| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 9, 2006
From the Institute of Child Health (J.P.J.H.), University College London, London, United Kingdom; the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (K.R.A.N.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich; Cardiology Branch (G.Z.), National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md; and the Division of Cardiology (A.A.Q.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.halcox{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract--Endothelin 1 mediates coronary vasoconstriction and endothelial dysfunction via endothelin receptor type A (ETA) activation. However, the effects of selective endothelin receptor type B (ETB) and combined ETA+B receptor blockade on coronary vasomotion are unknown. We measured coronary vascular tone and endothelium-dependent and -independent vasomotor function before and after selective infusion of BQ-788 (an ETB receptor antagonist) or combined infusion of BQ-788+BQ-123 (an ETA antagonist) into unobstructed coronary arteries of 39 patients with coronary atherosclerosis or risk factors undergoing cardiac catheterization. BQ-788 did not affect epicardial diameter but constricted the microcirculation (P<0.0001), increased coronary sinus endothelin, and reduced nitrogen oxide levels. In contrast, BQ-123+BQ-788 dilated epicardial (P<0.0001) and resistance (P=0.022) arteries. Responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were unaffected by BQ-788 alone. Epicardial endothelial dysfunction improved after BQ-123+BQ-788 (P=0.007). Coronary microvascular responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were unaffected by BQ-123+BQ-788. We conclude that selective ETB receptor antagonism causes coronary microvascular constriction, without affecting epicardial tone or endothelial function, via reduced endothelin clearance and NO availability. Combined ETA+B blockade dilates coronary conduit and resistance vessels and improves endothelial dysfunction of the epicardial coronary arteries. Thus, endogenous endothelin, predominantly via ETA receptor stimulation, contributes to basal constrictor tone and endothelial dysfunction, whereas ETB activation mediates vasodilation in human coronaries. Our data suggest that selective ETA blockade may have greater therapeutic potential than nonselective agents, particularly for treatment of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis.
Revised on November 26, 2006
Endogenous Endothelin in Human Coronary Vascular Function. Differential Contribution of Endothelin Receptor Types A and B
Julian P.J. Halcox*;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Wexberg, W Sperker, N G Morgenthaler, H Heinzl, C Adlbrecht, C Plass, H D Glogar, I M Lang, and T Neunteufl Inhomogeneous vasomotor effects of moderate selective and non-selective endothelin-receptor blockade in stable coronary artery disease Heart, August 1, 2009; 95(15): 1258 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Kandalaft, A. Facciabene, R. J. Buckanovich, and G. Coukos Endothelin B Receptor, a New Target in Cancer Immune Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2009; 15(14): 4521 - 4528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |