This Article Free upon publication Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 53/3/500    most recent HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.125674v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Agarwal, R. Articles by Light, R. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Agarwal, R. Articles by Light, R. P. Related Collections Clinical Studies Other Treatment Related Article

(Hypertension. 2009;53:500.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Articles

Dry-Weight Reduction in Hypertensive Hemodialysis Patients (DRIP)

A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Rajiv Agarwal; Pooneh Alborzi; Sangeetha Satyan; Robert P. Light

From the Division of Nephrology (R.A., P.A., S.S., R.P.L.) and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center (R.A.), Indianapolis, Ind.

Correspondence to Rajiv Agarwal, VAMC, 111 N, 1481 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202. E-mail ragarwal{at}iupui.edu

Volume excess is thought to be important in the pathogenesis of hypertension among hemodialysis patients. To determine whether additional volume reduction will result in improvement in blood pressure (BP) among hypertensive patients on hemodialysis and to evaluate the time course of this response, we randomly assigned long-term hypertensive hemodialysis patients to ultrafiltration or control groups. The additional ultrafiltration group (n=100) had the dry weight probed without increasing time or duration of dialysis, whereas the control group (n=50) only had physician visits. The primary outcome was change in systolic interdialytic ambulatory BP. Postdialysis weight was reduced by 0.9 kg at 4 weeks and resulted in –6.9 mm Hg (95% CI: –12.4 to –1.3 mm Hg; P=0.016) change in systolic BP and –3.1 mm Hg (95% CI: –6.2 to –0.02 mm Hg; P=0.048) change in diastolic BP. At 8 weeks, dry weight was reduced 1 kg, systolic BP changed –6.6 mm Hg (95% CI: –12.2 to –1.0 mm Hg; P=0.021), and diastolic BP changed –3.3 mm Hg (95% CI: –6.4 to –0.2 mm Hg; P=0.037) from baseline. The Mantel-Hanzel combined odds ratio for systolic BP reduction of 10 mm Hg was 2.24 (95% CI: 1.32 to 3.81; P=0.003). There was no deterioration seen in any domain of the kidney disease quality of life health survey despite an increase in intradialytic signs and symptoms of hypotension. The reduction of dry weight is a simple, efficacious, and well-tolerated maneuver to improve BP control in hypertensive hemodialysis patients. Long-term control of BP will depend on continued assessment and maintenance of dry weight.

Key Words: hemodialysis • hypertension • ultrafiltration • ambulatory blood pressure • volume overload

Related Article:

Assessing Blood Pressure Control in Dialysis Patients: Finally a Step Forward

Keith Hopkins and George L. Bakris
Hypertension 2009 53: 448-449. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Machek, T. Jirka, U. Moissl, P. Chamney, and P. Wabel Guided optimization of fluid status in haemodialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 30, 2009; (2009) gfp487v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Agarwal Volume-Associated Ambulatory Blood Pressure Patterns in Hemodialysis Patients Hypertension, August 1, 2009; 54(2): 241 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Hopkins and G. L. Bakris Assessing Blood Pressure Control in Dialysis Patients: Finally a Step Forward Hypertension, March 1, 2009; 53(3): 448 - 449. [Full Text] [PDF]