This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 51/6/1470    most recent HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.108910v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Avolio, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Avolio, A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information High Blood Pressure Related Collections Other hypertension Related Article

(Hypertension. 2008;51:1470.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorial Commentaries

Central Aortic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Risk

A Paradigm Shift?

Alberto Avolio

From the Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.

Correspondence to Alberto Avolio, Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Level 1, Dow Corning Building, 3 Innovation Rd, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia. E-mail alberto.avolio@mq.edu.au

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

The provocative proposition of "hypertension is a myth" has generated many a debate and editorial commentary.^1,2 In contrast, the realities of high blood pressure and the associated cardiovascular risks have been ascertained from data obtained by the conventional brachial cuff sphygmomanometer. Notwithstanding the inherent limitations of the technique, there is yet no equivalent and suitable device that can be universally accepted to replace the cuff sphygmomanometer for practical and noninvasive measurement of arterial blood pressure in large population groups and with wide clinical applications. Attempts at complementing information obtained from cuff measurements have resorted to basic physiological studies in humans and experimental animals, which have shown that pulsatile blood flow in arteries can be described in terms of characteristics common to systems of wave propagation.³ These concepts explain the complex relationship between oscillatory blood pressure and flow, the difference in pressure wave shape, and the increase in pulse pressure between the aorta and peripheral arteries. Such wave propagation characteristics can be described in terms of mathematical entities known as transfer functions, with associated assumptions of stability and linearity.^3,4

The study by McEniery et al in this issue of Hypertension⁵ uses methodologies for both the cuff sphygmomanometer and transfer functions⁴ to determine central aortic pressure from the brachial cuff pressure measurement and the tonometric radial artery pressure pulse in >10 000 adults of age range 18 to 101 years. This is the largest study of its kind with conventional pressure measurements and pulse waveform data. The study allows analysis that can . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Related Article:

Central Pressure: Variability and Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial II

Carmel M. McEniery, Yasmin, Barry McDonnell, Margaret Munnery, Sharon M. Wallace, Chloe V. Rowe, John R. Cockcroft, Ian B. Wilkinson on Behalf of the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial Investigators
Hypertension 2008 51: 1476-1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Namasivayam, B. J. McDonnell, C. M. McEniery, M. F. O'Rourke, and on behalf of the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial Does Wave Reflection Dominate Age-Related Change in Aortic Blood Pressure Across the Human Life Span? Hypertension, June 1, 2009; 53(6): 979 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]