Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
      • Research Guidelines
        • Minimum Information About Microarray Data Experiments (MIAME)
      • Abstract
      • Acknowledgments
      • Clinical Implications (Only by invitation)
      • Conflict(s) of Interest/Disclosure(s) Statement
      • Figure Legends
      • Figures
      • Novelty and Significance: 1) What Is New, 2) What Is Relevant?
      • References
      • Sources of Funding
      • Tables
      • Text
      • Title Page
      • Online/Data Supplement
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
      • Change of Authorship Form
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Hypertension

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Scientific Contributions

Clonidine Prevents Insulin Resistance and Hypertension in Obese Dogs

Albert P. Rocchini, Hui Z. Mao, Keshava Babu, Paul Marker, Albert J. Rocchini
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.33.1.548
Hypertension. 1999;33:548-553
Originally published January 1, 1999
Albert P. Rocchini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui Z. Mao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keshava Babu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Marker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert J. Rocchini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Abstract—The role that the central sympathetic nervous system plays in the development of obesity hypertension and insulin was evaluated by feeding dogs a high fat diet with or without clonidine treatment. Thirteen adult mongrel dogs were chronically instrumented and randomly assigned to receive either a high fat diet and no clonidine (n=6) or a high fat diet plus clonidine (n=7), 0.3 mg BID. Blood pressure, heart rate, plasma insulin, and electrolytes were measured daily. Insulin resistance was assessed with a multiple-dose euglycemic clamp (1, 2, and 30 mU · kg−1 · min−1) before and after 1, 3, and 6 weeks of the high fat diet. Clonidine prevented the hypertension, tachycardia, and insulin resistance associated with feeding dogs the high fat diet but did not affect weight gain. The present study suggests that the central sympathetic nervous system plays a critical role in the development of both insulin resistance and hypertension associated with feeding dogs a high fat diet.

  • hypertension, arterial
  • obesity
  • insulin resistance
  • clonidine
  • sympathetic nervous system
  • cardiac output

The mechanism involved in the pathogenesis of the increased blood pressure in obesity is incompletely understood. Studies in our laboratory1 2 and by others3 suggest that insulin resistance may be the link between obesity and hypertension. However, other observations suggest that the relation between insulin and obesity-induced hypertension is not so straightforward. The San Antonio Heart Study showed that hyperinsulinemia is more common in Mexican Americans than in white non-Hispanics, yet the prevalence of hypertension is high in the latter group.4 Hall et al5 failed to observe an increase in blood pressure when normal dogs were given a chronic infusion of insulin with or without norepinephrine.

We believe that an alternate hypothesis to explain the pathogenesis of obesity-induced hypertension is that chronic central sympathetic nervous system activation links insulin resistance and hypertension. Sowers et al6 observed that borderline hypertensive obese subjects had higher norepinephrine levels than did nonobese normotensive control subjects, that their blood pressure correlated with norepinephrine levels, and that weight loss was accompanied by a fall in blood pressure that correlated with a decrease in serum norepinephrine. Hall et al7 suggested that combined α- and β-adrenergic blockade reduced arterial pressure to a much greater extent in obese than in normal dogs. Fasting or caloric deprivation reduces sympathetic activity and overfeeding stimulates sympathetic activity.8

Diebert and DeFronzo9 demonstrated that impairs both peripheral and hepatic resistance to the action of insulin. Jamerson et al10 demonstrated that a reflex increase in sympathetic tone in normotensive individuals can lead to acute insulin resistance in the forearm.

Thus, it is possible that central activation of the sympathetic nervous system is the physiological link that connects excess dietary intake to insulin resistance and hypertension. Through the feeding of fat with or without clonidine to dogs, the present study was designed to evaluate the role that the central sympathetic system plays in the development of hypertension and insulin resistance.

Methods

Thirteen adult mongrel dogs (6 males and 7 females) were trained to stand quietly in a padded sling and were surgically instrumented with 1 ascending aortic and 2 right atrial catheters. The dogs recovered for 3 weeks before baseline measurements were made. Dogs were randomly assigned to either a high-fat-diet, no-clonidine group (n=6) that received the control diet (1 can of dog food [Ken-L-Ration]) for 2 weeks followed by 6 weeks of a high fat diet consisting of 0.8 kg of cooked beef fat in addition to the regular diet2 or a high-fat-diet, clonidine group (n=7) that received 0.3 mg clonidine PO BID initiated 1 week before the start of the high fat diet and continued with the fat diet for an additional 6 weeks. (Figure 1⇓) All dogs received vitamin supplements (VAL Syrup; Fort Dodge Laboratories) and antibiotics throughout the entire study. Dogs were housed in air-conditioned cages and fed between 1:00 and 3:00 pm each day. Blood pressure, heart rate, and body weight were measured daily. Cardiac output, plasma glucose, and insulin were measured twice a week. All measurements were made between 8:00 and 11:00 am and before the daily feeding. All the procedures in this study were in accordance with the University of Minnesota, Northwestern University, and University of Michigan guidelines on animal experimentation.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the study design of the project.

Laboratory Measurements

Arterial pressure was measured with a pressure transducer mounted at the level of the heart, and the analog signals were sent to a computer to be analyzed. The computer calculated the average systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures and heart rate (over a 15- to 30-minute period). Cardiac output was measured with Cardiogreen dye (Waters Instruments).

Insulin resistance was assessed with a multiple insulin dose euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. The multiple insulin infusion euglycemic clamps were performed twice before starting the high fat diet and at 1, 3, and 6 weeks of the high fat diet. Arterial samples were obtained to determine basal glucose, insulin, and potassium levels, and cardiac output was measured. A constant infusion of insulin was administered at 3 insulin infusion rates (1, 2, and 30 mU · kg−1 · min−1).1 Concomitant with the insulin, an intravenous infusion of 20% glucose was administered with a variable infusion syringe pump to maintain euglycemia. To prevent severe hypokalemia, K2HPO4 was infused. Blood pressure and heart rate were continuously monitored throughout the clamp procedure. During the last 30 minutes of the insulin infusion, arterial blood was sampled for glucose, insulin, and potassium levels, and cardiac output was measured as the average of 2 determinations.

In 4 no-clonidine fat–fed dogs and 4 clonidine plus fat–fed dogs, basal glucose turnover was measured (at weeks 0, 1, 3, and 6) using d-[3-3H]glucose.11 The rate of hepatic glucose production was calculated, assuming steady-state conditions, using the Steele equation. These values of basal glucose production were used in the calculation of the insulin dose-response curves.

Analytic Methods

The serum glucose concentration was measured in duplicate with the glucose oxidase method using a glucose analyzer (model A23; Yellow Springs Instruments). Serum insulin was measured with double-antibody radioimmunoassay (ICN Biomedical). Plasma electrolytes were measured with flame photometry. Blood for the determination of plasma glucose specific activity was collected in sodium fluoride–treated tubes and immediately spun, and the supernatant was removed and stored at −20°C.1

Statistical Analysis

All values are mean±SEM. Weekly blood pressures, heart rates, and body weights were determined by averaging the daily values, and cardiac output and plasma glucose and insulin levels were determined by averaging the 2 values obtained each week. The dose-response curves for whole body glucose uptake versus insulin were fitted to a 4-parameter logistic equation using a least-squares mean iterative routine (ALLFIT)12 as follows: Y={(A−D)/[1+(I/ED50)B]}+D, where A is the expected maximal response, D is the expected minimal response, I is the insulin concentration, ED50 is the insulin concentration with expected response halfway between A and D, and B is the slope factor. After obtaining parameters A, D, B, and ED50 for the fat and no clonidine and the fat plus clonidine groups, separate analyses were performed to test whether parameters were similar between the groups. A repeated measures analysis was used to determine whether a significant change in the parameters occurred over time.

Within each group, a repeated measures ANOVA was performed for each variable to determine whether a significant change in the variable occurred over time. A 2-factor ANOVA for repeated measures was then performed for each variable to assess differences between the dogs fed the high fat diet and no clonidine and the dogs fed clonidine plus the high fat diet.

Results

Hemodynamic, Hormonal, and Metabolic Data

During the 1-week control period and the 1 week of clonidine plus regular diet, no significant differences were noted between the 2 groups for any of the measured variables. Over the 6 weeks of the high fat diet, both the clonidine and no-clonidine groups increased their body weight (P<0.001) Table 1⇓. In the high fat diet group without clonidine, the gain in weight was associated with a significant increase in arterial pressure (P<0.001), heart rate (P<0.001), and cardiac output (P<0.01). The clonidine plus fat–fed dogs experienced no change in these hemodynamic parameters (Table 1⇓). Plasma glucose did not significantly increase in either group with feeding of the high fat diet; however, we observed only in the group that did not receive clonidine a significant increase in fasting serum insulin concentration (86±10 to 208±21 pmol/L, P<0.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Hemodynamic, Hormonal, and Electrolyte Data

Euglycemic Clamp Data

During the euglycemic clamp studies, the steady-state blood glucose concentration in all dogs averaged ∼5.2 mmol/L and did not differ from the fasting concentration at any insulin infusion rate. The coefficient of variation of glucose level at each insulin plateau was<5%.

To characterize the ability of clonidine treatment to alter the insulin-mediated glucose uptake relation that occurs in dogs fed a high fat diet, we measured insulin-mediated glucose uptake dose-response curves before and after the high fat diet. Basal rates of whole body glucose uptake (hepatic glucose production) were measured on 4 dogs in the clonidine group and 4 dogs in the no-clonidine group. The high fat diet did not significantly change basal rates of whole body glucose uptake in either group of dogs (24±6 μmol · kg −1 · min−1 at week 0 versus 22±8 μmol · kg−1 · min−1 at week 6 in the no-clonidine group and 26±8 μmol · kg−1 · min−1 at week 0 versus 25±9 μmol · kg−1 · min−1 at week 6 in the clonidine group). Throughout the study, the 1–mU · kg−1 · min−1 insulin dose completely suppressed hepatic glucose output in both groups of dogs. During increasing insulin dose rates, whole body glucose uptake increased in a sigmoidal fashion (Figure 2⇓). In the no-clonidine group, the high fat diet was associated with a shift in the glucose uptake curve to the right, and the rate of maximal whole body glucose uptake was significantly decreased (P<0.001) (Table 2⇓). Compared with the control, pre–high fat period, the insulin concentration expected to produce a half-maximal response in glucose uptake (insulin ED50 dose) was 50% (P<0.01) higher at 1 week and 85% (P<0.001) higher at 6 weeks of the fat diet. In contrast to the no-clonidine group, the clonidine-treated group did not experience any change in the glucose uptake curve during the 6 weeks of the high fat diet. After 6 weeks of the high fat diet, the clonidine group had both maximal glucose uptake and the insulin concentration expected to produce a half-maximal response in glucose uptake (insulin ED50 dose), which were unchanged from values obtained in this control period. (Table 2⇓) In addition, 1 week of clonidine treatment without the high fat diet (week −1 versus week 0) also did not change the insulin-mediated glucose uptake curve. Finally, despite the infusion of the same amount of insulin per kilogram of weight in both groups of dogs, only the group of dogs that did not receive clonidine experienced, when fed the high fat diet, an increase over time in the plateau insulin values during the multiple-dose clamps (Table 2⇓).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Rates of whole body insulin-mediated glucose uptake (M) determined during euglycemic clamp studies over a wide range of steady-state insulin concentrations (□, week 0; ▵, week 1 of fat diet; X, week 6 of fat diet) in dogs fed a high fat diet with and without clonidine treatment. Weight gain resulted in a shift to the right and a decrease in the maximal rate of M (P<0.001) in dogs not treated with clonidine; however, if the dogs were treated with clonidine, weight gain did not alter the dose-response relation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Maximal and ED50 Values for Insulin-Mediated Glucose Uptake, Basal Maximal and ED50 Values for Cardiac Output, and Plateau Insulin Concentrations in High-Fat Clonidine-Fed and High Fat Non–Clonidine-Fed Dogs

In the no-clonidine group, the high fat diet was associated with an increase in resting cardiac output (P<0.01), whereas in the clonidine-treated group, the high fat diet resulted in no significant increase in cardiac output (P>0.1) (Table 1⇑). In both groups of dogs, before starting the high fat diet, euglycemic hyperinsulinemia caused a dose-dependent increase in cardiac output (Figure 3⇓). In the no-clonidine group, feeding the high fat diet resulted in rightward shift of the effect of insulin to increase cardiac output and a reduced maximal insulin-stimulated cardiac output (P<0.05) (Table 2⇑). After 6 weeks of the fat diet, euglycemic hyperinsulinemia caused virtually no increase in cardiac output. However, in the clonidine group, the high fat diet did not change the ability of insulin to increase cardiac output. After 6 weeks of the high fat diet, euglycemic hyperinsulinemia in clonidine-treated dogs still resulted in a 37% increase in cardiac output.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Insulin-induced changes in cardiac output were determined during euglycemic clamp studies over a wide range of steady-state insulin concentrations (□, week 0; ▵, week 1 of fat diet; X, week 6 of fat diet) in dogs fed a high fat diet with and without clonidine. In the absence of clonidine, weight gain resulted in an increase in basal cardiac output and a shift to the right of the effect of insulin to increase cardiac output (P<0.01); however, with clonidine treatment, weight gain was not associated with either an increase in cardiac output or a shift in the effect of insulin to increase cardiac output.

In both groups of dogs, before starting the high fat diet, the euglycemic clamp resulted in a 6±2 mm Hg decrease in arterial pressure and a 7±3 bpm increase in rate. In the no-clonidine group, after 6 weeks of a high fat diet, euglycemic hyperinsulinemia did not cause either a decrease in arterial pressure or an increase in heart rate; however, in the clonidine group, the high fat diet euglycemic hyperinsulinemia was still associated with a 5±2 mm Hg decrease in pressure and a 5±3 increase in heart rate.

Discussion

The present study demonstrates that clonidine, an antihypertensive agent that lowers blood pressure through stimulation of central α2-receptors and, to a lesser degree, the I1 imidazole receptors, prevented both the hypertension and insulin resistance associated with weight gain in the dog. Our finding that clonidine prevented hypertension in the obese dog model is consist with the report of Hall et al7 They demonstrated that combined α- and β-adrenergic blockade reduced arterial pressure to a much greater extent in obese than in normal dogs. We believe the mechanism whereby clonidine treatment prevented the increase in blood pressure associated with weight gain is due to central inhibition of the peripheral sympathic nervous system.13 Because we did not directly measure sympathetic activity, further studies are necessary to directly prove that clonidine inhibited peripheral sympathetic activity. The failure of weight gain to induce tachycardia in the clonidine-treated dogs is consistent with the known central nervous system action of clonidine. In addition, the failure of clonidine-treated dogs to increase their cardiac output in association with weight gain is consistent with a reduced degree of renal salt and water retention. Kassab et al14 have shown that bilateral renal denervation prevents the hypertension and sodium retention associated with obesity in the dog. We believe that clonidine treatment could have prevented the high fat diet–induced activation of the renal efferent sympathetic nerves. Further studies that measure in detail the sodium and fluid balance in clonidine-treated dogs fed a high fat diet will be necessary to more directly answer whether clonidine does prevent sodium and fluid retention in obese dogs.

Perhaps the more important and new finding in the present study is that clonidine also prevented the insulin resistance associated with obesity in the dog. Using the multiple insulin dose euglycemic clamp, we demonstrated that clonidine prevents the reduced sensitivity and responsiveness of the insulin-mediated glucose uptake dose-response curve that is associated with weight gain (Figure 2⇑, Table 2⇑). It has been speculated that insulin resistance (ie, resistance to the ability of insulin to stimulate glucose uptake) is the common metabolic abnormality connecting obesity, hypertension, and increased sympathetic nervous system activity. This hypothesis is supported by numerous reports that document a relation between insulin resistance and hypertension.1 2 3 However, the present study supports the concept, originally proposed by Julius et al,15 that central nervous system–induced sympathetic activation, not insulin resistance or hyperinsulinemia, is the metabolic link that connects obesity to hypertension.

Our finding that clonidine treatment prevented the insulin resistance associated with weight gain in the dog is consistent with other reports. Giugliano et al16 reported that in 20 hypertensive patients with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, clonidine treatment was associated with an improvement in insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues. Using the glucose clamp, these investigators found that clonidine significantly improved overall glucose metabolism and that this improvement was accompanied by increases in both oxidative and nonoxidative glucose metabolism. Other central acting antihypertensive drugs also have been reported to improve insulin resistance. Moxonidine, a highly selective I1 imidazole receptor agonist with weak central α2-receptor effects, has been shown to prevent the insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and hypertension in rats fed a fructose-enriched diet17 and to reduce blood pressure, reduce triglycerides, and improve glucose tolerance in obese spontaneously hypertensive rats.18 However, in their fructose-fed rate model, Hwang et al19 failed to show a beneficial effect of clonidine in preventing insulin resistance despite demonstrating that clonidine did prevent the increase in blood pressure. The acute administration of clonidine has been shown to induce hyperglycemia and impaired glucose tolerance in rats and humans.20 However, chronic clonidine treatment does not appear to exert such effects.21

The present study was not designed to determine the mechanism whereby clonidine prevents the development of insulin resistance that occurs in dogs fed a high fat diet. However, because of previous studies and our present study design, some inferences can be made into the mechanism of insulin resistance. Insulin-mediated glucose uptake is determined both by the ability of insulin to stimulate glucose extraction at the level of tissues and cells and by the rate of glucose and insulin delivery (blood flow). Thus, the relative contributions of tissue and blood flow actions of insulin will determine the overall rate of glucose uptake (ie, degree of insulin resistance). Baron et al22 observed that the reduced rate of insulin-mediated glucose uptake that occurs in non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hypertension may be due in large part to an impairment in the action of insulin to increase skeletal muscle blood flow. In the present and other studies,1 we have demonstrated that obese dogs have a reduced ability of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia to increase cardiac output (Figure 3⇑). Because clonidine treatment enabled euglycemic hyperinsulinemia to cause a dose-dependent increase in cardiac output even after the dogs gained weight, we believe that the increased blood flow responses to insulin may have contributed to the improvement in insulin resistance with clonidine. Vollenweider et al23 demonstrated that insulin resistance in obese subjects is associated, in skeletal muscle, with a specific impairment of sympathetic neural and vasodilatory responsiveness to hyperinsulinemia. The impairment of insulin to increase skeletal muscle blood flow in obesity and in non–insulin-dependent diabetes is speculated to be related to an abnormality in the nitric oxide system.24 Insulin is known to interact with the sympathetic nervous system at the vascular level, predominantly through the α2-adrenergic pathway.25 Lacolley et al26 demonstrated that the sympathetic nervous system plays an important role in modulating the synthesis, release, or both of vascular nitric oxide. Thus, it is possible that clonidine treatment of dogs fed a high fat diet may have prevented insulin resistance by blocking the sympathetically mediated reduced vasodilator responsiveness to insulin known to occur in obesity.

Besides the affect of the sympathetic nervous system on glucose uptake by reducing blood flow, there is evidence that the sympathetic nervous system can directly influence the cellular uptake of glucose. Takahashi et al27 demonstrated in the rat that ventromedial hypothalamic stimulation can alter peripheral glucose uptake at the cellular level. Catecholamine treatment of rat adipocytes has also been demonstrated to reduce the tyrosine kinase activity of the insulin receptor.28 Finally, because clonidine is known to suppress free fatty acid levels,29 it is possible that glucose uptake in our obese dogs was improved by increasing oxidative glucose metabolism.

In summary, the results of the present study document that clonidine treatment of dogs fed a high fat diet blocks the development of both hypertension and insulin resistance even though the dogs still gained weight. Further studies will be necessary to better clarify how clonidine is able to dissociate weight gain from both hypertension and insulin resistance.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant 1RO1-HL-52205.

  • Received September 16, 1998.
  • Revision received October 14, 1998.
  • Accepted October 26, 1998.

References

  1. ↵
    Rocchini AP, Marker P, Cervenka T. Time course of insulin resistance associated with feeding dogs a high-fat diet. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:E147–E154.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Rocchini AP, Moorehead CS, DeRemer S, Bondie D. Pathogenesis of weight-related changes in pressure in the dog. Hypertension. 1989;13:922–928.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    O’Hare JA. The enigma of insulin resistance and hypertension, insulin resistance, blood pressure and the circulation. Am J Med. 1988;84:505–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Ferrannini E, Haffner SM, Stern MP. Essential hypertension: an insulin-resistance state. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15(suppl 5):S18–S25.
  5. ↵
    Hall JE, Brands MW, Kivlighn SD, Mizelle HL, Hidebrandt DA, Gaillard CA. Chronic hyperinsulinemia and blood pressure: interaction with catecholamines? Hypertension. 1990;15:519–527.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Sowers JR, Nyby M, Stern N, Beck F, Baron S, Catania R, Vlachis N. Blood pressure and hormonal changes associated with weight reduction in the obese. Hypertension. 1982;4:686–691.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Hall JE, Van Vliet BN, Garrity CA, Connell RD, Brands MW. Role of increased adrenergic activity in obesity-induced hypertension. Circulation. 1992;86(suppl I):I-541. Abstract.
  8. ↵
    Young JB, Saville ME, Rothwell NJ, Stock MJ, Landsberg L. Effect of diet and cold exposure on norepinephrine turnover in brown adipose tissue in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1982;69:1061–1071.
  9. ↵
    Diebert DC, DeFronzo RA. Epinephrine-induced insulin resistance in man. J Clin Invest. 1980;65:717–721.
  10. ↵
    Jamerson KA, Julius A, Gudbrandsson T, Andersson O, Brant DO. Reflex sympathetic activation induces acute insulin resistance in the human forearm. Hypertension. 1993;21:618–623.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Finegood DT, Bergman RN, Vranic M. Estimation of endogenous glucose production during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamps: comparison of unlabeled and labeled exogenous glucose infusates. Diabetes. 1987;36:914–924.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    DeLean A, Munson PJ, Rodbard D. Simultaneous analysis of families of sigmoidal curves: application to bioassay, radioligand assay and physiological dose-response curves. Am J Physiol. 1978;235:E97–E102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Van Zwieten PA. Centrally acting antihypertensives: a renaissance of interest. Mechanisms and haemodynamics. J Hypertens. 1997;15:S3–S8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Kassab S, Kato T, Wilkins FC, Chen R, Hall JE, Granger JP. Renal denervation attenuates the sodium retention and hypertension associated with obesity. Hypertension. 1995;25:893–897.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Julius S, Gudbrandsson T, Jamerson K, Shahab ST, Andersson O. The hemodynamic link between insulin resistance and hypertension. J Hypertens. 1991;9:983–986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Giugliano D, Acampora R, Marfella R, La Marca C, Marfella M, Nappo F, D’Onofrio F. Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of transdermal clonidine in patients with hypertension and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:184–189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Rosen P, Ohly P, Gleochman J. Experimental benefit of moxonidine on glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in the fructose-fed rat. J Hypertens. 1997;15(suppl I):S31–S38.
  18. ↵
    Ernsberger P, Friedman JE, Kooletsky RJ. The I1-imidazoline receptor: from binding site to therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease. J Hypertens. 1997;15(suppl I):S9–S23.
  19. ↵
    Hwang I, Ho H, Hoffman B, Reaven G. Fructose-induced insulin resistance and hypertension in rats. Hypertension. 1987;10:512–516.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Metz SA, Halter JB, Robertson RP. Induction of defective insulin secretion and impaired glucose tolerance by clonidine. Diabetes. 1978;27:554–562.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Barbieri C, Caldara R, Testori G, Pierpoli V, Trezzi R, Romussi M, Ferrari C. Oral glucose tolerance and insulin response after one week’s clonidine treatment in hypertensive patients. Acta Diabetol Lantina. 1981;18:59–63.
  22. ↵
    Baron AD, Laakso M, Brechtel G, Edelman SV. Mechanism of insulin resistance in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a major role for reduced skeletal muscle blood flow. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:637–643.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Vollenweider P, Randin B, Tappy L, Jequier E, Nicod P, Scherrer U. Impaired insulin-induced sympathetic neural activation and vasodilation in skeletal muscle in obese humans. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:2365–2371.
  24. ↵
    Steinberg HO, Brechtel G, Johnson A, Fineberg N, Baron AD. Insulin-mediated skeletal muscle vasodilation is nitric oxide dependent: a novel action of insulin to increase nitric oxide release. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1172–1179.
  25. ↵
    Lembo G, Iaccarino G, Vecchione C, Barbato E, Izzo R, Fontana D, Trimarco B. Insulin modulation of an endothelial nitric oxide component present in the alpha2- and beta-adrenergic responses in human forearm. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:2007–2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Lacolley PJ, Lewis SJ, Brody MJ. Role of sympathetic nerve activity in the generation of vascular nitric oxide in urethane-anesthetized rats. Hypertension. 1991;17:881–887.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Takahashi A, Sudo M, Minokoshi Y, Shimazua T. Effect of ventromedial hypothalamic stimulation on glucose transport system in rat tissue. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:R1228–R1234.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Haring HU, Kirsch D, Obermaier B, Ermel B, Machicaco F. Reduced tyrosine kinase activity of insulin receptor isolated from rat adipocytes rendered insulin resistant by catecholamine treatment in vitro. Biochem J. 1986;234:59–66.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    Swislocki ALM, Vestal RE, Reaven GM, Hoffman BB. Acute metabolic effects of clonidine and adenosine in man. Horm Metab Res. 1993;25:90–95.
    OpenUrlPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Hypertension
January 1999, Volume 33, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Clonidine Prevents Insulin Resistance and Hypertension in Obese Dogs
    Albert P. Rocchini, Hui Z. Mao, Keshava Babu, Paul Marker and Albert J. Rocchini
    Hypertension. 1999;33:548-553, originally published January 1, 1999
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.33.1.548

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Hypertension.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Clonidine Prevents Insulin Resistance and Hypertension in Obese Dogs
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Hypertension
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Hypertension web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Clonidine Prevents Insulin Resistance and Hypertension in Obese Dogs
    Albert P. Rocchini, Hui Z. Mao, Keshava Babu, Paul Marker and Albert J. Rocchini
    Hypertension. 1999;33:548-553, originally published January 1, 1999
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.33.1.548
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Hypertension

  • About Hypertension
  • Instructions for Authors
  • AHA CME
  • Guidelines and Statements
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231
email: hypertension@heart.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured