Hypertension. 2008;52:1-9
Published online before print May 22, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.189011
Published online before print May 22, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.189011
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;52:1.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
AHA/ASH/PCNA Scientific Statements |
Call to Action on Use and Reimbursement for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: Executive Summary
A Joint Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) overcomes many of the limitations of traditional office blood pressure (BP) measurement and is both cheaper and easier to perform than ambulatory BP monitoring. Monitors that use the oscillometric method are currently available that are accurate, reliable, easy to use, and relatively inexpensive. An increasing number of patients are using them regularly to check their BP at home, but although this has been endorsed by national and international guidelines, detailed recommendations for their use have been lacking. There is a rapidly growing literature showing that measurements taken by patients at home are often lower than readings taken in the office and closer to the average BP recorded by 24-hour ambulatory monitors, which is the BP that best predicts cardiovascular risk. Because of the larger numbers of readings that can be taken by HBPM than in the office and the elimination of the white-coat effect (the increase of BP during an office visit), home readings are more reproducible than office readings and show better correlations with measures of target organ damage. In addition, prospective studies that have used multiple home readings to express the true BP have found that home BP predicts risk better than office BP (class IIa; level of evidence A). This call-to-action article makes the following recommendations: (1) It is recommended that HBPM should become a routine component of BP measurement in the majority of patients with known or suspected hypertension; (2) Patients should be advised to purchase oscillometric monitors that measure BP on the upper arm with an appropriate cuff size and that have been shown to be accurate according to standard international protocols. They should be shown how to use them by their healthcare providers; (3) Two to 3 readings should be taken while the subject is resting in the seated position, both in the morning and at night, over a period of 1 week. A total of
12 readings are recommended for making clinical decisions; (4) HBPM is indicated in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected hypertension, in whom it may distinguish between white-coat and sustained hypertension. If the results are equivocal, ambulatory BP monitoring may help to establish the diagnosis; (5) In patients with prehypertension, HBPM may be useful for detecting masked hypertension; (6) HBPM is recommended for evaluating the response to any type of antihypertensive treatment and may improve adherence; (7) The target HBPM goal for treatment is <135/85 mm Hg or <130/80 mm Hg in high-risk patients; (8) HBPM is useful in the elderly, in whom both BP variability and the white-coat effect are increased; (9) HBPM is of value in patients with diabetes, in whom tight BP control is of paramount importance; (10) Other populations in whom HBPM may be beneficial include pregnant women, children, and patients with kidney disease; and (11) HBPM has the potential to improve the quality of care while reducing costs and should be reimbursed. (Hypertension. 2008;52:1-9.)
Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements • blood pressure • hypertension • patients
Find additional patient-related information at:
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. V. da Silva, S. de Barros, H. Abensur, K. C. Ortega, D. Mion Jr, and Cochrane Renal Group Prospective Trial Register: C Home blood pressure monitoring in blood pressure control among haemodialysis patients: an open randomized clinical trial Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3805 - 3811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. L. Jablonski, P. E. Gates, G. L. Pierce, and D. R. Seals Low dietary sodium intake is associated with enhanced vascular endothelial function in middle-aged and older adults with elevated systolic blood pressure Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2009; 3(5): 347 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. LaMarca, M. Parrish, L. F. Ray, S. R. Murphy, L. Roberts, P. Glover, G. Wallukat, K. Wenzel, K. Cockrell, J. N. Martin Jr, et al. Hypertension in Response to Autoantibodies to the Angiotensin II Type I Receptor (AT1-AA) in Pregnant Rats: Role of Endothelin-1 Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 905 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Kasparov and A. G. Teschemacher The use of viral gene transfer in studies of brainstem noradrenergic and serotonergic neurons Phil Trans R Soc B, September 12, 2009; 364(1529): 2565 - 2576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. McCant, G. McKoy, J. Grubber, M. K Olsen, E. Oddone, B. Powers, and H. B Bosworth Feasibility of blood pressure telemonitoring in patients with poor blood pressure control J Telemed Telecare, September 1, 2009; 15(6): 281 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Hue and H. Taegtmeyer The Randle cycle revisited: a new head for an old hat Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2009; 297(3): E578 - E591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Parati, S. Omboni, and G. Bilo Why Is Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurement Needed?: Home Blood Pressure Measurements Will Increasingly Replace Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension Hypertension, August 1, 2009; 54(2): 181 - 187. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Namasivayam, B. J. McDonnell, C. M. McEniery, M. F. O'Rourke, and on behalf of the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial Does Wave Reflection Dominate Age-Related Change in Aortic Blood Pressure Across the Human Life Span? Hypertension, June 1, 2009; 53(6): 979 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Rinfret, M.-T. Lussier, A. Peirce, F. Duhamel, S. Cossette, L. Lalonde, C. Tremblay, M.-C. Guertin, J. LeLorier, J. Turgeon, et al. The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Information Technology-Supported Program on Blood Pressure Control in Primary Care Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 170 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. B. Weder, L. Gleiberman, and A. Sachdeva Whites Excrete a Water Load More Rapidly Than Blacks Hypertension, April 1, 2009; 53(4): 715 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Murden and C. Stamoolis Additional Benefits of Home Blood Pressure Monitors Hypertension, April 1, 2009; 53(4): e24 - e24. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. F. Carter Will Running the Numbers First Violate the Principles of Patient-Centered Care? Ann Intern Med, December 2, 2008; 149(11): 840 - 840. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Stergiou, A. Vazeou, and C. Stefanidis American Heart Association's Statement That "In Children Ambulatory Blood Pressure Is Superior to Home" Not Proven Hypertension, December 1, 2008; 52(6): e145 - e145. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Parati and G. Bilo Clinical Relevance of Day-by-Day Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability: New Information From Home Self-Measurements Hypertension, December 1, 2008; 52(6): 1006 - 1008. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. O'Rourke, A. Farnsworth, and J. O'Rourke Aortic dimensions and stiffness in normal adults. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., November 1, 2008; 1(6): 749 - 751. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. R. Krakoff On Treatment Blood Pressures: Which Can Be Trusted, Home or Clinic? Hypertension, November 1, 2008; 52(5): 795 - 796. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Renke, L. Tylicki, N. Knap, P. Rutkowski, A. Neuwelt, W. Larczynski, M. Wozniak, and B. Rutkowski Spironolactone Attenuates Oxidative Stress in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Hypertension, November 1, 2008; 52(5): e132 - e133. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Homing in on Blood Pressure Monitoring Journal Watch (General), June 24, 2008; 2008(624): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|