefstra, S. T. Houweling, S. J.J. Logtenberg, and H. J.G. Bilo
Prognostic Significance of Between-Arm Blood Pressure Differences: Between-Arm Blood Pressure Difference and Mortality
Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): e14 - e14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. Agarwal
Response to Prognostic Significance of Between-Arm Blood Pressure Differences: Between-Arm Blood Pressure Difference and Mortality and the Interarm Blood Pressure Difference: Between-Arm Blood Pressure Differences Are Important
Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): e16 - e17.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. E. Clark and J. L. Campbell
The Interarm Blood Pressure Difference
Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): e15 - e15.
[Full Text] [PDF]