Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1984;6:110-114

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by des Combes, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brunner, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by des Combes, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brunner, H. R.

Hypertension, Vol 6, 110-114, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Reproducibility and unpredictability

BJ des Combes, M Porchet, B Waeber and HR Brunner

The accuracy of blood pressure readings taken by the portable semiautomatic blood pressure recorder Remler M 2000 was investigated in 101 unselected, untreated volunteers. On the average, pressures recorded during usual daily activities were lower by approximately 10 mm Hg than pressures measured in the office. However, individual ambulatory pressures could not be predicted from office readings, and the difference varied among the volunteers from +14 to -43 mm Hg. The reproducibility of office and ambulatory pressures was investigated in 84 subjects. There was a highly significant correlation between pressure levels determined at a 3- to 4-month interval with both the conventional auscultatory method in the office and the Remler ambulatory recorder. These data demonstrate that the Remler M 2000 ambulatory blood pressure recorder, when used properly, provides reproducible blood pressure profiles during customary daily activities. The ambulatory pressure recorder seems particularly useful for a baseline evaluation of the usual daily blood pressure, which in the individual subject differs in a highly unpredictable manner from the blood pressure measured at the physician's office.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
M.-D. Schaller, J. Nussberger, B. Waeber, M. Porchet, and H. R. Brunner
Transdermal Clonidine Therapy in Hypertensive Patients: Effects on Office and Ambulatory Recorded Blood Pressure Values
JAMA, January 11, 1985; 253(2): 233 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]