Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2008;51:1103-1108
Published online before print February 7, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.105296
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/4/1103    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.105296v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Os, I.
Right arrow Articles by Oparil, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Os, I.
Right arrow Articles by Oparil, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATENOLOL
*LOSARTAN POTASSIUM
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood Pressure Medicines
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Clinical Studies

(Hypertension. 2008;51:1103.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Go Red Original Articles

Effects of Losartan in Women With Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Results From the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study

Ingrid Os; Veronica Franco; Sverre E. Kjeldsen; Karin Manhem; Richard B. Devereux; Eva Gerdts; Darcy A. Hille; Paulette A. Lyle; Peter M. Okin; Björn Dahlöf; Suzanne Oparil

From the Department of Nephrology (I.O., S.E.K.), Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo (I.O.), Oslo, Norway; Ohio State University (V.F.), Columbus; University of Alabama at Birmingham (S.O.); University of Michigan (S.E.K.), Ann Arbor; Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra (K.M., B.D.), Gothenburg, Sweden; Weill Cornell Medical College (R.B.D., P.M.O.), New York, NY; Institute of Medicine (E.G.), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Heart Disease (E.G.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; and Merck Research Laboratories (D.A.H., P.A.L.), Upper Gwynedd, Pa.

Correspondence to Ingrid Os, Department of Nephrology, Ullevaal University Hospital, 0407 Oslo, Norway. E-mail ingrid.os{at}medisin.uio.no

Hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and outcomes in women. These posthoc analyses from the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study evaluated losartan- versus atenolol-based therapy on the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction and other end points in 4963 women. Fewer events occurred in women versus men. Women in the losartan group had significant reductions in the primary end point (215 [18.2 per 1000 patient-years] versus 261 [22.5 per 1000 patient-years]; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68 to 0.98]; P=0.031), stroke (109 versus 154; HR: 0.71 [95% CI: 0.55 to 0.90]; P=0.005), total mortality (HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.63 to 0.95]; P=0.014), and new-onset diabetes (HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59 to 0.94]; P=0.015) versus the atenolol group, with no between-treatment difference for myocardial infarction (HR: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.74 to 1.39]; P=0.925), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.64 to 1.14]; P=0.282), or hospitalization for heart failure (HR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.68 to 1.28]; P=0.677). More women in the losartan group required hospitalization for angina (HR: 1.70 [95% CI: 1.16 to 2.51]; P=0.007). Risk reductions for the primary composite end point, stroke, total mortality, and new-onset diabetes were significantly greater with losartan- versus atenolol-based treatment in women with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in the LIFE study. The risk reductions for losartan, along with the tests for the interaction of treatment and gender, indicated that the treatment effect was consistent in men and women for all of the end points tested, with the exception of hospitalization for angina.


Key Words: gender • hypertension • left ventricular hypertrophy • outcomes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. Reichek, R. B. Devereux, R. A. Rocha, R. Hilkert, D. Hall, D. Purkayastha, and B. Pitt
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Left Ventricular Mass Reduction With Fixed-Dose Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Patients With High-Risk Hypertension
Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 731 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. J. Campbell
Can the Study of Female Rats Help Our Understanding of Women?
Hypertension, December 1, 2008; 52(6): e142 - e142.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. K. Sampson, K. M. Moritz, E. S. Jones, R. E. Widdop, and K. M. Denton
Response to Can the Study of Female Rats Help Our Understanding of Women?
Hypertension, December 1, 2008; 52(6): e143 - e143.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. Agabiti-Rosei and M. Salvetti
Gender Differences in the Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy During Antihypertensive Therapy
Hypertension, July 1, 2008; 52(1): 59 - 60.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Escobar and V. Barrios
Gender Differences in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Regression
Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): e58 - e58.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
I. Os, R. B. Devereux, and P. M. Okin
Response to Gender Differences in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Regression
Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): e59 - e59.
[Full Text] [PDF]