Skip main navigation

PPARγ Inhibition of Cyclooxygenase-2, PGE2 Synthase, and Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in Cardiac Myocytes

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000085332.69777.D1Hypertension. 2003;42:844–850

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily. They regulate lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, cell proliferation, and differentiation and modulate inflammatory responses. We examined whether PPARγ is functional in cultured neonatal ventricular myocytes and studied its role in inflammation. Western blots revealed PPARγ in myocytes. When myocytes were transfected with a PPAR response element reporter plasmid (PPRE-TK-luciferase), the PPARγ activator 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15dPGJ2) increased promoter activity, whereas cotransfection of a dominant negative PPARγ inhibited it. To determine the role of 15dPGJ2 in expression of proinflammatory genes, we tested its effect on interleukin-1β induction of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). 15dPGJ2 decreased interleukin-1β stimulation of COX-2 by 40% and PGE2 production by 73%. We next questioned whether 15dPGJ2 was modulating the expression of inducible prostaglandin E2 synthase (PGES) and found that it completely blocked interleukin-1β induction of PGES. Use of a second PPARγ agonist, troglitazone, and the selective PPARγ antagonist GW9662 demonstrated that the effects seen were PPARγ-dependent. In addition, we found that 15dPGJ2 blocked interleukin-1β stimulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). We concluded that 15dPGJ2 may play an anti-inflammatory role in a PPARγ-dependent manner, decreasing COX-2, PGES, and PGE2 production, as well as iNOS expression.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a family of 3 nuclear hormone receptors, PPARα, PPARβ (also named PPARδ), and PPARγ, which are members of the steroid receptor superfamily. PPARs bind to cognate DNA elements called peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPRE) as obligate heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor (RXR). After ligand activation, they work as transcription factors.1,2 There are two PPARγ subtypes, PPARγ1 and PPARγ2, which are derived from alternative splicing and promoter usage.3,4 PPARγ2 is highly expressed in adipose tissue, whereas PPARγ1 has been found in the kidney, heart, liver, and activated monocytes.5,6 PPARγ can be activated by docosahexanoic acid and certain prostaglandins.7 Other PPARγ ligands include the natural prostaglandin metabolite 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15dPGJ2),8,9 polyunsaturated fatty acids,10 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,11 and members of the thiazolinedione family.12

PPARγ has been associated with control of inflammation by inhibiting cytokine stimulation of COX-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression in different cell types,13–15 decreasing release of proinflammatory cytokines16 and inhibiting vascular smooth cell migration.17–19 PPARγ has also been shown to have antineoplastic and antigrowth properties.18 However, the precise mechanisms defining these effects are unknown.

We recently found that in neonatal ventricular myocytes (NVM), induction of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and prostaglandin E2 synthase (PGES) by the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β (IL-1β) results in preferential production of PGE2.20 In addition, we found that PGE2 induces growth in NVM, suggesting that it plays a detrimental role in the heart. Also, it is known that iNOS is induced on stimulation with IL-1β21 and that it contributes to myocyte damage after infarction in the rat22 and mouse.23 Thus, we hypothesized that PPARγ would exert an anti-inflammatory effect in NVM, decreasing COX-2 and PGES expression and leading to decreased production of the hypertrophic prostanoid PGE2, as well as decreasing iNOS.

Methods

Cell Culture

Primary cultures of NVM were derived from digestion of 1- to 2-day-old neonatal Sprague-Dawley rat hearts (Charles River).24 This protocol was approved by the Henry Ford Hospital IACUC. Myocytes were plated at a density of 1×105/cm2 (1×106 cells per well of a 6-well dish or 5.8×106 cells/10-cm dish) in DMEM (Gibco-BRL) plus 10% FBS (Gibco) and 0.1 mmol/L bromo- deoxyuridine for 40 hours. Serum-free medium supplemented with glutamine, insulin, selenium, and transferrin (SF-DMEM) was then added for 24 hours. Unless otherwise specified, all treatments lasted 24 hours. Cells were pretreated for 1 hour with 15dPGJ2, troglitazone, and GW9662 before treatment with 5 ng/mL IL-1β.

Isolation of Protein and Western Blot of COX-2, PGES, and iNOS

Protein was isolated from NVM through the use of lysis buffer and protease inhibitors.21 Lysate protein (50 μg per lane) was separated out by electrophoresis on an 8% SDS polyacrylamide gel (for COX-2 and iNOS detection) and transferred to an Immobilon-P PVDF membrane (Millipore); 72-kDa COX-2 and 130-kDa iNOS proteins were detected as described previously.25,26 Microsome-enriched preparations were used for Western blot of PGES. For this, 5.8×106 cells/10-cm dish were washed twice with PBS and scraped from the plate in the same solution. Cells were then centrifuged at 16 000g for 5 minutes, and the pellet was resuspended in a solution composed of 60 mmol/L PIPES, 25 mmol/L HEPES, 0.75% Triton-X 100, 10 mmol/L EGTA, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 μg/mL leupeptin, 5 μg/mL aprotinin, 1 μg/mL pepstatin, 156 μg/mL benzamidine, 1 mmol/L iodoacetamidine, and 0.5 mmol/L PMSF (pH 7.4). After 15 minutes of incubation on ice, the homogenate was placed on top of a 6% sucrose cushion and ultracentrifuged at 230 000g with the use of a Beckman ultracentrifuge and a 70.1-Ti rotor for 40 minutes. The pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors. The 17-kDa PGE2 synthase protein was separated out on a 15% SDS polyacrylamide gel and detected with an anti-rabbit polyclonal antibody (Cayman) diluted 1:500. The appropriate secondary antibody linked to horseradish peroxidase was used for chemiluminescent detection with ECL Western blot reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The signal was detected by exposure to Fuji RX film, quantified by laser densitometry, and expressed as optical density (OD) units.

Enzyme Immunoassay for Measurement of PGE2, PGF, and the Stable PGI2 Metabolite 6-Keto PGF

1×106 cells per well of a 6-well plate were treated with vehicle, IL-1β, 15dPGJ2, or 15dPGJ2+IL-1β in 1 mL SF-DMEM. A 1-mL aliquot of medium from each well was dried down and resuspended in 0.15 mL ultrapure H2O. Aliquots were diluted if necessary and assayed for specific prostaglandins with the use of EIA kits from Cayman. Values from triplicate wells were averaged, and mean±SEM values are expressed as nanograms per milligram of protein.

Isolation of RNA and RT-PCR of COX-2 and PGES

Total RNA was isolated from control and IL-1β–treated NVM by means of Tri Reagent (MRC), according to the manufacturer’s instructions; 2 μg total RNA was reverse-transcribed in a total volume of 25 μL, using 1 μg random primer (Gibco/BRL) and 200 U MMLV reverse transcriptase (Promega). Five-microliter aliquots of the resulting cDNA were subjected to PCR in a 50-μL reaction volume for amplification of COX-2 (462 bp), PGES (473 bp), and GAPDH (554 bp). Oligonucleotide primers (5′-3′) for rat COX-2 were AGT ACG AAG ACC CTG CCT ACG (sense) and TAA GTT GGT GGG CTG TCA AT (antisense). Primers for the complete PGES cDNA were ATG ACT TCC CTG GGT TTG GTG (sense) and TCA GCT GCT GGT CAC AGA TGG (antisense). Primers for rat GAPDH were AAT GCA TCC TGC ACC ACC TGC (sense) and GGA GGC CAT GTA GGC CAT GAG GTC (antisense). A PTC-100 thermal controller (MJ Research) was used for amplification, and the program settings were denaturation for 30 seconds at 95°C, annealing for 60 seconds at 55°C for COX-2, and 60°C for PGES and GAPDH, and extension for 90 seconds at 72°C for 35 (COX-2 and PGES) or 25 cycles (GAPDH). PCR products were separated out on a 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed. Densitometry was used for quantification. COX-2 and PGES were normalized to GAPDH.

Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assay

Transfection was performed by electroporation, and luciferase activity was assayed as described previously27,28;1 μg PPRE-TK-luciferase [containing 3 copies of PPRE, coupled to a minimal thymidine kinase (TK) promoter, kindly provided by Dr Ronald Evans, Salk Institute] was transfected per 3×106 NVM, and the cells were aliquoted into 3 wells of a 12-well plate. After 40 hours, the medium was changed to SF-DMEM, and 24 hours later the cells were treated with 15dPGJ2. After a 24-hour treatment period, NVM were lysed and assayed for luciferase activity using Promega reagents in an OptoComp 1 luminometer. Relative light units (RLU) from triplicate wells were averaged. RLU values in control (untreated) lysates were normalized, and the values of 15dPGJ2-treated lysates were compared with control to give the fold increase. Data are expressed as mean±SEM.

Chemicals

15dPGJ2, GW9662, PGES antibody, and EIA kits for PGE2, PGF, and 6-keto PGF were obtained from Cayman. Troglitazone was obtained from Biomol. PPARγ1, COX-2, and iNOS antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz, and IL-1β was from Collaborative Biomedical Products.

Statistics

Values are represented as mean±SEM. Differences in mean values were analyzed by Student t test or 1-way ANOVA, with pairwise multiple comparisons made by the Student-Newman-Keuls method. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Detection and Activation of PPARγ in NVM

To determine whether PPARγ receptors are present in NVM, protein from cell lysates was analyzed by Western blot. PPARγ1 was detected as a 52-kDa protein (Figure 1A). We next tested whether endogenous PPARγ is transcriptionally active in cardiac myocytes. For this, NVM were transiently transfected with the PPRE-TK-luciferase reporter plasmid and treated with the PPARγ agonist 15dPGJ2. Figure 1B shows that 15dPGJ2 increased luciferase activity 12.0±2.2-fold compared with untreated NVM. Finally, we cotransfected NVM with the PPRE-TK-Luc reporter gene and dominant negative PPARγ cDNA (dnPPARγ). As shown in Figure 1B, 15dPGJ2 activation of the PPRE-TK-Luc reporter gene was significantly decreased.

Figure 1. Expression and transcriptional activity of PPARγ. A, Western blot of 3 different myocyte preparations showing 52-kDa PPARγ protein. B, Transfection of PPRE-TK-luciferase reporter plasmid into NVM; y-axis is luciferase activity, expressed as fold increase vs control (CONT), which was arbitrarily set to 1; x-axis is treatment. CONT indicates untreated cells; 15dPGJ2=10 μmol/L (n=9) and dnPPARγ=a dominant-negative form of PPAR (n=3). Bars represent mean±SEM. *P<0.01 vs CONT, #P<0.01 vs PPRE-TK-Luc+15dPGJ2.

Effect of 15dPGJ2 on IL-1β Stimulation of COX-2, PGES, and Prostaglandin Production

High PGE2 resulting from induction of COX-2 participates in inflammation. We tested whether PPARγ activation is anti-inflammatory by examining the effect of the natural PPARγ agonist 15dPGJ2 on PGE2 production and COX-2 mRNA. 15dPGJ2 reduced IL-1β–stimulated PGE2 release by 73% (Figure 2A); however, IL-1β–induced PGF and PGI2 levels were not affected (data not shown). In addition, 15dPGJ2 decreased IL-1β–induced COX-2 mRNA levels by 40% (Figure 2B). IL-1β induction of COX-2 protein (72 kDa) was similarly inhibited (data not shown).

Figure 2. Effect of PPARγ agonist 15dPGJ2 on COX-2 expression and PGE2 production. A, PGE2 production; y-axis is PGE2 production, expressed as percentage of IL-1β–induced PGE2; x-axis is treatment. Basal PG production by control NVM (CONT) was in the range of 1 to 4 ng/mg protein. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=6). *P<0.01 vs IL-1β. B, RT-PCR of COX-2 mRNA; y-axis is COX-2 mRNA normalized to GAPDH mRNA, expressed as fold increase versus IL-1β; x-axis shows different treatments. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=7). *P<0.01 vs IL-1β. C, Representative RT-PCR results showing amplified cDNAs on 2% agarose gel.

Since PGE2 production was inhibited to a greater extent than COX-2 mRNA, we tested whether 15dPGJ2 was affecting the inducible form of PGE2 synthase (mPGES). Figure 3A shows that 15dPGJ2 completely inhibited IL-1β induction of PGES mRNA. Western blots of microsome-enriched preparations revealed that 15dPGJ2 also blocked IL-1β induction of PGES protein in NVM (Figure 3B).

Figure 3. Effect of the PPARγ agonist 15dPGJ2 on PGES expression. A, PGES mRNA; y-axis is PGES mRNA normalized to GAPDH mRNA, expressed as fold increase vs IL-1β; x-axis is treatment. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=6). *P<0.01 vs IL-1β. Figure below is representative agarose gel of RT-PCR results. B, PGES protein; y-axis is PGES protein expressed as OD units; x-axis is treatment. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=3). *P<0.01 vs IL-1β. Below is a representative Western blot.

Effect of the PPARγ Agonist Troglitazone on COX-2 and PGE2

We used a second PPARγ agonist, troglitazone (TRO, 100 μmol/L) to verify our findings with 15dPGJ2. TRO transactivated the PPRE-TK-LUC reporter plasmid (data not shown). TRO also blocked IL-1β–induced COX-2 (Figure 4A) and PGE2 production (Figure 4B).

Figure 4. Effect of the PPARγ agonist troglitazone on COX-2 expression and PGE2 production. A, COX-2 protein; y-axis is COX-2 protein, expressed as fold increase vs IL-1β; x-axis shows different treatments (TRO=100 μmol/L). Bars represent mean±SEM (n=6). *P<0.01 vs IL-1β. B, PGE2 production; y-axis is PGE2 production expressed as fold increase vs control; x-axis is treatment. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=3). *P<0.01 vs IL-1β.

Effect of a PPARγ Antagonist, GW9662, on COX-2 and PGES

To further verify that the effects of 15dPGJ2 are PPARγ-dependent, we studied the effect of the PPARγ antagonist GW9662 (GW, 2 μmol/L). GW blocked the effects of 15dPGJ2 on IL-1β–induced COX-2 (Figure 5A) and PGES mRNA (Figure 5B). GW alone did not modify either COX-2 or PGES mRNA (data not shown).

Figure 5. Effect of PPARγ antagonist GW9662 on COX-2 and PGES mRNA. A, RT-PCR of COX-2; y-axis is COX-2 mRNA normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold increase vs IL-1β; x-axis shows different treatments (15dPGJ2=10 μmol/L; GW9662=2 μmol/L). Bars represent mean±SEM (n=3). *P<0.01 vs 15dPGJ2+IL-1β. B, RT-PCR of PGES; y-axis is PGES mRNA normalized to GAPDH, expressed as fold increase vs 15dPGJ2+IL-1β; x-axis shows different treatments. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=4, except n=2 for GW). *P<0.01 vs 15dPGJ2+IL-1β.

Effect of the PPARγ Activator 15dPGJ2 on iNOS

We have previously shown that IL-1β induces iNOS expression and nitrite production in NVM.25 Since iNOS has been implicated in inflammation, we examined the effect of 15dPGJ2 on IL-1β induction of iNOS in NVM. Although treatment of NVM with IL-1β significantly increased iNOS protein, cotreatment with IL-1β and 15dPGJ2 inhibited iNOS expression (Figure 6A). Troglitazone mimicked the effect of 15dPGJ2 on IL-1β–induced iNOS expression (Figure 6B). GW was able to partially reverse the inhibitory effect of 15dPGJ2 on IL-1β–induced iNOS protein (Figure 6C).

Figure 6. Effects of PPAR agonists and antagonist on iNOS; y-axis is iNOS protein, expressed as fold increase vs IL-1β; x-axis is treatment. A, Effect of 15dPGJ2 on iNOS protein. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=10). *P<0.01 vs IL-1β. Below, representative Western blot. B, Effect of troglitazone on iNOS. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=5). *P<0.01 vs IL-1β. C, Effect of the PPARγ antagonist GW9662 on iNOS. 15dPGJ2=10 μmol/L; GW9662=2 μmol/L. Bars represent mean±SEM. P<0.01 vs IL-1β+15dPGJ2.

Discussion

We found that PPARγ is present and functional in cardiac myocytes. We also demonstrated that its natural agonist 15dPGJ2 exerts anti-inflammatory effects by modulating IL-1β–stimulated COX-2, PGES, and iNOS in a PPAR-dependent manner.

The PGD2 dehydration product 15dPGJ2 is the most potent endogenous ligand for PPARγ yet discovered.8,9 Recently, 15dPGJ2 production was measured in tryptase-stimulated mast cells in culture29 as well as human breast tissue.30 Moreover, prostaglandin D synthase (PGDS) mRNA is expressed in the heart.31 Thus, locally produced PGD2 may result in 15dPGJ2 in myocytes or surrounding cells. Although it is not known whether 15dPGJ2 is produced in myocytes and has autocrine effects to activate PPARγ, it is known that the 15dPGJ2 precursor Δ12-PGJ2 is transported into cells and accumulates in the nucleus.32

We found that 15dPGJ2 decreased IL-β induction of COX-2 mRNA. This inhibition probably occurred at the transcriptional level. The anti-inflammatory effects of PPARγ are thought to be mediated by antagonizing transcription factors such as NF-κB, AP-1, STAT,2 and NFAT,33 some of which are necessary for COX-2 transcription. In fact, Subbaramaiah et al13 showed that stimulation of a breast epithelial cell line with phorbol ester induced COX-2 and that two different PPARγ agonists interfered with AP-1–dependent activation of the COX-2 promoter. A PPARγ agonist also inhibited IL-β–induced COX-2 expression in mesangial cells, although the authors suggested that the effects seen are PPAR-independent.34

Previous studies have demonstrated that COX-2 and microsomal PGES are colocalized in the perinuclear envelope, suggesting coordinated biosynthetic activity between enzymes.35 In fact, induction of both COX-2 and PGES results in high level PGE2 production by cardiac myocytes.36 Our data show that 15dPGJ2 blocked IL-1β stimulation of PGE2 production but did not modify IL-1β stimulation of PGI2 or PGF, indicating that PPARγ ligand effects are specific for PGES. Naraba et al37 reported that the mouse PGES gene contains several cis-acting elements including C/EBPα, AP-1, C/EBPβ, and CACCC-binding factor. In contrast to COX-2, no binding sites for NF-κB or CREB were found in the PGES promoter region. This may indicate that the mechanisms for PPAR regulation of COX-2 and PGES are distinct. In the same report, the authors showed that induction of PGES is exclusively regulated by the transcription factor early growth response-1 (Egr-1), which can be rapidly and transiently upregulated by various growth factors including IL-1β.37,38 Also, Egr-1 interacts with CBP/p300 to modulate gene transcription.39 Interestingly, ligand-induced transactivation of PPARγ is achieved by receptor recruitment of the coactivator CBP/p300.40 Hence, we speculate that PPAR-mediated inhibition of PGES could result from competition for limited amounts of CBP/p300.

It has been shown that the PPAR ligand 15dPGJ2 exerts anti-inflammatory functions independent of PPAR activation.41 Some of the independent effects of 15dPGJ2 have been attributed to an electrophilic carbon that can react with nucleophils.40 To validate our results, we tested a different PPAR agonist. Troglitazone, an antidiabetic drug belonging to the thiazolinedione family, mimicked the effect of 15dPGJ2 on IL-1β–induced COX-2, iNOS, and PGE2 production. We found that troglitazone was more effective than 15dPGJ2 in inhibiting IL-1β induction of COX-2. This may result from the fact that these two selective PPARγ agonists bind PPAR and alter its structure in specific ways, resulting in distinct PPARγ-coactivator interactions.42 It is also possible that 15dPGJ2 and troglitazone may differ in their stability and affinity binding constant for PPARγ in NVM.

Recently, a PPAR-selective antagonist, GW9662, was identified.43 GW9662 has been demonstrated to covalently modify PPAR in a selective and irreversible manner and was found to block the effects of 15dPGJ2 in bone marrow,44 hepatocytes,45 and human smooth muscle cells.46 By using this PPAR-specific antagonist, we demonstrated that the effects of 15dPGJ2 on IL-1β–induced COX-2 and PGES are essentially mediated by PPAR.

As expected, activation of PPARγ inhibited IL-1β stimulation of the proinflammatory gene iNOS. Previous reports demonstrated that 15dPGJ2 inhibited IL-1β regulation of iNOS by blocking NF-κB activation.47 A similar mechanism is probably responsible for regulation of iNOS in cardiac myocytes in our studies, since we know that IL-1β activates NF-κB in cardiac myocytes, and 15dPGJ2 can partially abrogate this effect (Mendez and LaPointe, unpublished data). However, PPAR-independent effects have been reported.40,48 Our results show that GW only partly reverses the effect of 15dPGJ2 on IL-induced iNOS protein. Thus, we cannot rule out the possibility of some PPAR-independent effect of the natural ligand 15dPGJ2 on iNOS regulation. At this time, we know of no studies that definitively address the PPAR-independent mechanisms that regulate iNOS expression in cardiac myocytes.

iNOS and inducible COX-2 have been implicated in pathophysiological events in the heart.22,49,50 We reported that PGE2 is produced by COX-2 in cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts and that PGE2 analogues stimulate myocyte hypertrophy20 and fibroblast proliferation in vitro (Mendez and LaPointe, unpublished observations). In addition, COX-2 inhibition reduces hypertrophy and fibrosis in vivo in a mouse model of myocardial infarction (LaPointe, unpublished data). PPAR inhibitors have been shown to reduce protein synthesis in myocytes51,52 and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation.18 It is interesting to speculate that 15dPGJ2 exerts its antigrowth effects in NVM by blocking the release of the hypertrophic prostaglandin PGE2.

Perspectives

PPARγ has been shown to participate in cell growth, differentiation, and inhibition of inflammatory responses in multiple cell types important to cardiovascular function, such as vascular smooth muscle cells and cardiac myocytes. In this study, we provide compelling evidence that PPARγ activation blunts the release of the hypertrophic and proinflammatory prostanoid PGE2, along with blockade of the inflammatory genes COX-2 and PGES, in a PPAR-dependent manner. In addition, blockade of iNOS is both PPAR-dependent and PPAR-independent. Knowledge of key components of the transcriptional regulation of inflammatory genes by PPARγ may provide a viable therapeutic target in the control of cardiac diseases resulting from inflammatory stimuli.

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant P01-HL-28982 (M.C.L.) and American Heart Association Midwest Affiliate Postdoctoral Fellowship D11533 (M.M.).

Footnotes

Correspondence to Margot C. LaPointe, PhD, Hypertension and Vascular Research Division, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202-2689. E-mail

References

  • 1 Gelman L, Fruchart JC, Auwerx J. An update on the mechanisms of action of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and their roles in inflammation and cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999; 55: 932–943.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Desvergne B, Wahli W. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism. Endocr Rev. 1999; 20: 649–688.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zhu Y, Qi C, Korenberg JR, Chen XN, Noya D, Rao MS, Reddy JK. Structural organization of mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (mPPAR gamma) gene: alternative promoter use and different splicing yield two mPPAR gamma isoforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 7921–7925.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fajas L, Auboeuf D, Raspe E, Schoonjans K, Lefebvre AM, Saladin R, Najib J, Laville M, Fruchart JC, Deeb S, Vidal-Puig A, Flier J, Briggs MR, Staels B, Vidal H, Auwerx J. The organization, promoter analysis, and expression of the human PPARgamma gene. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 18779–18789.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mukherjee R, Jow L, Croston GE, Paterniti JR Jr. Identification, characterization, and tissue distribution of human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) isoforms PPARgamma2 versus PPARgamma1 and activation with retinoid X receptor agonists and antagonists. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 8071–8076.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schoonjans K, Staels B, Auwerx J. The peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARS) and their effects on lipid metabolism and adipocyte differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996; 1302: 93–109.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yu K, Bayona W, Kallen CB, Harding HP, Ravera CP, McMahon G, Brown M, Lazar MA. Differential activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors by eicosanoids. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 23975–23983.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kliewer SA, Lenhard JM, Willson TM, Patel I, Morris DC, Lehmann JM. A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell. 1995; 83: 813–819.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J, Brun RP, Spiegelman BM, Evans RM. 15-Deoxy-delta 12, 14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR gamma. Cell. 1995; 83: 803–812.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kliewer SA, Sundseth SS, Jones SA, Brown PJ, Wisely GB, Koble CS, Devchand P, Wahli W, Willson TM, Lenhard JM, Lehmann JM. Fatty acids and eicosanoids regulate gene expression through direct interactions with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 4318–4323.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lehmann JM, Lenhard JM, Oliver BB, Ringold GM, Kliewer SA. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma are activated by indomethacin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 3406–3410.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Stumvoll M, Haring HU. Glitazones: clinical effects and molecular mechanisms. Ann Med. 2002; 34: 217–224.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Subbaramaiah K, Lin DT, Hart JC, Dannenberg AJ. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands suppress the transcriptional activation of cyclooxygenase-2: evidence for involvement of activator protein-1 and CREB-binding protein/p300. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 12440–12448.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Callejas NA, Castrillo A, Bosca L, Martin-Sanz P. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis up-regulates cyclooxygenase-2 induced by lipopolysaccharide and peroxisomal proliferators. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999; 288: 1235–1241.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ricote M, Li AC, Willson TM, Kelly CJ, Glass CK. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature. 1998; 391: 79–82.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jiang C, Ting AT, Seed B. PPAR-gamma agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines. Nature. 1998; 391: 82–86.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Marx N, Schonbeck U, Lazar MA, Libby P, Plutzky J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activators inhibit gene expression and migration in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1998; 83: 1097–1103.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Law RE, Meehan WP, Xi XP, Graf K, Wuthrich DA, Coats W, Faxon D, Hsueh WA. Troglitazone inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth and intimal hyperplasia. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98: 1897–1905.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Goetze S, Xi XP, Kawano H, Gotlibowski T, Fleck E, Hsueh WA, Law RE. PPAR gamma-ligands inhibit migration mediated by multiple chemoattractants in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999; 33: 798–806.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mendez M, LaPointe MC. Trophic effects of the cyclooxygenase-2 product prostaglandin E(2) in cardiac myocytes. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 382–388.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 LaPointe MC, Sitkins JR. Mechanisms of interleukin-1beta regulation of nitric oxide synthase in cardiac myocytes. Hypertension. 1996; 27: 709–714.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wang D, Yang X-P, Liu Y-H, Carretero OA, LaPointe MC. Reduction of myocardial infarct size by inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Am J Hypertens. 1999; 12: 174–182.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sam F, Sawyer DB, Xie Z, Chang DL, Ngoy S, Brenner DA, Siwik DA, Singh K, Apstein CS, Colucci WS. Mice lacking inducible nitric oxide synthase have improved left ventricular contractile function and reduced apoptotic cell death late after myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 351–356.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 LaPointe MC, Sitkins JR. Phorbol ester stimulates the synthesis and secretion of brain natriuretic peptide from neonatal rat ventricular cardiocytes: a comparison with the regulation of atrial natriuretic factor. Mol Endocrinol. 1993; 7: 1284–1296.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 LaPointe MC, Isenovic E. Interleukin-1beta regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 involves the p42/44 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in cardiac myocytes. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 276–282.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 LaPointe MC, Sitkins JR. Phospholipase A2 metabolites regulate inducible nitric oxide synthase in myocytes. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 218–224.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 LaPointe MC, Wu G, Garami M, Yang XP, Gardner DG. Tissue-specific expression of the human brain natriuretic peptide gene in cardiac myocytes. Hypertension. 1996; 27: 715–722.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 He Q, Wu G, LaPointe MC. Isoproterenol and cAMP regulation of the human brain natriuretic peptide gene involves Src and Rac. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 278: E1115–E1123.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Frungieri MB, Weidinger S, Meineke V, Kohn FM, Mayerhofer A. Proliferative action of mast-cell tryptase is mediated by PAR2, COX2, prostaglandins, and PPARgamma: possible relevance to human fibrotic disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 15072–15077.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Badawi AF, Badr MZ. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and levels of prostaglandin E2 and 15-deoxy-delta12, 14-prostaglandin J2 in human breast cancer and metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2003; 103: 84–90.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Eguchi Y, Eguchi N, Oda H, Seiki K, Kijima Y, Matsu-ura Y, Urade Y, Hayaishi O. Expression of lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase (beta-trace) in human heart and its accumulation in the coronary circulation of angina patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 14689–14694.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Narumiya S, Ohno K, Fukushima M, Fujiwara M. Site and mechanism of growth inhibition by prostaglandins, III: distribution and binding of prostaglandin A2 and delta 12-prostaglandin J2 in nuclei. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987; 242: 306–311.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Medvedev AV, Snedden SK, Raimbault S, Ricquier D, Collins S. Transcriptional regulation of the mouse uncoupling protein-2 gene: double E-box motif is required for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma-dependent activation. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 10817–10823.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sawano H, Haneda M, Sugimoto T, Inoki K, Koya D, Kikkawa R. 15-Deoxy-delta12, 14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits IL-1beta-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression in mesangial cells. Kidney Int. 2002; 61: 1957–1967.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Murakami M, Naraba H, Tanioka T, Semmyo N, Nakatani Y, Kojima F, Ikeda T, Fueki M, Ueno A, Oh-Ishi S, Kudo I. Regulation of prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis by inducible membrane-associated prostaglandin E2 synthase that acts in concert with cyclooxygenase-2. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 32783–32792.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kitamura K, Miller RT. Regulation of hormone-sensitive calcium influx by the adenylyl cyclase system in renal epithelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1994; 94: 328–336.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Naraba H, Yokoyama C, Tago N, Murakami M, Kudo I, Fueki M, Oh-Ishi S, Tanabe T. Transcriptional regulation of the membrane-associated prostaglandin E2 synthase gene: essential role of the transcription factor Egr-1. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 28601–28608.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Chaudhary LR, Cheng SL, Avioli LV. Induction of early growth response-1 gene by interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in normal human bone marrow stromal and osteoblastic cells: regulation by a protein kinase C inhibitor. Mol Cell Biochem. 1996; 156: 69–77.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Silverman ES, Du J, Williams AJ, Wadgaonkar R, Drazen JM, Collins T. cAMP-response-element-binding-protein-binding protein (CBP) and p300 are transcriptional co-activators of early growth response factor-1 (Egr-1). Biochem J. 1998; 336: 183–189.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Straus DS, Pascual G, Li M, Welch JS, Ricote M, Hsiang CH, Sengchanthalangsy LL, Ghosh G, Glass CK. 15-Deoxy-delta 12, 14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits multiple steps in the NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 4844–4849.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hunter JG, van Delft MF, Rachubinski RA, Capone JP. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands differentially modulate muscle cell differentiation and MyoD gene expression via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent and -independent pathways. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 38297–38306.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kodera Y, Takeyama K, Murayama A, Suzawa M, Masuhiro Y, Kato S. Ligand type-specific interactions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma with transcriptional coactivators. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 33201–33204.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Leesnitzer LM, Parks DJ, Bledsoe RK, Cobb JE, Collins JL, Consler TG, Davis RG, Hull-Ryde EA, Lenhard JM, Patel L, Plunket KD, Shenk JL, Stimmel JB, Therapontos C, Willson TM, Blanchard SG. Functional consequences of cysteine modification in the ligand binding sites of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors by GW9662. Biochemistry. 2002; 41: 6640–6650.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bendixen AC, Shevde NK, Dienger KM, Willson TM, Funk CD, Pike JW. IL-4 inhibits osteoclast formation through a direct action on osteo- clast precursors via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 2443–2448.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Miyahara T, Schrum L, Rippe R, Xiong S, Yee HF Jr, Motomura K, Anania FA, Willson TM, Tsukamoto H. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and hepatic stellate cell activation. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 35715–35722.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Fu M, Zhang J, Zhu X, Myles DE, Willson TM, Liu X, Chen YE. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma inhibits transforming growth factor beta-induced connective tissue growth factor expression in human aortic smooth muscle cells by interfering with Smad3. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 45888–45894.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ikeda U, Shimpo M, Murakami Y, Shimada K. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligands inhibit nitric oxide synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 1232–1236.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Castrillo A, Diaz-Guerra MJ, Hortelano S, Martin-Sanz P, Bosca L. Inhibition of IkappaB kinase and IkappaB phosphorylation by 15-deoxy-delta(12, 14)-prostaglandin J(2) in activated murine macrophages. Mol Cell Biol. 2000; 20: 1692–1698.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Saito T, Rodger IW, Hu F, Shennib H, Giaid A. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 improves cardiac function in myocardial infarction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000; 273: 772–775.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Scheuren N, Jacobs M, Ertl G, Schorb W. Cyclooxygenase-2 in myocardium stimulation by angiotensin-II in cultured cardiac fibroblasts and role at acute myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002; 34: 29–37.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Asakawa M, Takano H, Nagai T, Uozumi H, Hasegawa H, Kubota N, Saito T, Masuda Y, Kadowaki T, Komuro I. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma plays a critical role in inhibition of cardiac hypertrophy in vitro and in vivo. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1240–1246.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Yamamoto K, Ohki R, Lee RT, Ikeda U, Shimada K. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activators inhibit cardiac hypertrophy in cardiac myocytes. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1670–1675.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.