| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2009;54:421.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Seventh International Workshop on Structure and Function of the Vascular System |
From the Departments of Geriatric Medicine (L.J., C.P.-G., A.K.-S., P.S., A.B.), Nuclear Medicine (P.-Y.M., G.K.), and Radiology (D.M.), CHU-Nancy, Nancy; Nancy-Université (L.J., P.S., D.M., P.-Y.M., G.K., P.R., F.Z., A.B.), Nancy; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (L.J., P.S., P.-Y.M., P.R., F.Z., A.B.), U 961, Nancy; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (D.M.), U 947, Nancy; and the Clinical Investigation Centre (A.K.-S., P.R., F.Z.), CHU-Nancy, Hôpital Jeanne d'Arc, Toul, France.
Correspondence to Athanase Benetos, Centre de Gériatrie et Médecine Interne, CHU de Nancy, Rue du Morvan, 54511 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France. E-mail a.benetos{at}chu-nancy.fr
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) is considered the gold-standard measurement of arterial stiffness. Obesity, however, can render inaccurate the measurement of PWV by external noninvasive devices. Phase-contrast MRI allows the determination of aortic PWV in multiple aortic locations with intra-arterial distance measurements, as well as the assessment of aortic mechanical properties. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of external carotid-femoral PWV values measured by well-validated external devices in comparison with MRI acquisitions of PWV and aortic mechanical properties in a population of obese subjects. PWV was measured with PulsePen and Complior II devices in 32 volunteers (18 men and 14 women), aged 46 to 65 years (mean: 55.7±5.1 years), presenting with isolated abdominal obesity, with a waist circumference >102 cm for men and >88 cm for women, and a body mass index between 27 and 35. These results were then compared with MRI PWV values and cross-sectional MRI thoracic aorta distensibility values. MRI PWV values were positively correlated with PWV measured by both PulsePen (r=0.47; P=0.005) and Complior (r=0.43; P=0.01). Aortic cross-sectional stiffness was positively correlated with PulsePen PWV (r=0.42; P=0.02). The same trend was also observed with Complior PWV (r=0.33; P=0.06). This is the first study comparing transcutaneous PWV measurements with MRI aortic elastic properties in obese subjects. Our results indicate that, for body mass index values
35 kg m–2, PWV measured externally with Complior or PulsePen validly reflect values obtained directly in the thoracic aorta through MRI.
Key Words: arterial stiffness pulse wave velocity obesity MRI aortic distensibility
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Weber, M. Rammer, B. Eber, and M. F. O'Rourke Determination of Travel Distance for Noninvasive Measurement of Pulse Wave Velocity: Case Closed? Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): e137 - e137. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Struijker-Boudier, J. Blacher, B. I. Levy, and M. E. Safar Introduction to the Seventh International Workshop on Structure and Function of the Vascular System Hypertension, August 1, 2009; 54(2): 373 - 374. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |