Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
      • Research Guidelines
        • Minimum Information About Microarray Data Experiments (MIAME)
      • Abstract
      • Acknowledgments
      • Clinical Implications (Only by invitation)
      • Conflict(s) of Interest/Disclosure(s) Statement
      • Figure Legends
      • Figures
      • Novelty and Significance: 1) What Is New, 2) What Is Relevant?
      • References
      • Sources of Funding
      • Tables
      • Text
      • Title Page
      • Online/Data Supplement
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
      • Change of Authorship Form
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Hypertension

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • General Statistics
    • Editorial Board
    • Editors
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Clinical Implications
    • Clinical-Pathological Conferences
    • Controversies in Hypertension
    • Editors' Picks
    • Guidelines Debate
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Recent Advances in Hypertension
    • SPRINT Trial: the Conversation Continues
  • Resources
    • Instructions to Reviewers
    • Instructions for Authors
    • →Article Types
    • → Submission Guidelines
    • →Tips for Easier Manuscript Submission
    • → General Instructions for Revised Manuscripts
    • → Costs to Authors
    • → Open Access, Repositories, & Author Rights Q&A
    • Permissions to Reprint Figures and Tables
    • Journal Policies
    • Scientific Councils
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Original Article

Chronic Hypertension Leads to Neurodegeneration in the TgSwDI Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s DiseaseNovelty and Significance

Anna Kruyer, Nadine Soplop, Sidney Strickland, Erin H. Norris
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05524
Hypertension. 2015;66:175-182
Originally published May 4, 2015
Anna Kruyer
From the Patricia and John Rosenwald Laboratory of Neurobiology and Genetics (A.K., S.S., E.H.N.), Electron Microscopy Resource Center (N.S.), The Rockefeller University, New York, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadine Soplop
From the Patricia and John Rosenwald Laboratory of Neurobiology and Genetics (A.K., S.S., E.H.N.), Electron Microscopy Resource Center (N.S.), The Rockefeller University, New York, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sidney Strickland
From the Patricia and John Rosenwald Laboratory of Neurobiology and Genetics (A.K., S.S., E.H.N.), Electron Microscopy Resource Center (N.S.), The Rockefeller University, New York, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin H. Norris
From the Patricia and John Rosenwald Laboratory of Neurobiology and Genetics (A.K., S.S., E.H.N.), Electron Microscopy Resource Center (N.S.), The Rockefeller University, New York, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Sources of Funding
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Numerous epidemiological studies link vascular disorders, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and stroke, with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Hypertension, specifically, is an important modifiable risk factor for late-onset AD. To examine the link between midlife hypertension and the onset of AD later in life, we chemically induced chronic hypertension in the TgSwDI mouse model of AD in early adulthood. Hypertension accelerated cognitive deficits in the Barnes maze test (P<0.05 after 3 months of treatment; P<0.001 after 6 months), microvascular deposition of β-amyloid (P<0.001 after 3 months of treatment; P<0.05 after 6 months), vascular inflammation (P<0.05 in the dentate gyrus and P<0.001 in the dorsal subiculum after 6 months of treatment), blood–brain barrier leakage (P<0.05 after 3 and 6 months of treatment), and pericyte loss (P<0.05 in the dentate gyrus and P<0.01 in the dorsal subiculum after 6 months of treatment) in these mice. In addition, hypertension induced hippocampal neurodegeneration at an early age in this mouse line (43% reduction in the dorsal subiculum; P<0.05), establishing this as a useful research model of AD with mixed vascular and amyloid pathologies.

  • blood–brain barrier
  • cerebral amyloid angiopathy
  • hypertension

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, and there is no universal cause or treatment to delay or stop its progression. Late-onset AD often occurs without the contribution of known genetic risk factors and results in memory loss, irritability, and eventually death.1,2 Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), the deposition of β-amyloid (Aβ) along vessel walls in the central nervous system, is observed in ≈94% of patients with AD.3

In addition to CAA, researchers have observed numerous ultrastructural and functional changes within the AD microvasculature. Alterations in every cellular component of the neurovascular unit (NVU), the tightly regulated network of cells that couples neuronal energy demands to modulation of blood flow, have been observed in patients with AD. Furthermore, both endothelial cells and pericytes degenerate in brain capillaries in patients with AD.4,5 Loss of these cell types has detrimental effects on blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity. as well as neuronal perfusion and function.6–8 Astrocyte endfeet, which ensheath brain capillaries, help regulate capillary blood flow, and maintain the extracellular milieu, are swollen in the presence of CAA.6,7 The direct cause of these cellular abnormalities has not been determined although Aβ is toxic to neurons and other cell types in vitro.9 In addition, the presence of Aβ deposits among the cells of the NVU could interfere with signaling between cell types, alter cellular health and function, and result in reduced flow-mediated dilation, an indicator of vessel reactivity, also observed in AD brains.10 Thus, CAA may contribute to the reduced neurovascular coupling reported in multiple AD mouse lines.10–13

More than 30% of AD cases exhibit cerebrovascular pathology in addition to CAA,14 and the frequent coincidence of stroke and AD suggests that the cerebrovascular changes that occur during AD progression compromise vascular integrity and function.15 Clinical evidence suggests that cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, are linked to AD onset.14 In non-AD individuals, hypertension induces pathological changes in the brain, including impaired cerebral autoregulation, vascular remodeling, cerebral microbleeds, and cerebral atrophy.16–18 Given the vasoactive properties of Aβ,19 it is unclear whether midlife hypertension is an early symptom of the vascular pathology present in AD or whether it contributes to the onset of the disease. It is possible that elevated blood pressure (BP) during midlife compromises vascular integrity and leads to cellular, basement membrane, and BBB damage. Given the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged individuals and the relevance of these risk factors to AD susceptibility, we induced chronic hypertension in an AD mouse model. We examined behavioral, cellular, and ultrastructural changes to determine the effect of chronic hypertension before AD onset on disease pathogenesis.

Methods

An extended Methods section is available in the online-only Data Supplement.

Animals

TgSwDI+/− (AD) and −/− (wild-type [WT]) littermates were used to conduct the experiments described. Both males and females were included in approximately equal ratios for all experiments. Animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Rockefeller University.

L-NAME–Induced Hypertension

Nω-Nitro-l-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in drinking water, so that each mouse consumed ≈100 mg/kg body weight per day. Control mice consumed only water. Treatment was initiated at 3 to 4 months of age and continued for 3 or 6 months. BP was measured 1 week before and every week throughout treatment by tail-cuff plethysmography (Kent Scientific). An average of 3 BP readings was obtained for each animal during measurement.

Results

L-NAME–Induced Chronic Hypertension Accelerates Cognitive Decline in TgSwDI Mice

L-NAME was used to chemically induce hypertension in TgSwDI and WT mice. L-NAME treatment alone was used to induce hypertension to reduce the likelihood of hemorrhage and increase survivorship during long-term treatment.20,21 Our protocol was designed to mimic the pattern of hypertension that predisposes humans to late-onset AD, which occurs in individuals with midlife hypertension before indications of cognitive decline.18,22,23 Because TgSwDI mice are predisposed to AD, we induced hypertension at 3 to 4 months of age, which corresponds to early adulthood in humans and before we observed any dramatic AD-related pathological changes in this mouse line (not shown). Mice were treated for 3 or 6 months and were 6 to 7 or 9 to 10 months of age during testing/analysis, respectively. L-NAME–treated mice exhibited a significant increase in BP compared with water-treated animals (Figure 1A). There were no differences in levels of CD31 or α-smooth muscle actin between normotensive and hypertensive brains, suggesting that hypertension did not affect vessel number in the brains of these animals (not shown). The Barnes maze24 was used to compare the cognitive abilities of normotensive and hypertensive WT and TgSwDI mice. After 3 months of L-NAME treatment, TgSwDI mice performed significantly worse during the 5-day probe trial compared with water-treated TgSwDI mice and all WT mice (Figure 1B), indicating that chronic hypertension affects cognition after only 3 months, well before significant cognitive impairment is evident from the transgene alone. TgSwDI mice treated with L-NAME for 6 months exhibited a similar trend (not shown). After 6 months of treatment, hypertensive TgSwDI mice performed worse during Barnes maze training, taking significantly longer to find the escape hole compared with all other groups (Figure 1C), an effect that was not observed in TgSwDI mice after 3 months of treatment. There were no differences in baseline locomotor activity between any of the groups (not shown). Interestingly, this cohort of water-treated TgSwDI mice (9–10 months of age) did not have cognitive deficits relative to WT mice in this test, although chronic hypertension was able to induce significant cognitive dysfunction.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Chronic L-NAME treatment induces hypertension in wild-type (WT) and TgSwDI mice and exacerbates Alzheimer’s disease–related cognitive decline. A, WT and TgSwDI mice administered L-NAME in their drinking water exhibited significantly elevated blood pressure (BP) compared with water-treated groups (***P<0.001 for effect of treatment for each genotype by 2-way ANOVA). Mice treated with water maintained constant BP. Treatments started on day 0, after baseline BP was measured. B, TgSwDI mice treated with L-NAME for 3 months exhibited cognitive deficits in the Barnes maze relative to untreated TgSwDI and WT groups. During the probe trial carried out 5 days after training, hypertensive TgSwDI mice approached the target hole less frequently than normotensive TgSwDI (*P<0.05) and WT (P<0.05) mice. There was no effect of hypertension on cognitive function in WT mice. C, Long-term hypertension, induced by L-NAME treatment for 6 months, affected learning in TgSwDI mice, which exhibited extended latencies to find the target hole during training compared with normotensive TgSwDI mice (***P<0.001), an effect not observed after 3 months of L-NAME treatment (not shown). [n=8–12 per group (A), 10–12 per group (B and C)].

Chronic Hypertension Induces Vascular Amyloid Deposition in TgSwDI Mice

To determine whether increased levels of Aβ in the hippocampus were responsible for the cognitive deficits observed in our hypertensive TgSwDI mice, we used thioflavin-S to detect fibrillar Aβ. We costained sections with an anti-collagen IV antibody, which recognizes the basement membrane of capillaries. After quantifying the total length of collagen IV-positive capillaries in the dorsal subiculum (DS), we quantified the length of vessels costained by thioflavin-S to calculate the percent of capillary CAA. We found that Aβ in the DS of normotensive TgSwDI mice (Figure 2A and 2C) was both microvascular and parenchymal. Hypertensive TgSwDI mice (Figure 2B and 2E), however, had fewer parenchymal deposits and exhibited significantly more microvascular CAA (Figure 2C and 2F). Although localization of Aβ deposition in the brains of normotensive and hypertensive TgSwDI mice was different, thioflavin-S intensity overall was not (not shown), suggesting that the amount of Aβ in these groups was similar. Immunostaining with anti-Aβ40- and 42-specific antibodies revealed no significant difference in levels of either peptide between normotensive and hypertensive TgSwDI mice, though both were slightly elevated in the hypertensive group (not shown), suggesting that both peptides contribute to CAA load in these mice. Immunoelectron microscopy confirmed that Aβ deposition appeared as finger-like clusters around microvessels (Figure 2G).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Hypertensive TgSwDI mice exhibit increased vascular β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition. Thioflavin-S (ThioS; green) and an anti-collagen IV antibody (red) were used to determine levels of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) in normotensive (A and D) and hypertensive (B and E) TgSwDI mice. CAA levels were significantly increased after 3 (B and C) and 6 (E and F) months of L-NAME treatment (***P<0.001 or **P<0.01 normotensive TgSwDI vs normotensive wild-type [WT]; ***P<0.001 or *P<0.05 normotensive vs hypertensive TgSwDI; scale bar, 50 μm; n=7–8 per group). G, Microvascular Aβ deposition, observed by immunoelectron microscopy, appeared as dark finger-like projections adhering to the basement membrane of capillaries in hypertensive TgSwDI brains (scale bar, 500 nm). E indicates endothelial cell; and L, lumen.

Abundant Microglia Surround Microvessels of Hypertensive TgSwDI Mice

Because activated astrocytes and microglia are often abundant in Aβ-laden tissue,25 we examined glial markers in normotensive and hypertensive TgSwDI and WT brains. Although levels of astrocyte markers were similar in both TgSwDI groups (not shown), the microglial marker ionized calcium–binding adapter molecule 1 was upregulated in hippocampal subregions of hypertensive TgSwDI mice compared with those of normotensive mice (Figure 3A and 3D versus Figure 3B and 3E). Ionized calcium–binding adapter molecule 1 expression was significantly elevated in water-treated TgSwDI mice compared with water-treated WT mice and was even higher in L-NAME–treated TgSwDI mice (Figure 3C and 3F). The pattern of ionized calcium–binding adapter molecule 1 staining in the dentate gyrus (DG) appears patchy (Figure 3B), likely due to the presence of larger parenchymal plaques in this region, compared with the DS, where the staining appears vascular (Figure 3E). We examined Aβ-laden microvessels by electron microscopy and confirmed that CAA is often surrounded by infiltrating microglia (Figure 3G, M).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Hypertensive TgSwDI mice display increased vascular microgliosis. Microgliosis was examined in tissues using an anti–ionized calcium–binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba-1) antibody (green) and vessels were stained with an endothelial cell–specific anti-CD31 antibody (red). Compared with water-treated TgSwDI (A and D) and wild-type (WT; not shown) groups, the dentate gyrus (DG; B) and dorsal subiculum (DS; E) of hypertensive TgSwDI brains exhibited significantly more Iba-1 staining after 6 months of treatment (C and F; **P<0.01 normotensive TgSwDI vs normotensive WT; *P<0.05 or ***P<0.001 normotensive vs hypertensive TgSwDI; scale bar, 100 μm; n=6–9 per group). G, The infiltration of microglia (M) was observed by electron microscopy of brain capillaries in hypertensive TgSwDI samples. Capillaries laden with β-amyloid (*) were surrounded by infiltrating microglial nuclei (scale bar, 2 μm). L indicates lumen.

Hypertension Disrupts Tight Junctions and Decreases BBB Integrity in TgSwDI Mice

Because the BBB is disrupted in patients with AD and mouse models,26–28 we examined the BBB integrity to determine whether hypertension affects this feature of AD pathology. Under normal conditions, tight junctions, which form the basis of the BBB,29 appear continuous and lay flat, preventing diffusion of blood components into the brain30 (Figure 4A). However, the tight junctions in samples from hypertensive TgSwDI mice appeared to be breaking off into the capillary lumen and lifting slightly from the endothelial cell layer (arrowheads in Figure 4B–4D), providing an opportunity for BBB leakage. Given these structural alterations, we examined tissue for the presence of blood components that could enter the brain if BBB integrity were compromised. Albumin was elevated in the DS and DG of hypertensive TgSwDI brains when compared with normotensive TgSwDI brains after only 3 months of treatment, indicating that BBB integrity was compromised because of hypertension (Figure 4E–4H).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Hypertensive TgSwDI mice have increased blood–brain barrier disruption. Compared with capillary structure in water-treated mouse vessels (A), capillaries in brains of hypertensive TgSwDI mice exhibited tight junction alterations (arrowheads in B–D). Compared with the structure of normal tight junctions (arrow in A), those of hypertensive TgSwDI mice were often lifted or fragmented (arrowheads in B–D). The plasma protein albumin, which was present at low levels in the dorsal subiculum (DS) of normotensive TgSwDI brains (E), was significantly enriched in the DS (F–H; *P<0.05) and dentate gyrus (DG; not shown) of hypertensive TgSwDI mice after 3 months of L-NAME treatment. Compared with normotensive wild-type (WT) mice, hypertensive WT mice also exhibited significant leakage of albumin from the vasculature into the DS after 3 months of L-NAME treatment (H; *P<0.05; scale bar, 1 μm (A) and 20 μm (E); n=4–6 per group).

Chronic Hypertension Results in the Loss of Neurons and Pericytes in TgSwDI Brains

Under normal conditions, many AD mouse models, including TgSwDI mice, do not exhibit neurodegeneration,31,32 a hallmark of AD pathology. Because of the accelerated time course of other pathologies in L-NAME–treated TgSwDI mice, we examined hippocampal subregions for neuronal death. Neurodegeneration was not evident in normotensive TgSwDI mice (Figure 5A and 5C), but significant neuronal loss was observed after short-term L-NAME treatment (3 months) and at only 6 to 7 months of age (Figure 5B and 5C). Normotensive TgSwDI mice at 9 to 10 months of age began to exhibit subtle signs of neuronal loss, making hypertension-induced cell death at this age less dramatic (Figure 5D–5F).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Hypertensive TgSwDI mice exhibit early neuron and pericyte loss. Anti-NeuN antibody was used to identify neurons in the dorsal subiculum (DS) of normotensive (A and D) and hypertensive (B and E) TgSwDI mice. C, Reduced NeuN intensity was observed in hypertensive TgSwDI mice after 3 months of L-NAME treatment (*P<0.05; n=3–9 per group). F, Because NeuN intensity was slightly decreased in normotensive TgSwDI animals after 6 months of treatment because of advanced age (9–10 months of age), there was no longer a significant difference between groups. Although NeuN intensity appeared reduced in the DS of hypertensive wild-type (WT) mice compared with normotensive WT mice after 3 and 6 months of treatment, neither change was significant (C and F). Similarly, anti–platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) antibody was used to examine pericyte coverage of vessels in normotensive (G and J) and hypertensive (H and K) TgSwDI mice. I and L, PDGFRβ levels were significantly reduced in hypertensive TgSwDI mice in the dentate gyrus (DG) and DS compared with control groups after 6 months of treatment (*P<0.05, **P<0.01; scale bar, 50 μm; n=5–9 per group).

Perictye loss occurs in severely affected patients with AD33 and in older TgSwDI mice12; so, we examined the levels of platelet-derived growth factor receptor β to determine whether the expression of this pericyte marker is altered in our hypertensive groups. After 6 months of L-NAME treatment, hypertensive TgSwDI mice exhibited a significant decrease in platelet-derived growth factor receptor β staining in both the DG and DS (Figure 5G and 5J versus Figure 5H and 5K; Figure 5I and 5L). Taken together, these results suggest that neuronal and pericytic loss can occur at a much earlier age when there is concomitant hypertension.

Discussion

Under normal conditions, hypertension induces pathological changes within the cerebral vasculature, resulting in impaired autoregulation, microbleeds, and lacunar infarcts, as well global downstream changes, such as white matter lesions and atrophy.16,34–39 In fact, these changes within the cerebral vasculature of hypertensive individuals also occur in patients with AD in the absence of hypertension.40–42 In addition, midlife hypertension is a significant risk factor for the development of AD later in life.14 Hypertension may initiate vascular damage before the onset of AD, allowing symptoms to be more pronounced and progress more quickly. In addition, compromised vessels may be more vulnerable to the deleterious effects of Aβ. For example, because hypertension results in reduced BBB integrity (Figure 4), blood components may enter the brain before large-scale accumulation of Aβ occurs. These blood components may serve as a seed for Aβ deposition and increase vascular inflammation (Figure 3), resulting in cellular damage and the release of toxic molecules.

The hippocampus coordinates memory consolidation and spatial navigation and is one of the first regions in the brain to suffer damage in AD.43 The DG receives all hippocampal inputs and passes them through the hippocampus proper (CA1-4) to the subiculum, which projects to the entorhinal cortex.44 Thus, proper functioning of the DG and subiculum is essential to memory consolidation and spatial navigation. The subiculum may also be involved in the spread of Aβ, as lesions in this region inhibit plaque formation in other brain areas.45

We found that the location, but not abundance, of Aβ deposits is altered in hypertensive TgSwDI mice, which also exhibit early and dramatic cognitive decline. Our findings suggest that CAA contributes more to cognitive decline than parenchymal plaques. We also observed that microvascular Aβ adheres to capillary basement membranes that normally bind cells of the NVU together. Therefore, CAA may act as a physical barrier to cell signaling at the NVU. Moreover, CAA seems to obstruct binding of astrocytic endfeet and contribute to pericyte loss (Figure 5). Both astrocytes and pericytes are involved in the recruitment of blood flow during neuronal activity, and damage to these cell types in hypertensive TgSwDI mice may impair neurovascular coupling.

Aβ is thought to be deposited as CAA because of failed clearance across the BBB and along perivascular spaces.46 Because L-NAME treatment results in increased CAA in TgSwDI mice without an overall increase in Aβ levels, hypertension may have a detrimental effect on either or both of these clearance pathways. L-NAME inhibits endothelial nitric oxide synthase and thereby prevents the production of the vasodilator nitric oxide. Alternatively, it could be that nitric oxide–mediated vasodilation in normotensive mice is required for effective clearance of Aβ across the BBB or along perivascular drainage pathways.

The neuronal loss we observed in hypertensive TgSwDI mice could result from reductions in blood flow and impaired function of NVU support cells that either degenerate (pericytes; Figure 5) or are chronically activated (microglia; Figure 3). Because brain atrophy is associated with hypertension in humans16 and hypertensive WT mice exhibit a trend toward reduced neuron number, it is possible that vascular changes that occur during hypertension in WTs, such as BBB leakage (Figure 4), affect neuronal health. However, the changes specific to hypertensive TgSwDI mice, such as increased microgliosis (Figure 3) and severe CAA (Figure 2), are likely to contribute in some way. In addition to the cytotoxic effects of Aβ itself,47–49 activated microglia are known to produce cytotoxic molecules,50 which may damage neurons.

We used L-NAME to induce hypertension because of its long-term tolerability and ease of administration to large cohorts of mice. L-NAME treatment resulted in elevated BP similar to other treatment types but circumvented drawbacks of other surgical and chemical techniques. Surgical wounds are susceptible to infection or injury, often requiring animals to be singly housed and excluded from behavioral experiments. Techniques requiring infusion pumps are shorter in duration, hindering the implementation of chronic hypertension, and more severe treatment regimes, such as the pairing of L-NAME with other molecules, resulted in seizures and intracerebral hemorrhage in our mice (not shown). Therefore, long-term L-NAME treatment was the best suited to mimic chronic hypertension in humans, which can last decades.

Although models of comorbid hypertension and AD are limited, our results are consistent with what has been observed in other models. Similar to our findings, surgically induced hypertension in WT mice results in cognitive deficits and subtle amyloid pathology,51 whereas angiotensin-II infusion in APPPS1 mice results in a more rapid onset of AD pathology.52 However, it is possible that longer-term L-NAME–induced hypertension exacerbates previously observed pathologies, such as cognitive decline (Figure 1) and microvascular Aβ deposition (Figure 2), and reveals new neuropathologies not previously observed, such as microglia activation (Figure 3), BBB leakage (Figure 4), and pericytic and neuronal loss (Figure 5).

Studies linking hypertension with AD define midlife as the time between the ages of 40 and 64 years. Midlife hypertension is associated with an increased risk of developing AD, but late-life hypertension (typically defined as age ≥65) does not have this association. Importantly, studies linking hypertension with AD examine BP before onset of AD symptoms. Given that untreated TgSwDI mice develop some AD pathology ≈6 months of age (Figures 2 and 3) and cognitive decline ≈10 to 12 months (not shown), we initiated hypertension at an age corresponding to early adulthood developmentally, to maximize the duration of hypertension before the onset of AD symptoms. Although midlife hypertension is a significant risk factor for AD and treatment alleviates this risk,18,19 dramatic reduction in BP often occurs at later stages of AD, after which point antihypertensives are deleterious to cognitive function.18,53 Hypertension may compromise vascular integrity during midlife and lead to cellular, basement membrane, and BBB damage. However, after the onset of AD symptoms, low BP may aggravate the brain hypoperfusion already present in AD because of other types of vascular damage.

We found that hypertension dramatically accelerated various features of AD pathology in our model. Microvascular Aβ deposition was increased in hypertensive TgSwDI mice without an increase in overall Aβ deposition (Figure 2), suggesting that Aβ is recruited to capillaries in hypertensive individuals. Because we showed that L-NAME–treated TgSwDI mice have deficits in cognitive function (Figure 1B and 1C), our results suggest that capillary CAA is detrimental to cognitive function relative to other forms of deposited Aβ, an idea that has been proposed by others in the field.54,55 It is possible that the deposition of microvascular Aβ compromises the survival of NVU cells, such as pericytes and endothelial cells. Although others have shown pericyte loss in TgSwDI mice at 18 months of age,12 we found that chronic hypertension induced pericyte loss significantly earlier (9–10 months of age; Figure 5G–5L). Furthermore, neuronal loss has never been reported in this transgenic model, yet hypertensive TgSwDI mice demonstrated significant neurodegeneration in a subregion of the hippocampus (Figure 5A–5F). Moreover, not only did hypertension result in quantifiable neuronal loss, but it did so much earlier (6–7 months of age) than the few other mouse lines that exhibit this feature of AD.56 At 6 to 7 months of age, the first indications of AD (Aβ deposition, neuroinflammation, and cognitive decline) are often just becoming apparent in other AD mouse models.56–58 Our finding is notable because neuronal loss is widely accepted as a hallmark of AD yet does not occur in many commonly used AD models.59 If hypertension indeed accelerates AD pathogenesis, then a reasonable hypothesis is that neuronal loss is a downstream effect of the abundant microvascular amyloid pathology observed in TgSwDI mice. Pairing hypertension with genetic predisposition to AD may represent a more complete model of AD than the traditional AD mouse model.

Our results suggest that hypertension has a significant effect on the onset and progression of AD pathology. Treating hypertension in midlife may be an effective strategy for reducing the likelihood of AD onset later in life, as suggested by numerous epidemiological studies.17,53 Vascular damage because of untreated hypertension results in loss of vascular tone and hypotension in older individuals. Treatment with antihypertensives after the onset of cognitive symptoms in patients with AD exacerbates cognitive decline,60 possibly because of further reduction in neurovascular coupling. If blood flow were reduced to areas of the brain requiring energy substrates, then low BP would only exacerbate this effect and damage already-compromised neurons and NVU components.61

Perspectives

We show that hypertension accelerates cognitive decline and other AD pathologies—CAA, neuroinflammation, BBB leakage, pericyte loss, and neurodegeneration—in transgenic mice predisposed to AD. Because many individuals with late-onset AD experience some form of midlife cardiovascular–related disease, such as hypertension,62 our mouse model of mixed vascular and amyloid pathologies may be more relevant for studying human AD pathophysiology than a mouse model of AD alone.

Acknowledgments

We thank Strickland laboratory members, especially Odella Jno-Charles and Allison Richards for their technical assistance; Drs Zamolodchikov, Chen, and Yao for experimental advice; and Dr Hultman for assistance with early experiments. We also thank Dr Uryu for technical and experimental electron microscopy support.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by the American Heart Association (14SDG18300001), National Institutes of Health (NS050537), Mellam Family Foundation, May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation, Litwin Foundation, and by John A. Hermann Jr.

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at http://hyper.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05524/-/DC1.

  • Received March 26, 2015.
  • Revision received April 6, 2015.
  • Accepted April 10, 2015.
  • © 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Isik AT.
    Late onset Alzheimer’s disease in older people. Clin Interv Aging. 2010;5:307–311. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S11718.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Balin BJ,
    2. Hudson AP.
    Etiology and pathogenesis of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014;14:417. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0417-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jellinger KA,
    2. Attems J.
    Prevalence and pathogenic role of cerebrovascular lesions in Alzheimer disease. J Neurol Sci. 2005;229–230:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.11.018.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kalaria RN,
    2. Hedera P.
    Differential degeneration of the cerebral microvasculature in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport. 1995;6:477–480.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sagare AP,
    2. Bell RD,
    3. Zhao Z,
    4. Ma Q,
    5. Winkler EA,
    6. Ramanathan A,
    7. Zlokovic BV.
    Pericyte loss influences Alzheimer-like neurodegeneration in mice. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2932. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3932.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Yamashita K,
    2. Miyakawa T,
    3. Katsuragi S.
    Vascular changes in the brains with Alzheimer’s disease. Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1991;45:79–84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Higuchi Y,
    2. Miyakawa T,
    3. Shimoji A,
    4. Katsuragi S.
    Ultrastructural changes of blood vessels in the cerebral cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1987;41:283–290.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lyros E,
    2. Bakogiannis C,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Fassbender K.
    Molecular links between endothelial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2014;11:18–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Carrillo-Mora P,
    2. Luna R,
    3. Colín-Barenque L.
    Amyloid beta: multiple mechanisms of toxicity and only some protective effects? Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:795375. doi: 10.1155/2014/795375.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Iadecola C.
    Neurovascular regulation in the normal brain and in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:347–360. doi: 10.1038/nrn1387.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Niwa K,
    2. Kazama K,
    3. Younkin L,
    4. Younkin SG,
    5. Carlson GA,
    6. Iadecola C.
    Cerebrovascular autoregulation is profoundly impaired in mice overexpressing amyloid precursor protein. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;283:H315–H323. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00022.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Park L,
    2. Koizumi K,
    3. El Jamal S,
    4. Zhou P,
    5. Previti ML,
    6. Van Nostrand WE,
    7. Carlson G,
    8. Iadecola C.
    Age-dependent neurovascular dysfunction and damage in a mouse model of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Stroke. 2014;45:1815–1821. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Niwa K,
    2. Kazama K,
    3. Younkin SG,
    4. Carlson GA,
    5. Iadecola C.
    Alterations in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in mice overexpressing the amyloid precursor protein. Neurobiol Dis. 2002;9:61–68. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0460.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kalaria RN,
    2. Ballard C.
    Overlap between pathology of Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999;13(suppl 3):S115–S123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zhou J,
    2. Yu JT,
    3. Wang HF,
    4. Meng XF,
    5. Tan CC,
    6. Wang J,
    7. Wang C,
    8. Tan L.
    Association between stroke and Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43:479–489. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140666.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Beauchet O,
    2. Celle S,
    3. Roche F,
    4. Bartha R,
    5. Montero-Odasso M,
    6. Allali G,
    7. Annweiler C.
    Blood pressure levels and brain volume reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1502–1516. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32836184b5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Forette F,
    2. Seux ML,
    3. Staessen JA,
    4. et al
    . Prevention of dementia in randomised double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial. Lancet. 1998;352:1347–1351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Joas E,
    2. Bäckman K,
    3. Gustafson D,
    4. Ostling S,
    5. Waern M,
    6. Guo X,
    7. Skoog I.
    Blood pressure trajectories from midlife to late life in relation to dementia in women followed for 37 years. Hypertension. 2012;59:796–801. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.182204.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Townsend KP,
    2. Obregon D,
    3. Quadros A,
    4. Patel N,
    5. Volmar Ch,
    6. Paris D,
    7. Mullan M.
    Proinflammatory and vasoactive effects of Abeta in the cerebrovasculature. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;977:65–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Wakisaka Y,
    2. Chu Y,
    3. Miller JD,
    4. Rosenberg GA,
    5. Heistad DD.
    Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage during acute and chronic hypertension in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:56–69. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Francois H,
    2. Makhanova N,
    3. Ruiz P,
    4. Ellison J,
    5. Mao L,
    6. Rockman HA,
    7. Coffman TM.
    A role for the thromboxane receptor in L-NAME hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;295:F1096–F1102. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00369.2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Feldstein CA.
    Association between chronic blood pressure changes and development of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;32:753–763. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-120613.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Shah NS,
    2. Vidal JS,
    3. Masaki K,
    4. Petrovitch H,
    5. Ross GW,
    6. Tilley C,
    7. DeMattos RB,
    8. Tracy RP,
    9. White LR,
    10. Launer LJ.
    Midlife blood pressure, plasma β-amyloid, and the risk for Alzheimer disease: the Honolulu Asia Aging Study. Hypertension. 2012;59:780–786. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.178962.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Barnes CA,
    2. Eppich C,
    3. Rao G.
    Selective improvement of aged rat short-term spatial memory by 3,4-diaminopyridine. Neurobiol Aging. 1989;10:337–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Johnstone M,
    2. Gearing AJ,
    3. Miller KM.
    A central role for astrocytes in the inflammatory response to beta-amyloid; chemokines, cytokines and reactive oxygen species are produced. J Neuroimmunol. 1999;93:182–193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Claudio L.
    Ultrastructural features of the blood-brain barrier in biopsy tissue from Alzheimer’s disease patients. Acta Neuropathol. 1996;91:6–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Leonardi A,
    2. Gandolfo C,
    3. Caponnetto C,
    4. Arata L,
    5. Vecchia R.
    The integrity of the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s type and multi-infarct dementia evaluated by the study of albumin and IgG in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurol Sci. 1985;67:253–261.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Wisniewski HM,
    2. Kozlowski PB.
    Evidence for blood-brain barrier changes in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT). Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1982;396:119–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Brightman MW,
    2. Reese TS.
    Junctions between intimately apposed cell membranes in the vertebrate brain. J Cell Biol. 1969;40:648–677.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Dermietzel R,
    2. Leibstein AG.
    The microvascular pattern and perivascular linings of the area postrema. A combined freeze-etching and ultrathin section study. Cell Tissue Res. 1978;186:97–110.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. German DC,
    2. Eisch AJ.
    Mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease: insight into treatment. Rev Neurosci. 2004;15:353–369.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Timmer NM,
    2. Metaxas A,
    3. van der Stelt I,
    4. Kluijtmans LA,
    5. van Berckel BN,
    6. Verbeek MM.
    Cerebral level of vGlut1 is increased and level of glycine is decreased in TgSwDI mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;39:89–101. doi: 10.3233/JAD-130437.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Szpak GM,
    2. Lewandowska E,
    3. Wierzba-Bobrowicz T,
    4. Bertrand E,
    5. Pasennik E,
    6. Mendel T,
    7. Stepień T,
    8. Leszczyńska A,
    9. Rafałowska J.
    Small cerebral vessel disease in familial amyloid and non-amyloid angiopathies: FAD-PS-1 (P117L) mutation and CADASIL. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies. Folia Neuropathol. 2007;45:192–204.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Calcinaghi N,
    2. Wyss MT,
    3. Jolivet R,
    4. Singh A,
    5. Keller AL,
    6. Winnik S,
    7. Fritschy JM,
    8. Buck A,
    9. Matter CM,
    10. Weber B.
    Multimodal imaging in rats reveals impaired neurovascular coupling in sustained hypertension. Stroke. 2013;44:1957–1964. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000185.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Heistad DD,
    2. Baumbach GL.
    Cerebral vascular changes during chronic hypertension: good guys and bad guys. J Hypertens Suppl. 1992;10:S71–S75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Romero JR,
    2. Preis SR,
    3. Beiser A,
    4. DeCarli C,
    5. Viswanathan A,
    6. Martinez-Ramirez S,
    7. Kase CS,
    8. Wolf PA,
    9. Seshadri S.
    Risk factors, stroke prevention treatments, and prevalence of cerebral microbleeds in the Framingham Heart Study. Stroke. 2014;45:1492–1494. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004130.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. van Swieten JC,
    2. Geyskes GG,
    3. Derix MM,
    4. Peeck BM,
    5. Ramos LM,
    6. van Latum JC,
    7. van Gijn J.
    Hypertension in the elderly is associated with white matter lesions and cognitive decline. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:825–830. doi: 10.1002/ana.410300612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Klarenbeek P,
    2. van Oostenbrugge RJ,
    3. Rouhl RP,
    4. Knottnerus IL,
    5. Staals J.
    Higher ambulatory blood pressure relates to new cerebral microbleeds: 2-year follow-up study in lacunar stroke patients. Stroke. 2013;44:978–983. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.676619.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Kaiser D,
    2. Weise G,
    3. Möller K,
    4. Scheibe J,
    5. Pösel C,
    6. Baasch S,
    7. Gawlitza M,
    8. Lobsien D,
    9. Diederich K,
    10. Minnerup J,
    11. Kranz A,
    12. Boltze J,
    13. Wagner DC.
    Spontaneous white matter damage, cognitive decline and neuroinflammation in middle-aged hypertensive rats: an animal model of early-stage cerebral small vessel disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2:169. doi: 10.1186/s40478-014-0169-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Benedictus MR,
    2. Goos JD,
    3. Binnewijzend MA,
    4. Muller M,
    5. Barkhof F,
    6. Scheltens P,
    7. Prins ND,
    8. van der Flier WM.
    Specific risk factors for microbleeds and white matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:2488–2494. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.04.023.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Arai H,
    2. Kobayashi K,
    3. Ikeda K,
    4. Nagao Y,
    5. Ogihara R,
    6. Kosaka K.
    A computed tomography study of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol. 1983;229:69–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Claassen JA,
    2. Diaz-Arrastia R,
    3. Martin-Cook K,
    4. Levine BD,
    5. Zhang R.
    Altered cerebral hemodynamics in early Alzheimer disease: a pilot study using transcranial Doppler. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;17:621–629. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2009-1079.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Laczó J,
    2. Vlcek K,
    3. Vyhnálek M,
    4. Vajnerová O,
    5. Ort M,
    6. Holmerová I,
    7. Tolar M,
    8. Andel R,
    9. Bojar M,
    10. Hort J.
    Spatial navigation testing discriminates two types of amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Behav Brain Res. 2009;202:252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.041.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Gorchetchnikov A,
    2. Grossberg S.
    Space, time and learning in the hippocampus: how fine spatial and temporal scales are expanded into population codes for behavioral control. Neural Netw. 2007;20:182–193. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.11.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. George S,
    2. Rönnbäck A,
    3. Gouras GK,
    4. Petit GH,
    5. Grueninger F,
    6. Winblad B,
    7. Graff C,
    8. Brundin P.
    Lesion of the subiculum reduces the spread of amyloid beta pathology to interconnected brain regions in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2:17. doi: 10.1186/2051-5960-2-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Attems J,
    2. Jellinger K,
    3. Thal DR,
    4. Van Nostrand W.
    Review: sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011;37:75–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01137.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Ahmed SH,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Ku G,
    6. Goldberg MP,
    7. Hsu CY.
    Amyloid-beta peptides are cytotoxic to oligodendrocytes. J Neurosci. 2001;21:RC118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Folin M,
    2. Baiguera S,
    3. Tommasini M,
    4. Guidolin D,
    5. Conconi MT,
    6. De Carlo E,
    7. Nussdorfer GG,
    8. Parnigotto PP.
    Effects of beta-amyloid on rat neuromicrovascular endothelial cells cultured in vitro. Int J Mol Med. 2005;15:929–935.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Liu ML,
    2. Hong ST.
    Early phase of amyloid beta42-induced cytotoxicity in neuronal cells is associated with vacuole formation and enhancement of exocytosis. Exp Mol Med. 2005;37:559–566. doi: 10.1038/emm.2005.69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Nakajima K,
    2. Kohsaka S.
    Microglia: activation and their significance in the central nervous system. J Biochem. 2001;130:169–175.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Carnevale D,
    2. Mascio G,
    3. D’Andrea I,
    4. Fardella V,
    5. Bell RD,
    6. Branchi I,
    7. Pallante F,
    8. Zlokovic B,
    9. Yan SS,
    10. Lembo G.
    Hypertension induces brain β-amyloid accumulation, cognitive impairment, and memory deterioration through activation of receptor for advanced glycation end products in brain vasculature. Hypertension. 2012;60:188–197. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.195511.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Cifuentes D,
    2. Poittevin M,
    3. Dere E,
    4. Broqueres-You D,
    5. Bonnin P,
    6. Benessiano J,
    7. Pocard M,
    8. Mariani J,
    9. Kubis N,
    10. Merkulova-Rainon T,
    11. Levy BI.
    Hypertension accelerates the progression of alzheimer-like pathology in a mouse model of the disease. Hypertension. 2014;65:218–224. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04139.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Tanabe C,
    4. Maeda T,
    5. Zou K,
    6. Komano H.
    Differential effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers on Aβ generation. Neurosci Lett. 2014;567:51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.03.030.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Thal DR,
    2. Ghebremedhin E,
    3. Orantes M,
    4. Wiestler OD.
    Vascular pathology in Alzheimer disease: correlation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and arteriosclerosis/lipohyalinosis with cognitive decline. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62:1287–1301.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Soffer D.
    Cerebral amyloid angiopathy–a disease or age-related condition. Isr Med Assoc J. 2006;8:803–806.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Eriksen JL,
    2. Janus CG.
    Plaques, tangles, and memory loss in mouse models of neurodegeneration. Behav Genet. 2007;37:79–100. doi: 10.1007/s10519-006-9118-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Janus C.
    Search strategies used by APP transgenic mice during navigation in the Morris water maze. Learn Mem. 2004;11:337–346. doi: 10.1101/lm.70104.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Lovasic L,
    2. Bauschke H,
    3. Janus C.
    Working memory impairment in a transgenic amyloid precursor protein TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Genes Brain Behav. 2005;4:197–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2004.00104.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Zahs KR,
    2. Ashe KH.
    ‘Too much good news’ - are Alzheimer mouse models trying to tell us how to prevent, not cure, Alzheimer’s disease? Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:381–389. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.05.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Kennelly S,
    2. Collins O.
    Walking the cognitive “minefield” between high and low blood pressure. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;32:609–621. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-120748.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. de la Torre JC.
    Cardiovascular risk factors promote brain hypoperfusion leading to cognitive decline and dementia. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol. 2012;2012:367516.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Yano Y,
    2. Stamler J,
    3. Garside DB,
    4. Daviglus ML,
    5. Franklin SS,
    6. Carnethon MR,
    7. Liu K,
    8. Greenland P,
    9. Lloyd-Jones DM.
    Isolated systolic hypertension in young and middle-aged adults and 31-year risk for cardiovascular mortality: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:327–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.060.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Novelty and Significance

What Is New?

  • We used L-NAME to chemically induce chronic hypertension in the TgSwDI mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Long-term L-NAME treatment was well tolerated by both wild-type and TgSwDI mice and consistently elevated blood pressure for many consecutive months. Not only did chronic L-NAME treatment accelerate known pathological changes in this model, but it induced neuronal loss, which has not been observed previously in TgSwDI mice.

What Is Relevant?

  • Hypertension in early adulthood hastens AD pathogenesis in TgSwDI mice. Pathologies known to occur in this mouse model, such as cognitive decline, microgliosis, blood–brain barrier damage, and pericyte loss, occurred significantly earlier when mice had chronic hypertension. We also observed neuronal loss in hypertensive TgSwDI mice, a feature of AD pathology that has not yet been reported in this mouse line.

Summary

Because hypertension accelerates AD pathogenesis, our results suggest that neuronal loss could be part of the disease trajectory in this and possibly other mouse lines if mouse models were longer lived. Given that (1) hypertensive TgSwDI mice exhibited neuronal loss and many other AD hallmarks and (2) many individuals with late-onset AD experience some form of midlife cardiovascular–related disease, our mouse model of mixed vascular and amyloid pathologies may be more relevant for studying human AD pathophysiology than a mouse model of AD alone.

View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Hypertension
July 2015, Volume 66, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Sources of Funding
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Chronic Hypertension Leads to Neurodegeneration in the TgSwDI Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s DiseaseNovelty and Significance
    Anna Kruyer, Nadine Soplop, Sidney Strickland and Erin H. Norris
    Hypertension. 2015;66:175-182, originally published May 4, 2015
    https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05524

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Hypertension.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Chronic Hypertension Leads to Neurodegeneration in the TgSwDI Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s DiseaseNovelty and Significance
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Hypertension
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Hypertension web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Chronic Hypertension Leads to Neurodegeneration in the TgSwDI Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s DiseaseNovelty and Significance
    Anna Kruyer, Nadine Soplop, Sidney Strickland and Erin H. Norris
    Hypertension. 2015;66:175-182, originally published May 4, 2015
    https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05524
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Etiology
    • Animal Models of Human Disease

Hypertension

  • About Hypertension
  • Instructions for Authors
  • AHA CME
  • Guidelines and Statements
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231
email: hypertension@heart.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured