Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
      • Research Guidelines
        • Minimum Information About Microarray Data Experiments (MIAME)
      • Abstract
      • Acknowledgments
      • Clinical Implications (Only by invitation)
      • Conflict(s) of Interest/Disclosure(s) Statement
      • Figure Legends
      • Figures
      • Novelty and Significance: 1) What Is New, 2) What Is Relevant?
      • References
      • Sources of Funding
      • Tables
      • Text
      • Title Page
      • Online/Data Supplement
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
      • Change of Authorship Form
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Hypertension

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Hypertension Highlights

Vitamin D and Hypertension

Current Evidence and Future Directions

Anand Vaidya, John P. Forman
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.140160
Hypertension. 2010;56:774-779
Originally published October 20, 2010
Anand Vaidya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John P. Forman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Update on Mechanisms Linking Vitamin D With Hypertension
    • Update on the Epidemiology of Vitamin D, Hypertension, and Blood Pressure
    • Update on Existing Human Trials
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

The prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency, defined by a 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) level <30 ng/mL, in the United States was 77% in 2004.1 Although the use of vitamin D supplementation may be increasing since 2004, it is likely that the majority of US citizens continue to have inadequate vitamin D status.2 Observational studies suggest that low 25(OH)D levels are associated with a higher risk of hypertension. However, findings from randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation to lower blood pressure are inconsistent, possibly stemming from variability in study population, sample size, vitamin D dose, and duration. If vitamin D supplementation lowers blood pressure, its widespread use could have major public health benefits. In this review, we summarize the existing literature dealing with the vitamin D-hypertension link, including mechanistic studies, observational data, and clinical trials; we place special emphasis on recent findings.

Update on Mechanisms Linking Vitamin D With Hypertension

Biological mechanisms relating vitamin D with hypertension have been proposed for >25 years. Vitamin D has been implicated in the proximal regulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and in interacting with the RAS to determine the intracellular calcium milieu in vascular smooth muscle.

Vitamin D and the RAS

Dietary sodium and increased activity of the RAS are known to contribute to hypertension; salt restriction and inhibition of RAS activity reduce blood pressure.3–5 Li et al6 provided convincing support for vitamin D as a proximal inhibitor of the RAS when they described a phenotype of excess plasma renin activity and hypertension in mice lacking the vitamin D receptor, which normalized after treatment with RAS antagonists. These vitamin D receptor–null mice also displayed an increased susceptibility to obstructive renal injury that could be prevented with RAS antagonism.7 Mice with deficient 1α-hydroxylase activity were also found to have increased plasma renin activity and hypertension, and this unfavorable phenotype could be reversed with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25[OH]2D).8 Their collective experiments indicated that vitamin D may inhibit the RAS by reducing renin gene expression.9

This mechanistic link between vitamin D and the RAS has been translated to cross-sectional studies in humans. A quarter century ago, increasing 1,25(OH)2D concentrations were associated with lower plasma renin activity in human hypertension.10,11 More recently, Tomaschitz et al12 showed that both 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)D were inversely associated with plasma renin and angiotensin II concentrations in a cohort referred for coronary angiography. These patients were evaluated while on their ad libitum medications (including antihypertensive drugs) and on an uncontrolled ad libitum sodium diet, both of which can influence the RAS. Despite these notable limitations, their findings were consistent with those by Forman et al13 in nonhypertensive individuals maintained in dietary sodium balance, who exhibited augmented renal vascular RAS activity and increased angiotensin II concentrations with 25(OH)D deficiency.

These cumulative animal and human data echo previous observations of an inverse relation between vitamin D and RAS activity, suggesting that vitamin D may act as an endogenous inhibitor of the RAS. Definitive mechanistic and outcome studies to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the RAS and blood pressure have yet to be completed.

Vitamin D, the RAS, and Intracellular Calcium Homeostasis

Calcium homeostasis has long been linked to blood pressure regulation14–19; however, this concept evolved with the demonstrations that intracellular calcium concentrations were positively associated with blood pressure15 and that the flux of calcium into vascular smooth muscle cells may be facilitated by 1,25(OH)2D.20,21 These data suggested that vitamin D may play a role in regulating vascular tone by influencing the concentration of calcium in vascular smooth muscle cells. Because intracellular calcium accumulation also results in an inhibition of renin secretion in juxtaglomerular cells,22,23 subsequent hypotheses speculated that sodium-regulating hormones (the RAS) and calcium-regulating hormones (vitamin D) may be interdependent factors in the process of hypertension.24

Previous studies showed that dietary salt loading in human hypertension increased concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D.10,11,25,26 Furthermore, individuals with the greatest salt-induced elevations in 1,25(OH)2D exhibited the greatest salt-induced elevations in blood pressure, presumably because of increases in intracellular calcium. The exact mechanism for this salt-induced promotion of 1,25(OH)2D has not been elucidated, nor has the role of salt and RAS components in the 1,25(OH)2D-mediated calcium entry into cells.21

Resnick and colleagues10,11 speculated that, in the setting of a sustained dietary sodium load, 1,25(OH)2D production and calcium flux into cells were increased, resulting in reduced RAS activity and increased vascular smooth muscle tone. Although this hypothesis bridged the independent implications of sodium, calcium,14–19,22,23,27 and parathyroid hormone28–35 directly in the regulation of the RAS and blood pressure, it did not explain whether the calcium-regulatory role of 1,25(OH)2D on blood pressure was prohypertensive or antihypertensive. Rather, these experiments established a unique interplay among dietary sodium, the RAS, and 1,25(OH)2D on vascular tone that is incompletely understood. Further understanding of these complex relationships may improve the understanding of the role of vitamin D in blood pressure physiology.

Vitamin D and Other Vascular Mechanisms

In addition to potential effects on the RAS and regulation of vascular smooth muscle contractility, the link between vitamin D and hypertension has also been hypothesized to be mediated by other direct effects on vascular endothelium and smooth muscle. In vitro studies have supported 1,25(OH)2D as a vascular protective agent by showing that it reduces the deleterious effect of advanced glycation end products on the endothelium, improves activity of the NO system, and reduces inflammatory and atherosclerotic parameters.36–38 Furthermore, 1,25(OH)2D has been implicated in the growth of vascular myocytes and has been shown to enhance prostacyclin production (possibly via the cyclooxygenase pathway) in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells.39,40 Translated to humans, one prospective study described endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress with 25(OH)D deficiency that was significantly improved with vitamin D supplementation.41

Taken together, these data posit that vitamin D may influence blood pressure by functioning as an endogenous inhibitor of the RAS, interacting with salt and the RAS to modulate vascular smooth muscle tone, and indirectly affecting the vascular endothelium. Definitive studies to test these hypotheses in humans and determine whether these mechanisms are interrelated or independent have not been performed. Because future investigations aim to better define the mechanistic link between vitamin D and hypertension, a crucial aspect of study designs will require focus on differentiating the causal role of vitamin D from that of calcium, parathyroid hormone, sodium, and the RAS.

Update on the Epidemiology of Vitamin D, Hypertension, and Blood Pressure

Cross-Sectional Studies

More than 20 cross-sectional studies have examined the association between plasma 25(OH)D and either blood pressure or prevalent hypertension. The great majority of these studies demonstrate that lower circulating 25(OH)D levels are associated with higher blood pressures or a higher prevalence of hypertension, including large population-based cohorts in the United States,42 Germany,43 and the United Kingdom.44

Only 2 large cross-sectional studies, the Amsterdam Longitudinal Aging Study and the Rancho-Bernardo Study, failed to document a significant association, but these null findings may have alternate explanations.45,46 In the Amsterdam study, approximately one third of participants were using antihypertensive medication, possibly obscuring an association with blood pressure; indeed, antihypertensive use was 33% lower among those whose 25(OH)D level was >30 ng/mL compared with <10 ng/mL.46 The Rancho-Benardo Study included white individuals living in Southern California, and 98% of the population had normal 25(OH)D levels; thus, the lack of an association may be expected.45

Prospective Studies

Before 2010, 2 prospective studies reported the association between baseline 25(OH)D levels and incident hypertension.47,48 In the first, 1811 nonhypertensive participants with available 25(OH)D levels at baseline were followed for 4 years. Those with 25(OH)D levels <15 ng/mL had a relative risk for incident hypertension of 2.67 (95% CI: 1.05 to 6.79) compared with those whose levels were ≥30 ng/mL after adjusting for several demographic and lifestyle factors.48 The same authors then performed a nested case-control study within the Nurses’ Health Study II cohort and measured both 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone levels at baseline.47 After adjustment for parathyroid hormone and multiple other factors, including age, body mass index, physical activity, smoking, family history of hypertension, alcohol, and other dietary factors, plus blood levels of calcium, phosphorous, and uric acid, they observed an odds ratio for incident hypertension of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.11 to 2.48) comparing the lowest (≤21.0 ng/mL) with highest (≥32.3 ng/mL) quartile of 25(OH)D (P for trend=0.01).

In 2010, Jorde et al49 reported the association between 25(OH)D and blood pressure during 14 years of follow-up in the Tromso Study. Baseline systolic blood pressure was significantly higher by 3.6 mm Hg among individuals in the lowest (<16.6 ng/mL) compared with the highest (>25.0 ng/mL) quartile of 25(OH)D.49 Among the individuals not using antihypertensive medication in either 1994 and 2008 (approximately two thirds of the original population), the 14-year change in systolic blood pressure among those in the lowest quartile of 25(OH)D was 11.9 mm Hg and among those in the highest quartile was 10.8 mm Hg (1.1 mm Hg greater increase among those in the lowest quartile); this difference was not significant. Of the individuals who did not have prevalent hypertension at baseline, the incidence of hypertension during the subsequent 14 years was ≈50%. Compared with those whose baseline 25(OH)D level was >25.0 ng/mL, individuals whose baseline 25(OH)D level was <16.6 ng/mL had an adjusted odds ratio for incident hypertension of 1.22 (95% CI: 0.87 to 1.72).49

Although at first this study may seem to contradict the 2 previous prospective studies, which demonstrate a inverse association, this is not necessarily the case. The results from the Nurses’ Health Study II (an 8-year study) demonstrated an odds ratio (1.66) that fits within the CIs reported by Jorde et al49 (0.87 to 1.72); thus, the findings from these 2 studies are consistent from a statistical point of view. Furthermore, the study by Jorde et al49 analyzed associations between baseline levels of 25(OH)D and hypertension data 14 years later. Because these participants also had 25(OH)D levels measured at the 14-year mark, it could be determined that the 25(OH)D levels in 1994 explained just 18% of the variability in the 25(OH)D levels in 2008.49 Because participants were classified into quartiles based on 25(OH)D levels in 1994, increasing degrees of misclassification of 25(OH)D status likely occurred as the study progressed. This type of misclassification tends to create a null bias (underestimating the true association) and predisposes the study toward not finding an association. Finally, the great majority of individuals in the Tromso Study had vitamin D insufficiency; thus, there was inadequate statistical power to analyze hypertension risk comparing individuals with insufficiency to those with optimal vitamin D levels.

Although the majority of observational data point to an inverse association between 25(OH)D and blood pressure, residual confounding may explain these findings. Randomized, controlled trials are needed to verify whether these associations are causal.

Update on Existing Human Trials

Randomized Trials

A total of 13 randomized trials have reported results for change in blood pressure comparing cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol with placebo (Table).50–62 Only 2 trials were specifically designed to examine effects on blood pressure, such that use of antihypertensive medications was not permitted, and blood pressure was the primary end point.58,60 Scragg et al60 randomized 189 men and women with mean baseline 25(OH)D levels of 13 ng/mL to receive a single dose of 100 000 IU of cholecalciferol or placebo. After 5 weeks of follow-up, the mean 25(OH)D concentration had risen by 7 ng/mL in the intervention group, but there was no detectable difference in blood pressure when compared with placebo.60 In the other trial, Pfeifer et al58 randomized 148 elderly women with a mean baseline 25(OH)D level of 10 ng/mL to receive 800 IU/d of cholecalciferol or placebo for 8 weeks. With a 12-ng/mL increase in 25(OH)D levels, the group receiving cholecalciferol had a significant 7-mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure compared with placebo.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table. Summary of Vitamin D: Blood Pressure Interventional Trials

The largest of these 13 randomized trials was the Women’s Health Initiative54; the study was originally designed to examine whether 400 IU/d of cholecalciferol plus 1000 mg/d of calcium compared with placebo would reduce fracture and cancer risks.63,64 After 7 years, no change in blood pressure was noted among those receiving cholecalciferol compared with placebo, and no association between cholecalciferol treatment and incident hypertension was found.54 However, several features of the Women’s Health Initiative analysis temper any conclusions that can be drawn: (1) the dose of vitamin D used in Women’s Health Initiative (400 IU/d) has a very modest effect on plasma 25(OH)D levels, typically ≤4 ng/mL65–67; (2) the great majority of women in Women’s Health Initiative had baseline vitamin D insufficiency (<30 ng/mL), and 400 IU/d would not be expected to achieve sufficient levels in these individuals54; (3) ≈40% of women on active treatment were noncompliant with study drugs; (4) ≈60% of women on placebo took an equivalent dose of supplemental vitamin D; and (5) although an effect of cholecalciferol on blood pressure in those without baseline hypertension was absent, these individuals could have initiated antihypertensive medication during the 7 years of follow-up, and this was not taken into account in the analysis.54

In the most recent trial to emerge, Jorde et al52 published secondary findings from a randomized trial among >400 obese and severely obese adults. The study, which was designed to examine the potential effects of vitamin D on weight loss, included 3 treatment groups: 40 000 IU cholecalciferol per week, 20 000 IU per week, and placebo. Treatment and follow-up were ≈1 year. Approximately 21% of the study population was using antihypertensive medication at baseline. Baseline levels of 25(OH)D were 23 ng/mL and increased by 32 ng/mL among those receiving 40 000 IU per week and by 17 ng/mL among those receiving 20 000 IU per week. Neither 40 000 IU per week nor 20 000 IU per week lowered blood pressure after 1 year when compared with placebo.

Given that this trial combined an adequate vitamin D dosing regimen with a larger sample size than most other trials that have examined the effects of vitamin D on blood pressure, it represents the strongest evidence to date that vitamin D may not lower blood pressure. On the other hand, it is not clear whether these results extend to a population with less adiposity or one that is older. Because most mechanisms relating vitamin D to blood pressure postulate a role in direct or indirect vascular damage, it is possible that 1 year of vitamin D supplementation may not be long enough to detect differences in an outcome such as blood pressure. Furthermore, several baseline characteristics, including age and blood pressure, displayed unexpected cross-sectional associations with baseline 25(OH)D; whether this is a function of the specific population that was studied is unknown.

The randomized VITamin d and omegA-3 triaL (VITAL) begins this winter (2010–2011). Approximately 20 000 older individuals (age ≥60 years for men and ≥65 years for women) of various races and ethnicities from across the United States will be enrolled. One primary goal of this trial is to determine whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation (cholecalciferol: 2000 IU per day) given over a long duration (5 years) can prevent cardiovascular end points and cancer. Based on the anticipated prevalence of hypertension among the older individuals, ≈8000 of the anticipated 20 000 enrollees will be free from hypertension at the start of the study. Thus, this study should have sufficient statistical power to examine whether high-dose, long-term vitamin D supplementation can reduce the incidence of hypertension. Furthermore, ≈1000 participants will undergo blood pressure measurements prerandomization, with repeat blood pressure measurements 2 years later.

Meta-Analyses of Previous Randomized Trials

Two published meta-analyses have pooled these, as well as additional trials (of activated vitamin D compounds or UVB light exposure) to determine whether the aggregate of these data indicate a blood pressure–lowering effect of vitamin D supplementation.68,69 The meta-analysis by Witham et al69 mixed trials of cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, alphacalcidol (a 1,25[OH]2D analog), and UVB radiation as sources of vitamin D. Some of the 13 trials shown in the Table were included. When the authors limited their meta-analysis to 4 trials of hypertensive participants that used cholecalciferol as the intervention, the pooled effect on systolic blood pressure was −6.2 mm Hg (95% CI: −12.30 to −0.04 mm Hg).69 No effect was observed pooling trials of only nonhypertensive participants.

The second meta-analysis included 9 of the 12 trials shown in the Table, plus a trial of UVB radiation.68 No significant overall effect of vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure was found. However, when only trials that used higher doses of vitamin D (>1000 IU per day) were included, a significant lowering of diastolic blood pressure was noted (−1.5 mm Hg; P=0.04).

Dosing Regimens

Mention should be paid to the dose of vitamin D used in various previous trials, as well as future trials. Most investigators would agree that the dose of vitamin D should be sufficient to increase 25(OH)D levels from the range of insufficiency to the normal range. On the other hand, is there such a thing as too high of a dose of vitamin D? Alternatively, can infrequent yet very high doses be detrimental, as indicated by the counterintuitive adverse effects on falls and fractures of very high single-dose regimens of vitamin D?70,71 Should vitamin D be supplemented by skin exposure to UVB radiation instead of oral supplementation? It turns out that the pharmacokinetics of vitamin D are complex and could differ for skin-produced vitamin D versus oral supplementation; furthermore, it is possible that very high single-dose regimens of vitamin D may temporarily suppress levels of 1,25(OH)2D, which could have negative consequences.

The complexity of vitamin D pharmacology makes the optimal strategy for vitamin D supplementation unclear. Moreover, this complexity might make the interpretation of findings from various trials of vitamin D and blood pressure that use different supplementation strategies more difficult to interpret.

As a whole, the randomized trial data to date do not corroborate the epidemiological data. The simplest explanation for this discrepancy is that the observational data were confounded by unmeasured factors, whatever they may be. On the other hand, the discrepancy may also be attributed to problems with randomized trials, such as insufficient statistical power, in many; study designs with blood pressure as a secondary end point; inadequate dosing or duration of vitamin D supplementation; inconsistency in vitamin D levels at study end points; or to characteristics of the specific population under study. Thus, whether vitamin D supplementation can be an effective strategy to lower blood pressure and prevent hypertension remains unclear.

Conclusions

The majority of observational data suggest that lower levels of vitamin D may be associated with a higher blood pressure and a higher risk of developing hypertension, although conflicting studies exist. Experimental studies in animals, as well as some observational and experimental data in humans, suggest that vitamin D and its metabolites are integrally related to blood pressure and the RAS. Nevertheless, randomized, controlled trials have thus far failed to confirm that vitamin D supplementation lowers blood pressure. Additional evidence is required before recommending widespread vitamin D supplementation to treat blood pressure or prevent hypertension.

Acknowledgments

Disclosures

None.

  • Received June 21, 2010.
  • Revision received July 5, 2010.
  • Accepted September 13, 2010.

References

  1. ↵
    Ginde AA, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA Jr. Vitamin D, respiratory infections, and asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2009; 9: 81–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Holick MF, Siris ES, Binkley N, Beard MK, Khan A, Katzer JT, Petruschke RA, Chen E, de Papp AE. Prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy among postmenopausal North American women receiving osteoporosis therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90: 3215–3224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Adrogue HJ, Madias NE. Sodium and potassium in the pathogenesis of hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1966–1978.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, Obarzanek E, Conlin PR, Miller ER III, Simons-Morton DG, Karanja N, Lin PH. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet: DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 3–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Vasan RS, Evans JC, Larson MG, Wilson PW, Meigs JB, Rifai N, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Serum aldosterone and the incidence of hypertension in nonhypertensive persons. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 33–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Li YC, Kong J, Wei M, Chen ZF, Liu SQ, Cao LP. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) is a negative endocrine regulator of the renin-angiotensin system. J Clin Invest. 2002; 110: 229–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Zhang Y, Kong J, Deb DK, Chang A, Li YC. Vitamin D receptor attenuates renal fibrosis by suppressing the renin-angiotensin system. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 21: 966–973.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Zhou C, Lu F, Cao K, Xu D, Goltzman D, Miao D. Calcium-independent and 1,25(OH)2D3-dependent regulation of the renin-angiotensin system in 1α-hydroxylase knockout mice. Kidney Int. 2008; 74: 170–179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Li YC. Vitamin D regulation of the renin-angiotensin system. J Cell Biochem. 2003; 88: 327–331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Resnick LM, Muller FB, Laragh JH. Calcium-regulating hormones in essential hypertension. Relation to plasma renin activity and sodium metabolism. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 105: 649–654.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Resnick LM, Nicholson JP, Laragh JH. Calcium metabolism in essential hypertension: relationship to altered renin system activity. Fed Proc. 1986; 45: 2739–2745.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Tomaschitz A, Pilz S, Ritz E, Grammer T, Drechsler C, Boehm BO, Marz W. Independent association between 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D and the renin-angiotensin system: the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) Study. Clin Chim Acta. 2010; 411: 1354–1360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Forman JP, Williams JS, Fisher ND. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and regulation of the renin-angiotensin system in humans. Hypertension. 2010; 55: 1283–1288.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Blaustein MP, Hamlyn JM. Sodium transport inhibition, cell calcium, and hypertension. The natriuretic hormone/Na+-Ca2+ exchange/hypertension hypothesis. Am J Med. 1984; 77: 45–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Erne P, Bolli P, Burgisser E, Buhler FR. Correlation of platelet calcium with blood pressure: effect of antihypertensive therapy. N Engl J Med. 1984; 310: 1084–1088.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Lau K, Eby B. The role of calcium in genetic hypertension. Hypertension. 1985; 7: 657–667.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Parrott-Garcia M, McCarron DA. Calcium and hypertension. Nutr Rev. 1984; 42: 206–213.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Robinson BF. Altered calcium handling as a cause of primary hypertension. J Hypertens. 1984; 2: 453–460.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Sprenger KB. Alteration of cellular calcium metabolism as primary cause of hypertension. Clin Physiol Biochem. 1985; 3: 208–220.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    Bukoski RD, Xue H, McCarron DA. Effect of 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 and ionized Ca2+ on 45Ca uptake by primary cultures of aortic myocytes of spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar Kyoto normotensive rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987; 146: 1330–1335.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Shan J, Resnick LM, Lewanczuk RZ, Karpinski E, Li B, Pang PK. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D as a cardiovascular hormone: effects on calcium current and cytosolic free calcium in vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Hypertens. 1993; 6: 983–988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Beierwaltes WH. The role of calcium in the regulation of renin secretion. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010; 298: F1–F11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Naftilan AJ, Oparil S. The role of calcium in the control of renin release. Hypertension. 1982; 4: 670–675.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Resnick LM. Calciotropic hormones in salt-sensitive essential hypertension: 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hypertensive factor. J Hypertens. 1994; 12 (suppl): S3–S9.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    Burgess ED, Hawkins RG, Watanabe M. Interaction of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and plasma renin activity in high renin essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1990; 3: 903–905.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Nicholson JP, Resnick LM, Cigarroa J, Marion D, Vaughan ED Jr, Laragh JH. The pressor effect of sodium-volume expansion is calcium mediated. Am J Hypertens. 1991; 4: 904–908.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Porter L, Conlin PR, Scott J, Brown EM, El-Hajj Fuleihan G. Calcium modulation of the renin-aldosterone axis. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999; 22: 115–121.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Fitzpatrick LA, Bilezikian JP, Silverberg SJ. Parathyroid hormone and the cardiovascular system. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2008; 6: 77–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Fliser D, Franek E, Fode P, Stefanski A, Schmitt CP, Lyons M, Ritz E. Subacute infusion of physiological doses of parathyroid hormone raises blood pressure in humans. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997; 12: 933–938.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Gennari C, Nami R, Gonnelli S. Hypertension and primary hyperparathyroidism: the role of adrenergic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1995; 21: 77–81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Jorde R, Sundsfjord J, Haug E, Bonaa KH. Relation between low calcium intake, parathyroid hormone, and blood pressure. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 1154–1159.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Lakatos P, Tatrai A, Foldes J, Horvath C, Mako J, Stern PH. Endothelin concentrations are elevated in plasma of patients with primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996; 58: 70–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Morfis L, Smerdely P, Howes LG. Relationship between serum parathyroid hormone levels in the elderly and 24 h ambulatory blood pressures. J Hypertens. 1997; 15: 1271–1276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Young EW, McCarron DA, Morris CD. Calcium regulating hormones in essential hypertension: importance of gender. Am J Hypertens. 1990; 3: 161S–166S.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Young EW, Morris CD, Holcomb S, McMillan G, McCarron DA. Regulation of parathyroid hormone and vitamin D in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1995; 8: 957–964.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Tahawi Z, Orolinova N, Joshua IG, Bader M, Fletcher EC. Altered vascular reactivity in arterioles of chronic intermittent hypoxic rats. J Appl Physiol. 2001; 90: 2007–2013;discussion, 2000.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Talmor Y, Bernheim J, Klein O, Green J, Rashid G. Calcitriol blunts pro-atherosclerotic parameters through NFkappaB and p38 in vitro. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008; 38: 548–554.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Talmor Y, Golan E, Benchetrit S, Bernheim J, Klein O, Green J, Rashid G. Calcitriol blunts the deleterious impact of advanced glycation end products on endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008; 294: F1059–F1064.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Bukoski RD, DeWan P, McCarron DA. 1,25 (OH)2 vitamin D3 modifies growth and contractile function of vascular smooth muscle of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Hypertens. 1989; 2: 553–556.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Wakasugi M, Noguchi T, Inoue M, Kazama Y, Tawata M, Kanemaru Y, Onaya T. Vitamin D3 stimulates the production of prostacyclin by vascular smooth muscle cells. Prostaglandins. 1991; 42: 127–136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Tarcin O, Yavuz DG, Ozben B, Telli A, Ogunc AV, Yuksel M, Toprak A, Yazici D, Sancak S, Deyneli O, Akalin S. Effect of vitamin D deficiency and replacement on endothelial function in asymptomatic subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94: 4023–4030.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Scragg R, Sowers M, Bell C. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, ethnicity, and blood pressure in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Hypertens. 2007; 20: 713–719.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Hintzpeter B, Mensink GB, Thierfelder W, Muller MJ, Scheidt-Nave C. Vitamin D status and health correlates among German adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008; 62: 1079–1089.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Hypponen E, Boucher BJ, Berry DJ, Power C. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D, IGF-1, and metabolic syndrome at 45 years of age: a cross-sectional study in the 1958 British Birth Cohort. Diabetes. 2008; 57: 298–305.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Reis JP, von Muhlen D, Kritz-Silverstein D, Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E. Vitamin D, parathyroid hormone levels, and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in community-dwelling older adults. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30: 1549–1555.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Snijder MB, Lips P, Seidell JC, Visser M, Deeg DJ, Dekker JM, van Dam RM. Vitamin D status and parathyroid hormone levels in relation to blood pressure: a population-based study in older men and women. J Intern Med. 2007; 261: 558–565.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Forman JP, Curhan GC, Taylor EN. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin d levels and risk of incident hypertension among young women. Hypertension. 2008; 52: 828–832.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Forman JP, Giovannucci E, Holmes MD, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Tworoger SS, Willett WC, Curhan GC. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of incident hypertension. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 1063–1069.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Jorde R, Figenschau Y, Emaus N, Hutchinson M, Grimnes G. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are strongly related to systolic blood pressure but do not predict future hypertension. Hypertension. 2010; 55: 792–798.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Daly RM, Nowson CA. Long-term effect of calcium-vitamin D(3) fortified milk on blood pressure and serum lipid concentrations in healthy older men. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009; 63: 993–1000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Jorde R, Figenschau Y. Supplementation with cholecalciferol does not improve glycaemic control in diabetic subjects with normal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Eur J Nutr. 2009; 48: 349–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Jorde R, Sneve M, Torjesen P, Figenschau Y. No improvement in cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese subjects after supplementation with vitamin D3 for 1 year. J Intern Med. 2010; 267: 462–472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Major GC, Alarie F, Dore J, Phouttama S, Tremblay A. Supplementation with calcium + vitamin D enhances the beneficial effect of weight loss on plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007; 85: 54–59.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Margolis KL, Ray RM, Van Horn L, Manson JE, Allison MA, Black HR, Beresford SA, Connelly SA, Curb JD, Grimm RH Jr, Kotchen TA, Kuller LH, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Thomson CA, Torner JC. Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure: the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial. Hypertension. 2008; 52: 847–855.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Nagpal J, Pande JN, Bhartia A. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the short-term effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on insulin sensitivity in apparently healthy, middle-aged, centrally obese men. Diabet Med. 2009; 26: 19–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Orwoll ES, Oviatt S. Relationship of mineral metabolism and long-term calcium and cholecalciferol supplementation to blood pressure in normotensive men. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990; 52: 717–721.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Pan WH, Wang CY, Li LA, Kao LS, Yeh SH. No significant effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure and calcium metabolism in elderly Chinese. Chin J Physiol. 1993; 36: 85–94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW, Nachtigall D, Hansen C. Effects of a short-term vitamin D(3) and calcium supplementation on blood pressure and parathyroid hormone levels in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86: 1633–1637.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Schleithoff SS, Zittermann A, Tenderich G, Berthold HK, Stehle P, Koerfer R. Vitamin D supplementation improves cytokine profiles in patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83: 754–759.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    Scragg R, Khaw KT, Murphy S. Effect of winter oral vitamin D3 supplementation on cardiovascular risk factors in elderly adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1995; 49: 640–646.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    Sugden JA, Davies JI, Witham MD, Morris AD, Struthers AD. Vitamin D improves endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and low vitamin D levels. Diabet Med. 2008; 25: 320–325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Zittermann A, Frisch S, Berthold HK, Gotting C, Kuhn J, Kleesiek K, Stehle P, Koertke H, Koerfer R. Vitamin D supplementation enhances the beneficial effects of weight loss on cardiovascular disease risk markers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 89: 1321–1327.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, Gass M, Wallace RB, Robbins J, Lewis CE, Bassford T, Beresford SA, Black HR, Blanchette P, Bonds DE, Brunner RL, Brzyski RG, Caan B, Cauley JA, Chlebowski RT, Cummings SR, Granek I, Hays J, Heiss G, Hendrix SL, Howard BV, Hsia J, Hubbell FA, Johnson KC, Judd H, Kotchen JM, Kuller LH, Langer RD, Lasser NL, Limacher MC, Ludlam S, Manson JE, Margolis KL, McGowan J, Ockene JK, O'Sullivan MJ, Phillips L, Prentice RL, Sarto GE, Stefanick ML, Van Horn L, Wactawski-Wende J, Whitlock E, Anderson GL, Assaf AR, Barad D. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 669–683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    Wactawski-Wende J, Kotchen JM, Anderson GL, Assaf AR, Brunner RL, O'Sullivan MJ, Margolis KL, Ockene JK, Phillips L, Pottern L, Prentice RL, Robbins J, Rohan TE, Sarto GE, Sharma S, Stefanick ML, Van Horn L, Wallace RB, Whitlock E, Bassford T, Beresford SA, Black HR, Bonds DE, Brzyski RG, Caan B, Chlebowski RT, Cochrane B, Garland C, Gass M, Hays J, Heiss G, Hendrix SL, Howard BV, Hsia J, Hubbell FA, Jackson RD, Johnson KC, Judd H, Kooperberg CL, Kuller LH, LaCroix AZ, Lane DS, Langer RD, Lasser NL, Lewis CE, Limacher MC, Manson JE. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 684–696.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Cashman KD, Hill TR, Lucey AJ, Taylor N, Seamans KM, Muldowney S, Fitzgerald AP, Flynn A, Barnes MS, Horigan G, Bonham MP, Duffy EM, Strain JJ, Wallace JM, Kiely M. Estimation of the dietary requirement for vitamin D in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 88: 1535–1542.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    Cashman KD, Wallace JM, Horigan G, Hill TR, Barnes MS, Lucey AJ, Bonham MP, Taylor N, Duffy EM, Seamans K, Muldowney S, Fitzgerald AP, Flynn A, Strain JJ, Kiely M. Estimation of the dietary requirement for vitamin D in free-living adults >=64 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 89: 1366–1374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    Lehtonen-Veromaa M, Mottonen T, Nuotio I, Irjala K, Viikari J. The effect of conventional vitamin D(2) supplementation on serum 25(OH)D concentration is weak among peripubertal Finnish girls: a 3-y prospective study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002; 56: 431–437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Pittas AG, Chung M, Trikalinos T, Mitri J, Brendel M, Patel K, Lichtenstein AH, Lau J, Balk EM. Systematic review: vitamin D and cardiometabolic outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 152: 307–314.
  69. ↵
    Witham MD, Nadir MA, Struthers AD. Effect of vitamin D on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2009; 27: 1948–1954.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Simpson JA, Kotowicz MA, Young D, Nicholson GC. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010; 303: 1815–1822.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    Smith H, Anderson F, Raphael H, Maslin P, Crozier S, Cooper C. Effect of annual intramuscular vitamin D on fracture risk in elderly men and women–a population-based, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007; 46: 1852–1857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Hypertension
November 2010, Volume 56, Issue 5
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Update on Mechanisms Linking Vitamin D With Hypertension
    • Update on the Epidemiology of Vitamin D, Hypertension, and Blood Pressure
    • Update on Existing Human Trials
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Vitamin D and Hypertension
    Anand Vaidya and John P. Forman
    Hypertension. 2010;56:774-779, originally published October 20, 2010
    https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.140160

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Hypertension.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Vitamin D and Hypertension
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Hypertension
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Hypertension web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Vitamin D and Hypertension
    Anand Vaidya and John P. Forman
    Hypertension. 2010;56:774-779, originally published October 20, 2010
    https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.140160
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Etiology
  • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Epidemiology

Hypertension

  • About Hypertension
  • Instructions for Authors
  • AHA CME
  • Guidelines and Statements
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231
email: hypertension@heart.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured