Hypertension, Vol 6, 110-114, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association
BJ des Combes, M Porchet, B Waeber and HR Brunner
The accuracy of blood pressure readings taken by the portable semiautomatic
blood pressure recorder Remler M 2000 was investigated in 101 unselected,
untreated volunteers. On the average, pressures recorded during usual daily
activities were lower by approximately 10 mm Hg than pressures measured in
the office. However, individual ambulatory pressures could not be predicted
from office readings, and the difference varied among the volunteers from
+14 to -43 mm Hg. The reproducibility of office and ambulatory pressures
was investigated in 84 subjects. There was a highly significant correlation
between pressure levels determined at a 3- to 4-month interval with both
the conventional auscultatory method in the office and the Remler
ambulatory recorder. These data demonstrate that the Remler M 2000
ambulatory blood pressure recorder, when used properly, provides
reproducible blood pressure profiles during customary daily activities. The
ambulatory pressure recorder seems particularly useful for a baseline
evaluation of the usual daily blood pressure, which in the individual
subject differs in a highly unpredictable manner from the blood pressure
measured at the physician's office.
ARTICLES
Ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Reproducibility and unpredictability
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.-D. Schaller, J. Nussberger, B. Waeber, M. Porchet, and H. R. Brunner Transdermal Clonidine Therapy in Hypertensive Patients: Effects on Office and Ambulatory Recorded Blood Pressure Values JAMA, January 11, 1985; 253(2): 233 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1984 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |