Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 10, 2008

Hypertension. 2008
Published online before print March 10, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101659
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/4/841    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101659v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Graves, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Graves, J. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
*Seniors' Health
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - treatment
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Compliance/Adherence
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on September 23, 2007
Revised on October 9, 2007

Novel Use of Kaplan–Meier Methods to Explain Age and Gender Differences in Hypertension Control Rates

Kent R. Bailey*; Brandon R. Grossardt; and John W. Graves

From the Division of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research (K.R.B., B.R.G.), and Division of Nephrology and Hypertension (J.W.G.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; Rochester, Minn.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: baileyk{at}mayo.edu.

Abstract—Despite 40 years of research demonstrating the efficacy of antihypertensive medications for lowering blood pressure and decreasing cardiovascular disease, hypertension control rates worldwide remain low. We explored here how both medication efficacy rates and patient/physician decision-making (discontinuation rates) affect overall hypertension control rates. To do this we introduced the use of Kaplan–Meier methodology to predict hypertension control rates separately within age strata. An important aspect of our analysis is the use of a "treatment intensity score," including both the number of agent(s) and the percentage of maximal dose of agent(s). We investigated how blood pressure control rates vary with age, gender, and treatment intensity. Our analysis found that both efficacy and discontinuation rates at different treatment intensities vary with age and gender, so that for each increase in age by 1 decade, the log hazard of achieving controlled blood pressure at any given intensity decreases by 0.10 in men and 0.20 in women. Overall hypertension control rates ranged from 80.8% for persons age 15 to 39 years to only 42.1% for persons age ≥80 years. Our analysis more accurately represents achievable hypertension control rates, with differences by gender, than previous work, because we investigated the contributions of efficacy and treatment aggressiveness in the control of hypertension.


Key words: hypertension • survival analysis • antihypertensive medication • aging • gender


Related Article:

Older Patients Need Better Guidelines for Optimal Treatment of High Blood Pressure: 1 Size Fits Few
Lawrence R. Krakoff
Hypertension 2008 51: 817-818. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. R. Krakoff
Older Patients Need Better Guidelines for Optimal Treatment of High Blood Pressure: 1 Size Fits Few
Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 817 - 818.
[Full Text] [PDF]