Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
      • Research Guidelines
        • Minimum Information About Microarray Data Experiments (MIAME)
      • Abstract
      • Acknowledgments
      • Clinical Implications (Only by invitation)
      • Conflict(s) of Interest/Disclosure(s) Statement
      • Figure Legends
      • Figures
      • Novelty and Significance: 1) What Is New, 2) What Is Relevant?
      • References
      • Sources of Funding
      • Tables
      • Text
      • Title Page
      • Online/Data Supplement
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
      • Change of Authorship Form
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Hypertension

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Scientific Contributions

Mechanics and Composition of Human Subcutaneous Resistance Arteries in Essential Hypertension

Hope D. Intengan, Li Y. Deng, Jin S. Li, Ernesto L. Schiffrin
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.33.1.569
Hypertension. 1999;33:569-574
Originally published January 1, 1999
Hope D. Intengan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Y. Deng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jin S. Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ernesto L. Schiffrin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Abstract—Mechanical properties of arteries are altered in some rat models of hypertension, and this may influence peripheral resistance and blood pressure as well as some of the complications of hypertension. It has usually been assumed that arterial wall stiffness is increased in hypertension, although recent studies suggest that this may not necessarily be the case in large arteries. We determined whether the mechanics of human resistance arteries are altered in hypertension. Subcutaneous resistance arteries (lumen diameter<300 μm) were isolated from hypertensive and normotensive subjects of similar ages (46±3 and 43±4 years, respectively). Vessels were mounted in a pressurized myograph, deactivated, and exposed to intraluminal pressures ranging from 3 to 140 mm Hg. At each pressure, lumen and media dimensions were measured. Media-to-lumen ratio and media width were greater in hypertensive vessels, reducing wall stress (P<0.01), whereas media cross section was similar in vessels from both groups. Isobaric elastic modulus (which is influenced by vessel geometry and by wall component stiffness) was lower in hypertensive vessels (P<0.01). Stiffness of wall components (slope of incremental elastic modulus versus stress, which is geometry-independent) was significantly lower in hypertensive vessels (8.2±0.7) versus normotensive vessels (11.0±1.0, P<0.05), whereas distensibility was unchanged. Electron microscopic analysis of the media of the small arteries showed a greater collagen to elastin ratio (P<0.05) in the media of vessels from hypertensive patients. In conclusion, the stiffness of wall components (slope of elastic modulus versus stress) is not increased but is in fact decreased in subcutaneous resistance arteries from patients with mild essential hypertension. Reduced stiffness of resistance arteries from hypertensive patients does not appear to relate to changes in volume density of extracellular matrix components but may be the result of changes in extracellular matrix architecture or cell-matrix attachment, which remains to be established.

  • arteries, small
  • remodeling
  • elasticity
  • elastic modulus
  • collagen

The structure1 2 and mechanical properties3 4 5 of arteries are altered in hypertension. In large arteries it has usually been assumed that structural changes result in increased stiffness of vessels. It has been shown, however, that this is not necessarily the case. Indeed, several recent studies demonstrate that compliance of large arteries is not uniformly reduced in hypertension and may even be increased.6 7 In experimental hypertensive models in the rat, the structure of small resistance size arteries is altered,1 2 and some studies have shown that in some vascular beds, this is associated with reduced rather than increased stiffness of the vessel wall.8 9 The structural alterations of small arteries may comprise a combination of growth (characterized by increased media thickness and cross-sectional area) and eutrophic remodeling (characterized by decreased lumen and external diameter, with unchanged media cross-sectional area).10 The changes in composition of small arteries may influence how the structural alterations result in changes in wall mechanics. In small arterioles of the cerebral circulation, genetic hypertension is associated with increased elastin and distensibility,11 whereas in the mesenteric circulation, there is increased collagen deposition, without a change in volume density.12

Alterations in small artery mechanics may exacerbate vascular damage resulting from hemodynamic changes (for example, pulse pressure, wave reflection, and shear stress). An understanding of the former provides important mechanistic information for choosing therapeutic targets in hypertension. Mechanical properties may also provide a parameter that may eventually be useful for the noninvasive evaluation of cardiovascular risk. Some studies of human resistance arteries in which their structure has been elucidated in hypertensive patients are available,13 14 but little is known of the mechanical changes that follow the alterations in structure that occur in hypertension. Changes in wall mechanics (stiffness) of resistance arteries may influence pressure-diameter relationships of blood vessels. We hypothesized that as in rat models of hypertension, mechanical properties of human resistance arteries from patients with mild hypertension would not present abnormal stiffness despite altered structure. There is only one previous study in which mechanical properties of resistance arteries from patients with mild hypertension have been studied.15 It showed similar stiffness of wall components in resistance arteries from normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients, but that study was performed with the older technique of the wire myograph. There have been suggestions that the wire myograph may not accurately reflect properties of small arteries,16 although most of the data obtained with the wire myograph in studies of human small arteries have been reproduced in studies using more modern and physiological pressurized arteriographs.17 Therefore, to assess the mechanical properties of pressurized small arteries, we isolated small vessels (lumen diameter<300 μm) from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies performed on normotensive and hypertensive subjects and investigated their mechanics on a pressurized arteriograph. To understand mechanistically changes found in mechanical properties, we investigated the composition of the media of these resistance vessels by electron microscopy.

Methods

Subjects

The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal. Written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from each subject. Subjects aged 25 to 65 years were recruited from the Hypertension Clinic of the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal if they had essential hypertension and had never been treated with antihypertensive drugs. The hypertensive subjects had a history of recumbent systolic blood pressures of >140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >95 mm Hg on more than two occasions. The diagnosis of essential hypertension was established by the absence of clinical evidence of secondary hypertension; normal serum electrolytes, creatinine, and urinalysis; normal abdominal ultrasound examination; and where indicated, normal renal scintiscan, renal arteriogram, and computed abdominal tomography. Individuals were excluded if they smoked more than 5 cigarettes per day, their fasting blood glucose level was abnormal, their serum creatinine concentration was >150 μmol/L, or they had any other systemic disease. Control subjects were recruited simultaneously with the hypertensive subjects and were matched for age. They had systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <85 mm Hg, smoked fewer than 5 cigarettes per day, and had no evidence of disease on physical or routine laboratory investigation. Subjects arrived between 7:30 and 9 am, having fasted since the previous evening. Blood pressure was measured with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer after subjects had rested 15 minutes in the sitting position. Diastolic blood pressure was read as phase V of the Korotkoff sounds.

Preparation and Study of Pressurized Small Arteries

Biopsies of gluteal subcutaneous fat were obtained from all subjects by the same physician, with subjects under local anesthesia. Superficial subcutaneous tissue (1.0×0.5×0.5 cm) was obtained through a horizontal 1-cm-long incision of the skin in the upper external gluteal quadrant. Arteries were dissected from the sample of subcutaneous tissue under a dissecting microscope immediately after the biopsy was obtained, and 1 to 3 small arteries were chosen at random and isolated. Arteries were mounted in a servo-controlled pressurized myograph chamber, allowing a stable preset pressure as previously described.9 The vessels were slipped onto two glass microcannulas and secured with nylon ties. The axial length of the vessel was adjusted by moving one cannula until the vessel walls were parallel without stretch. Vessels were equilibrated under a constant intraluminal pressure of 60 mm Hg for 1 hour with physiological salt solution (PSS) (37°C) that was continuously bubbled with 95% air and 5% CO2 to achieve a pH of 7.40 to 7.45. PSS contained (mmol/L) NaCl 120, NaHCO3 25, glucose 5.5, KCl 4.7, CaCl2 2.5, KH2PO4 1.2, MgSO4 1.2, and EDTA 0.026. Vessels were deactivated of myogenic tone by perfusion with Ca2+-free PSS containing 10 mmol/L EGTA for 30 minutes. Lumen and media dimensions (for morphology) were measured while the intraluminal pressure was 60 mm Hg. Intraluminal pressure was then raised to 140 mm Hg three times, and the cannula was adjusted until the artery walls were straight and parallel to each other. Adjustments in length for the maintenance of parallel walls were minimal.

For calculation of vessel mechanics, intraluminal pressure was increased at several intervals up to 140 mm Hg, as previously described,9 and media thickness and lumen diameter were measured at each pressure level at 5 points along the vessel. The precision of the system was 0.7 μm. The initial diameter was measured at 3 mm Hg unless the vessel collapsed. In these cases, lumen diameter was estimated by fitting the intraluminal pressure-lumen diameter data (measured between 10 and 140 mm Hg) to a third-order polynomial equation.

Determination of the Composition of Small Artery Walls

Composition of the media of small artery walls was studied as we have previously described.12 Briefly, after morphometric determinations, pressurized arteries from 5 of the normotensive and 9 of the hypertensive subjects were perfused for 30 minutes with calcium-free PSS at an intravascular pressure of 60 mm Hg, fixed with 1.5% glutaraldehyde solution at room temperature for 60 minutes, and removed from the cannula. After three washes with calcium-free PSS, vessels were stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C. Arteries were then fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 30 minutes at room temperature, dehydrated in graded ethanol, and embedded in araldite CY212 epoxy resin (Ladd Research Industries Inc). Excess resin was trimmed so that the block face contained only the specimen. Sections were cut on a microtome (Reichert Ultrathin) at a thickness ranging from 70 to 90 nm and stained with 0.25% phosphotungstic acid for 15 minutes, 4% uranyl acetate for 10 minutes, and lead citrate for 3 minutes. The sections were examined with a JEM-1200EX electron microscope (JEOL Ltd). Electron micrographs were taken at an original magnification of ×4000 and enlarged by a factor of 3 for a final magnification ×12 000. Vessels were divided into four quadrants, and three electron micrographs were taken randomly for a total of 12 to 15 electron micrographs per vessel. Negatives of micrographs were scanned (Scan Jet 4C/T, Hewlett-Packard). The areas occupied by smooth muscle, collagen fibers, and elastin were measured by repeated tracing with a light pen and then use of an imaging program (Adobe Photoshop 3.0). Means of repeated tracings recorded in pixels were averaged and used to calculate the cross-sectional area occupied by each component.

Data Analysis

Calculation of arterial morphology and mechanics was done as previously described.9 Results are represented as mean±SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed by two-tailed Student’s t test. Statistical evaluation of relationships between mechanical parameters of vessels from normotensive and hypertensive subjects was performed by repeated-measures analysis of variance. Where statistical significance was detected, interaction means were compared using a two-tailed Student’s t test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a value of P<0.05.

Results

Demographics of the study subjects are shown in Table 1⇓. Seven normotensive and 14 hypertensive individuals were investigated. The normotensive group had proportionately more women; otherwise, there were no significant differences between the groups in age, body mass index, serum creatinine levels, and serum lipid profile. Blood pressure was significantly elevated in the hypertensive subjects, who were untreated at the time of the study.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Subject Demographics

The structure of subcutaneous small arteries of the subjects studied is depicted in Table 2⇓. Media width and media-to-lumen ratio of the vessels of hypertensive subjects were increased (P<0.01), whereas media cross-sectional area and lumen diameter did not exhibit significant differences between the groups. The growth index, that is, the percent difference in cross-sectional area of the media between vessels from hypertensive and normotensive subjects, was 32.8%.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Small Artery Structure and Composition

Vascular mechanics were studied by progressively increasing intraluminal pressure. The left panel of Figure 1⇓ shows that wall distensibility plotted against intraluminal pressure was similar in arteries from both groups. The right panel of Figure 1⇓ depicts the media stress-strain relationship, which was significantly shallower in the vessels from hypertensive subjects, indicating that isometric stress was lower in hypertensive vessels. From the stress-strain relationship, incremental elastic modulus was calculated and plotted against intraluminal pressure and circumferential stress (Figure 2⇓). The left panel of Figure 2⇓ shows that incremental elastic modulus plotted against intraluminal pressure was lower in vessels from hypertensive subjects. The right panel demonstrates that when plotted against circumferential stress, the slope of the incremental elastic modulus (β), which demonstrates the stiffness of wall components, was significantly lower in vessels from hypertensive subjects than in those from normotensive subjects. Since in the present study there was a marked imbalance in the number of male and female hypertensive subjects, the mechanics of vessels from male and female normotensive and hypertensive subjects were evaluated separately. Figure 3⇓ shows that vessel mechanics in male and female hypertensive subjects were identical. No significant differences were found between vessels from male and female normotensive subjects. Differences between mechanics of all normotensive and hypertensive subjects were thus maintained within men and women.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Left, Incremental distensibility plotted against intraluminal pressure in relaxed subcutaneous small arteries from normotensive and hypertensive subjects. The curves did not differ significantly. Right, Media stress plotted against strain at progressively higher intraluminal pressures. Curves were significantly different (P<0.01). Error bars indicate SEM.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Left, Incremental elastic modulus plotted against intraluminal pressure in relaxed subcutaneous small arteries from normotensive and hypertensive subjects. **P<0.01. Right, Incremental elastic modulus plotted against media stress at progressively higher intraluminal pressures. The slope of both curves (β) was significantly different (P<0.05). Error bars indicate SEM.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Left, Incremental elastic modulus plotted against intraluminal pressure in relaxed subcutaneous small arteries from male and female hypertensive subjects. Right, Incremental elastic modulus in vessels from male and female hypertensive subjects plotted against media stress at progressively higher intraluminal pressures. The slopes of both curves (β) were similar. Error bars indicate SEM.

Electron microscopic evaluation of the structure and composition of the media of pressurized small arteries from 5 of the 7 normotensive subjects and 9 of the 14 hypertensive subjects showed a trend toward a greater number of smooth muscle layers (P=0.07) and higher collagen volume density (P=0.08) in vessels from hypertensive subjects and a significant increase in the collagen-elastin ratio (P<0.05) (Table 2⇑).

Discussion

This study evaluates the vascular mechanics of subcutaneous small resistance size arteries from hypertensive subjects for the first time using a pressurized system, which may represent a more physiological approach than other methods previously used for examining vascular structure and mechanics.17 The composition of the media of vessels was also studied to determine whether changes in the volume density of collagen (less distensible) and elastin or smooth muscle (more distensible) could explain the differences in mechanical properties. We show that subcutaneous small arteries of the hypertensive subjects studied present an altered structure, as previously reported by others13 and in our own studies.14 In this particular group of subjects, media-to-lumen ratio of small arteries was increased, as was media width, whereas media cross-sectional area was not. However, although differences between the media cross section of small arteries did not achieve statistical significance, the growth index was 32.8%, which suggested a trend toward what has been designated as hypertrophic remodeling.10 This finding is in contrast to previous studies from our own group14 and others18 in which the predominant finding was that of eutrophic remodeling, but is in agreement with the first results obtained from the study of human subcutaneous small arteries.13 The heterogeneity of individuals with essential hypertension suggests the need for caution in making our conclusions in view of the range of results that may be encountered.

The lumen diameter of a vessel will depend on opposing forces of transmural pressure and compliance of the vessel wall. Compliance, that is, the ability of a vessel to buffer changes in pressure, depends on the geometry and stiffness of the wall components of the vessel. Decreases in lumen size (resulting mainly from remodeling in hypertension10 ) may reduce compliance, which is geometry-dependent. However, vascular compliance may be normalized by decreases in elastic modulus. Incremental elastic modulus is geometry-independent and depends on the stiffness of the vessel wall components. Elastic modulus is determined by the combined elastic modulus of the structural components of the vascular wall: connective tissue, elastin and collagen fibers, smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells. Previous studies of the mechanics of large arteries have demonstrated that vascular wall compliance is not necessarily reduced in hypertension both in animal models and in human essential hypertension.6 The mechanism for the absence of reduced vascular compliance and distensibility despite increased media thickness and collagen deposition has been obscure. In very small arteries from the brain, the pioneering studies of Baumbach et al19 showed for the first time that wall mechanics in hypertension might not be altered as expected. These investigators first reported that compliance and distensibility could actually be increased and that the slope of the incremental elastic modulus in relation to circumferential stress, that is, the stiffness of wall components, could be reduced in pial arterioles of approximately 80 μm in lumen diameter from stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP).8 They found similar results in small arteries (<150 μm in lumen diameter) but not larger small arteries (150 to 300 μm in lumen diameter) in the brain. Their studies demonstrated that the composition of vessels with reduced stiffness was altered, with increased elastin content,11 which could explain the direction of the alteration in mechanics. We have found in some groups of SHR,9 and in Dahl-salt sensitive rats20 and deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)–salt hypertensive rats,21 similar or lower stiffness of wall components of mesenteric small arteries than in equivalent vessels from normotensive rats. Together with previous6 and more recent22 23 findings in large arteries from animal models and humans, this may suggest that a reduced stiffness of wall components is indeed a common characteristic in hypertension. The mechanism may not be the same for all vascular beds, however, because in contrast to pial arterioles, in which elastin is increased, in large arteries in SHR most studies have shown an increase in collagen deposition24 (although the volume density of collagen was not increased25 ). In mesenteric small arteries of SHR we have recently demonstrated increases in collagen as well.12 In the present study we found that even though the stiffness of wall components is decreased in vessels from hypertensive subjects, the volume density of collagen in the media tends to be increased, although not achieving statistical significance, and the collagen-elastin ratio is significantly enhanced. This agrees with our previous findings in mesenteric arteries of similar dimension in SHR.12 It would be expected that an increased collagen-elastin ratio might increase stiffness.19 Thus it is likely that in these vessels other factors are involved, and it is possible that changes in extracellular matrix–smooth muscle cell attachments may play a role in the change in mechanical properties found in both human arteries and those of experimental models of hypertension. Recent studies have demonstrated that in aorta of SHR, fibronectin and α5-integrin are increased.25 It has been speculated that increases in cell–extracellular matrix attachment sites may contribute to the maintenance of equivalent mechanical properties even though SHR vessels, or human vessels in the present study, are subjected in vivo to higher pressures. The mechanisms involved in the reduction of the elastic modulus in relation to wall stress and pressure in resistance arteries from hypertensive individuals remain unclear. Since differences in the volume density of more- versus less-distensible components of the media (smooth muscle and elastin versus collagen) do not appear to play an important role, the difference in mechanical properties could be related in part to the characteristics and/or organization of these components in the vascular wall, particularly the arrangement, alignment, and adhesion of fibrillar and cellular elements. Models of arrangement of these components in the vascular wall in general assume that collagen is arranged in series to smooth muscle cells and in parallel to elastin.26 The linking of collagen to smooth muscle cells and the degree to which the collagen jacket is tensed may thus play an important role, since collagen is less distensible than elastin.27 Its contribution is supposed to occur in the latter portion of the pressure curve, since collagen fibers may be coiled and not under tension until the smooth muscle cells in series and the elastin in parallel have been stretched. In the remodeled small artery, with more closely aligned cellular and fibrillar components due to changes in adhesion of cellular and fibrillar structures, the collagen fibers may be recruited at higher distending pressures in vessels from hypertensive subjects than in vessels from normotensive subjects. Thus, although in small arteries from hypertensive subjects vascular compliance may be reduced in part because of their smaller lumen and greater collagen-elastin ratio, this may be compensated by the engagement of collagen fibers, and resulting tensing of the collagen jacket may occur in a later portion of the pressure curve. This has already been proposed by Bank et al28 to explain changes in compliance and stiffness in the human brachial artery during contraction and relaxation. If for each level of media stress, elastic modulus (stiffness) is lower, this will contribute to buffering the effects of greater intravascular pressure in hypertension.

Elastic properties of subcutaneous small arteries from hypertensive and normotensive individuals have been the subject of one previous study.15 That study was carried out with the wire myograph technique and showed that elastic modulus was not increased in hypertensive vessels. The present results extend the previous observations, showing comparable results with the newer and more physiological approach of examining small arteries in a pressurized system and distending them progressively by increasing intraluminal pressure rather than by stretching the vessels with two wires inserted in the lumen. We have previously demonstrated that structural data obtained with the pressurized system are also comparable to data from observations using wire myography.29 With respect to the study of mechanical properties, both techniques may have limitations. Stretching a vessel with two wires may result in vessel shortening, which may affect the transversally measured elastic properties of the shortened vessel; and pressurization of vessels may result in elongation, which necessitates adjustment of the microcannulas to maintain parallel walls. This could also affect the mechanical characteristics measured. In the present study, however, very little or no adjustment was necessary in the distance between the microcannulas. Thus, it is unlikely that this played a role as a confounder in the results obtained. The loss of tethering by surrounding tissues results in different conditions when the vessels are studied in vitro relative to the in vivo situation. However, the present study does not pretend to examine the in vivo behavior of these vessels, but rather the in vitro characteristics of the vessel wall under similar conditions in arteries from normotensive and hypertensive subjects to help understand the changes that have occurred in the vessel wall. Furthermore, because the original length in vivo of the vessels studied cannot be known, axial stiffness cannot be evaluated whereas circumferential stiffness may be quantified. The arterial wall is anisotropic, that is, direction-dependent.30 Axial and circumferential compliance have been evaluated in carotid arteries in situ in SHR and shown to be similar.31 However, these studies may be performed only when the in vivo length of vessels can be evaluated, such as with the use of ultrasound techniques, which are not yet applicable to the study of human subcutaneous small arteries.17 Because mechanical properties may be altered biaxially,31 32 uniaxial stiffness as investigated in the current study has to be interpreted cautiously.

A limitation of this study is that the proportion of men and women differed in the normotensive and hypertensive groups. This resulted from the difficulties inherent in the recruitment of subjects for an invasive study such as this one, in which a biopsy of subcutaneous tissue was performed. This could potentially have contributed to the suggestion of hypertrophic growth in resistance arteries from this group of hypertensive subjects, who were predominantly male. However, the stiffness of small arteries from normotensive men and women was not significantly different, and the same was found for hypertensive men and women (Figure 3⇑). Also, within men, the stiffness of vessels was greater in normotensive than in hypertensive individuals, and in women, the direction of the findings was similar, although not achieving statistical significance in the latter because of the small numbers. Thus, although this imbalance in the number of subjects from each sex is a recognized limitation, it may not have influenced the results.

The clinical relevance of these findings may result from the fact that altered mechanics of the vascular wall may affect the velocity of the pulse wave, wave reflection, pulsatility of vessels, blood flow velocity, and accordingly shear stress. Vascular wall damage, and with it cardiovascular risk, may be modified by changes in wall mechanics. Decreases in the stiffness of wall components may protect the vessel wall. The extent to which these changes in mechanics are protective and whether their absence may be an indicator of increased vascular risk remain to be determined.

In conclusion, the components of the wall of subcutaneous small arteries of hypertensive subjects are less stiff than in comparable vessels from normotensive subjects. The mechanism for the increased compliance of small arteries of hypertensive individuals remains unclear. The changes found in the composition of the media of the wall of small arteries, an increased collagen-elastin ratio, cannot explain the differences in mechanical properties between vessels from normotensive and hypertensive subjects. It is possible that changes in extracellular matrix architecture or in cell–extracellular matrix attachments may play a role, but this remains to be established. Whether similar changes occur in other vascular beds at the same level of the vasculature requires further study.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a group grant from the Medical Research Council of Canada to the Multidisciplinary Research Group on Hypertension and by a grant from the Fondation des maladies du coeur du Québec. Dr. Intengan is supported by a Medical Research Council of Canada/Canadian Hypertension Society postdoctoral research fellowship. The authors are grateful to Mireille Kirouac, RN, and Michelle Lapointe, RN, for help in recruiting subjects for this study and blood sampling.

  • Received September 16, 1998.
  • Revision received October 16, 1998.
  • Accepted October 30, 1998.

References

  1. ↵
    Mulvany MJ, Aalkjaer C. Structure and function of small arteries. Physiol Rev. 1990;10:921–961.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Schiffrin EL. Reactivity of small blood vessels in hypertension: relation with structural changes. Hypertension. 1992;19(suppl II):II-1–II-9.
  3. ↵
    Gribbin B, Pickering TG, Sleight P. Arterial distensibility in normal and hypertensive man. Clin Sci. 1979;56:413–417.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Folkow B. Physiological aspects of primary hypertension. Physiol Rev. 1982;62:347–504.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Simon AC, Laurent S, Levenson JA, Bouthier JA, Safar ME. Estimation of forearm arterial compliance in normal and hypertensive men from simultaneous pressure and flow measurements in the brachial artery, using a pulsed Doppler device and a first-order arterial model during diastole. Cardiovasc Res. 1983;17:331–338.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Hayoz D, Rutschmann B, Perret F, Niederberger M, Tardy Y, Mooser V, Nussberger J, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Conduit artery compliance and distensibility are not necessarily reduced in hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;20:1–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Laurent S, Caviezel B, Beck L, Girerd X, Billaud E, Boutouyrie P, Hoeks A, Safar M. Carotid artery distensibility and distending pressure in hypertensive humans. Hypertension. 1994;23(suppl 2):878–883.
  8. ↵
    Hajdu MA, Baumbach GL. Mechanics of large and small cerebral arteries in chronic hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H1027–H1033.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Laurant P, Touyz RM, Schiffrin EL. Effect of pressurization on mechanical properties of mesenteric small arteries from spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Vasc Res. 1997;34:117–125.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Mulvany MJ, Baumbach GL, Aalkjaer C, Heagerty AM, Korsgaard N, Schiffrin EL, Heistad DD. Vascular remodeling. Hypertension. 1996;28:505–506.
  11. ↵
    Baumbach GL, Hajdu MA. Mechanics and composition of cerebral arterioles in renal and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1993;21:816–826.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Sharifi AM, Li JS, Endemann D, Schiffrin EL. Comparison of effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and the calcium channel antagonist amlodipine on small artery structure and composition, and on endothelial dysfunction in SHR. J Hypertens. 1998;16:457–466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Aalkjaer C, Heagerty AM, Petersen KK, Swales JD, Mulvany MJ. Evidence for increased media thickness, increased neuronal amine uptake, and depressed excitation-contraction coupling in isolated resistance vessels from essential hypertensives. Circ Res. 1987;61:181–186.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Schiffrin EL, Deng LY, Larochelle P. Morphology of resistance arteries and comparison of effects of vasoconstrictors in mild essential hypertensive patients. Clin Invest Med. 1993;16:177–186.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Thybo NK, Mulvany MJ, Jastrup B, Nielsen H, Aalkjaer C. Some pharmacological and elastic characteristics of isolated subcutaneous small arteries from patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1996;14:993–998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Lew MJ, Angus JA. Wall thickness to lumen diameter ratios of arteries from SHR and WKY: comparison of pressurised and wire-mounted preparations. J Vasc Res. 1992;29:435–442.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Schiffrin EL, Hayoz D. How to assess vascular remodelling in small and medium-sized muscular arteries in humans. J Hypertens. 1997;15:571–584.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Heagerty AM, Aalkjær C, Bund SJ, Korsgaard N, Mulvany MJ. Small artery structure in hypertension: dual processes of remodeling and growth. Hypertension. 1993;21:391–397.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Baumbach GL, Dobrin PB, Hart MN, Heistad DD. Mechanics of cerebral arterioles in hypertensive rats. Circ Res. 1988;62:56–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Intengan H, Schiffrin EL. Mechanical properties of mesenteric resistance arteries from Dahl salt-resistant and salt-sensitive rats: role of endothelin-1. J Hypertens. In press.
  21. ↵
    Intengan HD, He G, Schiffrin EL. Effect of vasopressin antagonism on structure and mechanics of small arteries and vascular expression of endothelin-1 in deoxycorticosterone acetate–salt hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1998;32:770–777.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Armentano R, Megnien JL, Simon A, Bellenfant F, Barra J, Levenson J. Effect of hypertension on visco-elasticity of carotid and femoral arteries in humans. Hypertension. 1995;26:48–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Laurent S, Girerd X, Mourad J, Lacolley P, Beck L, Boutouyrie P, Mignot J, Safar M. Elastic modulus of the radial artery wall material is not increased in patients with essential hypertension. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:1223–1231.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Albaladejo P, Bouaziz H, Duriez M, Gohlke P, Levy BI, Safar ME, Benetos A. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition prevents the increase in aortic collagen in rats. Hypertension. 1994;23:74–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Bézie Y, Lamazière J-MD, Laurent S, Challande P, Cunha RS, Bonnet J, Lacolley P. Fibronectin expression and aortic wall elastic modulus in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1027–1034.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Roach MR, Burton AC. The reason for the shape of the distensibility curves of arteries. Can J Physiol Biochem. 1957;35:681–690.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Cox RH. Regional variation of series elasticity in canine arterial smooth muscles. Am J Physiol. 1978;234:H542–H551.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Bank AJ, Wilson RF, Kubo SH, Holte JE, Dresing TJ, Wang H. Direct effects of smooth muscle relaxation and contraction on in vivo human brachial artery elastic properties. Circ Res. 1995;77:1008–1016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Schiffrin EL, Deng LY. Structure and function of resistance arteries of hypertensive patients treated with a β-blocker or a calcium channel antagonist. J Hypertens. 1996;14:1247–1255.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    L’Italien GJ, Chandrasekar NR, Lamuraglia GM, Pevec WC, Dhara S, Warnock DF, Abbott WM. Biaxial elastic properties of rat arteries in vivo: influence of vascular wall cells on anisotropy. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H574–H579.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Lichtenstein O, Safar ME, Poitevin P, Levy BI. Biaxial mechanical properties of carotid arteries from normotensive and hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1995;26:15–19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Gaballa A, Jacob CT, Raya TE, Liu J, Simon B, Goldman S. Large artery remodeling during aging: biaxial passive and active stiffness. Hypertension. 1998;32:437–443.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Hypertension
January 1999, Volume 33, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Mechanics and Composition of Human Subcutaneous Resistance Arteries in Essential Hypertension
    Hope D. Intengan, Li Y. Deng, Jin S. Li and Ernesto L. Schiffrin
    Hypertension. 1999;33:569-574, originally published January 1, 1999
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.33.1.569

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Hypertension.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Mechanics and Composition of Human Subcutaneous Resistance Arteries in Essential Hypertension
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Hypertension
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Hypertension web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Mechanics and Composition of Human Subcutaneous Resistance Arteries in Essential Hypertension
    Hope D. Intengan, Li Y. Deng, Jin S. Li and Ernesto L. Schiffrin
    Hypertension. 1999;33:569-574, originally published January 1, 1999
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.33.1.569
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Hypertension

  • About Hypertension
  • Instructions for Authors
  • AHA CME
  • Guidelines and Statements
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231
email: hypertension@heart.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured