Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on December 1, 2008

Hypertension. 2008
Published online before print December 1, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.124545
A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
53/2_Part_2/319    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.124545v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ren, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carretero, O. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ren, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carretero, O. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrow Other Research

Submitted on October 4, 2008
Revised on October 22, 2008

Possible Mediators of Connecting Tubule Glomerular Feedback

YiLin Ren; Martin A. D'Ambrosio; Jeffrey L. Garvin; Hong Wang; and Oscar A. Carretero*

From the Division of Hypertension and Vascular Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ocarret1{at}hfhs.org.

Abstract—In the renal cortex, the connecting tubule (CNT) returns to the glomerular hilum and contacts the afferent arteriole (Af-Art). Increasing Na delivery to the CNT dilates the Af-Art by activating epithelial Na channels, a process that we call connecting tubule glomerular feedback (CTGF). However, the mediator(s) of CTGF are unknown. We tested the hypothesis that Na reabsorption by the CNT induces release of arachidonic acid metabolites that diffuse to and dilate the Af-Art. Microdissected rabbit Af-Arts and adherent CNTs were simultaneously microperfused. CTGF was measured as the increase in diameter of norepinephrine-preconstricted Af-Arts in response to switching NaCl concentration in the lumen of the CNT from 10 to 80 mmol/L. Under control conditions, CTGF was repeatable and completely reversed norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction. In the presence of 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid, an inhibitor of arachidonic acid metabolism, CTGF was completely blocked (-0.7±0.3 versus 7.3±0.5 µm), suggesting that arachidonic acid metabolites mediate CTGF. Because both cyclooxygenase-derived prostaglandins and epoxygenase-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids are known vasodilatory arachidonic acid metabolites, we tested whether indomethacin or MS-PPOH (a cyclooxygenase and an epoxygenase inhibitor) could block CTGF. Both indomethacin and MS-PPOH partially blocked CTGF (2.3±0.8 versus 6.5±0.5 µm, and 2.9±0.8 versus 6.6±1.1 µm, respectively). When combined, they completely blocked CTGF (-0.4±0.3 versus 6.6±1.1 µm). We confirmed these findings by using the epoxyeicosatrienoic acid antagonist 14,15-EEZE. The combination of indomethacin plus 14,15-EEZE completely abolished CTGF (-0.3±0.2 versus 8.0±1.0 µm). We conclude that increasing Na concentrations in the CNT stimulate release of prostaglandins and epoxyeicosatrienoic acids, which mediate CTGF.


Key words: afferent arteriole • connecting tubule • tubuloglomerular feedback • EETs • cyclooxygenase