Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
      • Research Guidelines
        • Minimum Information About Microarray Data Experiments (MIAME)
      • Abstract
      • Acknowledgments
      • Clinical Implications (Only by invitation)
      • Conflict(s) of Interest/Disclosure(s) Statement
      • Figure Legends
      • Figures
      • Novelty and Significance: 1) What Is New, 2) What Is Relevant?
      • References
      • Sources of Funding
      • Tables
      • Text
      • Title Page
      • Online/Data Supplement
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
      • Change of Authorship Form
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Hypertension

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Scientific Contributions

Low Birth Weight Predicts Higher Blood Pressure But Not Dermal Capillary Density in Two Populations

R. John Irving, Angela C. Shore, Neville R. Belton, Robert A. Elton, David J. Webb, Brian R. Walker
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000116029.85706.5f
Hypertension. 2004;43:610-613
Originally published February 26, 2004
R. John Irving
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela C. Shore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neville R. Belton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert A. Elton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Webb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian R. Walker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

The association between low birth weight and high blood pressure is well established, but underlying mechanisms remain undefined. Vascular rarefaction, which may elevate peripheral vascular resistance, has been observed in capillaries of young men at risk for hypertension and men who had low birth weight. We looked for evidence that capillary rarefaction explains the association of low birth weight with high blood pressure in two cohorts. Participants in study 1 included 107 healthy boys aged 6 to 16 years recruited at random from a single school. Study 2 included 61 members of a cohort recruited at birth and studied at age 24 years. Measurements included indices of current size, blood pressure by automated sphygmomanometer, and dermal capillary density by video capillaroscopy of dorsal index finger skin after 10 minutes of venous occlusion. Lower birth weight predicted higher systolic blood pressure in both studies: in study 1, 3.57 mm Hg/kg birth weight (after adjustment for current height, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 6.75, P<0.05); in study 2, 122±12 mm Hg in low birth weight (<2 kg) versus 115±9 in controls (P<0.05). Dermal capillary density was not associated in either group with birth weight or systolic blood pressure. We have found no evidence in these 2 cohorts that reduced capillary density explains the associations between lower birth weight and higher blood pressure.

  • blood pressure
  • capillaries
  • children
  • vascular disease

Associations between low birth weight and high blood pressure in later life have been reported in many populations, but there is no consensus as to the mechanisms that underpin these observations. It has been suggested that cardiovascular and metabolic processes are “programmed” during an adverse intrauterine development, eg, because of impaired maternal nutrition.1 Animal studies suggest that there may be crucial windows during development when plasticity of structure and function is sensitive to external influences, and the exposed individual will subsequently display a permanently altered phenotype.1–3

A putative target for programming that could mediate subsequent hypertension and insulin resistance is alteration in microvascular structure. High blood pressure is characterized by increased peripheral resistance and normal cardiac output. Although the exact site of true resistance vessels in humans is unknown, in animal studies it is likely that the microcirculation, comprising vessels <100 μm in internal diameter, makes a significant contribution to peripheral resistance.4,5 Reduced microvascular density (ie, “rarefaction,” which predicts increased peripheral resistance) has been identified at early stages in the development of high blood pressure.6,7 It has been suggested by Tooke and Hattersley that diminished somatic and capillary growth as a result of insulin resistance could link the associations between birth weight and blood pressure.8 In support of this, there are reports that individuals born with low birth weight have rarefaction of capillaries in retinal9 and, after ischemia, in finger nailfold10,11 circulations.

Rarefaction in established hypertension may be a cause or consequence of higher blood pressure. To test the hypothesis that capillary density is reduced throughout life as a result of the processes that result in low birth weight, we measured capillary density in children and young adults with known birth characteristics.

Methods

Study 1

We studied boys attending George Watson’s College, a private, fee-paying school in Edinburgh. Participants were chosen randomly from each year group from ages 5 to 16 years. Parents of 110 boys were sent a questionnaire requesting parental size, offspring birth weight, and informed consent. Only 3 declined to allow their sons to participate. Maternal recall of birth weight has been shown previously to be accurate in adults.12–14

Study 2

We have previously published an analysis of associations between birth weight and adult cardiovascular risk factors in this prospectively recruited cohort.15 Briefly, in the Simpson Memorial Maternity Pavilion in Edinburgh between November 1973 and February 1975, mothers of 72 low-birth-weight (<2000 g) babies agreed to participate. As controls, mothers of 54 normal birth weight (>2000 g) babies born on the same day and matched for sex, birth order, and father’s social status were also recruited. Gestational age was estimated from the mother’s last menstrual period and by developmental assessment by a pediatrician. Low-birth-weight babies were classified as either having appropriate weight for gestational age (n=30) or having intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) (n=42) by means of a cut-off of the 10th percentile on Gairdner-Pearson growth charts.16 From 1998 to 1999, we contacted 81 of the original 126 babies, and 61 consented to a further study. Local research ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained for both studies.

Clinical Measurements

Height, weight, and waist/hip ratio were recorded before the subject reclined on a couch. After 1 minute, blood pressure was recorded in the left arm using an automated sphygmomanometer (Omron HEM 705CP).

The index finger of the right hand was then positioned on the stage of a videomicroscope and secured gently in place with Blu-tak (Bostik Inc). Dermal capillary density was recorded on the dorsum of the middle phalanx of the right index finger by intravital videomicroscopy. The skin was prepared with a coating of clear nail varnish. Dermal capillaries were visualized using a microscope (Leitz; Leica UK) under illumination with a mercury filament lamp (Leitz). To maximize the number of perfused capillaries, venous occlusion was achieved by inflating a cuff (Peni-cuff; Hokanson) to 40 mm Hg around the base of the finger. After 10 minutes, 6 adjacent fields of 0.25 mm2 were recorded via a television camera (Phillips LDH0703; KRP Power Source) onto videotape for 30 seconds. Calibration was checked periodically with a graticule (Graticules Ltd). Capillary counting was performed at a later date by an investigator who was blind to the blood pressure and birth weight data. In the adult participants in study 2, we also recorded 6 fields before inflation of the venous occlusion cuff to measure basal capillary number as well as maximal capillary number; this step was omitted in the children to improve compliance. In our hands, the intrasubject coefficient of variation for measurement of capillary density before venous occlusion was 8%, and after venous occlusion it was 7%.6

Statistics

In study 1, data were normally distributed and comparisons were made by linear regression. In study 2, comparisons between groups were by unpaired Student t tests. Power calculations show that the sample size in study 1 gives 84% power to detect correlations of r=0.30 at P<0.05; this compares favorably with the r>0.40 observed in studies of birth weight and capillary function.10 In study 2, the sample size gives 89% power to detect a difference of 4 capillaries/mm2 at P<0.05, which is the magnitude of difference previously observed between adults with and without a familial predisposition to high blood pressure.10

Results

Study 1

Characteristics of participants in study 1 are recorded in Table 1. Systolic blood pressure increased with older age (slope=2.02 mm Hg per year, r=0.50, P<0.0001), height (slope=0.32 mm Hg per cm, r=0.53, P<0.0001), and weight (slope=0.47 mm Hg per kg, r=0.66, P<0.0001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

TABLE 1. Characteristics of Participants of Study 1

Birth weights were normally distributed in the population (mean: 3.41 kg; range: 1.35 to 5.06 kg; Shapiro Wilks w test: not significant). Lower birth weight predicted lower childhood height after adjustment for age (2.90 cm/kg birth weight; 95% confidence intervals 0.59 to 5.21; P=0.01) but did not predict age-adjusted weight (1.37 kg/kg birth weight; −1.62 to 4.35; P=0.36) or body mass index (BMI) (−0.10 kg/m2 per kg birth weight; −1.03 to 0.82; P=0.82). In simple regression analyses, birth weight did not predict systolic blood pressure (r=−0.14, P=0.15) or diastolic blood pressure (r=0.05, P=0.61). In multiple regression, after adjusting for the effects of age, height, and weight on blood pressure, lower birth weight predicted higher systolic blood pressure (Table 2). Diastolic blood pressure was not significantly predicted by birth weight in similar analyses (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

TABLE 2. Multiple Regression Models to Predict Systolic Blood Pressure in Study 1

Capillary density was not recordable in 9 subjects. Data were rejected from another 4 subjects in whom fewer than 5 fields were countable. Technical failures occurred because of poor skin preparation or excessive movement. Younger age correlated with fewer countable fields (r=0.30, P=0.002). In simple regression, capillary density was not significantly associated with birth weight (r=−0.01, P=0.91), systolic blood pressure (r=−0.03, P=0.77), or diastolic blood pressure (r=0.01, P=0.96). In multiple regression, capillary density did not confound associations between birth weight, current height or weight, and systolic blood pressure (Table 2).

Study 2

In study 2, the characteristics of the groups were published previously.15 As shown in Table 3, subjects in the low-birth-weight group had higher adult blood pressure, irrespective of whether they were in the premature group who were appropriate size for gestational age or in the group with IUGR. The IUGR group remained shorter and lighter as adults. In these adults, we counted capillary density before and after venous occlusion. Neither index of capillary density was different between the groups with differing birth weight and intrauterine growth (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

TABLE 3. Characteristics of Participants in Study 2

Discussion

These studies examined relationships between birth weight and blood pressure, dermal capillary density, height, and weight during childhood and in young adults. In both studies, lower birth weight predicted higher subsequent blood pressure. In the adults, as previously reported,15 this relationship occurred irrespective of whether the low birth weight was caused by IUGR or prematurity. In the children, we did not obtain data on gestational age at birth. However, in neither group did we find evidence that diminished dermal capillary density is a programmed mechanism that mediates the association between birth weight and blood pressure.

The current studies had similar power to detect capillary rarefaction as a previous study of 104 young adults, which demonstrated dermal capillary rarefaction in men with an inherited predisposition to high blood pressure but not in men with higher blood pressure whose parents had low blood pressure.6 In this previously studied cohort, we also provided evidence that the inheritance of high blood pressure co-segregates with low birth weight,12 leading us to propose that capillary rarefaction would be demonstrable in individuals of low birth weight throughout life. Although small effects cannot be excluded, we conclude from the current studies that the factors influencing birth weight and blood pressure, in a cohort of socio-economically advantaged boys and also in a highly selected cohort of premature and term babies, do not strongly influence dermal capillary density. This is in keeping with similar observations of resting capillary number in the skin in infants,17 prepubertal children,11 and adults.10 These studies explored the relationship between birth weight and capillary density in groups that were not preselected for hypertension risk. It may be true that if we had selected individuals with contrasting familial predisposition to hypertension, then we would have obtained different results.

These studies do not exclude the possibility that capillary density in other vascular beds may be influenced by birth weight, or that functional changes in the microcirculation are programmed by events in early life. Indeed, a previous study of middle-aged men did show a relationship between low birth weight and altered microvascular structure in the retinal circulation.9 Stehouwer’s group have reported microvascular abnormalities in the nailfolds of children11 and adults10 with low birth weight. The recruitment of capillaries to perfusion after ischemia was increased even though basal capillary numbers were not different. The mechanisms for these changes remain to be elucidated, but they appear to reflect functional rather than structural changes in blood vessels.

Other studies of microvascular function have shown that endothelium-dependent dermal vasodilatation was lower in 9-year-old children with low birth weight than in controls.18 This group also showed a correlation between carotid artery stiffness and low birth weight. Similar findings were demonstrated in a study of infants aged 3 months;19 however, impaired endothelial function in this study was found only in babies with low birth weight at term and not in premature and/or IUGR babies. Further, another study17 suggests that endothelial dysfunction is not the only mediator of altered vasodilator responses in low birth weight babies, because it showed diminished hyperaemic skin response to heating in low-birth-weight infants without any change in endothelium-dependent vasodilatation.

Perspectives

An attractive and topical explanation for links between low birth weight and adult disease is that intrauterine growth retardation prevents normal peripheral vascular development. However, we have found no evidence of programming of capillary density by birth weight in two cohorts in which lower birth weight predicted higher blood pressure. The decrease in dermal capillary density observed in adult men with a familial predisposition to hypertension appears not to be explained by permanent “programming” of vascular structure by events in early life. However, further studies on capillary and arteriolar structure in beds that make a greater contribution to peripheral vascular resistance remain of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the British Heart Foundation and Chief Scientist’s Office of the Scottish Executive. We are grateful to the staff, parents, and pupils of George Watson’s College.

  • Received October 27, 2003.
  • Revision received November 7, 2003.
  • Accepted December 22, 2003.

References

  1. ↵
    Benediktsson R, Lindsay RS, Noble J, Seckl JR, Edwards CR. Glucocorticoid exposure in utero: new model for adult hypertension. Lancet. 1993; 341: 339–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Langley-Evans SC, Welham SJ, Sherman RC, Jackson AA. Weanling rats exposed to maternal low-protein diets during discrete periods of gestation exhibit differing severity of hypertension. Clin Sci. 1996; 91: 607–615.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Khan IY, Taylor PD, Dekou V, Seed PT, Lakasing L, Graham D, Dominiczak AF, Hanson MA, Poston L. Gender-linked hypertension in offspring of lard-fed pregnant rats. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 168–175.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Struijker Boudier HAJ, le Noble JLML, Messing WJ, Huijberts MSP, le Noble FAC, van Essen H. The microcirculation and hypertension. J Hypertens. 1992; 10: S147–S156.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    Borders JL, Granger HJ. Power dissipation as a measure of peripheral resistance in vascular networks. Hypertension. 1986; 8: 184–191.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Noon JP, Walker BR, Webb DJ, Shore AC, Holton DW, Edwards HV, Watt GM. Impaired microvascular dilatation and capillary rarefaction in young adults with a predisposition to high blood pressure. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 1873–1879.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Sullivan JM, Prewitt RL, Josephs JA. Attenuation of the microcirculation in young patients with high-output borderline hypertension. Hypertension. 1983; 5: 844–851.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Hattersley AT, Tooke JE. The fetal insulin hypothesis: An alternative explanation of the association of low birth weight with diabetes and vascular disease. Lancet. 1999; 353: 1789–1792.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Chapman N, Mohamudally A, Cerutti A, Stanton A, Sayer AA, Cooper C, Barker D, Rauf A, Evans J, Wormald R, Sever P, Hughes A, Thom S. Retinal vascular network architecture in low-birth-weight men. J Hypertens. 1997; 15: 1449–1453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Serne EH, Stehouwer CA, ter Maaten JC, ter Wee PM, Donker AM, Gans RB. Birth weight relates to blood pressure and microvascular function in normal subjects. J Hypertens. 2000; 18: 1421–1427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Ijzerman RG, Stehouwer CDA, Boomsma DI. Evidence for Genetic Factors Explaining the Birth Weight-Blood Pressure Relation : Analysis in Twins. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 1008–1012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Walker BR, McConnachie A, Noon JP, Webb DJ, Watt GCM. Contribution of parental blood pressures to association between low birth weight and adult high blood pressure: cross sectional study. BMJ. 1998; 316: 834–837.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Troy LM, Michels KB, Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Self-reported birth weight and history of having been breastfed among younger women: An assessment of validity. Int J Epidemiol. 1996; 25: 122–127.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Lumey LH, Stein AD, Ravelli AJ. Maternal recall of birth weights of adult children: Validation by hospital and well baby clinic records. Int J Epidemiol. 1994; 23: 1006–1012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Irving RJ, Belton NR, Elton RA, Walker BR. Adult cardiovascular risk factors in premature babies. Lancet. 2000; 355: 2135–2136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Gairdner D, Pearson J. A growth chart for premature and other infants. Arch Dis Child. 1971; 46: 783–787.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Goh KL, Shore AC, Quinn M, Tooke JE. Impaired microvascular vasodilatory function in 3-month-old infants of low birth weight. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 1102–1107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Martin H, Hu J, Gennser G, Norman M. Impaired endothelial function and increased carotid stiffness in 9-year-old children with low birth weight. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2739–2744.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Norman M, Martin H. Preterm birth attenuates the association between low birth weight and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2003; 108: 996–1001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Hypertension
March 2004, Volume 43, Issue 3
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Low Birth Weight Predicts Higher Blood Pressure But Not Dermal Capillary Density in Two Populations
    R. John Irving, Angela C. Shore, Neville R. Belton, Robert A. Elton, David J. Webb and Brian R. Walker
    Hypertension. 2004;43:610-613, originally published February 26, 2004
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000116029.85706.5f

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Hypertension.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Low Birth Weight Predicts Higher Blood Pressure But Not Dermal Capillary Density in Two Populations
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Hypertension
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Hypertension web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Low Birth Weight Predicts Higher Blood Pressure But Not Dermal Capillary Density in Two Populations
    R. John Irving, Angela C. Shore, Neville R. Belton, Robert A. Elton, David J. Webb and Brian R. Walker
    Hypertension. 2004;43:610-613, originally published February 26, 2004
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000116029.85706.5f
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Vascular Biology

Hypertension

  • About Hypertension
  • Instructions for Authors
  • AHA CME
  • Guidelines and Statements
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231
email: hypertension@heart.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured