Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
      • Research Guidelines
        • Minimum Information About Microarray Data Experiments (MIAME)
      • Abstract
      • Acknowledgments
      • Clinical Implications (Only by invitation)
      • Conflict(s) of Interest/Disclosure(s) Statement
      • Figure Legends
      • Figures
      • Novelty and Significance: 1) What Is New, 2) What Is Relevant?
      • References
      • Sources of Funding
      • Tables
      • Text
      • Title Page
      • Online/Data Supplement
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
      • Change of Authorship Form
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Hypertension

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Articles

Effect of Salt Intake and Inhibitor Dose on Arterial Hypertension and Renal Injury Induced by Chronic Nitric Oxide Blockade

Sergio Seiji Yamada, Ana Lúcia Sassaki, Clarice Kazue Fujihara, Denise Maria Avancini Costa Malheiros, Gilberto De Nucci, Roberto Zatz
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.27.5.1165
Hypertension. 1996;27:1165-1172
Originally published May 1, 1996
Sergio Seiji Yamada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Lúcia Sassaki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clarice Kazue Fujihara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise Maria Avancini Costa Malheiros
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gilberto De Nucci
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Zatz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Abstract Long-term nitric oxide blockade by Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) leads to severe and progressive hypertension. The role of salt intake in this model is unclear. To verify whether salt dependence in this model is related to the extent of nitric oxide inhibition, we gave adult male Munich-Wistar rats a low salt, standard salt, or high salt diet and oral L-NAME treatment at either 3 or 25 mg/kg per day. At 10 to 15 days of treatment, the slope of the pressure-natriuresis line was decreased in rats receiving low-dose L-NAME compared with untreated controls. In rats treated with the higher dose, the line was shifted to the right but remained parallel to that obtained in untreated controls. Renal vascular resistance was moderately increased in rats receiving low-dose L-NAME, whereas high-dose L-NAME induced a marked vasoconstriction that was aggravated by salt overload. Low-dose L-NAME treatment induced hypertension only when associated with sodium overload. In rats receiving high-dose L-NAME, hypertension was aggravated by sodium excess but was not ameliorated by sodium restriction. Long-term (6 weeks) L-NAME treatment was associated with progressive hypertension, which was aggravated by salt overload, and with the development of albuminuria, focal glomerular collapse, glomerulosclerosis, and renal interstitial expansion. These abnormalities were worsened by salt overload and largely prevented by salt restriction. In the model of chronic nitric oxide blockade, salt dependence is a function of the inhibitor dose, and renal injury varies directly with the level of salt intake.

  • nitric oxide
  • kidney
  • salt
  • pressure natriuresis

Chronic inhibition of NO synthesis promotes progressive arterial hypertension and renal parenchymal injury consisting primarily of glomerular ischemia, glomerulosclerosis, and interstitial expansion.1 2 The exact mechanisms underlying the functional and structural changes encountered in this model remain to be determined.

The pathogenetic role of salt retention in this model is particularly controversial. Several investigators have reported evidence that sodium retention contributes to the development of hypertension in this model,3 4 that administration of pressor4 and subpressor5 doses of NO inhibitors induces salt sensitivity, and that a deficient NO response may underlie spontaneously occurring salt sensitivity.6 Consistent with these findings, other studies have shown that acute NO inhibition shifts the pressure-natriuresis relationship to the right, thereby impairing renal sodium excretion capability.7 8 Similar results were obtained by chronic infusion of an NO inhibitor directly into the renal medulla.9 However, other studies of chronic NO inhibition failed to disclose any effect on BP of concomitant salt restriction10 or excess.11 12 In addition, sodium balance was found not to be affected in these rats,13 casting doubt as to whether salt retention occurs in this model. The reasons for these conflicting results are unclear. However, it must be noted that these studies have used widely varying doses of NO inhibitors. Conceivably, lower-grade NO inhibition might subtly impair renal sodium excretory capability and promote salt-dependent hypertension, whereas severe and generalized vasoconstriction14 might predominate with more complete NO inhibition. Indeed, those studies indicating salt sensitivity in this model tended to use relatively low or even subpressor doses of NO inhibitors.3 4 5 Additionally, in none of these studies was sodium intake varied between extremes, such as needed, for instance, to demonstrate salt sensitivity in Dahl rats.6

In the present study, we examined renal and systemic hemodynamics and renal histology at two different levels of NO inhibition combined with three widely differing levels of salt intake. In addition, we examined the effect of chronic NO inhibition on the pressure-natriuresis relationship. In this manner, we were able to explore in detail the interaction of NO inhibition and salt intake in this model.

Methods

One hundred and ninety-six adult male Munich-Wistar rats, obtained from an established colony at the University of São Paulo and weighing 239 to 295 g, were used in this study. Rats received tap water ad libitum and commercially available rat chow (Harlan Teklad) containing 25% protein and sodium chloride at either 0.06% sodium (LS diet), 0.5% sodium (SS diet), or 3.2% sodium (HS diet). All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with our institutional guidelines.

Experimental Groups

Rats were distributed among nine experimental groups. (1) Group LS0: Rats received an LS diet and no drug treatment. (2) Group LS3: Rats received an LS diet and the NO inhibitor L-NAME, 0.12 mmol/L, corresponding to a daily ingestion of approximately 3 mg/kg. In preliminary experiments, this dose was shown to promote little or no increase in BP even after several weeks of treatment. (3) Group LS25: Rats received an LS diet and 1 mmol/L L-NAME, corresponding to a daily ingestion of approximately 25 mg/kg. In preliminary experiments, this dose was shown to reproducibly promote progressive systemic hypertension. (4) Group SS0: Rats received an SS diet and no drug treatment. (5) Group SS3: Rats received an SS diet and 0.12 mmol/L L-NAME in the drinking water, corresponding to an average intake of approximately 3 mg/kg per day. (6) Group SS25: Rats received an SS diet and 1 mmol/L L-NAME in the drinking water, corresponding to an average intake of approximately 25 mg/kg per day. (7) Group HS0: Rats received an HS diet and no drug treatment. (8) Group HS3: Rats received an HS diet and 0.06 mmol/L L-NAME, corresponding to a daily ingestion of approximately 3 mg/kg. Since rats on an HS diet drank twice as much water as those on an LS diet, L-NAME concentrations in the drinking water were correspondingly adjusted to ensure that HS3 rats received the same dose of the inhibitor as SS3 and LS3 rats, namely, 3 mg/kg per day. (9) Group HS25: Rats received an HS diet and 0.5 mmol/L L-NAME, corresponding to a daily ingestion of approximately 25 mg/kg. As in the preceding group, L-NAME concentrations in the drinking water were adjusted to compensate for the higher water intake of rats on an HS diet. All salt regimens were started 1 week before L-NAME treatment was initiated.

Pressure-Natriuresis Curves

In 8 additional rats of group SS0, 11 of group SS3, 12 of group SS25, 15 of group HS0, 14 of group HS3, and 14 of group HS25, the pressure-natriuresis curve was determined at 2 weeks of treatment with a modified form of the method described by Roman and Cowley.15 Rats were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg thiobutabarbital IP and placed on a temperature-controlled surgical table. Rectal temperature was maintained at 37±0.5°C. The femoral artery was cannulated with PE-50 tubing for continuous monitoring of mean arterial pressure by a Statham P23Db pressure transducer connected to a chart recorder (model A8200, Anamed Instruments). After tracheotomy, the left jugular vein was catheterized with PE-50 tubing for infusion of homologous plasma to replace surgical losses and keep a euvolemic state.16 An amount of plasma equivalent to 1% body weight was given over about 45 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5 to 1.0 mL/h for the remainder of the experiment. PE-50 tubing was also placed in the right jugular vein for maintenance of a continuous saline infusion (1.5 mL/h) throughout the experiment. The right carotid artery was cannulated with PE-50 tubing for continuous BP monitoring at the late phases of the experiment (see below). The left ureter was catheterized with PE-10 tubing. About 2.5 hours after anesthesia, urine was collected during 20 minutes at baseline femoral arterial pressure for determination of flow and sodium excretion rates. Femoral arterial pressure (and hence renal perfusion pressure) was then lowered by 20 to 25 mm Hg with an inflatable cuff placed around the abdominal aorta just above the emergence of the renal arteries. After stabilization for 15 minutes, urine collection was repeated. The cuff was then deflated and the superior mesenteric and celiac arteries were ligated to raise renal perfusion pressure above baseline. Since urine flow always increased dramatically with this procedure, the saline infusion rate was raised at this time to 3 mL/h. After a new 15-minute stabilization period, a third timed urine sample was obtained. A bulldog clamp was then placed around the abdominal aorta below the renal arteries to further elevate renal perfusion pressure, now estimated by carotid pressure. After 15 minutes, a final urine sample was obtained. Urine samples were always obtained in this exact order. The experiment was discarded whenever the rat exhibited prolonged (>10 minutes) hemodynamic instability. Since renal mass reduction markedly aggravates injury in rats with chronic NO blockade,17 rats were not subjected to uninephrectomy before these experiments. Likewise, exogenous infusions of vasoactive compounds and renal denervation15 were not performed, because the pathogenesis of hypertension in this chronic model likely involves the participation of several vasoconstrictors1 18 19 20 as well as altered sympathetic output to the kidneys.21 22 23

Renal Functional Studies

For assessment of renal hemodynamics, 8 rats of groups LS0, 8 of group LS3, 8 of group LS25, 8 of group HS0, 8 of group HS3, and 8 of group HS25 were anesthetized at 10 to 15 days with thiobutabarbital and placed on a temperature-controlled surgical table for maintenance of rectal temperature at 37±0.5°C. The left femoral artery, jugular veins, trachea, and left ureter were cannulated as described above. Homologous plasma was infused through the left jugular as described above. Saline solution containing 14C-tagged inulin (2 μCi/mL) was infused through the right jugular at 1.5 mL/h in rats fed an LS diet and 3 mL/h in those given an HS diet. About 2.5 hours after anesthesia, urine was collected during 25 to 35 minutes for determination of flow rate and inulin clearance. Whole-kidney filtration fraction (FF) was determined by simultaneous collection of blood samples from the femoral artery and renal vein and measurement of the respective 14C activities in a scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments) for calculation of inulin extraction. Blood was obtained from the renal vein with a sharpened glass micropipette (about 40 μm OD). Renal plasma flow (RPF) was calculated as RPF=GFR/FF, where GFR is glomerular filtration rate. Renal total vascular resistance (RVR) was estimated by RVR=MAP(1−Ht)/RPF, where MAP is mean arterial pressure, Ht is arterial hematocrit, and RPF is renal plasma flow. At the end of the experiment, the renal tissue was perfusion-fixed at the observed BP with Dubosq-Brazil solution after a brief washout with saline.

Long-term Studies

Eight rats of each group were followed for up to 6 weeks of treatment. Mean BP, estimated by a tail-cuff method24 ; PRA, assayed in tail blood samples; and urinary albumin excretion rate were obtained at 3 and 6 weeks. At the end of 6 weeks, the rats were anesthetized with 50 mg/kg pentobarbital IP. The renal tissue was then perfusion-fixed in situ with Dubosq-Brazil solution after a brief washout with saline and examined by light microscopy for evaluation of glomerular and interstitial injury.

Analytic Methods

Urinary albumin excretion rate was determined by a radial immunodiffusion technique.25 PRA was measured by an enzymatic technique26 adapted for small samples. Urinary sodium concentration was determined by flame photometry.

Histological Techniques

After perfusion fixation, two midcoronal slices of the right kidney were embedded in paraffin, and 2- to 3-μm-thick sections were stained by the PAS reaction for examination by light microscopy. Additional sections were stained with Masson’s trichrome for measurement of fractional interstitial area. Tissue was examined in a blinded fashion by light microscopy at ×160 magnification. At least 300 glomeruli were examined for each rat. Glomeruli exhibiting global collapse or sclerosis were identified according to criteria described previously27 and detailed in “Results.” The frequency of collapsed glomeruli was expressed as a percentage of the total number of glomeruli examined. For assessment of the extent of interstitial expansion, the fraction of renal cortex occupied by interstitial tissue staining positively for collagen was quantitatively evaluated in Masson-stained sections by a point-counting technique28 in 25 consecutive microscopic fields examined at a final magnification of ×400 under a 110-point ocular grid.

Statistics

Differences among groups were compared by two-way ANOVA with pairwise Bonferroni comparisons.29 Pressure-natriuresis lines were obtained by least-squares regression analysis. Significance of the differences between curves was assessed by comparison of linear regression slopes and intercepts.30 A value of P<.05 was considered significant.

Results

Pressure-natriuresis and pressure-diuresis lines obtained in groups SS0, SS3, and SS25 are shown in Fig 1⇓. In all groups, urine flow and sodium excretion rate were best described as linear functions of renal perfusion pressure. Fitting to nonlinear functions such as two-phase exponential growth was also obtained, although the r values were lower and the differences between groups less apparent than with linear regression. In rats treated with low-dose L-NAME (group SS3), the slope of these regression lines was significantly lower than in untreated rats (group SS0). In rats receiving high-dose L-NAME (group SS25), the pressure-natriuresis and pressure-diuresis lines were both shifted to the right compared with SS0. However, their slopes were not significantly different compared with untreated rats. In rats receiving HS diet, the pressure-natriuresis and pressure-diuresis lines exhibited exactly the same behavior as in rats given an SS diet (data not shown).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Pressure-natriuresis (left) and pressure-diuresis (right) lines at 2 weeks of L-NAME treatment in rats receiving SS (0.5% NaCl, wt/wt) diet. UNaV indicates urinary excretion of sodium; V, urine volume; and RPP, renal perfusion pressure.

Renal and systemic hemodynamic parameters measured at 10 to 15 days of treatment in LS and HS groups are shown in the Table⇓. Body growth was similar among groups. Left kidney weight was not significantly altered by either L-NAME treatment or dietary salt intake, except for group HS3, which had slightly larger kidneys. Mean arterial pressure was not significantly affected by dietary sodium in the absence of L-NAME treatment. However, sodium intake was decisive for the establishment of arterial hypertension in rats receiving low-dose L-NAME. LS diet significantly attenuated arterial hypertension in rats receiving high-dose L-NAME, although it failed to normalize BP in these rats. Low-dose L-NAME (groups LS3 and HS3) did not significantly affect glomerular filtration rate. However, glomerular filtration rate was moderately decreased in groups LS25 and HS25, although only in the latter did the differences with the respective control achieve statistical significance. Filtration fraction was similar among groups, except for groups LS25 and HS25. Accordingly, renal plasma flow was lowered in these two groups compared with their respective controls. Renal vascular resistance was insensitive to salt intake in untreated rats. Low-dose L-NAME treatment increased renal vascular resistance by 41% in rats receiving an LS diet and by 48% in those given an HS diet. Vasoconstriction was more severe in rats receiving high-dose L-NAME.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Systemic and Renal Hemodynamic Parameters at 2 Weeks of L-NAME Treatment

Long-term treatment with L-NAME was associated with normal body growth in all groups except group HS25, in which body weight (262±9 g) was low compared with rats receiving either low-dose L-NAME and salt overload (HS3, 307±11 g) or high-dose L-NAME and salt restriction (LS25, 322±5 g). No limitation to body growth was seen in the other groups. The evolution of tail-cuff pressure during 6 weeks of treatment is shown in Fig 2⇓. Tail-cuff pressure increased steadily in group HS3 compared with untreated controls, reaching 152±8 mm Hg after 6 weeks of treatment, compared with 124±4 mm Hg in group HS0 (P<.05). Salt restriction prevented BP elevation in group LS3, characterizing the development of hypertension at this L-NAME dose as salt dependent. Rats receiving high-dose L-NAME and HS intake (group HS25) developed more severe and rapidly progressive hypertension, reaching 170±10 mm Hg after 6 weeks of treatment. Since the mortality rate in this group was 20%, as opposed to 0% in the remaining groups, and since it is likely that the BPs of the rats that died would have been even higher at 6 weeks, the tail-cuff pressure measured at the end of the study may have underestimated the severity of the hemodynamic derangement occurring in this group. Salt restriction attenuated but did not prevent hypertension in group LS25 (145±4 versus 118±1 mm Hg in group LS0, P<.05).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Tail-cuff pressure as a function of time in rats receiving no treatment, low-dose L-NAME (3 mg/kg per day), or high-dose L-NAME (25 mg/kg per day) and varying amounts of dietary sodium.

As expected, plasma renin levels were persistently higher in rats receiving an LS diet than in those given salt excess (Fig 3⇓). Low-dose L-NAME treatment had little effect on PRA in rats receiving an HS diet but promoted a steady decline in renin levels in rats given an LS diet. High-dose L-NAME treatment depressed PRA even faster in rats receiving an LS diet. In rats receiving an HS diet, high-dose L-NAME further lowered circulating renin levels at 3 weeks but markedly increased PRA at 6 weeks of treatment.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

PRA as a function of time in rats receiving no treatment, low-dose L-NAME (3 mg/kg per day), or high-dose L-NAME (25 mg/kg per day) and either HS or LS diet. AI indicates angiotensin I.

Albumin excretion rate (Fig 4⇓) was increased at 6 weeks of treatment in group HS3, reaching 30.2±18.3 mg/24 h, although this variation did not reach statistical significance compared with groups HS0 (1.3±0.3 mg/24 h) and LS3 (1.2±0.2 mg/24 h). Urinary albumin excretion rate was numerically increased in group SS25, reaching 19.9±7.0 mg/24 h, although this value did not differ statistically from those observed in groups LS25 (2.7±0.6 mg/24 h) and SS3 (1.3±0.3 mg/24 h). In group HS25, however, albuminuria rose steadily from the beginning of the study, reaching 168±22 mg/24 h at 6 weeks (P<.05 versus groups HS0, HS3, and LS25).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Urinary albumin excretion rate as a function of time in rats receiving no treatment, low-dose L-NAME (3 mg/kg per day), or high-dose L-NAME (25 mg/kg per day) and varying amounts of dietary sodium.

Fig 5⇓ shows the three most frequently occurring modalities of renal injury encountered in L-NAME–treated rats.27 Collapsed glomeruli (Fig 5⇓, top) appeared reduced in size, with prominent thickening of the basement membrane and extreme narrowing of capillary loops, without adhesions to Bowman’s capsule. Glomerulosclerosis (Fig 5⇓, middle) was defined as tuft deposition of PAS-positive material with loop occlusion and/or adhesions to Bowman’s capsule. Interstitial expansion (Fig 5⇓, bottom) consisted of focal enlargement of interstitial tissue, with infiltration by fibroblasts and deposition of collagen-like material, frequently associated with tubular atrophy and vacuolization. Confluence of these areas was seen in more severely affected rats. Fig 6⇓, left, depicts the frequency of glomerular collapse in the groups studied. In group SS25, 15.9±4.3% of glomeruli presented with tuft collapse (P<.05 versus SS0 and SS3), whereas sodium excess increased the frequency of these glomeruli in group HS25 (28.5±3.4%, P<.05 versus groups HS0 and HS3). Sodium restriction attenuated glomerular collapse in group LS25 (7.0±1.4%, P<.05 versus HS25 and P>.1 versus LS0). Parallel results were obtained regarding glomerulosclerosis (Fig 6⇓, middle) and interstitial expansion (Fig 6⇓, right). Focal and segmental necrosis of the glomerular tuft appeared in nearly 1.2% of glomeruli examined in group HS25 but was virtually absent in the other groups. Arteriolar wall thickening was observed in group HS3 and, more often, in group HS25. Fibrinoid necrosis of the arteriolar wall was seen only in group HS25.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Top, Global collapse of the glomerulus, with widespread occlusion of capillary loops and thickening of basement membrane. PAS in 3-μm-thick section, magnification ×160. Middle, Segmental sclerosis of the glomerular tuft, consisting of deposition of PAS-positive material with occlusion of capillary loops and adhesion to Bowman’s capsule. PAS in 3-μm-thick section, magnification ×160. Bottom, Focal expansion of the interstitial area. Fibroblast nuclei, matrix expansion, and tubular atrophy are readily visible. Masson’s trichrome in 3-μm-thick section, magnification ×100.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Bar graphs show frequency of structural abnormalities in rats receiving L-NAME treatment for 6 weeks. Open bars represent LS diet; shaded bars, SS diet; and solid bars, HS diet. Left, collapsed glomeruli; middle, glomerulosclerosis; and right, relative interstitial area. The following comparisons were statistically significant: left, glomerular collapse: HS25 vs HS0, SS25 vs SS0, HS25 vs SS25, HS25 vs LS25, SS25 vs LS25, HS25 vs HS3, and SS25 vs SS3; middle, glomerulosclerosis: HS25 vs HS0, HS25 vs SS25, HS25 vs LS25, and HS25 vs HS3; right, interstitial area: HS25 vs HS0, HS25 vs SS25, HS25 vs LS25, and HS25 vs HS3.

Discussion

The present observations indicate a rather complex pathogenetic interaction between salt intake and chronic NO inhibition. At low L-NAME doses, the development of hypertension depended entirely on concomitant dietary salt overload, an observation in agreement with those made by Salazar and coworkers,3 who showed induction of salt-dependent hypertension in dogs by chronic infusion of subpressor doses of L-NAME, and by Tolins and Shultz,4 who showed marked aggravation of hypertension induced by low-dose L-NAME in rats also receiving dietary salt excess. In addition, these results are consistent with those reported by Chen and Sanders,6 who suggested that spontaneous NO deficiency may underlie the salt-dependent hypertension observed in Dahl rats. Collectively, these studies support the view that low-grade NO inhibition subtly impairs the renal ability to excrete sodium, predisposing the animals to the development of hypertension on salt overload. This effect was predicted by the pressure-natriuresis and pressure-diuresis relationships observed in the present study. Regardless of salt intake, the slopes of the regression lines were decreased compared with untreated rats, indicating that (1) relatively small reductions in salt intake would be expected to promote substantial BP lowering and (2) salt overload is necessary for hypertension to become manifest. Previous studies showed that the pressure-natriuresis relationship is blunted in rats and dogs acutely treated with NO inhibitors.7 8 The present observations indicate that this functional abnormality can persist for at least 2 weeks of NO inhibition and contribute to the maintenance of hypertension in salt-loaded animals.

Salt sensitivity was less pronounced at higher L-NAME doses. Although massive salt overload did elevate final BP by 25 mm Hg compared with rats receiving an SS diet, reduction of salt intake to very low levels had little effect on BP. These results are in keeping with those reported previously in rats treated with relatively high doses of L-NAME10 11 12 and characterize a relatively salt-insensitive hypertension in this setting. Again, these effects of salt intake were predicted by the pressure-natriuresis/diuresis relationship obtained in this group. As in rats treated with low-dose L-NAME, the regression lines were shifted to the right, indicating that higher BPs were required for excretion of a given amount of sodium and water. However, the slopes of these lines were indistinguishable from those of control, indicating a resetting of the pressure-natriuresis relationship and predicting (1) no more salt sensitivity in these rats than in untreated controls and (2) little BP effect of salt deprivation compared with SS intake, as effectively observed in this group.

Although the analysis of the pressure-natriuresis/diuresis lines helps the understanding in phenomenological terms of the complex interplay between salt intake and different levels of NO inhibition in the generation of hypertension, the mechanistic aspects involved in this setting are unclear. Administration of low-dose L-NAME in the present study promoted a 40% increase in renal vascular resistance, whereas higher-grade NO inhibition increased renal vascular resistance by more than twofold. Although these hemodynamic effects may contribute to the discordant responses of the pressure-natriuresis relationship to differing doses of L-NAME, they may also reflect simple autoregulation. On the other hand, previous studies showed that selective NO production at the inner medulla in response to variations in renal perfusion pressure may strongly influence sodium excretion by modifying local blood flow9 31 32 and/or by directly influencing tubular sodium transport.33 Further investigation is necessary for determination of whether L-NAME has a dose-dependent effect on these mechanisms, thus explaining the differing functional effects of high and low doses of the inhibitor. Additional limitation to renal sodium excretion may have originated from an enhanced renal sympathetic influx,21 22 23 as well as from activation of the renin-angiotensin system.10 19

Of particular interest was the behavior of plasma renin levels in these experiments. As expected, PRA was depressed by sodium excess and augmented by sodium restriction in rats not receiving L-NAME, compared with levels previously observed in rats receiving an SS diet.1 27 34 Low doses of L-NAME promoted a progressive decline in PRA in both salt-depleted and salt-loaded rats, whereas the initial depression of renin levels was even faster with high L-NAME doses, suggesting that whatever the level of salt repletion, renin production at least partially depends on NO availability. These results are consistent with several recent studies from this laboratory and elsewhere in which chronic NO inhibition, at least in the initial weeks of treatment, was reported to lower circulating renin levels.1 10 11 27 34 They are also in accordance with the observed depression of renin levels by acute L-NAME treatment in vivo35 36 and in isolated perfused rat kidneys37 38 and by the observation that endothelium-derived NO enhances renin secretion in cultivated juxtaglomerular cells.39 Later in the course of treatment, renin levels were markedly and paradoxically elevated in rats receiving high-dose L-NAME and dietary sodium overload, confirming previous observations of this laboratory.1 27 In these rats, hyperreninemia is unlikely to reflect a primary effect of NO on renin production. Rather, enhanced renin production appears to result from the profound structural derangement of the renal parenchyma, especially the extensive glomerular ischemia associated with this model. Hyperreninemia is likely to have contributed to aggravation of hypertension in this group at the late stages of the study. However, the initiation and maintenance of hypertension at the initial phase of this process appear to bear no direct relationship to the circulating renin levels, which were elevated in the face of normal BPs in LS rats receiving low-dose L-NAME and depressed in HS rats given the same dose of the inhibitor that nevertheless were always hypertensive. Since administration of renin-angiotensin antagonists has been shown to largely prevent hypertension in this model,1 27 40 the beneficial effects of these drugs must depend on some aspect of the renin-angiotensin system not directly related to circulating renin levels.

The renal parenchymal injury observed at 6 weeks in L-NAME–treated rats not subjected to salt restriction may have contributed additionally to the development of hypertension. As described previously,1 27 the most frequent structural abnormality encountered in these rats was a global collapse of the glomerular tuft, consistent with severe glomerular ischemia. Correa-Rotter and coworkers41 reported evidence that these glomeruli, also found in the renal ablation model,41 42 may release excessive amounts of renin, which in turn might promote the development of both systemic hypertension43 and renal structural injury.42 Exacerbation of this abnormality by salt overload coincided with aggravation of systemic hypertension, especially at later stages, suggesting a pathogenetic role for inadequately “high” circulating and/or local renin levels. Sodium restriction prevented both hypertension and glomerular collapse, further suggesting a pathogenetic association between these two phenomena. The mechanisms whereby salt intake levels might influence the development of glomerular collapse are unclear. NO inhibition and sodium overload might interact to promote severe afferent constriction, an abnormality shown in this and previous studies27 to associate with glomerular collapse. Sodium overload has been shown to increase cytosolic free calcium concentrations in erythrocytes.44 Although direct experimental evidence in this regard is lacking, excess sodium might influence smooth muscle cells similarly, thus favoring vasoconstriction. Conversely, sodium restriction might promote smooth muscle relaxation by lowering cytosolic calcium concentration, thus exerting a protective effect akin to that previously obtained in this model with chronic nifedipine treatment.45 Alternatively, glomerular collapse may have resulted directly from systemic hypertension. Although this hypothesis would also explain the observed prevention of glomerular collapse by salt restriction, it must be noted that hypertension as severe as that observed in this study is not associated with glomerular collapse in models such as the spontaneously hypertensive rat,46 renal ablation,47 or the Milan hypertensive rat.48

The present study confirms previous observations of this laboratory that renal interstitial fibrosis is a prominent feature of the structural derangement observed in rats receiving chronic L-NAME treatment and that this process is worsened by simultaneous sodium overload.27 In addition, sodium restriction largely prevented renal interstitial expansion in L-NAME–treated rats, regardless of the dose used. Given the antimitogenic properties of NO,49 50 51 renal interstitial enlargement in this model may be related at least in part to abnormal cell proliferation. Sodium overload has been shown to elevate cytosolic calcium concentration,44 whereas the latter has been consistently linked to activation of mitogenesis.52 53 54 Thus, it is possible that in the chronic NO blockade model, sodium overload aggravates interstitial expansion by enhancing cell proliferation, whereas sodium restriction has the opposite effect. In the absence of direct experimental evidence, however, this possibility must remain speculative.

In summary, the present observations indicate that chronic NO inhibition promotes salt-dependent hypertension. However, salt dependence can be demonstrated only at a relatively low dose of the inhibitor. Hypertension resulting from higher doses of the inhibitor is aggravated by dietary salt overload but cannot be prevented by salt restriction. Whatever the dose of NO inhibitor used, sodium restriction largely prevents the renal parenchymal injury associated with this model. Elucidation of the intimate mechanisms dictating the pathogenetic interaction between chronic NO inhibition and salt intake levels awaits further investigation.

Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms

BP=blood pressure
HS=high salt
L-NAME=Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester
LS=low salt
NO=nitric oxide
PAS=periodic acid–Schiff
PRA=plasma renin activity
SS=standard salt

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant No. 92/3496-9 from the São Paulo Foundation for Research Support (FAPESP). During these studies Dr Zatz was the recipient of a Research Award (No. 326.429/81) from the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technologic Development (CNPq). We are thankful to Cláudia Ramos de Sena and Marinete Miristeni dos Santos for expert technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • Parts of this study were presented at the 28th Congress of the American Society of Nephrology, San Diego, Calif, November 5-8, 1995, and published in abstract form (J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6:635).

  • Received November 20, 1995.
  • Revision received December 18, 1995.
  • Accepted January 22, 1996.

References

  1. ↵
    Ribeiro MO, Antunes E, De-Nucci G, Lovisolo SM, Zatz R. Chronic inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis: a new model of arterial hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;20:298-303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Baylis C, Mitruka B, Deng A. Chronic blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in the rat produces systemic hypertension and glomerular damage. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:278-281.
  3. ↵
    Salazar FJ, Alberola A, Pinilla JM, Romero JC, Quesada T. Salt-induced increase in arterial pressure during nitric oxide synthesis inhibition. Hypertension. 1993;22:49-55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Tolins JP, Shultz PJ. Endogenous nitric oxide synthesis determines sensitivity to the pressor effect of salt. Kidney Int. 1994;46:230-236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Salazar FJ, Pinilla JM, Lopez F, Romero JC, Quesada T. Renal effects of prolonged synthesis inhibition of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Hypertension. 1992;20:113-117.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Chen PY, Sanders PW. L-arginine abrogates salt-sensitive hypertension in Dahl/Rapp rats. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:1559-1567.
  7. ↵
    Majid DS, Williams A, Navar LG. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis attenuates pressure-induced natriuretic responses in anesthetized dogs. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:F79-F87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Salom MG, Lahera V, Miranda-Guardiola F, Romero JC. Blockade of pressure natriuresis induced by inhibition of renal synthesis of nitric oxide in dogs. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:F718-F722.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Mattson DL, Lu S, Nakanishi K, Papanek PE, Cowley AW Jr. Effect of chronic renal medullary nitric oxide inhibition on blood pressure. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H1918-H1926.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Jover B, Herizi A, Ventre F, Dupont M, Mimran A. Sodium and angiotensin in hypertension induced by long-term nitric oxide blockade. Hypertension. 1993;21:944-948.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Johnson RA, Freeman RH. Sustained hypertension in the rat induced by chronic blockade of nitric oxide production. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:919-922.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Fernández-Rivas A, García-Estañ J, Vargas F. Effects of chronic increased salt intake on nitric oxide synthesis inhibition-induced hypertension. J Hypertens. 1995;13:123-128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Navarro J, Sanchez A, Saiz J, Ruilope LM, Garciaestan J, Romero JC, Moncada S, Lahera V. Hormonal, renal, and metabolic alterations during hypertension induced by chronic inhibition of NO in rats. Am J Physiol. 1994;36:R1516-R1521.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Gardiner SM, Compton AM, Bennett T, Palmer RMJ, Moncada S. Regional hemodynamic changes during oral ingestion of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine or NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester in conscious Brattleboro rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1990;101:10-12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Roman RJ, Cowley AW Jr. Characterization of a new model for the study of pressure-natriuresis in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:F190-F198.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Maddox DA, Price DC, Rector FC Jr. Effects of surgery on plasma volume and salt and water excretion in rats. Am J Physiol. 1977;233:F600-F606.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Fujihara CK, De Nucci G, Zatz R. Chronic nitric oxide inhibition aggravates glomerular injury in rats with subtotal nephrectomy. Nephron. 1995;5:1498-1507.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    Manning RD, Hu LF, Williamson TD. Mechanisms involved in the cardiovascular-renal actions of nitric oxide inhibition. Hypertension. 1994;23:951-956.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Qiu C, Engels K, Baylis C. Angiotensin II and alpha 1-adrenergic tone in chronic nitric oxide blockade-induced hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:R1470-R1476.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Nafrialdi N, Jover B, Mimran A. Endogenous vasoactive systems and the pressor effect of acute N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester administration. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;23:765-771.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    Sakuma I, Togashi H, Yoshioka M, Saito H, Yanagida M, Tamura M, Kobayashi T, Yasuda H, Gross SS, Levi R. NG-methyl-l-arginine, an inhibitor of l-arginine–derived nitric oxide synthesis, stimulates renal nerve activity in vivo: a role for nitric oxide in the central regulation of sympathetic tone? Circulation. 1992;70:607-611.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Toda N, Kitamura Y, Okamura T. Neural mechanism of hypertension by nitric oxide synthase inhibition in dogs. Hypertension. 1993;21:3-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Matsuoka H, Nishida H, Nomura G, Vanvliet BN, Toshima H. Hypertension induced by nitric oxide synthesis inhibition is renal nerve dependent. Hypertension. 1994;23:971-975.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    Zatz R. A low-cost tail-cuff method for the estimation of mean arterial pressure in conscious rats. Lab Anim Sci. 1990;42:198-201.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    Mancini GAO, Carbonaro JF. Immunochemical quantitation of antigens by single radial immunodiffusion. Immunochemistry. 1965;2:235-254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Haber E, Koerner T, Page LB, Kliman B, Purnode A. Application of radioimmunoassay for angiotensin I to the physiologic measurement of plasma renin activity in normal human subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1969;29:1349-1355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Fujihara CK, Michellazzo SM, de-Nucci G, Zatz R. Sodium excess aggravates hypertension and renal parenchymal injury in rats with chronic NO inhibition. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:F697-F705.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Jepsen FL, Mortensen PB. Interstitial fibrosis of the renal cortex in minimal change lesion and its correlation with renal function: a quantitative study. Virchows Arch A. 1979;383:265-270.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Wallenstein S, Zucker CL, Fleiss JL. Some statistical methods useful in circulation research. Circ Res. 1980;41:1-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984:300.
  31. ↵
    Fenoy FJ, Ferrer P, Carbonell L, Garciasalom M. Role of nitric oxide on papillary blood flow and pressure natriuresis. Hypertension. 1995;25:408-414.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Nakanishi K, Mattson DL, Cowley AW. Role of renal medullary blood flow in the development of L-NAME hypertension in rats. Am J Physiol. 1995;37:R317-R323.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    McKee M, Scavone C, Nathanson JA. Nitric oxide, cGMP, and hormone regulation of active sodium transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:12056-12060.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Arnal JF, Warin L, Michel JB. Determinants of aortic cyclic guanosine monophosphate in hypertension induced by chronic inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:647-652.
  35. ↵
    Deng XL, Welch WJ, Wilcox CS. Renal vasoconstriction during inhibition of NO synthase: effects of dietary salt. Kidney Int. 1994;46:639-646.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Johnson RA, Freeman RH. Pressure natriuresis in rats during blockade of the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway. Hypertension. 1992;19:333-338.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Gardes J, Gonzalez MF, Alhenc-Gelas F, Menard J. Influence of sodium diet on L-NAME effects on renin release and renal vasoconstriction. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:F798-F804.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Scholz H, Hamann M, Gotz KH, Kurtz A. Role of calcium ions in the pressure control of renin secretion from the kidneys. Pflugers Arch. 1994;428:173-178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Kramer BK, Ritthaler T, Ackermann M, Holmer S, Schricker K, Riegger GAJ, Kurtz A. Endothelium-mediated regulation of renin secretion. Kidney Int. 1994;46:1577-1579.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    Pollock DM, Polakowski JS, Divish BJ, Opgenorth TJ. Angiotensin blockade reverses hypertension during long-term nitric oxide synthase inhibition. Hypertension. 1993;21:660-666.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Correa-Rotter R, Hostetter TH, Manivel JC, Rosemberg ME. Renin expression in renal ablation. Hypertension. 1992;20:483-490.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Meyer TW, Rennke HG. Progressive glomerular injury after limited renal infarction in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:F856-F862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Sealey JE, Blumenfeld JD, Bell GM, Pecker MS, Sommers SC, Laragh JH. On the renal basis for essential hypertension: nephron heterogeneity with discordant renin secretion and sodium excretion causing a hypertensive vasoconstriction volume relationship. J Hypertens. 1988;6:763-777.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Resnick LM, Gupta RK, Difabio B, Barbagallo M, Mann S, Marion R, Laragh JH. Intracellular ionic consequences of dietary salt loading in essential hypertension: relation to blood pressure and effects of calcium channel blockade. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1269-1276.
  45. ↵
    Ribeiro MO, Antunes E, Muscara MN, Denucci G, Zatz R. Nifedipine prevents renal injury in rats with chronic nitric oxide inhibition. Hypertension. 1995;26:150-155.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Feld LG, Van Liew JB, Galaske RG, Boylan JW. Selectivity of renal injury and proteinuria in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Kidney Int. 1977;12:332-343.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    Anderson S, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. Therapeutic advantage of converting enzyme inhibitors in arresting progressive renal disease associated with systemic hypertension in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:1993-2000.
  48. ↵
    Brandis A, Bianchi G, Reale E, Helmchen U, Kühn K. Age-dependent glomerulosclerosis and proteinuria occurring in rats of the Milan normotensive strain and not in rats of the Milan hypertensive strain. Lab Invest. 1986;55:234-243.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    Garg UC, Hassid A. Nitric oxide-generating vasodilators inhibit mitogenesis and proliferation of BALB/c 3T3 fibroblasts by a cyclic GMP-independent mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990;171:474-479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Scott-Burden T, Schini VB, Elizondo E, Junquero DC, Vanhoutte PM. Platelet-derived growth factor suppresses and fibroblast growth factor enhances cytokine-induced production of nitric oxide by cultured smooth muscle cells: effects on cell proliferation. Circ Res. 1992;71:1088-1100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    Garg UC, Hassid A. Inhibition of rat mesangial cell mitogenesis by nitric oxide-generating vasodilators. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:F60-F66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Fujiwara R, Hayashi T, Kutsumi Y, Oida K, Tamai T, Nakai T, Miyabo S. Effects of nicorandil on cell proliferation and cholesteryl ester accumulation in arterial smooth muscle cells in culture. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1993;7:365-372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Shultz PJ, Raij L. Effect of amlodipine on mesangial cell proliferation and protein synthesis. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:912-914.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    Akai Y, Homma T, Burns KD, Yasuda T, Badr KF, Harris RC. Mechanical stretch/relaxation of cultured rat mesangial cells induces protooncogenes and cyclooxygenase. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:C482-C490.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Hypertension
May 1996, Volume 27, Issue 5
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Effect of Salt Intake and Inhibitor Dose on Arterial Hypertension and Renal Injury Induced by Chronic Nitric Oxide Blockade
    Sergio Seiji Yamada, Ana Lúcia Sassaki, Clarice Kazue Fujihara, Denise Maria Avancini Costa Malheiros, Gilberto De Nucci and Roberto Zatz
    Hypertension. 1996;27:1165-1172, originally published May 1, 1996
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.27.5.1165

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Hypertension.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Effect of Salt Intake and Inhibitor Dose on Arterial Hypertension and Renal Injury Induced by Chronic Nitric Oxide Blockade
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Hypertension
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Hypertension web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Effect of Salt Intake and Inhibitor Dose on Arterial Hypertension and Renal Injury Induced by Chronic Nitric Oxide Blockade
    Sergio Seiji Yamada, Ana Lúcia Sassaki, Clarice Kazue Fujihara, Denise Maria Avancini Costa Malheiros, Gilberto De Nucci and Roberto Zatz
    Hypertension. 1996;27:1165-1172, originally published May 1, 1996
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.27.5.1165
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Hypertension

  • About Hypertension
  • Instructions for Authors
  • AHA CME
  • Guidelines and Statements
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231
email: hypertension@heart.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured