Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
      • Research Guidelines
        • Minimum Information About Microarray Data Experiments (MIAME)
      • Abstract
      • Acknowledgments
      • Clinical Implications (Only by invitation)
      • Conflict(s) of Interest/Disclosure(s) Statement
      • Figure Legends
      • Figures
      • Novelty and Significance: 1) What Is New, 2) What Is Relevant?
      • References
      • Sources of Funding
      • Tables
      • Text
      • Title Page
      • Online/Data Supplement
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
      • Change of Authorship Form
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Hypertension

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Sympathetic Nervous System

Neurons of the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Contribute to Obesity-Induced Hypertension in Rats

Sean D. Stocker, Rachel Meador, Julye M. Adams
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000254828.71253.dc
Hypertension. 2007;49:640-646
Originally published February 15, 2007
Sean D. Stocker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Meador
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julye M. Adams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Activation of the sympathetic nervous system contributes to the pathogenesis of obesity-induced hypertension. The present study sought to determine whether sympathetic regulatory neurons of the rostral ventrolateral medulla contribute to the elevated blood pressure in obese rats. Male Sprague–Dawley rats (350 to 425 g) were placed on a moderately high-fat diet (32% kcal as fat) or a low-fat (LF) diet (10.6% kcal as fat). After 13 weeks, rats fed the moderately high-fat diet segregated into obesity-prone (OP) and obesity-resistant (OR) groups based on their body weight (OP: 839±22 g; OR: 668±15 g; LF: 680±18 g; n=15 for all groups; P<0.01). Under isoflurane anesthesia, baseline mean arterial blood pressure was significantly elevated in the OP rats versus the OR and LF rats (OP: 108±2 mm Hg; OR: 100±2 mm Hg; LF: 97±3 mm Hg; n=7; P<0.05). Inhibition of the rostral ventrolateral medulla with bilateral microinjection of the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol (200 pmol/100 nL) decreased mean arterial blood pressure to similar levels across the groups (OP: 49±1 mm Hg; OR: 50±2 mm Hg; LF: 49±1 mm Hg), but the magnitude of this decrease was significantly greater in the OP versus the OR and LF rats (OP: −58±2 mm Hg; OR: −49±1 mm Hg; LF: −48±3 mm Hg; P<0.01). These differences in mean arterial blood pressure cannot be explained by changes in vascular reactivity as the ED50 in response to phenylephrine and norepinephrine was similar across the groups. The present findings suggest that the elevated sympathetic nerve activity and arterial blood pressure in obese rats depends on the tonic activity of rostral ventrolateral medulla sympathetic neurons.

  • obesity
  • sympathetic
  • blood pressure

Risk estimates from the Farmington Heart Study suggest that ≈78% of essential hypertension in men and 65% in women can be directly attributed to obesity.1 Several lines of evidence strongly indicate that activation of the sympathetic nervous system contributes to the etiology of obesity-induced hypertension.2,3 First, renal norepinephrine spillover is approximately doubled in obese versus lean subjects.4–6 Second, muscle sympathetic nerve activity assessed by microneurography is higher in obese humans.7,8 Consistent with this notion, pharmacological blockade of peripheral adrenergic receptors9 or ganglionic blockade10 reduces arterial blood pressure (ABP) to a greater extent in obese versus lean subjects. Similar observations have been reported in animal models of obesity hypertension.11–16 For example, bilateral renal denervation prevents the development of obesity-induced hypertension in dogs.13 Despite the importance of sympathetic nervous system activation in obesity-induced hypertension, the central neural mechanisms and pathways that support the elevated sympathetic outflow and ABP are poorly understood.

Basal sympathetic outflow arises from the tonic drive of neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) to preganglionic neurons in the thoracic and lumbar spinal cord.17 Although other hypothalamic and pontomedullary structures innervate sympathetic preganglionic neurons,17 and stimulation of these regions can increase sympathetic outflow and ABP through pathways independent of the RVLM,18,19 the RVLM is regarded as the major vasomotor center within the central nervous system.17 For example, a myriad of studies indicate that RVLM neurons mediate numerous reflexive adjustments in sympathetic outflow under physiological conditions.17 Electrical stimulation or chemical excitation of this region profoundly increases sympathetic nerve activity and ABP.17 Moreover, several studies have suggested that RVLM neurons contribute to the elevated sympathetic outflow and ABP in several experimental animal models of hypertension.20–24 Interestingly, Lohmeier et al25 reported an increased level of Fos expression, a marker of synaptic activation, in the RVLM of obese hypertensive dogs.

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether RVLM neurons contribute to the elevated ABP in obesity-induced hypertension. Previous studies have demonstrated that feeding rats a moderate high-fat diet for an extended period of time results in the segregation of obesity-resistant (OR) and obesity-prone (OP) rats.14,15,26,27 The latter group has an elevated ABP that is associated with activation of the renin–angiotensin system, hyperleptinemia, hyperinsulinemia, and elevated sympathetic outflow.14,15,26–28 All of these characteristics parallel those observed in obese, hypertensive humans.2,3 In addition, the segregation of OP and OR rats allows studies to distinguish between the effects of obesity versus diet composition. Using this model, we hypothesized that RVLM neurons contribute to the elevated ABP in OP rats. If this greater contribution is related to obesity rather than diet, then the maintenance of ABP by RVLM neurons should be equivalent between OR and rats fed a low-fat (LF) diet.

Methods

Animals

All of the experimental procedures were approved by the University of Kentucky Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Male Sprague–Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories) weighing 350 to 425 g were housed individually in a temperature-controlled room (22° to 23°C) with a 14-hour/10-hour light-dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 am). Rats were placed on an LF diet (10% kcal from fat; Research Diets, Inc, D12489B) or a moderate high-fat diet (32% kcal from fat, Research Diets, Inc, D12266B) for 13 weeks. After 5 weeks, rats fed the moderately high-fat diet segregate into OP and OR based on the body weight distribution as described previously.14,15,26 Briefly, a body weight histogram was constructed and resulted in a distribution of rats into OP and OR groups corresponding with the upper and lower one third of rats, respectively.

Measurement of Food Intake and ABP

One group of LF (n=8), OR (n=8), and OP (n=8) rats was maintained on the respective diet for 13 weeks. Daily food intake was measured throughout the 13-week regimen. ABP was measured every other week for the initial 8 weeks by tail cuff (CODA2, Kent Scientific Corporation). Then, telemetry blood pressure transmitters (TA11PA-C40, Data Sciences International) were implanted into the femoral artery, and the transmitter was sutured to the internal abdominal wall while rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (2% to 3% in 100% O2). Rats received an injection of ampicillin (100 mg/kg, IM) and were returned to home cages. At least 1 week later, ABP and heart rate (HR) were measured by telemetry for 2 weeks. Then, rats were euthanized with isoflurane, and the epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pads were isolated and weighed for calculation of the adiposity index (see below). Transmitter offsets were measured before implantation and at the end of the study. These values were factored into the reported MABP values.

Measurement of Osmolality, Hematocrit, and Blood Volume

A second set of LF (n=7), OR (n=7), and OP (n=7) rats was maintained on the respective diet for 13 weeks. On week 12, rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (2% to 3% in 100% O2) and instrumented with catheters in the left femoral artery and vein. After ABP stabilized for 10 minutes, a blood sample (0.25 mL) was collected from the arterial line into microcentrifuge tubes containing heparin (5 U) and centrifuged (10 000g) immediately. Plasma osmolality was determined in duplicate by freezing point depression (model 3320, Advanced Instruments), and plasma protein concentration was determined by protein refractometry (Refractometer Veterinary ATC, VWR International). Then, Evan’s Blue Dye (200 μL; 0.5%) was injected intravenously to determine plasma volume. After 5 minutes, a blood sample (0.5 mL) was collected from the arterial line as described above, and hematocrit was determined from duplicate capillary tubes. The remainder of the blood sample was centrifuged (10 000g, 1 minute), and 100 μL of plasma was diluted in 900 μL of isotonic saline. The absorbance was measured at 610 nm, and the values were compared with a standard curve using donor blood with known amounts of dye to calculate plasma volume. Blood volume was calculated as described elsewhere.29 For all of the samples, blood volume was replaced with isotonic saline. Catheters were removed, the incision sutured, and animals were returned to home cages for 1 week until RVLM microinjection experiments.

Microinjection into the RVLM

To determine whether RVLM neurons contribute to the elevated ABP in obesity hypertension, LF, OR, and OP rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (2% to 3% in 100% O2) and instrumented with catheters in the femoral artery and vein to measure ABP and administration of drugs, respectively. After tracheal cannulation, rats were ventilated with isoflurane, and end-tidal PCO2 was maintained between 4% and 5% by adjusting the ventilation rate (60 to 80 breaths per minute) or tidal volume (2 to 3 mL). Body temperature was maintained at 37±1°C by a water-circulating blanket. Animals were placed into a stereotaxic head frame with the incisor bar positioned 11 mm below the interaural line. A small portion of the occipital bone was removed, and the area postrema was visualized. Throughout these procedures, the level of anesthesia was examined by the lack of corneal reflexes, and the amount of isoflurane was adjusted accordingly. After all of the surgical procedures and a stable level of anesthesia was obtained, rats were paralyzed with a continuous infusion of gallamine triethiodide (25 mg/kg per hour at 25 μL/h in 5% dextrose), and RVLM injections were performed 15 minutes later.

A glass micropipette was angled 20° rostrally and lowered into the RVLM at the following coordinates with reference to the dorsal surface and caudal tip of the area postrema: 1.8 mm lateral, 1.8 mm rostral, and 2.9 mm ventral. Initially, the RVLM on each side was located functionally by a pressor response (>20 mm Hg) to microinjection of l-glutamate (1 nmol per 100 nL). It was common in these animals that the rostral coordinate was adjusted to 2.0 to 2.2 mm rostral to the caudal tip of the area postrema. The pipette was removed, rinsed with isotonic saline, and filled with the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol. Once baseline variables stabilized for 10 minutes, muscimol (200 pmol per 100 nL per side) was microinjected into the left and right RVLM separated by 2 to 3 minutes. At least 5 minutes after the second muscimol injection, the ganglionic blocker hexamethonium (30 mg/kg, IV) was administered. At the end of experiments, microinjection sites were marked with 2% Chicago Sky Blue (100 nL).

Assessment of In Vivo Vascular Reactivity

After RVLM microinjection and ganglionic blockade with hexamethonium, vascular reactivity was assessed in LF, OR, and OP rats by multiple bolus injections of phenylephrine (0.3 to 100 μg/kg, IV) or norepinephrine (0.03 to 10 μg/kg, IV). Each dose was given in a randomized order, and the next dose was given when MABP returned to baseline levels. Baseline MABP values were sampled from the 30 s immediately before the bolus injection and compared with the 1-s peak response. MABP values were expressed as a percentage of the maximum response within each rat, and the ED50 was determined using Graph Pad Prism software.

Histology

At the end of all of the experiments, animals were euthanized with 5% isoflurane or 1 mL of saturated KCl. Epididymal and retroperitoneal fad pads were isolated and weighed in all of the animals. The adiposity index was calculated for each rat using the following equation: 100 × (epididymal fat + retroperitoneal fat)/(body weight − sum of epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pads). For microinjection experiments, brains were removed and immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 1 week and then transferred to 30% sucrose. Brain stems were sectioned on a vibratome at 50 μm. All of the injection sites were confined to the RVLM as defined by the triangular region located 0 to 500 μm caudal to the caudal tip of the facial nucleus and bordered dorsally by nucleus ambiguus, medially by the inferior olive or pyradimal tracts, and laterally by the spinal trigeminal nucleus.30,31

Statistical Analysis

All of the data are expressed as mean±SEM. All of the variables were analyzed by an ANOVA with repeated measures when appropriate. When a significant F value was obtained, Fisher’s posthoc test (group variable) or paired t tests with a layered Bonferroni correction (within group) was used. For RVLM microinjection experiments, the peak response (30 s) was compared with a 5-minute baseline immediately before the first injection.

Results

Body Weight, Food Intake, and Measurement of ABP in Awake LF, OR, and OP Rats

Initial body weight was not significantly different among LF, OR, and OP rats (Figure 1A). By week 3, there was a significant difference in body weight between OP versus LF and OR rats, and this effect was significantly greater by week 5 and throughout the remainder of the study. There was no difference in body weight between those rats used for blood pressure measurements in awake rats versus those used in microinjection experiments. In a subset of animals, we measured daily food and caloric intake. OP rats had a significantly higher daily caloric intake than LF and OR rats throughout the 13 weeks (Figure 1B). There was no difference in caloric intake between LF and OR rats. The larger increases in body weight and caloric intake observed in OP rats were associated with greater accumulation of fat mass in the epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pads (Table). As expected, the adiposity indices were significantly greater in OP versus LF and OR rats (Table). There were no significant differences in body weight, fat pad mass, or adiposity indices between LF and OR rats.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. Body weight and average daily caloric intake (kcal) as a function of time for LF, OR, and OP rats. A, Although baseline body weight did not differ among groups, OP had a significantly higher body weight than LF or OR rats by week 3 and remained significantly higher throughout the duration of the experiment. B, OP rats had a significantly greater daily caloric intake vs LF and OR rats. *Significant difference between OP vs LF and OR rats (P<0.01). †Significant difference between OP vs LF and OR rats (P<0.0001). #Significant difference within OP rats from week 0 (P<0.01). Values are mean±SEM.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Characteristics of LF, OR, and OP Rats

In a subset of these rats, we measured ABP by 2 different methods: tail cuff and telemetry. Tail cuff did not reveal any significant differences in baseline mean ABP (MABP) or HR or any point during the study (data not shown). For example, there was no significant difference at 8 weeks in MABP (LF: 111±3 mm Hg; OR: 106±4 mm Hg; OP: 114±2 mm Hg; n=8 for all groups) or HR (LF: 412±9 bpm; OR: 420±6 bpm; OP: 415±4 bpm; n=8 for all groups). In contrast, telemetry recording of MABP during weeks 10 to 13 indicated a significant increase in 24-hour average MABP of OP rats versus LF or OR rats (LF: 103±3 mm Hg; OR: 102±4 mm Hg; OP: 111±3 mm Hg; P<0.05). HR did not differ among groups (LF: 368±9 bpm; OR: 365±11 bpm; OP: 377±12 bpm).

Plasma Osmolality and Protein Concentration, Hematocrit, and Plasma and Blood Volume in LF, OR, and OP Rats

There were no significant differences in plasma osmolality, plasma protein concentration, and hematocrit among LF, OR, and OP rats (Table). Similarly, we did not observe any significant differences in plasma or blood volume among LF, OR, and OP rats despite a significant difference in body weight (Table). When blood volume was normalized for 100-g body weight, OP rats had a significantly lower blood volume than OR rats. There was no significance difference between LF and OP rats.

Effect of RVLM Inhibition on MABP and HR in LF, OR, and OP Rats

Initially, we functionally identified the RVLM by successfully evoking a pressor response to microinjection of l-glutamate. Injection of l-glutamate produced a significant increase in MABP of LF, OR, and OP rats that was not different among groups (31±5, 24±1, and 34±6 mm Hg, respectively).

If the RVLM contributes to the elevated sympathetic outflow and ABP in obesity-induced hypertension, then inhibition of the RVLM with the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol should produce a greater drop in MABP in OP versus LF or OR rats. Figure 2 shows examples of these responses in all 3 of the groups. Injection of muscimol into the left and right RVLM produced a precipitous fall in ABP and HR in LF, OR, and OP rats. Group responses are summarized in Figure 3. Baseline MABP was significantly elevated in OP versus LF and OR rats (Figure 3A). Inhibition of the RVLM significantly decreased MABP to similar levels across the groups, but the magnitude of the fall in MABP was significantly larger in the OP versus the LF or OR rats (Figure 3B). Administration of the ganglionic blocker hexamethonium did not further reduce MABP in any group (Figure 3). Baseline HR was not different between groups (LF: 369±15 bpm; OR: 362±15 bpm; OP: 389±11 bpm), and inhibition of the RVLM decreased HR to levels that were not statistically different between groups (LF: 289±18 bpm; OR: 297±4 bpm; OP: 300±12 bpm) nor was the change in HR different (LF: −80±14 bpm; OR: −65±12 bpm; OP: −89±11 bpm).

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. Effect of muscimol injection into the RVLM on ABP, MABP, and HR of an LF, OR, and OP rat. Summary data are presented in Figure 3. ▾, injection of muscimol into the left and right RVLM; ▿, injection of hexamethonium (30 mg/kg, IV).

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 3. Effect of RVLM inhibition on MABP in LF, OR, and OP rats. A, Baseline MABP was significantly elevated in OP vs LF and OR rats; however, bilateral inhibition of the RVLM significantly decreased MABP to levels that were similar across groups. Injection of hexamethonium did not further decrease MABP. B, The magnitude of the fall in MABP after inhibition of the RVLM was significantly greater in OP vs LF and OR rats. *Significant difference from LF and OR rats (P<0.05). Values are mean±SEM. Hex indicates hexamethonium chloride.

Vascular Reactivity in LF, OR, and OP Rats

Intravenous bolus injection of phenylephrine produced dose-dependent increases in MABP in all 3 of the groups (Figure 4). These changes in MABP were not different whether these values were plotted as a function of the dose per body weight or amount of phenylephrine administered (Figure 4). When values were expressed as a percentage of the maximum change in MABP for each rat, the calculated ED50 was not significantly different across groups as a function of body weight (LF: 13.8±2.0 μg/kg; OR: 15.0±2.7μg/kg; OP: 12.2±1.5 μg/kg) or amount of phenylephrine (LF: 8.4±1.2 μg; OR: 10.5±1.8 μg; OP: 10.5±1.1 μg). Similarly, norepinephrine produced dose-dependent increases in MABP that were not different across LF, OR, and OP rats regardless of the dose per body weight or amount (Figure 5). Again, the ED50 for norepinephrine was not different across groups as a function of body weight (LF: 1.4±0.1 μg/kg; OR: 1.4±0.2 μg/kg; OP: 1.4±0.1 μg/kg) or amount of norepinephrine (LF: 1.4±0.1 μg; OR: 1.7±0.2 μg; OP: 1.6±0.1 μg). These experiments were performed in ganglionic-blocked rats to remove baroreflex-induced compensations, and this was confirmed by the lack of any bradycardia during administration of phenylephrine and norepinephrine. In fact, both drugs significantly increase HR at higher doses (data not shown).

Figure4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 4. Vascular reactivity in vivo to phenylephrine (PE) was not different among LF, OP, and OR rats regardless of whether the changes in MABP were plotted as a function of (A) dose (micrograms per kilogram) or (B) amount (microgram) of PE. The calculated EC50 values were not different irrespective of dose or amount of PE. Values are mean±SEM.

Figure5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 5. Vascular reactivity in vivo to norepinephrine (NE) was not different among LF, OP, and OR rats regardless of whether the changes in MABP were plotted as a function of (A) dose (micrograms per kilogram) or (B) amount (microgram) of NE. The calculated EC50 values were not different irrespective of the dose or amount of NE. Values are mean±SEM.

Discussion

Compelling evidence in both clinical studies and animal models indicates that elevated sympathetic nerve activity contributes to obesity-induced hypertension.2,3 However, the central neural mechanisms and pathways that support the elevated ABP in obesity are poorly understood. The present study demonstrates that neurons of the RVLM contribute to elevated sympathetic outflow and ABP in a rodent model of diet-induced obesity, and, therefore, provides the first identification of a central nervous system region that contributes to obesity hypertension.

The present experiments assessed the contribution of RVLM neurons to the elevated ABP in a rodent model of diet-induced obesity. Previous studies have demonstrated that feeding rats a moderately high-fat diet produces a differential weight gain profile that permits the segregation of OP and OR rats.14,15,26,27 This model has 2 advantages: the segregation of OP and OR rats allows studies to distinguish between the effects of obesity versus diet composition, and it closely mimics the neurohumoral and hemodynamic characteristics of human obesity, because OP rats have elevated cholesterol, insulin, leptin, activation of the renin–angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems, and an elevated ABP.14,15,26–28 In the present study, we observed a clear segregation of OR and OP rats with the latter group characterized by a higher daily caloric intake, a significantly larger weight gain, greater accumulation of visceral fat mass (and higher adiposity index), and an elevated ABP. Although a recent report suggests that there is no difference in ABP in this rodent model,32 telemetry recording of MABP in the present study revealed a difference between OP versus LF or OR rats and is in agreement with the elevated ABP reported by several other laboratories.14,15,27

RVLM neurons play a pivotal role in cardiovascular regulation. These neurons project to the spinal cord and directly innervate sympathetic preganglionic neurons in the thoracic and lumbar segments.17 We hypothesized that the elevated ABP in obese rats depends on the tonic activity of RVLM neurons. If this greater contribution of RVLM neurons to the elevated ABP was related to obesity rather than diet, then OP rats and not OR rats should display a greater drop in ABP compared with LF rats after inhibition of the RVLM. The present findings support this hypothesis, because injection of muscimol into the RVLM produces a significantly greater fall in the ABP of OP rats versus OR or LF rats. In addition, we confirmed that sympathetic outflow is elevated in OP rats via the RVLM, as ganglionic blockade did not further reduce MABP. Although sympathetic outflow could be equivalent among LF, OR, and OP rats, and the increased contribution of the RVLM to the elevated ABP in OP rats is reflected by an enhanced vascular reactivity to sympathetic input, we did not observe any difference in the ED50 of phenylephrine or norepinephrine among LF, OR, and OP rats. Therefore, our findings indicate that the elevated MABP in OP rats is due to a greater contribution of RVLM neurons. However, these findings do not necessarily demonstrate that the tonic activity of RVLM neurons is elevated in OP rats but does indicate that the tonic activity of RVLM neurons is necessary for the elevated ABP in obesity hypertension. Although stimulation of hypothalamic structures can increase sympathetic outflow and ABP after inhibition of the RVLM,18,19 ganglionic blockade did not further reduce ABP after inhibition of the RVLM, and this suggests that diet-induced obesity may directly activate RVLM to elevate ABP. The neural pathways underlie that activation of RVLM neurons in obesity hypertension merits further investigation.

The activity of RVLM neurons and its contribution to sympathetic outflow and ABP is maintained by a balance of excitatory and inhibitory inputs.17,33 Previous studies have suggested that this balance shifts to an increased excitatory drive in rodent models of experimental hypertension associated with an elevated sympathetic outflow. For example, blockade of excitatory amino acid and angiotensin II type 1 receptors lowers ABP in the spontaneously hypertensive rat, Dahl salt-sensitive rat, and Goldblatt models of hypertension.20–24 In some models, this shift in excitatory balance is associated with an increase in the sensitivity of the RVLM to l-glutamate,22 but we did not observe a difference in glutamate-evoked pressor responses among LF, OR, and OP rats. Future studies are needed to identify whether the elevated ABP in obesity depends on excitatory amino acid and/or angiotensin II inputs or whether diet-induced obesity recruits a mechanism within the RVLM that is unique to this condition.

The mechanism(s) by which obesity activates the sympathetic nervous system to increase ABP is largely unknown, although hyperleptinemia has been postulated to play a significant role.34 Acute administration of leptin increases lumbar, renal, and brown adipose sympathetic nerve activity,35 whereas chronic administration of leptin increases ABP through activation of peripheral adrenergic receptors.36 The acute and chronic renal sympathoexcitatory effects of leptin are blocked by central administration of melanocortin-4 receptor antagonists37 or are eliminated in melanocortin-4 receptor knockout mice.38,39 Interestingly, acute administration of leptin reportedly increases the discharge of neurons in the region of the RVLM.40 A second mechanism that may activate the sympathetic nervous system in obesity is the peripheral renin–angiotensin system. In humans, plasma renin activity declines with weight loss and is correlated with the reduction in ABP.41,42 Furthermore, angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces sympathetic nerve activity in obese, hypertensive humans.43 Interestingly, administration of losartan through the drinking water produces a significantly greater fall in MABP of OP versus OR rats.15 Circulating angiotensin II acts at circumventricular organs to subsequently activate complex pathways, including those using central angiotensin II as a neurotransmitter, to increases sympathetic outflow.44 Whether these mechanisms, independently or in combination with others, underlie the increased contribution of the RVLM to the elevated sympathetic outflow and ABP in OP rats awaits further investigation.

Perspectives

Accumulating evidence in obesity indicates that elevated sympathetic outflow contributes to the elevated ABP. However, human obesity increases sympathetic outflow in a regionally specific manner to the kidney and hindlimb vasculature.3 Although much speculation remains about the afferent signal(s) that activate the sympathetic nervous system in obesity, the regional specificity of sympathetic outflow raises the question of whether any one of these signals selectively increases sympathetic nerve activity to the kidney and hindlimb vasculature. For example, acute administration of leptin to rats increases sympathetic nerve activity to brown adipose tissue, hindlimb vasculature, kidney, and adrenal gland.35 This general increase in sympathetic outflow does not seem to occur in human obesity, because clinical studies indicate that sympathetic outflow is increased to the kidney and hindlimb but decreased or unchanged in the heart and adrenal gland.3 Additional insight into the specific neuronal pathways and neurochemical phenotype of sympathetic-regulatory neurons that mediate selective activation of regional sympathetic outflow in obesity would represent an important step toward the development of centrally acting drugs for the treatment of the elevated ABP. The present study provides the first identification of a specific central nervous system region that contributes to the elevated ABP in obesity. Although obesity-induced hypertension is generally thought to occur from a sympathetically mediated increase in tubular sodium and water reabsorption,13 this study also suggests that a sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction and increase in vascular resistance contributes to obesity hypertension. Whether 1 or both mechanisms ultimately contribute to the long-term maintenance of hypertension in obese humans is not known.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs Lisa Cassis and David Randall for insightful discussions regarding this project.

Sources of Funding

This research was supported by a Scientist Development Grant (S.D.S.) and postdoctoral fellowship (J.M.A.) from the American Heart Association. R.M. was supported by a University of Kentucky Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship.

Disclosures

None.

  • Received October 14, 2006.
  • Revision received November 5, 2006.
  • Accepted November 29, 2006.

References

  1. ↵
    Garrison RJ, Kannel WB, Stokes J, Castelli WP. Incidence and precursors of hypertension in young adults: the Framingham Offspring Study. Prev Med. 1987; 16: 235–251.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Davy KP, Hall JE. Obesity and hypertension: two epidemics or one? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 286: R803–R813.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Esler M, Straznicky N, Eikelis N, Masuo K, Lambert G, Lambert E. Mechanisms of sympathetic activation in obesity-related hypertension. Hypertension. 2006; 48: 787–796.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Vaz M, Jennings G, Turner A, Cox H, Lambert G, Esler M. Regional sympathetic nervous activity and oxygen consumption in obese normotensive human subjects. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3423–3429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Rumantir MS, Vaz M, Jennings GL, Collier G, Kaye DM, Seals DR, Wiesner GH, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Esler MD. Neural mechanisms in human obesity-related hypertension. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 1125–1133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Purdham DM, Zou MX, Rajapurohitam V, Karmazyn M. Rat heart is a site of leptin production and action. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 287: H2877–H2884.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Grassi G, Seravalle G, Cattaneo BM, Bolla GB, Lanfranchi A, Colombo M, Giannattasio C, Brunani A, Cavagnini F, Mancia G. Sympathetic activation in obese normotensive subjects. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 560–563.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Alvarez GE, Beske SD, Ballard TP, Davy KP. Sympathetic neural activation in visceral obesity. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2533–2536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Wofford MR, Anderson DC, Jr, Brown CA, Jones DW, Miller ME, Hall JE. Antihypertensive effect of alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade in obese and lean hypertensive subjects. Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14: 694–698.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Shibao C, Gamboa A, Diedrich A, Ertl AC, Chen KY, Byrne DW, Farley G, Paranjape SY, Davis SN, Baiggioni I. Autonomic contribution to blood pressure and metabolism in obesity. Hypertension. 2007, in press.
  11. ↵
    Rocchini AP, Mao HZ, Babu K, Marker P, Rocchini AJ. Clonidine prevents insulin resistance and hypertension in obese dogs. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 548–553.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Hall JE, Van Vliet BN, Garrity CA, Connell RD, Brands MW. Obesity hypertension: role of adrenergic mechanisms. Hypertension. 1993; 21: 528.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Kassab S, Kato T, Wilkins FC, Chen R, Hall JE, Granger JP. Renal denervation attenuates the sodium retention and hypertension associated with obesity. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 893–897.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Boustany CM, Bharadwaj K, Daugherty A, Brown DR, Randall DC, Cassis LA. Activation of the systemic and adipose renin-angiotensin system in rats with diet-induced obesity and hypertension. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 287: R943–R949.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Boustany CM, Brown DR, Randall DC, Cassis LA. AT1-receptor antagonism reverses the blood pressure elevation associated with diet-induced obesity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005; 289: R181–R186.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Schreihofer AM, Hair CD, Stepp DW. Reduced plasma volume and mesenteric vascular reactivity in obese Zucker rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005; 288: R253–R261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Guyenet PG. The sympathetic control of blood pressure. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006; 7: 335–346.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Kiely JM, Gordon FJ. Role of rostral ventrolateral medulla in centrally mediated pressor responses. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267: H1549–H1556.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Cao WH, Fan W, Morrison SF. Medullary pathways mediating specific sympathetic responses to activation of dorsomedial hypothalamus. Neuroscience. 2004; 126: 229–240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Bergamaschi C, Campos RR, Schor N, Lopes OU. Role of the rostral ventrolateral medulla in maintenance of blood pressure in rats with Goldblatt hypertension. Hypertension. 1995; 26: 1117–1120.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Ito S, Komatsu K, Tsukamoto K, Sved AF. Excitatory amino acids in the rostral ventrolateral medulla support blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 413–417.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Ito S, Komatsu K, Tsukamoto K, Sved AF. Tonic excitatory input to the rostral ventrolateral medulla in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 687–691.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Ito S, Komatsu K, Tsukamoto K, Kanmatsuse K, Sved AF. Ventrolateral medulla AT1 receptors support blood pressure in hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2002; 40: 552–559.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Ito S, Hiratsuka M, Komatsu K, Tsukamoto K, Kanmatsuse K, Sved AF. Ventrolateral medulla AT1 receptors support arterial pressure in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 744–750.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Lohmeier TE, Warren S, Cunningham JT. Sustained activation of the central baroreceptor pathway in obesity hypertension. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 96–102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Levin BE, Triscari J, Sullivan AC. Altered sympathetic activity during development of diet-induced obesity in rat. Am J Physiol. 1983; 244: R347–R355.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Dobrian AD, Davies MJ, Prewitt RL, Lauterio TJ. Development of hypertension in a rat model of diet-induced obesity. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 1009–1015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Levin BE, Keesey RE. Defense of differing body weight set points in diet-induced obese and resistant rats. Am J Physiol. 1998; 274: R412–R419.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    Fink GD, Johnson RJ, Galligan JJ. Mechanisms of increased venous smooth muscle tone in desoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertension. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 464–469.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Stocker SD, Cunningham JT, Toney GM. Water deprivation increases Fos immunoreactivity in PVN autonomic neurons with projections to the spinal cord and rostral ventrolateral medulla. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 287: R1172–R1183.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Stocker SD, Simmons JR, Stornetta RL, Toney GM, Guyenet PG. Water deprivation activates a glutamatergic projection from the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus to the rostral ventrolateral medulla. J Comp Neurol. 2006; 494: 673–685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Carroll JF, Zenebe WJ, Strange TB. Cardiovascular function in a rat model of diet-induced obesity. Hypertension. 2006; 48: 65–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Sved AF, Ito S, Madden CJ, Stocker SD, Yajima Y. Excitatory inputs to the RVLM in the context of the baroreceptor reflex. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 940: 247–258.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    Wofford MR, Hall JE. Pathophysiology and treatment of obesity hypertension. Curr Pharm Des. 2004; 10: 3621–3637.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Haynes WG, Morgan DA, Walsh SA, Mark AL, Sivitz WI. Receptor-mediated regional sympathetic nerve activation by leptin. J Clin Invest. 1997; 100: 270–278.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Carlyle M, Jones OB, Kuo JJ, Hall JE. Chronic cardiovascular and renal actions of leptin: role of adrenergic activity. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 496–501.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Haynes WG, Morgan DA, Djalali A, Sivitz WI, Mark AL. Interactions between the melanocortin system and leptin in control of sympathetic nerve traffic. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 542–547.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Rahmouni K, Haynes WG, Morgan DA, Mark AL. Role of melanocortin-4 receptors in mediating renal sympathoactivation to leptin and insulin. J Neurosci. 2003; 23: 5998–6004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Tallam LS, da Silva AA, Hall JE. Melanocortin-4 receptor mediates chronic cardiovascular and metabolic actions of leptin. Hypertension. 2006; 48: 58–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Zhang ZH, Felder RB. Melanocortin receptors mediate the excitatory effects of blood-borne murine leptin on hypothalamic paraventricular neurons in rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 286: R303–R310.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Sowers JR, Nyby M, Stern N, Beck F, Baron S, Catania R, Vlachis N. Blood pressure and hormone changes associated with weight reduction in the obese. Hypertension. 1982; 4: 686–691.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Reisin E, Frohlich ED. Effects of weight reduction on arterial pressure. J Chronic Dis. 1982; 35: 887–891.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Grassi G, Seravalle G, Dell’Oro R, Trevano FQ, Bombelli M, Scopelliti F, Facchini A, Mancia G. Comparative effects of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and sympathetic drive in obese hypertensive individuals: results of the CROSS study. J Hypertens. 2003; 21: 1761–1769.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Ferguson AV, Washburn DL. Angiotensin II: a peptidergic neurotransmitter in central autonomic pathways. Prog Neurobiol. 1998; 54: 169–192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Hypertension
March 2007, Volume 49, Issue 3
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Neurons of the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Contribute to Obesity-Induced Hypertension in Rats
    Sean D. Stocker, Rachel Meador and Julye M. Adams
    Hypertension. 2007;49:640-646, originally published February 15, 2007
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000254828.71253.dc

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Hypertension.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Neurons of the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Contribute to Obesity-Induced Hypertension in Rats
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Hypertension
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Hypertension web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Neurons of the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Contribute to Obesity-Induced Hypertension in Rats
    Sean D. Stocker, Rachel Meador and Julye M. Adams
    Hypertension. 2007;49:640-646, originally published February 15, 2007
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000254828.71253.dc
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Cardiology
    • Etiology
      • Hypertension
        • Hypertension
  • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Obesity
  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Animal Models of Human Disease

Hypertension

  • About Hypertension
  • Instructions for Authors
  • AHA CME
  • Guidelines and Statements
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231
email: hypertension@heart.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured